Its all about DENARD
How sweet it is...... Remember me ? I'm the guy who since day one has said Denard Robinson is a total gamer, and the guy you want with the ball in your hands at crunch time, and it is he who should be talked about, even moreso than Forcier. I even went on to say that he'll be our starting qb this season at least 50% of the time, and I got chastised pretty good here, leading to insults. I was told he cannot throw, he only completes 50% of passes, etc, etc, yet I maintained that in our new offense with young players, it'll be Denard who takes over, not Forcier. I said to trust your eyes, and watch Denard's films.
My praise of Denard really drew out alot of dickheads on this forum, and you all know who you are. You know, the same ones who will be saying they knew all along how great Denard was gonna be.
I will say it again for those of you with selective memory and those who still have Forcier's shlong in their mouths.. ITS ALL ABOUT DENARD, and remember, it was DICLEMEG who has been telling you so since MARCH.
My praise of Denard really drew out alot of dickheads on this forum, and you all know who you are. You know, the same ones who will be saying they knew all along how great Denard was gonna be.
I will say it again for those of you with selective memory and those who still have Forcier's shlong in their mouths.. ITS ALL ABOUT DENARD, and remember, it was DICLEMEG who has been telling you so since MARCH.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:04 AM ^
I agree with your sentiment, but you're a total fucking douchebag. Nobody likes "I Told You So".
But Denard's fucking sweet.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:08 AM ^
chitownbrown...go back and read the attacks i got for it.
if i were to say i told you so a million times, it still would be justified.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:11 AM ^
You'd still sound like a douche though. If it's not too much trouble (and I doubt it is...) I'd like to see links to some of those threads.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:16 AM ^
correction, since MARCH, not April....
http://mgoblog.com/content/its-all-about-denard
http://mgoblog.com/content/its-all-about-denard-0
August 24th, 2009 at 10:59 AM ^
I too, have sang Denards praises here for a long time (but admittedly have never walked out on that "very large limb" FWIW wouldn't a very tiny limb be more of a risk?????) and have thought in my mind that the QB race would be closer than many thought. The difference is I am not dumb enough (and I find it hard to believe Galileo was either) to proclaim I am right before a decision has even been made. Since you obviously like science you will remember the word hypothesis....It is your prediction of the outcome of an experiment. That is the stage you are currently at.
Also, if you were as intellegent as you seem to think you are you would know that people hate to be told "I told you so". You would also be secure enough in your intellegence that you would be content to simply know you were right and leave it at that. What tells me you are not nearly as intellegent as you think you are is the fact that you are questioning why you are receiving so many negative points. Any idoit could figure that out.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:05 AM ^
Wow, will I be a certified douchebag when I get my CoE diploma too?
August 24th, 2009 at 11:12 AM ^
Okay, I just wasted my day enough to go back to read the threads; I discovered that you didn't get roasted until you became arrogant enough to return and repeat your prediction with ZERO added evidence.
Oh, and the reason I didn't remember your name, diclemeg, is because I was student teaching Corey Miller and his classmates (you may have heard of him, FSU fans) and therefore somewhat busy at the time.
Oh, and while I'm at it:
BOOM! Banhammer'd.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:18 AM ^
maybe so, but true greatness is hardly ever understood by small minds like yourself.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:23 AM ^
Me:
You:
August 24th, 2009 at 10:25 AM ^
now THAT is more like it
August 24th, 2009 at 10:42 AM ^
You do realize that you eventually end up like this right?
[EDITED] Ok, so the pic of Christopher Reeve in a wheelchair with one of the muppets was probably in bad taste. My apologies.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:19 AM ^
-1 for using your better judgment...
(I didn't really neg you for this)
August 24th, 2009 at 3:54 PM ^
Chitown predicted Denard too (yes, I will grant without checking that you were first) but went on to say that he, like most any of us, ultimately doesn't know what he's talking about when predicting the starter between guys WEVE NEVER SEEN PLAY. That's called perspective. You predicted it supported by "trust me fellas, I've watched all the videos." Try again, I'm not buying.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:07 AM ^
All I read was:
I ... still have Forcier's schlong in ... mouths.We'll see who starts in a couple weeks, could go either way at this point.
August 24th, 2009 at 12:30 PM ^
Yep..it's still very early and we just don't know yet. I'm guessing that both (all three?) will get plenty of snaps on 9/5 and then the fun can really begin...some opinions based on playing in an actual college game.
The beauty of this is that it seems like we have 2 guys that folks are excited about and arguing for...such a better position than last summer at this time. I wasn't on this blog then but I'm guessing the arguments were more along the lines of trying to figure out who sucks the least.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:09 AM ^
I agree... Douchebag! BUT, you are correct that Denard is the Guy! He has a bit of a swagger to him and it looked like Tate was hanging his head a bit in the last interview, almost admitting that Denard was taking over the lead! At the Fan Appreciation Day it also looked like Nick Sheridan was out of it too. That's too bad. I hope that they all keep pushing each other to be better. An article in the Free Press (I think it was the Free Press) talks about who ever loses the battle for the starting spot will likely transfer. Is that what college sports is coming to?!? I don't remember that happening much 10 years ago...
August 24th, 2009 at 10:12 AM ^
Can you really say "I told you so" before the season has even begun? And when the three quarterbacks are splitting reps with the first team?
This is a ridiculous post. I can't believe you made a diary out of this. If I could neg you more than once, I would.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:16 AM ^
ive been saying it since March, but you clowns were so blind with Forcier to see it.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:19 AM ^
all that and a bag of chips. I also hope Tate is too, because I'm a M football fan.
However, the season hasn't started, RR has not named a starter so wait a few weeks and then proclaim how smart you are.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:32 AM ^
Sounds really good right now. Sour Cream and Cheddar Ruffles.....anyone else?
August 24th, 2009 at 10:20 AM ^
Even if you've been saying "It's all about Denard" since then, HE HASN'T PLAYED A DOWN NOR HAS HE BEEN NAMED THE STARTER.
That's like me saying there's going to be an earthquake in L.A. on December 18 . . . and then saying "I told you so!" on Thanksgiving.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:24 AM ^
good for you magnus... all you have done is prove you cannot see the bigger picture.
galileo was also chastised.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:33 AM ^
Did you seriously just fucking compare yourself to galileo?
August 24th, 2009 at 10:34 AM ^
was a physicist, astronomer, mathematician, discovered four moons of Jupiter, and was responsible for the birth of modern science.
You predicted something that has not yet happened.
Now shut up about Denard before your stupid postings tar my view of the guy BEFORE HE EVEN SETS FOOT ON THE FIELD FOR MICHIGAN.
By the way, this is the 3rd of the allowable 20 Board/Diary posts per day about Denard Robinson on the MGoBlog.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:17 AM ^
So he should have compared himself to Nostradamus.
August 26th, 2009 at 8:25 AM ^
Nostradumbass.
Ok, that was juvenile, but christ, "I told you so"?
August 24th, 2009 at 10:38 AM ^
You know what? Plus motherfucking one.
Any time someone compares themselves - without any sense of irony - to Galileo, that's a plus one. Book it.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:04 AM ^
Agreed, +1. This is the single most funny thing I have ever read on this board.
August 24th, 2009 at 1:34 PM ^
was so smart, then how come he's dead?
August 24th, 2009 at 5:26 PM ^
He danced with the devil in the pale moonlight.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:33 AM ^
you can do it!
Neg the OP
Neg every reply he makes.
Easy-peasy!
If you really want to be a pain, create another (multiple) accounts so that you can neg him some more!
Or we can just neg him once, and ignore him because we all have work to be doing...Now I have to go before my boss walks in...
August 24th, 2009 at 10:42 AM ^
this is how we reward greatness, so be it.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:04 AM ^
how we reward who? Am I going to get negbanged? Hello?
August 24th, 2009 at 11:06 AM ^
Well played, well played. +1
August 24th, 2009 at 10:16 AM ^
I am predicting that diclemeg gets a lot of negative votes for this one before it is removed, and that the neg effect will only be compounded by each subsequent O.P. reply.
You heard it here first.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:37 AM ^
typcial piece of shit you are.
instead of giving a someone props for going out on a major limb since march, you do the exact opposite. grow the fuck up.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:53 AM ^
You actually just said that. On the internet. To someone you may never know. Over a QB selection which will be made (BY OUR COACHES AND NOT ONE OF US) sometime in the future. Normally I hold back on joining in on a negbang, but you pretty much brought this on yourself in the worst way, sorry.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:05 AM ^
My praise of Denard really drew out alot of dickheads on this forum
those who still have Forcier's shlong in their mouths
true greatness is hardly ever understood by small minds like yourself
ive been saying it since March, but you clowns were so blind with Forcier to see it
But the small minds here could simply not do so, due to cognitive dissonance generated by the bombardment of Forcier fluff.
There was no other way to deliver the information through to the derelicts here
Yes, you’re right. Misopogon is the one that needs to grow up. Good comment. Kisses and hugs to you.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:01 AM ^
You started out being fun crazy. You peaked with the Galileo comment.
Now you just suck. Oh well. It was fun while it lasted.
August 24th, 2009 at 11:11 AM ^
Okay, well my prophesy came true, how about some props for that?
If yours comes true, on my honor, I swear I will come back and give you a Plus 1 on this post, and on one other reply. That's +4 MGoBlog points, for the -2 I have taken from you today.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:18 AM ^
You may be right, but we won't know until the season actually starts.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:22 AM ^
Thanks for pushing the awesome hs scouting report off the front page.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:25 AM ^
I can't wait to see how RR gets both of these talented FR on the field at the same time. Even if Tate, or Sheridan, get the start, you just know the coaches want Denard on the field bc of the 'big play' potential. And if you focus on that the Minor or Brown run you over. I can't wait til the 5th.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:36 AM ^
I don't think it really counts as the "wildcat" (a.k.a. the single wing) when your backup quarterback plays quarterback.
If it does count as the "wildcat", then it's certainly not the same thing as when Ronnie Brown or Darren McFadden runs it.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:26 AM ^
to talk about who was right and who was wrong in predicting the starting QB before the first game when no starters have been named? Not to mention if Denard does start that means he is BETTER than Forcier which would be fantastic for us Michigan fans considering what Forcier has done so far. I just think it is great that this year we actually have TOO many good QB's to talk about.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:30 AM ^
realize i got a zillion negative posts, for communicating what is soon to be truth, well before its time.
how could i have possibly been more right, and credited for it in a proper way? im curious.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:39 AM ^
"how could i have possibly been more right, and credited for it in a proper way?"
You could have started by...you know...waiting to see whether you're right or not.
August 24th, 2009 at 3:12 PM ^
That may have been the appropriate approach.
August 24th, 2009 at 8:04 PM ^
You were not neg-banged for your opinion of Denard Robinson...
You were neg-banged for being a douche. It sucks that you need to post this crap on a blog's message board to get satisfaction in your life.
August 24th, 2009 at 10:30 AM ^
If you're going to try to pull an "I told you so" you should probably at least wait until it happens...
Comments