Maryland 86, Michigan 82

Submitted by Alex Cook on

ce26d994-f459-4d6e-b6b7-7850967eb737

Paul Sherman – MGoBlog

After Michigan and Maryland traded baskets in the first five minutes of the game, the Terrapins locked up the Wolverines defensively and put together one of those frustratingly common runs that seem to take U-M out of the game. Over a span of about seven minutes, Maryland went on a 17-1 run and the game was following the script of Michigan’s many blowout losses this season. For the first time all season, the Wolverines stood in after taking a big early punch and managed to erase the deficit by the first TV timeout in the second half.

That resilience wasn’t quite enough, as Maryland eventually managed enough stops late in the game to pull ahead in what was an entertaining back-and-forth second half without much defense – Maryland (1.17 points per possession) put up its best performance against a Big Ten foe in nine games on the offensive end, while Michigan (1.09) mostly kept pace until the very end. Though no losses can be considered moral victories by this time of year, Michigan still acquitted themselves far better than they had in any loss so far this season – today, they were just unable to make enough shots in the final possessions to get away with what is still a much-needed marquee win for their NCAA tournament hopes.

Surprisingly, it was Michigan’s role players leading the charge – Derrick Walton and Zak Irvin combined for just 25 points on as many shot equivalents (though Walton added five assists, six boards, and three steals). Mark Donnal was excellent against a very good center duo: he flashed his full arsenal of skills in a 20-point second half as he finished with an extremely efficient 25, two offensive rebounds, and five blocks(!) Yet again, there was a significant drop-off from Donnal to Ricky Doyle and Moritz Wagner – per SCACCHoops, Donnal was +8 in 29 minutes. Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman also turned in one of the better performances of his season with 16 points and a career-high nine assists – as a team, Michigan had 22, indicative of the Wolverines’ excellent ball movement today. Duncan Robinson was largely off all day; Kam Chatman put in some of his best minutes off the bench and hit two threes (and no other bench player scored).

In Michigan’s win over Maryland, Zak Irvin won the battle of mismatched power forwards against Robert Carter – today, it was Carter who turned in a very good performance with an efficient 17 points, six rebounds, two blocks, and a critical tip-dunk to stretch the Terrapin lead to four with under two minutes left. Three others scored in double figures for Maryland: Jake Layman (16), Melo Trimble (14) – though he didn’t play well – and Diamond Stone (13). Collectively, UMD hit on 59% of its twos, 44% of its threes, and 90% on a high volume of free throw attempts; while both teams put up high eFG% marks and very similar rebounding rates and turnover rate, Maryland scored 12 more points from the free throw line than Michigan did. Michigan hit 13 threes on the game, which kept them in it; an atypically high turnover rate prevented them from getting as many looks as they should have.

Michigan now sits tied for seventh in the Big Ten at 9-6 and finishes the season with contests against Northwestern, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Michigan needs two more wins to feel safer about a tournament bid – though if those wins are against NW and a weak first-round opponent in the Big Ten tournament, it might be dicey. Moving forward, we shouldn’t assume that the Wolverines will make it in, though as things stands right now, I think it’s more likely than not that they’ll be dancing in a few weeks.

Comments

Stringer Bell

February 21st, 2016 at 4:57 PM ^

This game was kinda discouraging. We played well enough offensively and shot the ball well but still lost. This team couldn't stop a cold. First time we've lost under Beilein when scoring 80 points, seems fitting this team would end that streak.

Stringer Bell

February 21st, 2016 at 7:54 PM ^

It's not the loss. It's more the circumstances themselves. It's the fact that we're so outmanned and have been run out of the gym so many times this season that people are actually happy when we show up and don't get our shit kicked in. This is where Beilein has taken us in the 2 years since we've been good, and it's mind boggling that a large portion of this fanbase seems to be ok with it.

Stringer Bell

February 21st, 2016 at 8:20 PM ^

I just don't think Beilein can get us back to the level we were at in 2012-2014. That kind of success has been the exception and not the norm for his career. In fact, this year's team is more typical of a Beilein team than the Burke/Stauskas teams. A lot of people here seem to forget that and think he can return to heights he's very rarely reached in his career.

Stringer Bell

February 21st, 2016 at 9:00 PM ^

No, but you can make educated guesses based on past results. I'll go with that instead of hoping that Beilein can get back to the place he's been exactly once in his 25 years coaching D-1 basketball. I can also gauge the trajectory of the program. Recruiting has been on a downswing ever since the 2013 class, unless Xavier Simpson turns out to be the next Trey Burke.

Fishbulb

February 21st, 2016 at 5:03 PM ^

They are too limited athletically. A lot has to go right for them to beat a very good team. A team can get away with a couple unathletic guys in the rotation but Michigan plays a lot of them, often at the same time. The structure of the offense is a beautiful thing when it works, but when it doesn't, they don't have an athlete who can get a bucket on his own and stop a run or take over a game. One good example of this--the shot-clock violation when Chatman had his stuff thrown.

blue90

February 21st, 2016 at 5:14 PM ^

At this point I suppose we could not have expected more than this.  It was a moral victory I guess.  I'm just watching for the team to develop more and be ready for next year, this year is more or less over.  Maybe make it to the dance, maybe win one game in it.  We're looking at next years team right now and it looks pretty good to me, sweet sixteen or so.

Why does Dawkins ever play or DJ?  Their D is such garbage it is ridiculous, I'd rather have Kam out there, especially if he plays like he did today.  I guess Walton's last game heroics were going to not be heroic at some point, he just decided it was this game he was going to screw it up.

Everyone played pretty well which was a change and HUGE rareity. I think this one of their best offensive games all year, against a good offensive team.  If they can stop having random breakdowns where they let other teams go on 20-0 runs then we'd win a crap load more games.  Go blue, #cantwaitfornextyear

 

blue90

February 21st, 2016 at 5:21 PM ^

I still think we are a sweet sixteen this year, save Caris and Spike's injuries, right?  This team is on the cusp or better put, one good player away (Caris) from having two or three more wins than they do right now.  There is no way we're the same team as we are right now if we had them.  That is a top 25 NBA draft pick and another fourth year senior who has never turned the ball over in his career, (okay maybe once).  I'm not giving an excuse, I'm just making the case that we're a much better team (a couple wins better) with one or both of them.

blue90

February 21st, 2016 at 5:45 PM ^

I don't think he'll add much except 6-8pts and a couple assists, however he will be a thousand times better option than Dakich obvi.  Putting in Dakich is like assuming nothing is going to happen for a few minutes except bad offense and no defense.  I do think Waltons, Zaks, Duncans, and Donnals productions will all go up and they will be more consistent which is all we need.  Walton and Zak will both average right around 15, Duncan will go up to 13ish, Donnal to 10.  That is all we need really (plus mediocre D) and will make a difference between today and next year. I'm sure RAHK and Dawkins will still be just a hare under 10 but that is acceptable. 

Beilein probably and hopefully realizes now that we have to have a good defense or even top 75 in kenpom to compete with teams and I think he will focus on that ALOT this next offseason. That said, we're beating/almost beating some damn good teams this year even without a go-to scorer, so I'm pretty optimistic about next year.  Walton and Zak will both be go-tos next year (they're close to it right now). Yes Caris and Spike are gone next year but we're playing pretty well (not amazing) without them.

Stringer Bell

February 21st, 2016 at 6:05 PM ^

We're wildly inconsistent, capable of good performances but also capable of real stinkers. That's just the nature of being completely reliant on the 3 point ball and lacking NBA talent. I don't see that changing next year, unfortunately. I don't think there's much room for improvement from Walton and Irvin. The guys I'd really look to make a significant jump next year are Wilson and Chatman. It was just 1 game but Chatman looked the most confident I've seen him, and its encouraging that it came in a hostile road environment.

blue90

February 21st, 2016 at 6:14 PM ^

But Beilein can fix some things and we're still at the round of 64, maybe 32 with that wild incosistency.  It's foolish to think everything stays the exact same with the same players, it never does and that is the case between this and last year.  I suppose it could go down, but Beilein isn't THAT bad of a coach, if turns out he is then get rid of him.  Going from 16-16 to 22-10 (roughly) and then back down to 16-16 with the exact same players is pretty rare unless your coach just blows.  Beilein knows that he is doing, though he may not be an outstanding coach.  

I hope Kam gets going, I like him as a player.  I do think DJ completely sucks and gets garbage minutes or transfers.  Mo didn't come all the way over from Berlin to transfer or stop playing and he shows more promise than DJ.  There will be a lot of shake-up though next year with 6 bigs on scholarship so who knows.  My guess is Donnal plays 30 a game and Doyle and Teske trade-off.

Stringer Bell

February 21st, 2016 at 6:42 PM ^

I think Wilson and Wagner will be in the big man rotation next year. I imagine Doyle being the odd man out as he brings literally nothing to the table (and honestly I'm surprised he hasn't been taken out of the rotation yet), and both Wilson and Wagner have a lot of upside. Teske again will be a freshman and will likely struggle a lot as we've seen with all of our freshmen big men save McGary.

TrueBlue2003

February 22nd, 2016 at 12:39 AM ^

still plays is that SOMEbody has to give Donnal a break and it can't be Wilson or Wagner who play like 15 and 12 year olds, respectively.  Also, Doyle was decent last year but amazingly his TO rate has doubled in his second year.  I imagine the staff believes (hopes) that this is a fluke, and they have no other choice but to hope things start clicking.  Rare that a guy gets this much worse from year one to two.

The only way this team is getting any better next year is if Wilson or Wagner, or perhaps Chatman actually become plus players at the four.  This team needs Robinson to be playing a lot less if it has any hopes of being respectable at defense. If one of those three guys can provide a big enough boost on that end of the floor with much dropoff on offense, we could imrove. I'm not holding my breath though, because wow, those three look so far away in terms of being able to figure out what they're doing.

Other way to improve would be if Teske is a complete man-child rim protector.  But that's a pipedream.

blue90

February 21st, 2016 at 6:14 PM ^

But Beilein can fix some things and we're still at the round of 64, maybe 32 with that wild incosistency.  It's foolish to think everything stays the exact same with the same players, it never does and that is the case between this and last year.  I suppose it could go down, but Beilein isn't THAT bad of a coach, if turns out he is then get rid of him.  Going from 16-16 to 22-10 (roughly) and then back down to 16-16 with the exact same players is pretty rare unless your coach just blows.  Beilein knows that he is doing, though he may not be an outstanding coach.  

I hope Kam gets going, I like him as a player.  I do think DJ completely sucks and gets garbage minutes or transfers.  Mo didn't come all the way over from Berlin to transfer or stop playing and he shows more promise than DJ.  There will be a lot of shake-up though next year with 6 bigs on scholarship so who knows.  My guess is Donnal plays 30 a game and Doyle and Teske trade-off.

doggdetroit

February 21st, 2016 at 10:06 PM ^

The 09-10 team regressed. The 14-15 team was expected to take a step back after losing 3 players to the NBA, but they still returned Irvin, Levert and Walton and were expected to make the NCAA. Instead, they were bad even before Levert and Walton were lost to injury.

I don't think the 16-17 team will regress but I don't foresee any noticable improvement. They are a bubble team this year and they will be a bubble team next year. Xavier Simpson is the only potential instant impact player in the incoming recruiting class and he's rated lower than Walton, Irvin and Chatman were. So for Michigan to really improve Simpson is going to have to be Trey Burke on day 1 or guys on the existing roster are going to have to improve substantially. I don't see the latter happening, so in my opinion, Michigan's hopes fall on Simpson. 

TrueBlue2003

February 22nd, 2016 at 12:54 AM ^

09-10 team regressed with mostly the same players as the year before. Started the season ranked and tanked to a losing season, rather inexplicably. Four starters: Harris, Sims, Novak and Douglas shot worse from three than the season before, which might be just how things go sometimes when you take a lot of high variance shots.

There have obviously been a number of years in which we've gotten worse with the loss of players and one could argue that losing half a season of Levert could hurt this team.

They'll probably be a little better but how much? They're still going to be a disaster at defense.  Worst in the B1G in 2pt Fg %.  That is it right there.  Donnal and Robinson and Irvin aren't going to get taller or longer or more athletic.  DJ Wilson is the only hope of making a leap...

bronxblue

February 21st, 2016 at 5:17 PM ^

This is about right. They are a fringe tourney team, saved by no bad losses but hurt by inconsistent wins against good teams mixed with blowouts. If they win against Wiscy or especially Iowa they have a good chance, but I have my doubts. I do think they could win two games in the BTT, but it would depend on the matchup. Basically anyone other than MSU.

Boner Stabone

February 21st, 2016 at 5:19 PM ^

I think they still get in with one more win.  The bubble is very soft this year.  I think we have enough quality wins to get in.  The only thing that scares me is that Mark Hollis is the chairperson to the selection committee.  I can see him sticking it to us.  That is why 2 more wins would be a good idea.

kevin holt

February 21st, 2016 at 5:26 PM ^

Didn't watch the game, but why did we have so many more fouls than Maryland? That seems really out of character. Also I'm still upset Diamond Stone was only suspended for one game (against a shitty opponent, seemed like absolutely nothing until they lost that game to Minnesota (lol)). Slam a dude's head on the ground and you should sit for the year to think about it, son.

JohnnyHolliday…

February 21st, 2016 at 8:37 PM ^

The Washington Post reported that Brown "downplayed the incident after the game. When asked if his head was hit, Brown replied: "No. Didn't feel it."

Maryland still suspended Stone for a game and took a tough loss at time when every game is critical for tournament seeding.

Beilein has shown he is a superior coach to Turgeon I think. It is challenging for Maryland fans such as myself to adjust to this 'player's league' approach Turge is taking, with little structure on offense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

SagNasty

February 21st, 2016 at 5:44 PM ^

Would have been nice to steal this game but there were a few positives. Team actually fought back and had a shot to win after getting punched in the face. Donnal played a great game and hopefully he can build off of that performance. MAAR continues to impress and show his toughness.
I hate losing but I can stomach a loss much more when the team shows some fight. That was a tough environment against a top ten 10 that was on a mission to prove they are still a title contender and Michigan went toe to toe with them.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wolverine In Iowa 68

February 21st, 2016 at 5:52 PM ^

Donnal was on fire.  You could see the confidence.  Then he got his third foul and had to sit...

 

amazingly, as soon as Doyle came in, we went totally cold.  Him dropping the pass when nobody was near him under the basket told the story of his season.  You could see the excuses coming out of his mouth.  Needs to man up, grow up, and get his head on straight. 

The second half was fun to watch up until the last minute.  We just didn't have enough in the tank to finish them off.  This season has been one of "almosts".  I'm starting to think our tourney hopes will fall under that word too.

So what's better?  Making the NCAA and getting bounced in the first round, or performing impressively/winning the NIT?

TrueBlue2003

February 22nd, 2016 at 1:10 AM ^

Another game or three on one team's home floor (especially if it's your own home floor) that nobody cares does not help compared to seeing your name in the bracket, the week of prep, the travel, the playing in an odd neutral setting with few fans, even if just for one game is a much better experience.  Ask any player or coach and you wouldn't be able to find one that would rather play in the NIT.

Plus, it's very unlikely we (or any team in the NIT) will go the championship.  Winning 4 or 5 coin flips is highly unlikely.  And for bubble teams, you still have a coin flip's chance to play two games.  It's not like bubble teams are a 16 seed.  11 or 12 seeds still have essentially a coin flip first round game so your expected number of games in the NCAA isn't even that much less, especially if you play in the first four.  In which case, your first two games are coin flips.

Go Blue in MN

February 21st, 2016 at 6:05 PM ^

tells you a lot about our big man situation.  To state the obvious, we were a -12 in the 11 minutes he was on the bench.  The dropoff from Donnal to Doyle today was enormous.  If we had a serviceable backup C we could have won that game.