Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Diaries Seth's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (50)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 4 hours ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 1 day ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 2 days ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 802 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 734 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 726 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 694 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 513 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 17 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 14 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Jersey Name Patches
    8 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    51 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    39 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    24 replies
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    41 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    29 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    39 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    126 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    58 replies
  • BTN Tourney Baseball
    12 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    38 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    128 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    51 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    47 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    46 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    51 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    39 replies
  • Jersey Name Patches
    8 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    39 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    29 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    24 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    126 replies
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    41 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    31 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    58 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    128 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    47 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    51 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    143 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    128 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    126 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more

Formations Guide

By Seth — August 15th, 2012 at 1:59 PM — 12 comments
Filed under:
  • formations

The following are images I created while putting together this week's Museday. I figured they might be useful here for future discussions of alignment and such. I can build more and add as we need.

Spread 5-Wide

Personnel005-5wide

The offense has gone 5-wide with an empty backfield. Rather than tip their hand  and delve into the 5th spot on the receiver depth chart, offenses will have a running back as one of the slot backs, and maybe a tight end too, so 005 personnel is pretty rare outside of Hail Mary situations. Some teams with a running QB will do this to give the QB and his line a 6-on-5 in the box. Defense counters with a dime back. In an obvious passing situation the 5-tech could easily be lifted for another linebacker to patrol the middle.

Diamond

Personnel014-diamond

The diamond formation (there are variants, some of which are unbalanced) is all about creating space away from the box for a talented receiver to get a free release and/or lots of blockers on a screen. MSU used it a bunch last year to utilize Keyshawn Martin's skills. If you're going against defensive backs who can't tackle or avoid blocks very well, it can be devastating, however it's really just a wrinkle, not an offense.

Wildcat

Wildcat

This is another package rather than a full offense. Note that the QB is split out as a slot receiver. Also note the personnel: 2 backs, 1 tight end. This is part of the Wilcat's success—it creates a spread look but until they line up this way the defense is matching personnel to a two-receiver set.

Spread

Personnel104-ace

I've shown just one response to an under-center spread formation that Michigan used last year. Note that the SLB is mismatched against a slot receiver here. The more the offense spreads the field, the more linebackers end up playing in space. Often a 104 will be matched with a  dime formation for this reason.

Twins

Twins

"Twins" or "Trips" refers to receivers lining up on the same side of the formation, or maybe motioning there. How the defense reacts can tip whether they're in a man or zone coverage. Michigan in 2010 liked to do this in order to clear out the boundary corner and run Denard left with the halfback as lead blocker, putting pressure on the filling free safety and backside pursuit to close it down before Denard was free. When it worked we usually exclaimed something to the effect of "Martell Webb: secret weapon." Note how the linebackers have essentially swapped jobs because of the shift. Rather than come across with the receiver, the boundary corner will often come in where the WLB is set up here, and the SAM is left to deal with the slot receiver.

The Shotgun, the Nickel, and the Okie

Personnel113-shotgun

The most common offense Michigan has faced over the last four years, and is likely to see the most often again this year. Note the three WR draws a nickelback in to guard the space in the slot. However there's no rule saying the defense has to defend its 3rd and longs with a passive nickel. Here's the Okie:

Okie Okie Okie Okie Okie! This is a designer alignment that threatens rushers from all over the line in order to confuse blocking assignments, but is otherwise your standard NFL-style 3-4 zone blitz.

OKIE

The Future

Personnel122

Michigan will continue to use many sets but this one is particularly good for running with power while still having a killer passing game thanks to the abilities of the tight ends to reach many different routes and the relative isolation of talented receivers against CBs. It's an even formation that can attack either side equally, so the defense can't pick any one side to overload. Some variants on the 122:

Personnel122-ace

Putting the TEs on the line gives the WRs a better release and gets them closer to their blocks. The downside is the U-back can't move before the snap anymore, so motion has to come from the WRs or the HB.

Personnel122-shotgun

Same look as the first except the QB is in the shotgun. This makes the quarterback more of a rushing threat and the halfback less of one, a decent trade-off if Devin Gardner's legs are part of your quarterback. In 2014 I expect this will be our base offense as we transition to the power game, though it will take some development from the tight ends to get there.

Things You Do With Fullbacks:

Personnel203-iform

This is a good formation to run with even though you don't have tight ends because the defense has matched the receivers with a nickelback. The FB can motion and should have lots of room in the flat to receive. A favorite of West Coast enthusiasts everywhere when the offense thinks it can win up-front but doesn't want pesky OLBs getting all over things.

Personnel203-shotgun

In the shotgun the fullback is a "Superback" and hardly different from the RB. This is another run formation without tight ends like above except, again, you are trading the RB's downhill head start for the ability to use your QB's legs or get a pass off quickly. Expect to see this formation on 3rd down this year as Michigan loves Vincent Smith's blocking ability and the tight ends are iffy.

Personnel212-iformPersonnel212-iform2

Offsetting the fullback gives him a head start on blocking in that direction or leaking out into a receiving route. Putting him inline in a true I-formation makes him a quicker strike on the FB dive and better ISO blocker on a run down the middle.

Personnel212-splitbacks

Split-backs is a compromise between some of the shotgun's strengths and weaknesses and the I-form's. It's a great inside or outside running set that provides the passer a comfortable protection shell, is why this was used so much by Michigan in the Brady & Navarre periods, and why it's still found in the NFL.

Going "Big"

Personnel221-iform4-4

Big sets are for running with lead blockers. You can go big from a shotgun or whatever. Note that the defense will usually respond to this near sellout set with a bigger front and a stacked box (here another LB has come in for a safety while the original SAM has his hand down to give the defense a 5-man front). I meant for the field corner to come in tighter here, since he's now the edge defender. Michigan's Okie package sometimes riffed off of 4-4 personnel even though it's supposed to be a 3-man front technically, as the WDE and SLB acted as OLBs and the strong safety attacked from the edge.

Personnel221-iform5-3

Same thing, different defensive response. The safety has been lifted for an extra 3-tech. In this the nose tackle has two-gap responsibility but we've seen Michigan go with 5-3 personnel then put the SAM's hand down on the edge for a Bear look.

Goal Line

GOALLINE1WR

Close to the endzone the offense can no longer spread the field vertically, which hurts all offenses but the effect is felt greater on the passing game and its best formations, while running in a crowded area is still running in a crowded area. Teams will go BIG or forget about receivers altogether:

Personnel230goallinePersonnel320goalline

I'll update this cheatsheet as the year goes on and we see different things if people find it useful. Comments and suggestions welcome.

  • Seth's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 15th, 2012 at 2:21 PM | Genuine question, not (Score:2)
Michael Scarn
Michael Scarn's picture
Joined: 01/21/2011
MGoPoints: 1192

Genuine question, not snark:

In the diamond formation, and really anything where line strength and formation strength don't match up, wouldn't the line matchups be based on line strength? So in your example, the 5 tech would be on the tight end side? I could be totally off base but that was my understanding.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 3:25 PM | The 5T usually lines up on (Score:2)
Seth
Seth's picture
Joined: 10/14/2008
MGoPoints: 48305

The 5T usually lines up on the tight end side because the tight end often makes that side the strength of the formation. I've seen both ways -- the DEs have to be able to be interchangeable, or at least hold up doing the other's job, when the offense goes with designer formations/plays.

If they were to run out of that formation, the 5T is taking on an OT for the edge, while the WDE is up against the tight end, so for this formation that's the correct alignment. Note when Michigan ran the transcontinental out of a diamond (what it is after the motion) that it was a burly end coming in and trying to deflect the pass.

 

(Blogger alias: "Misopogon") This team is under construction. We thank you for your patience.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 2:34 PM | Nice work (Score:4 Normal)
EGD
EGD's picture
Joined: 09/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1878

This is easily one of the most useful pieces of football writing I've ever come across.  

I noticed last season that Borges used a lot of formations with stacked wide receivers.  I assumed he was doing that to help some of our smaller WRs get off the LOS--if so, then I imagine we'll see even more of that in 2012 since we have an even smaller group to work with.  Are those really separate formations, or just slight variations on the standard twins, trips, etc. sets?

"You will suffer humiliation when the team from my area defeats the team from your area." -- The Onion

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 3:20 PM | Wow, I'm going straight to (Score:1)
ChuckWood
ChuckWood's picture
Joined: 04/15/2011
MGoPoints: 1145

Wow, I'm going straight to NCAA 13.  I always wondered what package I was randomly clicking.  Now I know.

 

In all seriousness, great informative post.

It's the same old story. Boy finds girl, boy loses girl, girl finds boy, boy forgets girl, boy remembers girl, girls dies in a tragic blimp accident over the Orange Bowl on New Year's Day. 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 4:36 PM | This should be front page (Score:3 Normal)
Tauro
Tauro's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 656

This should be front page material...

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 4:49 PM | Nice Work (Score:2)
Marley Nowell
Marley Nowell's picture
Joined: 07/31/2008
MGoPoints: 2905

I would love to see a diagram for the 3 WR Stack that we saw last year which gave Denard a short/medium/long option

"Relax you panic monger" -Megatron

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 5:39 PM | The bit about QB runs away (Score:2 Normal)
Blueroller
Blueroller's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 403

The bit about QB runs away from the twins side is the kind of thing that adds so much to folks with my level of knowledge – maybe 20% of the way between zero and Seth. Posts like this are so helpful.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2012 at 1:57 AM | First off, (Score:2)
M Wolve
Joined: 09/04/2011
MGoPoints: 732

this is awesome.  Secondly, sorry to nit pick, but it looks like a lot of the 3 techs are playing head up on the guard instead of the outside shoulder for some of these diagrams.  That may be intentional for some of the formations, and I've only briefly looked at this, but I thought I'd point it out in case you missed it. 

Bring back Keith Jackson

  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2012 at 7:59 AM | Thanks -- when I was making (Score:2)
Seth
Seth's picture
Joined: 10/14/2008
MGoPoints: 48305

Thanks -- when I was making them initially I wasn't paying too close attention to pointing the points at the correct shoulder. However since I plan to make this a sticky once it's half-complete maybe I oughtta go back and fix those.

(Blogger alias: "Misopogon") This team is under construction. We thank you for your patience.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2012 at 6:02 PM | Cool. (Score:2)
M Wolve
Joined: 09/04/2011
MGoPoints: 732

Thanks again.

Bring back Keith Jackson

  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2012 at 4:02 PM | Thank you... so much. (Score:2)
MGoNOLA
MGoNOLA's picture
Joined: 11/01/2010
MGoPoints: 109

Thank you... so much.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2012 at 9:35 AM | Seth (Score:2)
TrppWlbrnID
TrppWlbrnID's picture
Joined: 10/29/2009
MGoPoints: 7890

Not to be a dick, but having the formation run perpendicular to the yard line image in the background is a bit....illogical. In some cases it might be helpful to see hash marks.

2013 resolution - make it onto the 2014 favorite MGoPosters post, not ironically
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.