Reviewing the 2011 Strength of Schedule for Big Ten Teams

Submitted by Maize_in_Spartyland on

Below are the strength of schedules for all Big Ten teams from 2011, as well as Michigan’s opponents in 2012 (note that Massachusetts isn’t listed, more about that later).

 

If you want to look at the rankings for opponent win percentage for all 120 FBS teams for 2011, check out my website.

 

Teams who had tough schedules in 2011, and easier schedules in 2012, should, theoretically, improve their win total. By contrast, teams who had easier schedules in 2011, and tougher schedules in 2012, should decrease their win total. Of course, it doesn’t always work out that way.

 

The opponent win percentage is simple based on the combined wins and losses of a team’s opponents (includes bowl games and conference championship games, as well). Note that the rankings do not include games played against FCS opponents.

 

Once every team in the country has a finalized schedule for 2012 (I’m looking at you, Big 12 and Big East), I’ll throw together the 2012 Strength of Schedule, based on the win totals from 2011.

 

Rank Team Conference Opponent Win%
2 Alabama SEC 65.8252%
8 Penn State Big Ten 62.1429%
10 Nebraska Big Ten 61.8375%
17 Michigan Big Ten 59.5432%
23 Minnesota Big Ten 58.9942%
32 Notre Dame Independent 57.5042%
37 Indiana Big Ten 56.8401%
38 Wisconsin Big Ten 56.7921%
53 Ohio State Big Ten 54.0230%
55 Michigan State Big Ten 53.9474%
57 Iowa Big Ten 53.8739%
59 Illinois Big Ten 53.1915%
80 Air Force Mountain West 50.4132%
88 Purdue Big Ten 49.4585%
91 Northwestern Big Ten 49.2647%

 

A few notes (on teams other than Michigan and their non-conference opponents) (Note that my projections will include postseason play, too):

 

Illinois –Illinois’s home conference games are all winnable – Penn State, Indiana, Minnesota, and Purdue. The road games are brutal, though: Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, finishing up with an easier game at Northwestern. Illinois’s non-conference schedule is a bit tougher than the 2011 version – Western Michigan, at Arizona State, Charleston Southern, and Louisiana Tech. Early projection: Illinois decreases their overall win total in 2012, from 7 in 2011.

 

Indiana –Hands down the worst team in the Big Ten; schedule was among the toughest due to games against Michigan State and Wisconsin. The Hoosiers have a relatively forgiving non-conference schedule, playing Indiana State, at Massachusetts, Ball State, and at Navy. Early projection: Indiana increases their overall win total in 2012, from 1 in 2011.

 

Iowa –The Hawkeyes travel to Ann Arbor and East Lansing in 2012, and also make trips to Evanston and Bloomington. The home games, outside of Nebraska, are easily winnable (Minnesota, Penn State and Purdue). Iowa plays Northern Illinois (at Chicago), Iowa State, Northern Iowa, and Central Michigan in 2012. Early projection: Iowa increases their overall win total in 2012, from 7 in 2011.

 

Michigan State –Illinois’s road Big Ten schedule is tough, but the Spartans will have it just as bad at home, as on the road. Michigan State plays Ohio, Iowa, Nebraska, and Northwestern at home, while traveling to Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Michigan State’s non-conference schedule is tougher than the one from 2011 (which isn’t saying much, since 2011 was pretty easy) – Boise State, at Central Michigan, Notre Dame, and Eastern Michigan. Early projection: Michigan State decreases their overall win total in 2012, from 11 in 2011.

 

Minnesota –Partly a byproduct of how bad the Gophers were, also a byproduct of having played Michigan, Michigan State, and Wisconsin, all of who had at least ten wins. Minnesota’s non-conference schedule allows the Gophers to improve – at UNLV, New Hampshire, Western Michigan, and Syracuse. Early projection: Minnesota increases their overall win total in 2012, from 3 in 2011.

 

Nebraska –The Cornhuskers had a particularly challenging schedule in their first year in the Big Ten, having to visit tough environments in Michigan, Penn State, and Wisconsin. The Huskers will play Ohio, Michigan State, and Iowa on the road (as well as Northwestern). Nebraska has one non-conference game to schedule; they will play Southern Miss, at UCLA, and Arkansas State. Early projection: Nebraska increases their overall win total in 2012, from 9 in 2011.

 

Northwestern –Easiest schedule out of all the Big Ten teams. Having to replace QB Dan Persa will be tough, but at least QB Kain Colter has experience. The Wildcats will need that experience, as they travel to Michigan and Michigan State on back-to-back weeks; Northwestern also travels to Penn State and Minnesota on back-to-back weeks. The Wildcats host Indiana, Nebraska, Iowa, and Illinois. Northwestern’s non-conference schedule in 2012 won’t be easy, playing at Syracuse, Vanderbilt, Boston College, and South Dakota. Early projection: Northwestern decreases their overall win total in 2012, from 6 in 2011.

 

Ohio –Talk to a Buckeye fan and they will tell you it was one of the toughest years to stomach, between the NCAA investigations, Jim Tressel, and the losing record, Ohio is looking to forget the 2011 season. 2012 will likely be better, but the Buckeyes won’t be in the postseason. The Buckeyss have a soft non-conference schedule in 2012, playing Miami (OH), UCF, California, and UAB. Early projection: Ohio increases their overall win total in 2012, from 6 in 2011.

 

Penn State –Oh boy, where do I start here? Penn State’s non-conference schedule has been notoriously soft in recent years. Yes, they did play Alabama the past two seasons, but other than that, its been extremely forgiving. Penn State's schedule turned out to be the toughest because of playing Alabama, Houston, Nebraska, Wisconsin (three of which won double digit games). Next year it gets tougher with games against Navy and at Virginia. Penn State also plays Ohio University and Temple. Early projection: Penn State decreases their overall win total in 2012, from 9 in 2011.

 

Purdue –Purdue plays five of their first six games at home; an early start would put Purdue in great shape to improve on their 2011 record. Unfortunately for Purdue fans, they catch Michigan and Wisconsin on back-to-back weeks, but at least they are at home. Purdue also plays Penn State and Indiana at West Lafayette. Purdue will make trips to Columbus, Minneapolis, Iowa City, and Illinois. Purdue’s non-conference schedule in 2012, absent Notre Dame, is forgiving; the Boilermakers play Eastern Kentucky, at Notre Dame, Eastern Michigan, and Marshall. Note that Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ohio State are on back-to-back-to-back weeks; three straight losses could send Purdue into a tailspin.  Early projection: Purdue decreases their overall win total in 2012, from 7 in 2011.

 

Wisconsin –The Badgers have it relatively easy for their Big Ten road games in 2012. Wisconsin will travel to Indiana and Purdue, but they also play Nebraska and Penn State on the road. Wisconsin’s 2012 non-conference schedule looks like four wins – Northern Iowa, at Oregon State, Utah State, and UTEP. Early projection: Wisconsin matches their overall win total in 2012, from 11 in 2011.

 

 

With that said, what are the early thoughts on Michigan?

 

EDIT: Thanks to Harmon98 and bluebrains98 for pointing out a serious problem. Problem is corrected. For those who are asking, this is based on the 2011 season, with 2011 opponents.

Comments

Ziff72

January 24th, 2012 at 10:34 AM ^

I like your team by team breakdown.  I just don't like your rankings.

I think to just look at schedule toughness based on last years records is misleading.   I'm sure MSU is getting a huge increase in their schedule toughness for playing Boise St who lost 1 game just like Alabama for Michigan.  

A home game against a WAC team playing without their 4 year starting QB and several other starters vs a neutral site game vs the NC team returning it's starting QB is no comparison in terms of toughness, but based on your schedule it looks pretty similar. 

This is a mild difference compared to playing a 9 win MAC team vs a 1 win MAC team.  Both are probably auto wins for a Top 20 team but their schedule toughness could take a large swing.

 

funkywolve

January 24th, 2012 at 11:37 AM ^

Shouldn't returning starters also factor into the strength of schedule for 2012?

Using win totals from 2011 is nice but if a team is losing a ton of starters and/or some key starters, projecting how they do in 2012 based upon what they did in 2011 might not be very accurate. 

Illinois is a good example.  They played both Western Michigan and Arizona St last year and will play them again this year.  Both WMU and ASU lose their starting QB's.  In the case of WMU, losing Carder is going to be a big loss.  Of the 524 pass attempts ASU attempted last year, Osweiler attempted 516.  They will start the year with a QB that is going to have almost no game experience in addition to trying to learn a new offensive system.

bluebrains98

January 24th, 2012 at 12:31 PM ^

It seems there needs to be some way to normalize the data a bit. Minnesota and Indiana both sucked in 2011. In a 12 game season, one W is going to affect a teams winning percentage in a significant way. So, by sucking so bad, both of them are effectively boosting their opponents' winning percentage. Without giving it much thought, it seems that the games opponents play against the team you are measuring should be removed from the analysis. This may not be the best way, but by definition, I would expect all really bad teams to boost opponents' SOS by about 8% (1/12).

Tuebor

January 24th, 2012 at 2:08 PM ^

When calculating Michigan's SOS do you include our win over Minnesota when calculating Minnesota's W/L record?  

By doing this don't you skew the SOS towards teams who lose more games because their opponents have better records as a result of playing them?

Tuebor

January 24th, 2012 at 4:14 PM ^

Essentially you calculated the Opponents record component of the RPI rating.

RPI = 25% your record + 50% opponents record + 25% opponents of opponents record.

 

I love me some sports statistics and analysis.  Go Blue!

 

bluebyyou

January 24th, 2012 at 5:11 PM ^

In the case of Wisconsin, unless another  Russell Wilson magically appears and three more great O linemen are generated, how can you predict the same level of success?  

Maize_in_Spartyland

January 24th, 2012 at 5:49 PM ^

Wilson wasn't as valuable as most people think. Remember, the year before he arrived they did make it to the Rose Bowl.

As for the linemen, you do have a point, but they seem to magically generate great O linemen every year.

As for the success, look at the schedule:

Northern Iowa

at Oregon State

Utah State

UTEP

at Nebraska

Illinois

at Purdue

Minnesota

Michigan State 

Open

at Indiana

Ohio

at Penn State

 

Asssuming they make a bowl game (but not Big Ten Championship) they have 13 chances to win 11 games (either lose a regular season and a bowl game or two regular season).

Nebraska is probably the closest to a for sure loss, after that?

jmblue

January 24th, 2012 at 6:47 PM ^

So after all the MSU bellyaching about schedule, we ended up playing a more difficult one?  By a fairly large margin, too, it looks like.