knows how to take advantage of DG's talents. I believe a big year is in store for Mr. Gardner.
I'VE HAD JUST ABOUT ENOUGH OF YOU SONNY
I will not use an Outback Bowl pic, because uniformz
Devin Gardner replaces the most exciting--and perhaps most-liked--player in Michigan history. The QB-turned-WR-turned-QB got his first chance to lead his childhood favorite for Michigan's final five games in 2012, and did so with stunning success. For 9-out-of-10 halves, the Michigan passing offense was more efficient and more potent than it had been in years, with the only stinker coming in the second stanza of the Ohio debacle.
Against three ranked teams (NW, OSU, and South Carolina), Michigan scored 38, 21, and 28 points--and the 21 all came in one half. Michigan converted a ridiculous 56% of their 3rd downs with DG running the offense, which would have been good for #1 in the country.
The question: Is a five-game stretch during which the offense was a transitional patchwork of schemes and strategies from the Borges-Denard Fusion Cuisine model a good sample from which to predict DG's 2013 production?
The answer to that question is almost certainly NO. The reality is that only one game--the Outback Bowl--offered enough time for the offense to install a pro-style attack, and even for that game the unique talents of #16 were significantly altering Michigan's tendencies. So...where might we find a decent sample?
How dare he wear red
I'm not going to pretend Ryan Lindley is a perfect comparison: Lindley was a three-star recruit with offers from SDSU and...Idaho. He played in the Mountain West and never faced a team like Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio, or South Carolina. But there are some similarities, and perhaps most importantly:
Al is clearly excited he can still get his fist in front of his belly
The 2010 Ryan Lindley was the QB for a 9-4 SDSU team--roughly the average (or just below average) expectations for the 2013 version of the Wolverines. This is important, because a team losing a lot of games will throw more, and a team winning a lot of games will run more. /broad generalization
In 2010, the Aztecs (that's San Diego State's mascot) threw the ball 426 times and ran it 439. That's a 49/51 pass/run ratio, which is, like, really balanced. I expect Michigan to look similar this year, and perhaps be slightly more run-heavy since that seems to the strength of the young O-line (and it's easier for young guys). By comparison, in the five games where DG was QB in 2012, Michigan ran the ball 59% of the time, even though three of those games were extremely close. The Outback Bowl was more balanced, but still had to get #16 more involved, and finished with a 45/55 pass/run ratio.
Back to Lindley. He is similar to DG in that he is very strong-armed but maybe not as accurate as you'd like. DG is more accurate, and far more athletic, although Lindley moved decently and could throw on the run. I don't think Borges will call the plays that differently, but may coach DG to run a bit more when the lanes are there. Here's Lindley's 2010 stats:
That would be the best passing season in U-M history (yards and TDs), and by some distance (499 yards and 3 TDs). SDSU had two very good receivers who accounted for 136 (56%) of the team's 244 receptions and 67% of the teams passing yards. In fact, their third leading receiver (by yardage) wasn't a receiver at all--it was RB Brandon Sullivan (26 rec, 383 yds). The number four guy was a TE named Gavin Escobar, who is now in the NFL and racked-up 29 catches, 323 yards, and 4 TDs. I mention that because I believe those numbers are least we can expect from Funchess this year, and because I believe we'll have much more receiving production from our backfield.
Here are DG's numbers from last season, actual and extrapolated:
Even with the extrapolations, DG has nearly 100 fewer attempts than Lindley did. Again, I expect that to change, and would guess that DG will probably throw the ball 350-400 times. Michigan ran 820 plays in 2012, and I believe blowouts will allow DG to sit out a few quarters, giving around 20 attempts to other QBs.
The 2013 U-M version of Borges' WCO seems unlikely to have two near-equal WRs atop its receiving chart. Jeremy Gallon will likely lead all receivers, but Borges has a long history of having two primary WR targets in his offense, and that is good news for Amara Darboh. I expect that whoever emerges as the #2 WR will vastly exceed expectations and have at least 40 grabs. Of course, Funchess could take on that role, but that hasn't been the Borges pattern.
So what happens if you extraploate DG's numbers with another 50 attempts or so? Really good stuff:
Those stats would have made DG #16 in yards, #2 in yards/att, #9 in TD passes, and #8 in QB Rating nationally in 2012. He would still rank #66 in att/game, so we're not talking about a pass-happy offense.
In terms of Michigan history, that would be #1 in passing yardage, moving well ahead of Navarre's 3,331 in '03. It would be #1 in TDs, well ahead of Henne's 25 in '04. And it would be tied for #4 in completions. But before you say, "No way does DG set single-season records in yardage and TDs his first year as a starter!" consider this: DG's extrapolated 2012 numbers would make him #2 in yardage and #1 in TDs--and that was running a watered-down version of Borges' WCO. Even if you bump DG's yds/att down to Lindley's 9.1, you still finish with the #1 passing offense in U-M history, with Devin throwing for 3,412 yards.
This is obviously not a perfect prediction, but it is reasonable to believe that DG has a very good chance of having one of the best passing seasons in Michigan football history. Before you get too excited about that remember this, too: Lindley's '10 Aztecs went 9-4.
knows how to take advantage of DG's talents. I believe a big year is in store for Mr. Gardner.
The running game increases passing efficiency. Toussaint needs to tear it up this fall.
I hope Fitz has a good year, but just want a consistent running game to emerge. Whether it's Fitz, Green, Hayes, Johnson, Rawls, Smith...I don't really care as long as we have an effective ground game.
Is Tree City's most famous Gardner. He'll be planting TD's at record breaking pace this upcoming year. The last 5 games of 2012, albeit a lil rusty at times, was I think a prelude of what's to come.
What does THE KNOWLEDGE have to say about this?
but SDSU played 7 defenses that were statiscally worse than Michigans that year (quite possibly M's worst D ever). In their four losses they threw the ball at almost a 2 to 1 ratio including a 40+ pass game.
You can counter that by sayin that SDSU didn't have the weapons and talent that Michigan has and it balances out a bit. Of course SDSU played lesser opponents but of course they also played with lesser ability players.
It's not necessarily true. While Michigan has talent surrounding DG this upcoming year, San Diego St had very good talent around Lindley (6th round draft pick) in RB Ronnie Hillman (3rd Rd), WR Vincent Brown (3rd Rd), WR Demarco Sampson (7th Rd), and TE Gavin Escobar (2nd Rd). So while Michigan may have that kind of talent eventually, I don't think this year they do.
I agree. The comparison is a loose one, but, as I pointed out, simply extrapolating DG's numbers gets him to a record-setting season. My point is that this offense is favorable for a QB and that DG has the skill set to make it hum. If he throws the ball 375 times or so, expect his numbers to be among the best ever for U-M.
DG is the first (and only) 4000/1000 QB ever.
It would be cool to watch though.
That would be frickin awesome, but with Touissant on the rebound, bowling ball-manchild Derrick Green coming into the fold, and a new (and hopefully much improved) interior offensive line, I'm guessing Borges won't want Gardner having to run anywhere near close to 1000 yards.
Especially considering we have a little bit of a depth issue at QB right now.....
There weren't many called runs for Gardner last year except for an occassionally bootleg. Most of his runs came on scrambles. With little depth and no experienced depth at the QB position after Gardner, I don't expect Borges to be calling many running plays for Gardner.
Any projection of future performance should include a slight increase in QB efficiency now that DG has had the certainy of practicing exclusively at QB since mid-year (including a full spring, summer and fall)...or is some of that offset by opposing Ds that will be able to gameplan exclusively for a WCO and not have to worry about the Denard X factor?
Does it account for the ~10 quarters Shane Morris will see in mop-up duty?
The extrapolated yardage and TD numbers look very appealing, but hopefully the 15 INTs don't happen.
He [Lindley] played in the Mountain West and never faced a team like Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio, or South Carolina.
True ... but he did face TCU that year. TCU had the #1 passing defense, the #5 rushing defense, and the #1 overall defense that year. Lindley did not light the scoreboard with his passing (11-for-26, 262 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INT), but it was in the ballpark of competitve as the final score was 40-35.
The thing that hurt SDSU was 3rd down conversions ... only 2 for 11. But again, that was against the #1 defense for 3rd down (TCU allowed only 24% conversion rate).
Your point is still valid, and I'm not disputing it. I'm really just highlighting one data point (the TCU game). What the boxscore does not indicate is whether SDSU ultimate faded under the harsh lights of a nationally important game (TCU was undefeated). Gardner's game-time experience presumably is deeper in those situations.
SDSU, beat BYU that year, but got screwed by a bad call in that game, so ten wins really.
Lindely deserves our attention and support. The young man came to A2 for the GHW Mott weekend. That earns honorary Michigan Man cred in my book.
It all comes down to the interior OL. If the young guys in the middle can find a way to be better than the guys who graduated....well, the sky is the limit for how good Devin can be.