My thoughts exactly.
Hockey pet peeve: "when a teammate tips a puck in on you, which is exactly how my first collegiate goal against happened. Thanks, Copper."
From my observations and what
has been written on this blog and in the MSM, I believe that we have changed our
recruiting focus from one that was more heavily focused on retaining all of the
talent within the State of Michigan and capturing what we can get in the
surrounding states (Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois) as well as a few athletes
from certain talent hotbeds (Florida, Texas and California) to a greater
emphasis being placed on recruiting from the talent hot beds. What are the ramifications of this philosophical
shift? And how have coaching changes
resulted in shifts in intra-region power?
The risk is that we chase
windmills and fail to land equal or better talent in the southeast and cede talent
within the State of Michigan
talent to MSU. The Spartans then gain an
ability to win the recruits we want and there is a possible shift in power. As I stated before, the mitigant to this is our
continued success on the field and fostering relationships between the program and
the high schools within the state.
Observations and Parallels:
Is RR’s focus on talent
outside of the home state due to his time at WVU where there was far less
instate talent than in Michigan? I’m not implying that Michigan is OH, PA, FL, TX or CA, but it is
clearly better than WV. One thing that
seems clear, is that the tenures of Bobby Williams and John L. Smith (and the
Spartans refer to us as slappies??) decimated the in-state recruiting at
MSU. While there were not great numbers
of Plaxico’s and Duckett’s at MSU there were some clear examples of players we
wanted but State got. BW and JLS seemed
to have killed this very nicely.
There have been some
interesting changes in balance of power within different regions during the
last 10-15 years that may provide interesting insight.
This post is to generate
discussion, as many of the ideas I have included have not been researched,
rather are observations of mine that seem to fit together with some degree of
My thoughts exactly.
Thanks. My apologies for the crappy formatting at the top. I can't seem to clear out the html tags.
I am sure down the road we'll be hearing something about esssss eeeeeee ceeeee speed and how RR is trying to steal it.
Good point about MSU though, I had the same question. One thing that I thought of, however, is will the state of Michigan become more open recruiting ground for schools like Wisconsin, PSU, and OSU because of RR's change to the spread?
I think many of us kind of assume MSU would pick up the big power backs and Statuesque QBs and 350 pound lineman that are left over. But if a Water Buffalo drop-back pocket QB, for example, is a real 4 or 5 star talent - I could see some of the other powers coming in and winning those battles vs. MSU.
I agree with you overall, but in your first #2 point, at least for this year and probably the next, UM will probably fall into the 2nd tier of the Big Ten, going to a bowl game, but not in serious contention for the Big Ten championship or a national title.
I think RR may be focusing more out of state because he and his coaches have already built up relationships with those out of state coaches. Of course, he's also quick to take advantage of a situation where there's a previous regime relationship and work it to his advantage, ie Cass Tech, Trotwood Madison, and Orlando Edgewater. I think that the more years RR is established in MI, the better his recruiting in MI will be, as more coaches will move over to the spread that he teaches, producing players that fit into his mold, et cetera. Until then, there's the potential for Sparty to land a few good classes of in state recruits.
As for this year, if you look at MSU's 4*'s, many of the offensive skill players don't fit RR's spread, 1 OL is from East Lansing, 1 OL was stolen from Iowa (zomg snake oil!), 2 RBs were offered and committed during the time that RR's staff was just getting onboard. The only matchup that UM clearly whiffed on was Chris Norman. We'll just have to see how Dantonio will do now. He has a couple of classes coming through now that are not highly regarded, if he can hold his own until the current recruits can start making a difference, AND the next 3-4 years are mediocre at UM, he might be able to turn it around.
Arg the formatting is still screwing up on me
I wouldn't rule it out. I would just assume that State is a more likely destination.
From the same theoretical stand point, it is no coincidence that the rise of MSU basketball coincides with the fall of Michigan basketball.
I do think that our recruiting out of state in football will be good enough to offset any gains MSU might make in-state. This is because we will still be able to cherry pick the guys we want instate and have a big enough brand name to get the guys we want out of state. I would say we are the biggest brand name running this type of offense so we should easily pickup the guys we need to run it from out of state.
Already one effect of Rich Rod in town now is that Cass Tech, a yearly hotbed of top talent, is switching to the spread offense. So yeah, as more schools in Michigan start switching to the spread, there will be more players developed that will fit our offense's mold and be more inclined to play for us than MSU.
That's a good point. High school teams generally put their best athlete at QB, so it only makes sense for more of them to run an offense similar to ours. (And the city of Detroit is overwhelmingly pro-UM; Detroit schools aren't going to want to produce square pegs for our system.)