I Am So Confused (or Why Do My Four-Stars Suck?)
Note: The data is from Rivals; I recognize that they have some different class (fresh, soph, etc.) info than I expected on some players, but for consistency, I used their data as published.
I am no Steve Sharik or gsimms, but after watching Iowa play defense Saturday night, I have to report back to Houston that there is a problem, and it’s not just our players. I just don’t buy Brian’s comment in his “Soaring” post that “Michigan's recruiting was wildly deficient in more than one area and will be an anchor going forward.” We may lack depth, but the guys on the front lines are supposed to be studs. Individually, many look like studs – Graham and Warren and Martin and Roh and even Brown this year – but put them together and Indiana shreds us.
Iowa's defense is better than ours. A lot better. This doesn't surprise anyone reading this, but the point I wish to make is not that they are better, but how in the name of Shiva the Destroyer is such a thing possible?
Let's look at the two defenses:
The Iowa defense is younger than ours overall and features a less-experienced secondary that averages 5.3 for a Rivals Rating, or a middle range two-star. Brian says about Michigan, “There is exactly one junior and no seniors at both safety and cornerback.” Iowa has less experience. Yet my gut tells me – with absolute certainty – Darryl Clark will have a far better day against our secondary. Who wants to take me up on that bet?
In general, their players are more lowly rated at every position (possible exception of one LB), often significantly so, with players converted from the offensive side of the ball (a TE turned DL) and one playing out of position.
Now one of two things is true.
- All our studs coming out of high school were overrated and we can say things like Cissoko isn’t good and Van Bergen isn’t good and our LBs aren’t good with a straight face and a shrug towards our bad evaluation of talent over two coaches, or
- Our coaching/scheme is flawed. The front line talent is there (no depth, I know), but they either haven’t been developed or the system hurts their performance.
Occam’s Razor makes it difficult to accept that our stud HS talent was pretty much collectively overrated, and Iowa’s meh HS talent was pretty much vastly underrated. Ferentz would have given a kidney to have Cissoko or Warren or Graham or Brown or Mouton or Martin. He doesn’t have enough organs to bargain with the devil to get those types of players with mega-hype coming out of HS, yet he easily is fielding a better defense that probably would have consumed Indiana whole without any sauce.
As for the “new system” argument – that switching from Shafer to Robinson has resulted in our guys being at the start of a new learning curve – I accept some of that, but not all. Now, I will defer to Sharik or gsimms to tell me whether a new system can transform studs into non-studs, but it would seem to me that stopping Eastern in the first half or stopping Indiana at all would frequently be possible with raw stud talent playing by instinct.
Please understand that I am not traditionally negative, and that I am really seeking an answer from people who know more about football than I do. Is our system/defensive coordinator sound? Are most of our players overrated? Would Iowa's starters on defense playing for Michigan and GERG be playing at the same high level? Or would Brian be observing that an unrated player (a walk-on, I assume) was playing in the secondary?
September 28th, 2009 at 2:46 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:49 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:56 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:01 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:08 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:52 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:59 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:53 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:42 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:58 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:04 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 2:59 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:06 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:23 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 10:12 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 10:15 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:07 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:10 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:13 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:18 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:22 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:33 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:49 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 7:14 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:23 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:35 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:45 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:41 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:04 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:26 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:52 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 3:51 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:05 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:21 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:57 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:24 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:16 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:23 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:20 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:17 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:26 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:28 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:32 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 4:53 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:16 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:27 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:42 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:58 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 10:04 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 7:29 PM ^
Comments