Review of John U. Bacon Endzone Book Event in Chicago

Submitted by Bando Calrissian on

Saturday, Michigan Man par excellence John U. Bacon kicked off the promotional whirlwind for his new book, Endzone: The Rise, Fall, and Return of Michigan Football at the Diag bar in Chicago at an event sponsored by the U of M Club of Greater Chicago.

To a standing-room-only crowd ranging from alumni to former Bacon students (like myself) to such luminaries as Will Hagerup and Carl Grapentine, the voice of the Michigan Marching Band and Michigan Stadium, Bacon explained the breakneck pace at which he completed his latest work on "this Michigan of ours." Though some (ahem, Buckeyes) are taking issue with the subtitle of the book (particularly, the part about Rise, Fall, and Return), Bacon's main thesis is that this book is not about wins and losses--it's about Michigan reclaiming itself from within.

This "Return," then, is one of values and traditions. While the losses the program has experienced since 2006 were certainly concerning, Bacon emphasizes that students, fans, and alumni were more concerned with the bigger picture around those losses: the rapid erosion of what made Michigan special, largely through the attitude and actions of former Athletic Director Dave Brandon. As a result, Bacon starts the story not with Dave Brandon, but Charles Baird, who pioneered the role of Athletic Director, building the foundation for Yost, Crisler, and Canham. As Bacon explained, this is a story of how Michigan built an unparalleled legacy and tradition for over a century, based on selling not a product or a game, but Michigan. By treating ticketholders, alumni, letterwiners, students, and fans with respect and a relatively remarkable degree of restraint and transparency, the Athletic Department built mountains of trust--and a waitlist for football tickets to show for it. When Dave Brandon eroded that trust, challenging the status quo at nearly every juncture for reasons that seemed petty or misguided, if not simply greedy, Michigan's core constituencies appealed to that same tradition and trust to unseat Brandon.

What makes this book so interesting, from portions I've torn through since I got my hands on it yesterday, is that this is clearly not a narrative about one big moment. While some may point to the Noodle, the Shane Morris incident, or the "quit drinking and go to bed" emails as points of rupture, these are just isolated examples that point to the fundamental reason Dave Brandon failed at Michigan: the slow accumulation of similarly small, seemingly innocuous changes and/or actions that in one way or another systematically ticked off yet another constituency within the Michigan family, from former M lettermen to Olympic sports coaches to alumni organizations to donors to the ordinary fan trying to bring their kid to a Michigan game. Ignoring many of the benchmarks of leadership Bacon highlighted in Bo's Lasting Lessons, Brandon found new and infinitely infuriating ways to turn every corner of the University against him, perhaps none more important than the Board of Regents, on which he had previously served with distinction. As a litany of miscues, it's truly breathtaking, and some in the crowd were only too eager to share yet more from their own experiences.

At the same time, Bacon was clear to point out that while we can all point to countless examples of Brandon's mismanagement and misdirected ego, he was also capable of going the extra mile for student-athletes and others within the department. Bacon emphasized Will Hagerup's story, with Hagerup in attendance, as a particularly poignant example to this end. It's clear Brandon cares deeply about Michigan, and often went out of his way to go the extra mile for those he considered his core constituencies.

Yet just as Lloyd Carr's true motivations were somewhat obscured in Three and Out, Bacon's book on Rich Rodriguez's tenure at Michigan, I think there's a similar complexity here about Dave Brandon. Just as Carr did with 3&O, Brandon declined Bacon's request for comment--even though, as Bacon explained yesterday, he was offered a nearly endless timeline to answer a series of questions (via email, which we know is a medium Brandon knows how to use) at the conclusion of the project. We're left, then, with a picture of a man whose actions usually didn't measure up to the better angels of his nature, inexplicably working to destroy a legacy Brandon was raised to uphold from the moment he committed to Michigan at the foot of Bo's hospital bed in January 1970. We're left with the frustration that Brandon knew better, yet seldom acted as if he did.

Which brings us to Jim Hackett and Harbaugh, which Bacon explained was a result of yet more small and seemingly innocuous events and coincidences that culminated in the perfect storm for Michigan to hire the right interim AD, and in turn to the right coach. And it was all made possible because Michigan's alumni, students, letterwinners, student-athletes, and coaches rallied around each other to reclaim what they knew to be Michigan, something which was far too important to let die away.

The event at the Diag was wonderful, as is the norm for the UMCGC, with lively discussion and questions (including one from Carl Grapentine himself, which, as Bacon commented, was "ear chocolate" for those of us who love Carl's dulcet tones), and a line out the door for signed books. For many of us who studied with Mr. Bacon at Michigan (as I did--a Baked Potato extended to my fellow Bacon alums!), it was just like being in that auditorium at Angell Hall.

For those in the Ann Arbor area, there will be a similar event on Tuesday, September 1st, at Rackham Auditorium at 7PM. There's room for a thousand people--tell your friends, bring the kids, and buy a book!

Comments

Michigasling

August 30th, 2015 at 6:34 PM ^

John U. Bacon, “Endzone” Book Tour
Tuesday, November 3rd 
6:30 pm
Barleycorn, 23 Park Pl, Manhattan
 
We may have to wait a bit longer, but thanks, Bando, for the early report.

M Fanfare

August 30th, 2015 at 8:01 PM ^

I finished Endzone today, and I thought it was great. As compelling as Three and Out but with a much more optimistic ending. My only disappointment was with the amount of typographical errors that are in it, which I think is more on the publisher than on Bacon. The content is fantastic.

Drbogue

September 2nd, 2015 at 11:54 AM ^

Man, the editor should be taught how to use spell-check. I counted at least 4 different occurrences of the word "Michingan". Some sentences make absolutely no sense due to missing words or punctuation. I am reading the e-book version and this is sometimes due to inaccurate transcription. I'm hoping that's the case because otherwise, John should get a new editor. The book is great, but those types of errors should not occur. 

charblue.

August 30th, 2015 at 8:59 PM ^

to those who have read Mr. Bacon that he writes about subject matter that he is completely familiar and comfortable with, a milleu that he inherently knows inside and out. But his expositional writing style and journalistic approach are somewhat at odds with each other in composing a tell-all book on the events that have shaped the post-Bo legacy at Michigan, and now being restyled in a third generational Bo image. What this book seemingly envisions is a return to Bo's Lasting Lessons through the Harbaugh lens. 

Mr. Bacon begins each of his books with an overarching theme which he then goes about documenting. This isn't so much an excercise in truth-telling as it is university style thesis writing without regard for the consequences  a careful examination of the storylines he uncovers might actually tell in the weaving of his calibrated score. 

He is after all not just a writer, but a teacher and historian.  And in his reporting, he operates as a pensive investigative reporter would with strong scruples about accuracy and transparency. He understands that you are only effective as a converyor of the truth if you are trustworthy with the facts and what you are able to report even if you know more than your documentation allows you to publish.

This, unfortunately, for readers is extremely frustrating, espcially in ferreting out the details motivations of the main characters he often writes about who never explain them. Worse, though, he's unwilling to speculate to fill in their blanks, hoping time or different perspectiuve will enlighten us.

What is clear, however, is that Mr. Bacon has given us window into an inside world and certain insight into those who have shaped Michigan's recent football history that we can bank on.  For most of us, I'm assuming, this still leaves us under-nourished, wantonly wishing Bacon would bend his writing rules.

But, of course, this will never happen. We're talking about a guy who bans cell phones in his classroom, will not accept a thesis paper after deadline, among other standards that he imposes with friendly wit and demeanor. Gee, sounds like someone else he once wrote about and whose gruff Team, Team Team influence still casts an incredible shadow on the UM campus. 

 

M-Dog

August 31st, 2015 at 12:49 AM ^

I read along with the JUB AMA today and I got a bit of a feel for some of the points you make.  

JUB made the following adamant point during the AMA:

(I) had over 100 people talk to me about direct experiences they had. The rule is simple: If they saw or heard it first hand, that's fair game. Second hand ends up being gossip, in my view, even when I was quite confident they knew what they were talking about. Even with eyewitness accounts, you have to consider the person's credibility and motives, and also talk to as many other people as you can to make sure they're on the mark. Just about every scene and observation in this book is either backed up with facts or multiple eyewitness accounts.

That is an admirable but very tight standard - perhaps necessary given his line of work - but it leaves us wanting more.  

He had once-in-a-lifetime access to people who knew what was going on.  He also has decades-long relationships with many of these folks, and as you said, he knows his Michigan subject matter inside and out.  

He is not just a reporter stumbling on a new story who has to stay at a disinterested arms-length to keep from making inadvertent false or naive assumptions.  I trust him to ferret out noise and here say and gossip.  I want him to play that role.  

You just know that there is a lot more information that he had to walk away from given his standard.  But I would have rather he just told me the information and then made it clear in the cases where it is not confirmed or an eyewitness account, but the information and its source are compelling in his professional judgment.  Take it with a grain of salt, but here it is.

Of course, I'm just a fan on the streets and I'm not going to sue him, so maybe I'm asking too much.

But it was one of the things I really liked about the way Brian covered the Brandon ouster and the Harbaugh search.  He came right out and told us what he knew, what he didn't know, and what he thought was true given his extensive sources and professional judgment . . . but could not prove.  Take it with a grain of salt, but here it is.

It gave us a feel of being part of the editorial process, what his thinking was, and why he said what he said.  If he turned out to be wrong about some things, we did not freak out because we knew why he thought them.

It's a unique style that JUB is perhaps a little jealous of (he talks about him and Brian having to approach the story from different perspectives), but it is a perfectly legitimate and effective style for this type of topic. 

 

lmgoblue1

August 30th, 2015 at 9:54 PM ^

6 months ago. Why am I still waiting when others are receiving the books at an event? I mean come on John. I helped pay you these last 6 months. Geez.

JeepinBen

August 31st, 2015 at 10:46 AM ^

Great time. I'm only 100 pages in... got to get reading!

I think michigan fans will eat this book up, but so far it's a GREAT expose on what "not to do" from a leadership standpoint. Anyone who is going to be in a leadership role could gain knowledge from this book

Blue Durham

August 31st, 2015 at 1:49 PM ^

when you're a hammer, you see everything as a nail. Being an executive for several companies, his focus was maximizing profit. Everything (with one exception that I can think of, the stupid skywriting stunt) that Brandon did was to maximize money coming into his organization, in this case the Athletic Department. That includes dismissing any traditions that might be contrary to his mission, including advertising in the stadium and making attending games less open regarding bringing stuff in (in order to sell water, seat cushions, etc.). Brandon saw the Athletic Department as its own entity, and cashed in any good will built up over the years by his predecessors in order to pad his bottom line. But the athletic department's purpose is to serve the university as a whole, not its own bottom line, and by doing what Brandon did was both myopic and short sighted. The university strives to treat its students (and alumni) as future donors, and the athletic department plays an important role. Brandon's nickle-and-diming only undercut the billion dollar fundraising efforts of the university - it should not have be allowed to continue as long as it did. Finally, Brandon's view of the athletes as his core constituency is just bizarre. The athletes provided a service and got something (and in the case of non-revenue sports, a lot more) in return. Did Brandon view the pizza delivery guys at Dominoes a core constituency? Dave Brandon's narrow view of the goals of the athletic department and his role as AD led as much to his dismissal as any of the stupid ideas (2 cokes for free tickets, charging for seat cushions, trying to charge for water, etc), stupid e-mails, and PR disasters did.

BlueCube

September 2nd, 2015 at 1:30 AM ^

Beav was there which was nice. Brian, Ira and Sam were also.

I was reading the book while I was waiting in line to have my copy signed and the one thing that came to mind is how important Jim Hackett's replacement is. I hope he stays a long time. Realistically it probably won't be that long and, if the wrong person is chosen, we could be right back where we were. I asked John if that was his impression and he mentioned it is.

The other thing he emphasized was that, although it was a small mention in the book, the part about Dave Brandon making suggestions to Hoke while he was reviewing film is a major item. He didn't go into great depth, but he did mention that Brandon had fired a lot of people for little to no reason and Hoke was very aware of this It's likely Brandon had an effect on many decisions and it wasn't limited to possibly suggesting Morris play at Minnesota. This was well known by many, including players which obviously wouldn't have a positive effect on Hoke trying to run the team.