Pride and Playcalling: Know Thy Team

Submitted by Magnum P.I. on

"We want to be able to run the football with a back in the backfield."

- Brady Hoke in 2011 interview upon hiring at Michigan

 

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle”

- Sun Tzu in The Art of War

Offense: Who We Want To Be

Coach Hoke has made it clear from the word 'go' that his vision for Michigan includes a stout offensive line that fuels a power running game. Wear the opponent down. Use the run to set up the pass. Control the clock. Preserve your defense. He walked into a roster ill-equipped to play this style of offense, but he promised to be patient and flexible during the transition. Denard Robinson can probably tell you whether this was successful or not.

Regardless, Hoke must feel pretty good about making progress toward this goal of a power running game after his first few recruiting classes at Michigan. Top tier offensive line classes in consecutive years. Stud workhorse running backs. Tight end restocked. The pieces are in place for a good power running game at Michigan in the future. 

This season is not the future.

Offense: Who We Are

Who are we as an offense? This is a tough question to answer. Let's start with who we are not. Yesterday, we ran 34 plays on first down. Here are the results:

Play call No. Yards per play <2 yard plays
Running back run 17 1.8 11
Quarterback run 8 8.4 1
Pass 12 13.8 5

In a power running offense, you rely on three to five yard runs on first and second down to gain short-yardage situations on third down. Yesterday we averaged 1.8 yards per play on first down runs, including 11 of 17 plays that went for one yard or less. When Devin Gardner ran on first down, he gained 8.4 yards per play with only one run for less than two yards. On the 12 occassions that passed on first down, we averaged 13.8 yards, including incomplete passes that gain zero yards.

We are not a power running team. 

It is not clear that the coaching staff yet appreciates this, and as a result we are succumbing in every battle. It seems that the staff thought that this would be the year that they could transition fully to a power running game base offense. They tried to impose their will against Akron, UConn, Minnesota, and Penn State. In each case, it hasn't worked.

Whatever our opponents' self-knowledge, they can all be sure that when they play Michigan, we will try to operate out of a base offense that runs on first down. Whatever you think about our talent/youth/experience on the offensive line, we have consistently run into walls of defenders who are happy to not have to make decisions but rather just move ahead and fill a running lane.  

We need to recognize who we are on offense and make a fundamental shift in approach.

A Note On Psychology

Albert Bandura's theory of self-efficacy explains how people come to believe that they are able to do something well. How people develop confidence in their ability. Devin Gardner's confidence is in the tank right now. It was clear that by the second half of the UConn game, he was trying to not throw interceptions more than he was trying to complete passes. But the coaches aren't helping him.

Self-efficacy theory holds that the best way to build confidence is to cultivate "mastery experiences," opportunities to be successful in the task at hand. In our case, this means giving Gardner easy passes--like screens, quick slants, and running back passes--to allow him to have little successes and rebuild confidence. Right now, we're doing the opposite. We've reacted to his turnovers by going into a shell and reducing his throwing opportunities. This has created a vicious cycle with us running into a loaded box of defenders, failing, then giving Gardner throwing opportunities in third and long situations, where he has less opportuntiy for "mastery." Gardner makes a mistake, loses further confidence. Coaches lose further confidence in his passing ability. Rinse. Repeat.

So, Who Are We, Again?

I'm not a coach, but it seems like, at this point, we need to fundamentally alter our approach to de-emphasize the early down running game. Power football doesn't work with 1.8 yards per first down run. We have had success in the short passing game, including last night. These plays have to become the new normal on first and second down. Whether this is spread or west coast or whatever, the pass has to start setting up the run. 

That's not what Hoke wants, but it's better to be honest with oneself than aspirational. Will we make the change? We'll see. We know coaches to be a prideful race.

 

Comments

aiglick

October 14th, 2013 at 12:07 AM ^

Interesting thanks for putting this together. I definitely agree about making less with the running up the middle and more with the short passes. Let's throw it out to Gallon or Funchess a couple of times on first downs and let them make a play. Something I've been thinking about is last year shortly after the Nebraska game. We had just lost Denard for an indefinite amount of time and we had lost a game that was critical to our Legends Division campaign. I don't know about you but I thought we were in trouble for the rest of the year. Gardner emerged and we ended up having a decent season where yes it was 8-5 but we were pretty much in every game for the rest of the year. It looks bad now but who knows how the rest of the season goes. Maybe the coaches reevaluate; time will tell. Let's beat Indiana and head into the bye week feeling a little better.

DonAZ

October 14th, 2013 at 7:24 AM ^

"it's better to be honest with oneself than aspirational"

That's a very good line ... and a very good assessment of this team.

It seems to me Mattison understands this better than do the offensive coaches.  He seems to do what he can with what he has. 

I think Borges capable ... just stubborn.  Which is a shame.

247Hinsdale

October 15th, 2013 at 10:04 AM ^

That's a good point.  I would like to see this too.  My initial thought is that most of the Gardner turnovers come in situations where we are in an unfavorable down and distance, not on first down, but I don't know that to be true.

I think a lot of the reluctance to throw is concern over interceptions, but, as mentioned above, that just leads to a vicious cycle where we can't run the ball, end up in third and long, and Gardner is faced with making difficult throws.

Magnum P.I.

October 15th, 2013 at 11:05 PM ^

The interception were in a 3rd and 8 situation and a 2nd and 7 situation. The interceptions don't matter to me. We have to keep throwing. This sounds lame, but I think Devin is trying too hard. He needs to be more central, not less. And he needs to be given more leeway. He's the best player on our team, in my opinion. He's had some shitty passes but its all psychology right now.

MichiganAggie

October 14th, 2013 at 12:50 PM ^

I like the section you put in there about Bandura and self efficacy.  Personally, I'd like the coaches to employ a Bandura-esque Bobo doll experiment with our OL.  Show them tapes of Jake Ryan beating the f- out of a Bobo doll and then having them replicate it on opposing teams' defensive linemen

6tyrone6

October 14th, 2013 at 6:18 PM ^

I go crazy when I see our offense consitently run into a defense with a 4 man front with 4 linebackers right behind them. Seems like it would be easy to change our play and everytime everyone on the offense sees that defensive aligment throw the fricken ball. If I were the RB I would take the handoff and throw it, beats running into the centers ass.