Purdue Preview

Submitted by The Mathlete on

Rush Offense vs Purdue

Michigan Off: +8, 2nd nationally, 1st Big Ten

Purdue Def: +0, 54th, 6th

Key Players:

Denard Robinson: +7, 1st nationally

Michael Shaw: +1, 7th in Big Ten (RB only)

Vincent Smith: +0, 10th in Big Ten

image

For the first time all season Michigan put up a huge day on the ground without Denard having a big day rushing. Shaw, Smith and Hopkins all had strong days against a very good defense. Purdue’s defense has been consistently average. All of their games so far this year have been between +4 and –2.

Last week proved that the offense can be big even without Denard gaining hundreds of yards on the ground. Purdue’s consistent averageness makes a strong day very likely. Let’s hope that the backs can continue their progress from last week and Denard can limit his carries enough to make it through a full game.

Prediction: Michigan +8

Pass Offense vs Purdue

Michigan Off: +5, 10th, 1st

Purdue Def: +1, 48th, 5th

Denard Robinson: +5, 5th in Big Ten, 23rd nationally

Junior Hemingway: +6 5th, 28th

Roy Roundtree: +6, 7th, 34th

Darryl Stonum: +3, 15th

image

Despite two early interceptions and a host of drops, Michigan’s two-headed passing attack produced one of their top two games of the season. Roundtree and Hemingway produced most of the highlights but Stonum added several key catches as well. It was far and away Michigan’s best Big Ten performance since Indiana and considering the stakes last weekend, probably their best showing of the year through the air.

Purdue’s pass defense has been all over the map. They have produced very good games against Wisconsin and Minnesota but have been terrible against Illinois and Ohio St, two teams with mobile quarterbacks. If Purdue’s weakness through air has been due to a focus on running quarterbacks, it should be a fun day Saturday.

Prediction: Michigan +4 with the possibility for much more.

Rush Defense vs Purdue

Michigan Def: –4, 109th, 11th

Purdue Off: –0, 67th, 7th

Key Players:

Dan Dierking: +0, 8th in Big Ten

image

Michigan has had three really bad games defending the run against some of the best Big Ten rushing teams. Against more mediocre ground games the porous Michigan run defense has held up OK.

Purdue hasn’t put more than +1 on the ground in any Big Ten game and only did it once against Toledo in non-conference play. Purdue doesn’t look like a team that can do the damage that Illinois, Penn St or Michigan State did.

Prediction: –4 by the numbers but a good chance it’s closer to 0 barring another Siller-tastrophy.

Pass Defense vs Purdue

Michigan Def: –4, 110th, 11th

Purdue Off: –4, 107th, 11th

Key Players:

Sean Robinson: –2 average against Illinois and Wisconsin

No qualifying receivers

image

That’s a whole lot of ugly all around. Michigan has been in the –6 range for most of Big Ten play. The Penn St showing might start to look better as they put up a better opponent adjusted score against NW than they did against Michigan. Purdue hasn’t been better than –6 versus anyone that’s not Minnesota or Ball St.

Although this matchup looks like what we thought would happen at Penn St, Purdue has a more known quantity behind center and McGloin has proven for at least two games to be a significant upgrade to the Penn St offense which has been +10 opponent adjusted the last two games after being –5 prior.

Prediction: Push, Purdue does more than normal but no major damage.

Special Teams vs Purdue

Michigan: –2, 107th, 10th

Purdue: +0, 82nd, 8th

Michigan Kicks: Push, both teams are bad

Purdue Kicks: Advantage Purdue, we are not good

Michigan Punts: Big advantage Michigan, hopefully don’t need it

Purdue Punts: Advantage Purdue, they’re not good but they’ve been better than us

Kicking: slight advantage Purdue, they’re not good but they’ve been better than us

Purdue hasn’t been great at any special teams but they haven’t been the disaster Michigan has been, either. Hopefully our offense renders most of our special teams weaknesses irrelevant.

Predictions almost certain to cost you money if taken seriously

Michigan 35 Purdue 30 The Vegas number seems a bit high but even though the numbers are calling a 5 point game I think there is substantially more upside than downside with a depleted Purdue offense.

Illinois 31 Minnesota 10 – Illinois gets a nice cupcake to bounce back after last week’s tough loss

Iowa 42 Northwestern 20 – Sorry Jamiemac, still not buying NW this year

Ohio St 31 Penn St 21 – Walk-on Favre keeps it closer than the experts think and if the Penn St offense can keep up their strong performance of the last two weeks then I think Penn St actually has a shot to pull the upset.

Wisconsin 38 Indiana 20 – Another bottom feeder for the Badgers before their trip to AA next week.

Comments

tlh908

November 12th, 2010 at 11:05 AM ^

I will be waiting for the payback against Purdue, no way they can pull 3 in a row.  Crawford's commitment today starts the exciting weekend.  Just hoping that Hope gets his payback for last years stunt.

beenplumb

November 12th, 2010 at 11:09 AM ^

Thanks for these, Mathlete. As a statistician I love seeing predictive analyses of all kinds.

To be clear, when you rate Michigan's rush offense as 2nd nationally, and Denard as 1st nationally, is that completely based on your PAN metric?

Hannibal.

November 12th, 2010 at 11:10 AM ^

You're predicting only 35 points scored by Michigan?  I'll be pretty surprised and disappointed in our offense if we only have that. The only way that they hold us to that score is if their offense manages to shorten the game to 9 posessions or less.

msoccer10

November 12th, 2010 at 11:37 AM ^

Everyone is predicting we win big, but I don't think that's likely. I hope we do, but given how this season has gone, I expect there to be a closer than comfortable feeling to the 4th quarter.

jmgoblue81

November 12th, 2010 at 12:56 PM ^

I really feel like we should win comfortably, but I just don't think our defense will allow that.  You can bet Purdue is going to have every trick play in their playbook ready to run against us to take advantage of our inexperience.  I really don't think our defense can stop any offense consistently right now regardless of how injury-depleted or talent-deficient they are.  I sincerely hope I'm wrong, but I'll be very surpised if we cover a 12-point spread.

jamiemac

November 12th, 2010 at 12:13 PM ^

Yeah, lets not talk about Northwestern, Taking the Dog in their games has remained a good strategy for me, except for the two times they were the underdog. Both were painful non-covers. One (MSU) should have been a cover. So I am not totally discouraged.

BUT

I have a question on Penn St vs OSU......The Bucks have held PSU to 125 yards or less passing the last 5 meetings. Can McGloin buck that trend? It's a Pick-4 game at the JCB, so realize your answer might swing a crowded leaderboard. No pressure.

Anyway, I was intriigued by the way you presented that pick, so I am wondering how successful you think he can truly be

The Mathlete

November 12th, 2010 at 12:21 PM ^

My numbers have Penn St's opponent adjusted offensive numbers at +8 vs Michigan and +13 against NW. Even though neither defense is the 85 Bears, those number indicate that Penn St with McGloin have done substantially better than average teams have against bad defenses. Under Bolden, Penn St averaged -5 in six games and -11 in three Big Ten games. With only two data points the magnitude could be a fluke but there is no doubt that the Nittany Lion offense has been substantially better under McGloin. Can that hold up against an elite Buckeye defense is the question. 

For the prediction I used Penn St's season average of -2 opponent adjusted on offense. If the can sustain the +10 level of the last two games thats a 12 point swing a makes the game a straight up pick em. I am not going to go so far as to say that my money is on pick em, but if you believe that McGloin can hold up at all against the Buckeye D then the Nittany Lions and the points looks like a great play.

The Mathlete

November 12th, 2010 at 12:59 PM ^

Each play is assigned a value on how it impacts the expected points of the team and how the field position affects the defense. The play is then adjusted based on the opposing defense does on an average run or pass play. The value is both assigned to the team and the individual players getting the stat. For running plays it is all assigned to the ball carrier and for pass players its assigned to the QB always and receiver if it is completed. Sacks are only assigned to the team and count as passing plays, not rushes. It's not perfect but it does a good enough job. 

bronxblue

November 12th, 2010 at 3:05 PM ^

Love the breakdown, as usual.  A little surprised you only see UM putting up 35 points, but I'll take a win. 

I also like walk-on Favre at PSU.  He just wins game with grit, and he obviously is having fun out there.  I wouldn't open a single text message old Ginger Favre sent me, but I definitely like him against OSU to keep it close.