Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
    • The Editor
    • Advertising/Associate Editor
    • Managing Editor/Hoops
  • MGoStore
    • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Football Schedule (wiki)
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • MGoFlickr
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
Home Diaries Blazefire's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 5 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 3 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 3 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,547 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 9 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Moderator Action Sticky 2018
    7 replies
  • Dantonio: players will decide if Reschke can rejoin the team
    84 replies
  • Brandon Wimbush Highlights in Notre Dame Spring Game
    25 replies
  • OT: Archer Danger Island
    24 replies
  • OT: Golden State Killer suspect arrested in California
    35 replies
  • SIAP: U of M Dearborn Bball Team Needs the Money Cannon!
    5 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    49 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    85 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    127 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    90 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    10 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    66 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    173 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    77 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Golden State Killer suspect arrested in California
    35 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    127 replies
  • Dantonio: players will decide if Reschke can rejoin the team
    83 replies
  • Brandon Wimbush Highlights in Notre Dame Spring Game
    25 replies
  • OT: Archer Danger Island
    24 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    49 replies
  • Moderator Action Sticky 2018
    7 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    66 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    85 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    90 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    10 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    80 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    173 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    18 replies
  • SIAP: U of M Dearborn Bball Team Needs the Money Cannon!
    5 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    173 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    129 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    126 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    92 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    90 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    85 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

The Line - What the heck is that?

By Blazefire — November 19th, 2010 at 12:45 AM — 27 comments
Filed under:
  • football
  • lines
  • Sports Betting

Introduction: Why post this obviousness?

I noticed the other day a poster had mentioned that 'the line' for the Wisconsin at Michigan game was Wisconsin -4, and they were confused as to how Michigan could be favored by four. Several posters corrected him, informing him that the -4 line means that Wisconsin is favored by 4 for betting purposes. After thinking about this for a moment, it occured to me that while most of us know this, I'm not sure WHY most of us know this.

I have never in my life seen a "beginner's guide to sports betting". Of course, I don't bet on sports, so I'm sure they probably exist, but for the majority of us that do not bet on sports, it's not something we're likely to come across. As such, it is perfectly reasonable that somebody might not get the concepts behind "lines". I'm not so much talking about how they're set, which JamieMac of Just Cover has done a wonderful job of going over before, talking about the practices of vegas oddsmakers and so on. No, I mean what they, and other sports gambling terminology means. As such, I've created a little diary here I hope that anyone who never really thought about the concept of "the line" will take a moment to look over.


Okay, fine, so what is a line, and how does it work?

Well... do you play golf?

No. I'm just a temporary personification of your target audience. I don't even know what golf is unless you decide I'm supposed to.

Shut up. You now know what golf is.

I know kung-golf.

You're not Neo, though. Moving on, in golf, one often will play with a handicap. Different leagues may calculate handicap in different ways, but the basics are this: A golfer's handicap is the number of strokes over par he is expected to finish on a given 18 holes, divided by a certain number, which changes based on the courses you've been playing. The intention of a handicap is to provide a golfer of lower ability a chance to "beat" par on the golf course.

This isn't helping.

Just wait. This is going to be rough and dirty, because I don't want to include too much math. If one golfer in a twosome has a handicap of 16, and the other has a handicap of two, that would indicate that on a standard par 72 18 holes, the first golfer would be expected to finish with a score of approximately 88, and the other a score of 74.

Rough and dirty twosomes? Lines are awesome.

Quiet. Let me speak. When you subtract each golfer's handicap from their raw score, it produces their handicapped score, which is used to determine the winner. So, in those conditions, if golfer one shot an 87, while golfer two shot his expected 74, golfer one would actually win the round with a handicapped score of 71, one under par.

And this applies to football because?

Because the lines are a form of handicap! The lines are vegas oddsmakers saying that, if we gave team one an advantage of X number of points, then it puts the teams on equal footing.

I still don't get it.

Okay. Work with me here. Lets go back to the numbers for the Wisky @ Michigan game: Wisky -4; Michigan +4. This is not an expectation of the outcome. They are not predicting that either team will win or lose by that many points.

But I though-

No. They're not. What they are saying is, "If Wisconsin were put in a 4 point hole, or Michigan were spotted 4 points, then the teams should be approximatly "on par". The difference between this and golf is that the teams should be on par with each other, rather than on par with the golf course.

So the line not a prediction of who will win or really even by how much, but a prediction of how to make the teams even?

Sort of. The important thing to remember is, the oddsmakers aren't trying to predict the outcome of the game. They're trying to generate betting. So Essentially, they're saying, "We think that on this field, at this time, Wisconsin is a better team by 4 points than Michigan. Do you agree or disagree?"

So when you bet against the line, you're not... betting on the game?

Not really. YOu're actually betting on whether the oddsmakers are right or wrong about the teams. Someone betting on Wisconsin is actually saying, "Wisconsin just destroyed Indiana, a team Michigan barely beat. They're more than 4 points better than Michigan." Someone betting on Michigan is actually saying, "Michigan is way improved over earlier in the year. I don't think they're four points worse than Wisconsin."

But isn't the answer to the question decided in the game?

Yeah, it is, but you're still betting on who will win or lose with the handicap, so you're still betting against the oddsmakers. Not against one team or the other. And even more worrisome... the oddsmakers are liars.

*gasp*

Yes, shocking, I know. that line they set... that's not really what they think would be an accurate handicap for the teams. If I were going to set a true handicap for the teams, I'd probably give Michigan abou a 7 handicap versus Wisconsin. If you added a touchdown to Michigan's final score, I think they'd come out tied in an average game.

So then... the point of a line?

To get you to bet. To get you either nodding your head in agreement or shaking it in disagreement with the oddsmakers, and putting your money where your mouth is.

I don't have a mouth.

Uhh... shut it anyway? Lets sum up:

The line is not a means of picking a winner of a game, nor is it intended to do so.

The line is a form of handicap, suggesting that under given circumstances, adjusting the final score by X points (subtracting for the team expected to win or adding for the team expected to lose) would create a tie score. It is an attempt to put the teams "on par" with eachother.

The line is a betting tool, and is not intended to predict the score of the game.

Betting with or against the line is an agreement or disagreement with Vegas, not a belief or disbelief in one of the teams.

Got it?

Sorta... kinda...

Good. I'm going to bed. If you have more questions, talk to one of our resident sports gamblers. At least now you won't be confused when you see Minn +16 against an opponent and wonder how they could be favored.

  • Blazefire's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 19th, 2010 at 12:53 AM
#2
bdsisme
bdsisme's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 9061
Nice job.

Now what's "the moneyline"?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 12:55 AM
(Reply to #2) #3
TJ
TJ's picture
Joined: 02/22/2010
MGoPoints: 553
Agreed

What the eff is that? 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 11:50 AM
(Reply to #4) #4
CAHLChamp
CAHLChamp's picture
Joined: 10/14/2010
MGoPoints: 167
Money line

The money line is the same "Handicap" idea, again with the goal to get equal money on both teams.  Instead of giving up points to bet the favorite, you give up money.  If the money line is Wisc - 180, you would have to bet $180 to win $100.  Conversely the underdog (Michigan) may be + 140, meaning by betting $100 you would win $140.  But both of these bets are STRAIGHT UP, with no points given of received

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 6:01 PM
(Reply to #16) #5
treetown
Joined: 11/10/2010
MGoPoints: 2240
Exactly - money line is an easier way of explaining odds

Money lines are easier to handle in most people's minds rather than odds. Betting $180 to win $100 is easier than 1.8 to 1 odds. A -200 is just a 1 to 2 - you'd have to bet $200 on Wisconsin to win 100. And Michigan would be +200 or a 2 to 1 - bet 100 to make 200.

Betting lines and propositions try to be (1) simple ideas to grasp, (2) clear cut wagering - bet x to win y, (3) seemingly based on a disparity in strength - when it is really about a disparity in perception.  Does anyone know who the Utah upset of Alabama did a few years ago? That is considered an upset with Alabama on paper being favored. ? Did the line cost the books money? Or did the line split the betting pool despite a large Alabama fan base probably picking the tide?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 12:53 AM
#6
Dan Man
Dan Man's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 762
Well, that was a waste of

Well, that was a waste of time.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 1:04 AM
#7
Milwaukee_MGoBlue
Milwaukee_MGoBlue's picture
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 265
But, how much money does it take....

to make it rain?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 9:48 AM
(Reply to #5) #8
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1671
I don't know Blazefire

I don't know Blazefire personally so I could be wrong but you should probably ask Lil Wayne that question.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 10:09 AM
(Reply to #5) #9
Biakabutuka Smash
Biakabutuka Smash's picture
Joined: 09/27/2010
MGoPoints: 224
It depends on how large you

It depends on how large you want the raindrops to be, a good estimate is 2000 x size

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 1:09 AM
#10
MGoShtoink
MGoShtoink's picture
Joined: 11/05/2010
MGoPoints: 8523
Who the hell were you talking

Who the hell were you talking to?

 

But seriously, thanks, nicely done.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 1:47 AM
#11
Blue_n_Aww
Blue_n_Aww's picture
Joined: 08/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1949
The only thing I disagree

The only thing I disagree with is, I think, a common fallacy among sports betters:

 

"Yes, shocking, I know. that line they set... that's not really what they think would be an accurate handicap for the teams. If I were going to set a true handicap for the teams, I'd probably give Michigan abou a 7 handicap versus Wisconsin. If you added a touchdown to Michigan's final score, I think they'd come out tied in an average game.Yes, shocking, I know. that line they set... that's not really what they think would be an accurate handicap for the teams. If I were going to set a true handicap for the teams, I'd probably give Michigan abou a 7 handicap versus Wisconsin. If you added a touchdown to Michigan's final score, I think they'd come out tied in an average game."

 

The flaw in this logic is that, if this were really the case, many many more people could beat sports betting than actually do. What you're really saying is that the betting public will tend to bet on Michigan's side more than on Wisconsin's side, for whatever reason. This might actually be true if you talk to a small town bookie in Ann Arbor (or Columbus in the case of OSU).

The problem with this logic is that if the line gets too far out of whack, smart sports bettors will absolutely kill Vegas by betting a lot of money on Wisconsin. If these bettors are correct that Wisconsin should be a 7 point favorite over Michigan, they win and Vegas loses. And if they do that, the spread will naturally go more and more towards Michigan's favor until the amount of money bet on each team is approximately equal. This is why spreads move during the week: they are indications of the market.

All of this is to say that, while it's true that you're betting against the odds makers, the odds makers make their money, not by reading public opinion, but by being more correct than the public. Also by charging vig.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 10:01 AM
(Reply to #7) #12
RSTJ
Joined: 02/27/2010
MGoPoints: 197
I like you, and your

I like you, and your thoughts.  People always gloss over this, but lines move throughout the week based on single bets and betting trends.  I believe Miami Ohio/Akron was on tuesday (akron and somebody), the line moved 4 points toward akron and they hadn't won a game.  The spread was under 10 by game time and Akron covered.

Personally (feel free to disagree), I see Vegas as the best power ranking.  The people willing to drop tons of cash on these games have algorithms and other methods to determine the value of XYZ team. They take all emotion out of it and look at the numbers.  Reverse trend lines are generally a huge indication of this.  Mich/Wisc is an example of this, majority of the public is putting money on Wisconsin (favorite, 9-1, etc), while the spread is moving toward michigan.  Obviously, someone dropped serious cash on Michigan at 6, 5.5, 5, and 4.5.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 2:12 PM
(Reply to #7) #13
Nick
Nick's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1094
thank you

popular misconception.  Vegas puts the line where they think they game will end up.  Or else they get absolutely hammered by wiseguys.

Public opinion dont mean shit

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 8:27 AM
#14
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 26813
Two things

First, talking to yourself is not a waste of time, because you get to talk to someone who really knows what he's talking about. Second, he really knows how to listen.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 9:56 AM
#15
beenplumb
beenplumb's picture
Joined: 10/15/2010
MGoPoints: 1450
Thanks

for this. I always wondered what that number meant.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 10:52 AM
#16
Magnum P.I.
Magnum P.I.'s picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11281
Too much work, but

it would be a supercool feature if Brian et al. could create an algorithm that would allow MGoBloggers to bet MGoPoints on games and have the "line" automatically adjust based on betting patterns.

People care enough about their MGoPoints that it would actually generate some realistic betting methinks. I've got 200 points on U-M +4!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 11:06 AM
#17
tlh908
tlh908's picture
Joined: 09/25/2010
MGoPoints: 2667
Thanks for the entertaining

Thanks for the entertaining intro class on betting.  It clears it up so I can understand the background.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 11:10 AM
#18
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 14048
Short answer

Wisconsin -4 = Michigan

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 12:26 PM
(Reply to #15) #19
treetown
Joined: 11/10/2010
MGoPoints: 2240
betting lines

In most sports the wagering is often based on picking the winner or order of finish: 1st, 2nd or 3rd. Games like football where there is incremental scoring the result isn't just that team A beat team B, but there is a record of by how many points, runs, goals, etc.

As you nicely point out the betting line is way of gauging the relative strength of the two sides in a manner consistent with the game. Key to these lines however is that the betting lines aren't just about an accurate assessment of the relative strength - it is also a way of judging the wagering public's perception of the strength. And perception in this case may be the most important factor. The sports books ideally want a line which would draw equal amounts of wagering on both sides. They make their money off of the percentage charged for each wager, so a neatly split betting pool nearly eliminates any risk they have. They win and lose equally and profit on their wagering fee - this is no small potatoes when millions of dollars are involved each weekend.

In some sports where there isn't incremental scoring or where the scoring is harder to figure out (ex: tennis, one doesn't see a wagering line that Roger Federer is -15 games or -2 sets versus Andy Murray) one usually sees odds given. Team A for example might be cited as a 3 to 1 favorite to beat Team B. Again the point is to make the line tantalizing enough to attract an equal wagering pool. Team A may be clearly better, but a 3 to 1 return may be high enough to tempt betters to bet on Team B.

The line usually shifts as the money is bet so an opening line may gradually shift again in order ideally to balance out the bets.

I apologize if this is all old hat to the experienced bettors here, but it is worth emphasizing that in betting it is the appearance or perception of the betting line which is critical and the actual accuracy of the line is less so. For the statisticians, the situation is reversed; they are seeking accurate prognostic stats to help them better predict the actual results and don't really worry when those results may surprise conventional perception.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 12:44 PM
(Reply to #15) #20
SaveTheDolphins
Joined: 09/10/2009
MGoPoints: 595
That's

how I always remember it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 12:24 PM
#21
m1jjb00
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 5350
You asked why most of us know

You asked why most of us know this.  Perhaps, they had the same conversation as I did:

Dad: Finished riding your Big Wheel?

Me: Yep.  Say, why do you have that pile of money?

Dad: Gotta go to Jordans and give it to my investment counselor.

Me:  Oh.  Jets didn't cover, huh.

Dad: Yep.

Me:  You should have bought the hook.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 12:43 PM
#22
Gene
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 439
Vegas doesn't "lie"

If the goal of Vegas in setting the line was to generate betting, they would set the line way out of whack, which would get a ton of people to bet (what betting man wouldn't at, say, Michigan -20?) Problem is, doing so will kill Vegas since all those people would likely, y'know, win. No, that's not what Vegas is doing. Instead, they're trying to balance the money on either side of the bet - that way, regardless of the way the actual game goes, half the bets win and half the bets lose. Vegas makes their cut, nothing less, nothing more. Even though each wager is against Vegas, by balancing their bets Vegas actually has minimal risk with essentially nothing on the line. As such, the line represents not what Vegas thinks (about anything, neither the game nor public opinion) but rather where the betting "market" places the game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 2:15 PM
(Reply to #19) #23
Nick
Nick's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1094
no no no

vegas doesnt do this. while they would like to have equal money on both sides, they cant move a line just to do that.

 It will get hammered by big bettors who know what they are doing and vegas will wind up with a couple hundred thousand dollar bets as liabilities on one side if their line just plays to public perception.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 3:48 PM
(Reply to #22) #24
RSTJ
Joined: 02/27/2010
MGoPoints: 197
Some of the bigger betters

Some of the bigger betters even "set up" some of the bookies. They'll place a "small" bet on one side to move the line one way and then drop 4x much on the other.

 

For example, line starts at 5.5 for mich/wisc

Person X puts 2500 on Wisconsin, and gets the line to 6.5, then goes back and drops 10k on michigan.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 4:34 PM
(Reply to #23) #25
Horace Prettyman
Horace Prettyman's picture
Joined: 07/14/2010
MGoPoints: 238
Bad strategy

The expected value of and extra point or two on the line does not outweight the expected losses of betting both sides of the game.

To if you drop 20% of your money on the other team to improve a line, you would need your ecpected value to win the big bet to increase by over 20%.  1 or 2 points on the line doesn't equate to that big of advantage in winning.  You would lose lots of money doing this.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 9:08 PM
(Reply to #24) #26
WolverineBlue
WolverineBlue's picture
Joined: 01/09/2010
MGoPoints: 564
Maybe not so bad

Sorry, but your analysis is not correct. The initial bet to move the line is not a complete throwaway and has almost as much chance of paying off as the main bet; so in addition to serving the purpose of moving the line to a more favorable position, it also serves as something of an insurance policy against loss.

In the previous example, let's suppose you estimate that the probability of Michigan winning or Wisconsin winning by 5 or less is 55%, the probability of a 6 point Wisconsin win is 10%, and the probability of a Wisconsin win by 7 or more is 35%. Then a straight $12,500 bet against the -5.5 line would yield an expected return of $13,062.50 (a $562.50 average profit, assuming a $1.90 payoff for each dollar bet, counting house cut). Now if an initial $2500 bet on Wisconsin moved the line to -6.5, the new expected return would be $2137.50 on the Wisconsin bet (a $312.50 loss) and $12,350 (a $2,350 profit) on the $10000 Michigan bet (against a -6.5 line). So your net expected profit goes from $562.50 to $2037.50!

Now there are lots of caveats here: it is unlikely that a $2500 bet will move a Vegas line by a full point, a 10% probability for an exact 6 point margin is somewhat high, and the ability to accurately assess probabilities significantly better than the Vegas line requires great skill. Still, the point is that betting on both sides of a moving line can present some profit opportunities for skilled gamblers, especially if that movement is by several points.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 19th, 2010 at 11:38 PM
#27
ST3
ST3's picture
Joined: 09/11/2010
MGoPoints: 31874
next week's assignment

explain parlays and teasers

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.