Recruiting Mid-Way Point, By The Numbers

Submitted by The Mathlete on

Hamlet

Dr. Hamlet III, consensus 6 star recruit

For the 2013 signees, the average Michigan commitment occurred on April 16th. The only other years a program has bested that average was in the heyday of the Texas Junior Days. This year has been a bit slower than last but that was almost certain to happen. In fact, prior to last season, Michigan’s previous earliest average commitment was for the 2012 class when the median decision date was in mid-July.

Jabrill Peppers’ commitment brought the 2014 class up to ten commitments (excluding Brady Pallante from the 2014 numbers). Barring an unlikely wave of Rodriguez level attrition the 2014 class should be over half way to an 18-19 member class.

The Seasons of Recruiting

Over the last five years, here is how the top ~500 recruits for the class have committed by commitment month:

image

The recruiting cycle typically begins slowly in March, sees a bump in April (Spring Game commitments?) before dropping back in May. The start of the summer sees another increase as players are typically between school and fall camp. The activity really dies down through the heart of football season before ramping up over the final three months of the cycle. The median Top 500 recruit typically commits sometime in August.

Michigan is clearly still ahead of this cycle for the 2014 class, even if they are behind last season’s breakneck pace.

 

Class Comparison

Comparing 10 commitments mid-cycle isn’t a truly valid comparison but just to see how this class has compared to Hoke’s other classes I did it anyway.

image

A consensus top 10(ish) and a consensus top 100 sure help out the curve. The top end of the 2014 Michigan recruiting class has already been established as the best during Hoke’s tenure in Ann Arbor. The rest of the group is a bit behind the last two years but that is mostly due to comparing a whole 10 member class to date versus the top 10 from prior seasons. The fact that the comparison holds up as well as it does speaks to the start the coaching staff have had to this cycle.

So where does this project out to? I projected an 18 player class with the following players adding their names to Project135.

Da’Shawn Hand

Malik McDowell

Parrker Westphal

Unknown Top 150 Defensive Back

Unknown Top 150 Wide Receiver

Unknown Top 500 Offensive Lineman

Unknown Top 500 Running Back

Unknown Top 500 Linebacker Chase Winovich

Wide receiver and defensive back both have several strong options still on the board and a top level rating was assumed. For linemen, linebacker and running back the options are bit less clear and I projected more of a 3/4 star borderline type of player. Westphal and McDowell are both consensus Michigan leans and Da’Shawn Hand is strong possibility and why not!

image

The top end of this potential class is a clear step above the 2013 class and equal in the middle. The drop at the tail end is a combination of small class effect and some conservative estimates on the remaining unfilled positions in the class. Continuing with the annual “Everything in the Offseason is a Positive Thing” theme, a minor lag in the tail end of the class isn’t a bad thing. To me it can be an indication that the staff is actually evaluating talent and looking for players they want as opposed to opening up the 247 composite rankings and offering down the list. 

 

Top Class Potential

Not to be the burster of bubbles but it ain’t happening. This class will be too small to have a shot at the overall title. Over the last twelve cycles Rivals has only had 10 classes ranked in their Top 10 with fewer than 20 commitments. Only 2007 (2nd) and 2009 (4th) USC have managed to crack the top 5. To have any shot attrition will have to force the class size into the 20s and even then it will probably take 22-23 to make it happen.

Is this a negative thing? Not really. You sign the best players you can with the scholarships taken from scrubs you have. When you look at the projected curve above, Michigan has a good chance to pull a better top 18 rated players this year than last. Rivals rated those 27 recruits #5 in the nation and this year’s might struggle to beat that rating with 18 players that are considerably better than the top 18 from last year’s #5 class. Michigan won’t win the top class ranking but that doesn’t mean they might not have the best class come February.

Comments

Double Wolverine

May 31st, 2013 at 1:54 AM ^

I love that Nth highest graph. It is a great way to compare recruits across classes or any arrays with one another. Not only are you a Mathlete, you've got some data representation skills.

Wolverine 73

May 31st, 2013 at 9:52 AM ^

Thanks.  I never get too excited about having the top class.  So long as you are in the top 5 or 10, you have to be happy because (1) you know you likely have quality and (2) no one really knows for sure who among the recruits is going to pan out.  Ben Braden was a 3 star, IIRC.  And yet he seems to be every bit the player (and maybe more) than the more highly rated linemen we recruited in his class.

PM

June 4th, 2013 at 3:37 PM ^

could we not call the weakest links, "scrubs".  That's cold.  Especially for kids who (probably) bust their tail trying to make or stay on the team. 

Having said that, this is shaping up to be an epic class!

BlueSwave34

June 5th, 2013 at 12:24 AM ^

Yeah I thot the "scrubs" statement was pretty lame to say. Have you ever tried playing D-1 football? If you get a scholarship to Michigan then you are not a scrub.