Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Diaries unWavering's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1 day ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 629 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 6 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    0 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    16 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    10 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse tweets apology for threats to Jim Harbaugh
    19 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    12 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    14 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    36 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    11 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    11 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    13 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • META : Drupalgeddon2. Unpatched Drupal servers being hacked
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    80 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    41 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse tweets apology for threats to Jim Harbaugh
    19 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    16 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    0 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    10 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    12 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    14 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    80 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    36 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    37 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    13 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    57 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    11 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    53 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    11 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    118 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Team travel distances for the proposed divisions

By unWavering — January 3rd, 2013 at 5:45 PM — 24 comments

This is my first diary, so here goes nothing.

As you all know, the new divisional alignment in the Big Ten will depend mainly on the following two factors:  geography, and competitive balance.  This diary will attempt to evaluate each of the proposed divisional alignments on the BTN survey based on geography.  

I have created a spreadsheet that contains the travel distances from each school in the Big Ten to every other school in an effort to see which divisional alignment is best in terms of travel distance.  I used Google Maps directions to obtain the distances.  I know that teams fly if the distance is over a certain amount, and therefore these distances may not be useful in some instances, but this can give you an idea of the travel costs for each team.  

Here are the straight up distances, along with average distance to other schools for each team:

  ILL IN IA UM MSU Minn Neb NW OSU PSU PU UW MD RU
ILL n/a 170 243 343 324 512 515 155 297 618 93 250 697 820
IN   n/a 410 328 309 640 657 250 225 548 116 379 627 750
IA     n/a 447 428 304 301 230 537 775 326 176 905 985
UM       n/a 64 648 749 259 190 390 298 387 522 603
MSU         n/a 629 730 240 255 454 276 368 587 667
Minn           n/a 435 406 763 974 532 273 1106 1187
Neb             n/a 527 813 1070 623 479 1203 1283
NW               n/a 373 585 141 145 716 797
OSU                 n/a 322 238 503 401 524
PSU                   n/a 560 713 198 227
PU                     n/a 269 639 761
UW                       n/a 846 926
MD                         n/a 215
RU                           n/a

Averages

  ILL IN IA UM MSU Minn Neb NW OSU PSU PU UW MD RU
AVG 387 416 467 402 410 647 722 371 419 572 375 440 666 750

 

Here is a list and description of things I will be looking at:

Avg Division Travel (ADT) - Average distance from a school to each of the other schools in the same division

Avg Crossover Travel (ACT) - Average distance from a school to each of the schools in the opposite division

Composite Avg - [(2/3*ADT)+(1/3*ACT)]  The thought here is that in a 9 game conference schedule, 2/3 of the games will consist of divisional games, and 1/3 will consist of crossover games.  This value attempts to compute the average travel distance for each away game in the conference.

Average Outer - This is a critical stat for comparing the amount of travel in each divisional layout.  This value is the average traveling distance to an away game for one of the schools that would be in the Inner-Outer divisional layout.  These schools will typically have the longest travel since they are located on the outskirts of the Big Ten footprint.  Making travel a little easier for these schools should be an objective.

Average All - This is the average of the Composite Average for each school in the Big Ten

 

Now, let's look at the divisions:

Existing +1 ILL IN IA UM MSU Minn Neb NW OSU PSU PU UW MD RU
Avg Division Travel 375 365 436 448 446 588 658 396 352 498 340 507 840 668
Avg Crossover Travel 398 460 493 363 379 697 777 349 476 635 405 382 518 820
Composite Avg 383 396 455 420 424 624 697 381 393 544 361 465 732 719
Average Legends 533                          
Average Leaders 466                          
Average Outer 605                          
Average All 500                          

 

 


 

East-West ILL IN IA UM MSU Minn Neb NW OSU PSU PU UW MD RU
Avg Division Travel 295 465 263 350 389 410 480 267 320 357 331 265 425 498
Avg Crossover Travel 467 375 641 447 428 850 929 460 503 756 413 589 873 966
Composite Avg 352 435 389 382 402 557 630 332 381 490 358 373 574 654
Average East 474                          
Average West 427                          
Average Outer 524                          
Average All 451                          

 

 


 

Inner-Outer ILL IN IA UM MSU Minn Neb NW OSU PSU PU UW MD RU
Avg Division Travel 230 233 574 247 245 713 844 236 263 531 194 569 746 804
Avg Crossover Travel 522 573 374 535 552 590 659 487 507 497 530 329 598 703
Composite Avg 328 346 508 343 347 672 783 320 344 519 306 489 696 770
Average Inner 333                          
Average Outer 634                          
Average All 484                          

 

 


 

So, what did we find?  You can tell right away that the Existing +1 divsion setup is the worst in terms of geography.  The average away game will be 500 miles on the dot from the traveling team's campus.  The Outer teams will have to travel an average of 600 miles to opposing teams' campuses.

The East-West setup improves things a bit, which is an intuitive result.  The average away game is 451 miles for each Big Ten team.

The Inner Outer setup is less improved, but somewhat surprising is the fact that it is a little better than the current setup.  This is because while the Outer Division will have to travel very far for half of its division games, the crossover games won't be very far in most cases.  The Inner Division will rarely have to travel very far.The average away game is 484 miles from campus.

Overall, I think the Inner-Outer setup provides the best competitive balance, and it improves upon the current divisional setup in terms of geography.  Inner-Outer gets my vote, and it already seems to be the most popular amongst mgobloggers.

  • unWavering's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:08 PM
#2
archangel2k12
archangel2k12's picture
Joined: 01/19/2011
MGoPoints: 1064
interesting

I like option 3.  Keeps little brother and ohio in our division and keeps the other division competitive with PSU, Wiscy, Neb and NW.  Good Diary!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 9:33 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 147117
The Inner Outer eyeball is

The Inner Outer eyeball is still a futile attempt to chase "competetive balance".

Just go with East and West and be done with it.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 12:48 AM
(Reply to #13) #4
Muttley
Muttley's picture
Joined: 07/07/2009
MGoPoints: -74933
The Iris and the Sclera divisions

Of course, Michigan is the pupil

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:23 PM
#5
cutter
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 814
New York is the #1 media market in the country . . . .

New York is the #1 media market in the country (and ESPN is located in Connecticut).  If you want to draw on an additional factor besides geography and competitve balance, than that's one to keep in mind.  The Big Ten will want to have its best programs shuttling thru the NYC/NJ area, which means Michigan, Ohio State and Penn State will all be in the east so they can play at Rutgers (or more likely, at the new stadium in the Meadowlands) on a regular basis (we'll add alumni distribution as another reason for those schools being in the east).

Here's another--the post-season.  With the 4-team playoff coming into being in 2014 along with the New Year's Day/New Year's Eve bowl lineup, the conference will not want to have two teams playing one another in the regular season finale and then one week later in the conference championship game.  That's why Michigan and Ohio State will both be in the same division and will continue to play one another the last regular game of the year.

The conference will have annual protected cross divisional games.  Why?  Because that ensures that the major teams play one another each year, which means that when the B1G television rights contract goes up for negotiation, the conference can say that the major programs in each division will play one another regularly each year.

Will travel time and mileage be a factor?  Perhaps, but when you look at a map and consider an Inner-Outer setup, you can see that it doesn't work at least in terms of fan perception.  A fan in Lincoln, NE or College Park, MD will see seven other teams from the other division physically located between them and the other teams in their own division.  That will not pass the "Does this make sense?" test.  

The other thing that the Inner-Outer setup does is structurally make the B1G a midwest-centric confernce.  Just put a point somewhere in northern Indiana and draw a small circle inside a larger ellipse and you have what that setup looks like.   Keep in mind that this is a conference that's planning on putting a second office in the east (probably New York City).  They want to the Big Ten image to be one of a national conference.

Jim Delany has said that geography will play a more important role than in 2010--see http://thegazette.com/2012/11/30/whats-next-for-b1g-expansion-football-r...

So you add all that up and what do you get (with rivalry games and better competitive balance in mind):

West - Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Illinois, Michigan State

East - Michigan, Indiana, Purdue, Ohio State, Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland

Protected Rivals Games:

Michigan-Michgian State

Ohio State-Wisconsin

Penn State-Nebraska

Indiana-Minnesota

Purdue-Iowa

Rutgers-Northwestern

Maryland-Illinois

This is a likely lineup for the Big Ten for the 2014/5 seasons.  Things may change a bit if they go to nine conference games by that time frame, although that will require a number of non-conference games to be cancelled or rescheduled.  I suspect in the short term we'll see eight conference games and then go to nine by perhaps the 2016 season.

On the final weekend of the season, we'll see the rivalry games being played out.  All these games will take place within the divisions (with perhaps one exception because there are seven teams in each division).  That includes the following:

Michigan-Ohio State

Indiana-Purdue

Illinois-Northwestern

Wisconsin-Minnesota

Iowa-Northwestern

The remaining teams are one from the west (Michigan State) and three from the east (Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland).  MSU-PSU could be a season ender, but it's just as likely that one of those two teams would take a bye.  Rutgers-Maryland could also be a season ender as well or one of those two teams takes a bye while the other plays Penn State.  Or you could make Maryland or Rutgers play Michigan State while the other team plays PSU.

The B1G is likely to add at least two more teams to get to 16.  Right now, the informed speculation is that those teams will be two of Virginia, North Carolina, Duke and Georgia Tech.  If that happens, I imagine the conference will want to have that in place by the 2016 or 2017 season, i.e., in concert with the new television contract.

At that point, we could see the conference adopt the pod system with four 4-team pods or the B1G might go to two permanent 8-team divisions playing nine conference games.  Regardless of the setup, the factors I listed above will still be in play and they would still effect how a 16-team B1G would look like in the end.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:43 PM
(Reply to #3) #6
Balrog_of_Morgoth
Balrog_of_Morgoth's picture
Joined: 11/12/2011
MGoPoints: 1510
It does seem likely

It does seem most likely that we will end up with the East-West divisions with Purdue and Michigan State switched. That is:

West: Nebraska, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Northwestern, Illinois, Michigan State

East: Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Rutgers, Maryland, Purdue, Indiana

It would make sense geographically and it would be somewhat competitively balanced. It also passes the eye test. However, one problem with these divisions is that the teams in the East would have an advantage due to much more fertile recruiting grounds. Since we would be in the East, I wouldn't mind it too much.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:45 PM
(Reply to #5) #7
cutter
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 814
One other thing to keep in mind . . .

If the Big Ten Network wants to get moved to basic cable in the NYC/NJ and Baltimore/DC areas, then it also makes sense to have as many of its bigger brands playing in the eastern division with Rutgers and Maryland.

One other thing from a Michigan perspective is that fund raising is tied into football.  I have to imagine that UM would love to have fund raising events in New York City and Washington DC in concert with games against Rutgers and Maryland over most any other option.  I suspect President Coleman will put her support behind getting Michigan in the eastern division for that very same reason.

If Wisconsin, Nebraska, Iowa and Minnesota truly want to play one another, then that's the core of the western division right there.  Now does it make sense to combine them with three schools on the east coast or to have them in close proximity to the other teams in their division?  I submit it's the latter, so that means Illinois and Northwestern would be #5 and #6.  Michigan State would make sense as the seventh team in terms of perceived competitive balance, but you have to ask yourself how good Penn State is going to be over the next four years or so with sanctions in place (not to mention the possibility of the current HC going to the NFL).  

Because if PSU isn't up to form, then the eastern division will have two major football programs (Michigan, Ohio State) and four others that are so-so (Purdue, Indiana, Maryland, Rutgers).  That could make for some pretty interesting season ending games with OSU.

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:14 PM
(Reply to #3) #8
Hardware Sushi
Hardware Sushi's picture
Joined: 03/08/2010
MGoPoints: 6379
I pretty much agree

I pretty much agree with this. Since I live on the East coast, I don't mind as much as people in the West division. Probably the best situation we can have.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 12:26 PM
(Reply to #3) #9
jhearnj
Joined: 02/09/2012
MGoPoints: 25
RU - UMd Rivalry game

Jersey high schools produce a ton of UMd students.  That rivalry game the last weekend of the season would hit the ground running... i like that idea.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:39 PM
#10
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 1962
I don't know if it's just me

I don't know if it's just me or not, but I can only see half the "straight up" distances. Everything to the left of your n/a marks is blank

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:47 PM
(Reply to #4) #11
Balrog_of_Morgoth
Balrog_of_Morgoth's picture
Joined: 11/12/2011
MGoPoints: 1510
The chart

The chart is symmetric about the diagonal since the distance from school A to B is the same as the distance from school B to A. It would be redundant (and harder to read) if those boxes were filled in as well.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:40 PM
(Reply to #6) #12
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 1962
I feel stupid now, can't

I feel stupid now, can't believe I missed that

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 11:07 PM
(Reply to #6) #13
leegoblue
leegoblue's picture
Joined: 11/08/2011
MGoPoints: 56
Nice

Nice Touch

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:14 PM
#14
SMJenkins3
Joined: 11/03/2011
MGoPoints: 522
Inner-Outer

I too was a little surprized by the average travel numbers in the Inner-Outer set up.  The one draw back about this is, while the average travel may be acceptable, it really makes 4 teams pay via travel.

Nebraska- 783 composite travel (up from 630 or 697)

Rutgers- 770 (up from 654 or 719)

And to a lesser extent:

Minn- 672 (up from 557 or 624)

Iowa- 508 (up from 389 or 455)

Plus, the in division games for some of these programs would make it pratically impossible for fans to travel to road games in division.  To an extent is depends on if you think people would travel 500 miles but not 800 miles.

Nebraska divisions games 844 (up from 480 or 658)

Rutgers division games 804 (up from 498 or 668)

Maryland division games 746 (less than exisitng [840] but 425 in East-West]

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:32 PM
#15
akim
Joined: 12/30/2010
MGoPoints: 530
I think one thing to keep in

I think one thing to keep in mind is... the teams are still going to have to travel EVERYWHERE it's just a matter of how often you travel to each of these places.

for the inner outer config, it could be arranged such that the outer teams have 2 far road games per year.  It's not like we go to every road game (I live in the chicago area and I thought Nebraska was too far to go to, so I doubt many people from Michigan would go there).

I guess the feast or famine doesn't sit well with some of the people I've spoken to, but I am still a fan of the eye of doom.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 8:27 PM
#16
mark5750
mark5750's picture
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 895
North-South

How about a North-South alignment with either Nebraska, Ohio, or Penn State going to the North for competitive balance.  My choice would be Ohio but you could work with any of them and have decent geographic alignment while also keeping many traditional rivalries,  The biggest down side I can see is both Michigan and Ohio not having regular games in the added markets.  Also, for competitive balance you could move Northwestern or Iowa for one weaker schools in the south.

 

North                              South

Michigan                        Penn State

Michigan State              Nebraska

Northwestern                Illinois

Wisconsin                     Indiana

Minnesota                     Purdue

Iowa                               Rutgers

Ohio                               Maryland

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 4:16 AM
(Reply to #11) #17
PitchAndCatch
PitchAndCatch's picture
Joined: 10/17/2009
MGoPoints: 1346
no

the way you have it set up, the North division is the Division of Death.  Who headlines the south division?  Nebraska and a sanctions-destroyed PSU?  No thanks.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 9:45 AM
(Reply to #11) #18
cutter
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 814
I doubt this is going to happen . . . .

I can think of a few reasons why your setup isn't very likely:

1.  This lineup splits Nebraska from Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa.  While you could have the Cornhuskers playing one or perhaps two of these teams per year based on schedule and fixed cross-divisional games, the sentiment among those universities is that they want to play one another each year.  Putting Nebraska in a division where none of its other members are in contiguous states isn't going to go down well in Lincoln.

2.  When you look at alumni distributions, you're putting Michigan and Ohio State (both schools with big East Coast presences) in the division opposite Rutgers and Maryland.  You want to have UM and OSU together with RU and MD.

3.  There are several media/television reasons why this wouldn't work.  The B1G wants to put its most popular brands in contact with the #1 media center in the world--New York City.  That pushes Michgan and Ohio State to the east along with Penn State.  When it comes to NYC, Nebraska doesn't push the needles as much as UM and OSU.  There's also questions about how this lineup would bring the Big Ten Network onto the basic cable tier in NYC/NJ and Baltimore/DC with that particular lineup.  

If the Big Ten was willing to live with the idea of having a Michigan-Ohio State rematch in the conference championship game one week after the regular season ender (or Illinois-Northwestern, FWIW), then you could take you could flip Nebraska and Ohio State from your lineup above and that'd give you this:

North:  Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, Wisconsin

South:  Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Rutgers 

Of course, in the short term given PSU's problems, that essentially hands the south division title to Ohio State every year because the rest of the teams in the south are pretty meh.  That 's another reason why it makes sense to have Michigan in the east with Ohio State and let Michigan State go to the west to provide more competition for Nebraska (along with Wisconsin and Northwestern).

 

 

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 8:53 PM
#19
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 16432
I get the appeal of the inner-outer

approach, but I don't see the league approving it. 

Great diary. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:05 PM
#20
oakapple
Joined: 02/06/2009
MGoPoints: 1331
You've asked the wrong question

The real question is travel time, not miles. Beyond a certain distance, teams and their fans are (mainly) going to be flying, not driving.

Now, airplane trips are much shorter in the air, but you've got to get to and from an airport, get through security, board/disembark, check and claim luggage, and so forth. For most Big Ten trips that require flying, travel time is dominated by these other factors, and it almost doesn't matter where you're going.

So the real issue for the Big Ten is not the average distance, but maximizing the drivable games. Once you're beyond driving distance, it doesn't matter who's in your division, and other factors will take over (rivalries, competitive balance, marketing).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:40 PM
(Reply to #14) #21
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 9242
Yes, I noted this (briefly)

Yes, I noted this (briefly) in the diary. I know teams won't drive to very far games, although I'm not sure what the cut off is for driving distance, whether or not it is a league-wife cut off, etc. So I decided to keep it relatively simple and use pure distance as an approximation for cost/inconvenience. Unfortunately there is nit a good way to tell how good of an approximation this is. I started doing this purely out of curiosity and realized it may be interesting to share here.

As it pertains to this diary, I think the Inner Outer division alignment allows for roughly half the away games per year to be drivable, even for Outer division members. The East-West setup would require most crossover away games to be flown to, as well as some of the divisional games so you see minimal, if any improvement.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 11:30 AM
(Reply to #15) #22
oakapple
Joined: 02/06/2009
MGoPoints: 1331
I also prefer Inner/Outer, but....

I also prefer Inner/Outer, but unfortunately I don't think it'll happen, for three reasons:

1) As a number of people have noted, I think the league will want to maximize the exposure of Michigan and Ohio State on the East Coast, and Inner/Outer fails to do that.

2) I think they'll worry about creating the perception that the Outer division is the "ghetto" for Big Ten arrivistes (i.e., all the teams that weren't in Bo & Woody's Big Ten).

3) I think they'll be skittish about names other than "East/West," given that "Leaders/Legends" didn't exactly take the world by storm.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 12:23 PM
#23
The Geek
The Geek's picture
Joined: 09/08/2009
MGoPoints: 10495
Distances from Lincoln

For comparison look at some of the distances while the Huskers were in the Big 12:

NU to UT ~ 820 miles

NU to TT ~ 750 miles

NU to A&M ~ 807 miles

NU to Baylor ~ 629 miles

NU to CU ~ 500 miles

Do teams like Nebraska utilize chartered air, and if so,  is distance really that much of a factor?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 6th, 2013 at 10:21 AM
#24
Ernis
Ernis's picture
Joined: 09/23/2008
MGoPoints: 2554
Question

How did you reconcile "Maryland or Rutgers" for Option 1?

Did you assign one to each division? Take an overall average? Or something else?

In any case, I agree with most of the posters here that Option 2 seems most likely. I think it's an improvement over the current setup- especially with new names. How about "Elitist Snobs and "Flyover Farms"?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 6th, 2013 at 2:17 PM
(Reply to #24) #25
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 9242
For option one I just put MD

For option one I just put MD in the Legends and RU in the Leaders since it makes more sense from a competitive standpoint. The other way makes little difference since the schools are pretty close to one another.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.