Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Diaries Space Coyote's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (53)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Does Expansion Actually Lead to More Recruits From a Certain Region?
    maizeonblueaction - 13 hours ago
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 1 day ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 2 days ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 3 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 4 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 895 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 788 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 765 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 704 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 588 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 17 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 17 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 13 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    24 replies
  • The Official SIAP Alan Branch Photoshop Thread
    9 replies
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    28 replies
  • OT: Star Trek + Dilithium = Esplode…. Esplode clarity
    20 replies
  • OT - ND paid Charlie more than Brian Kelly in 2012
    31 replies
  • Softball SuperRegionals Open Thread
    22 replies
  • OT: ESPN hires Paul Finebaum
    35 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    188 replies
  • Mark May Trolls Ohio State Again, Buckeyes Fans Let Him Have It On Twitter
    35 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    134 replies
  • Baseball Eliminated from B1G
    20 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    55 replies
  • Urbs and his obsession with butts
    52 replies
  • Very OT: The Hangover 3 *Thread May Contain Spoilers*
    59 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    151 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    24 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    151 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    73 replies
  • The Official SIAP Alan Branch Photoshop Thread
    9 replies
  • OT - ND paid Charlie more than Brian Kelly in 2012
    31 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    188 replies
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    28 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    151 replies
  • OT: Star Trek + Dilithium = Esplode…. Esplode clarity
    20 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    55 replies
  • Baseball Eliminated from B1G
    20 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    134 replies
  • Very OT: The Hangover 3 *Thread May Contain Spoilers*
    59 replies
  • OT: ESPN hires Paul Finebaum
    35 replies
  • Urbs and his obsession with butts
    52 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    188 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    151 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    151 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    145 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    141 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    134 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    91 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • SEC coaches with tiny faces

    I don't think they changed Les at all actually

    0 comments
  • This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews

    national champs baby

    1 comments
  • Rounding up the latest in NCAA absurdities.

    Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.

    0 comments
  • Cornell wrestler tops Michigan's Trey Burke for Sports Illustrated award | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

    first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"

    0 comments
  • Burke hearing he'll go two through six in NBA draft

    stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly

    0 comments
  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

FF201: Day 2 - 3-3-5 Vs. Tight Formations

By Space Coyote — August 12th, 2010 at 4:32 AM — 19 comments
Filed under:
  • 3-3-5
  • 3-3-5 Fundamentals
  • Basic Package
  • FF201
  • football

Football Fundamentals 201 - Intro to the 3-3-5 Defense

Day 2

A long, long time ago, when I lived in a Cleveland not so far away, I created a 3-3-5 Fundamentals diary because, well, I lived in Cleveland. Now I don’t, but I have come back from the dead and loving it, but don’t worry, because I’m much better than the Mel Brooks movie “Dracula: Dead and Loving It”. Anyway, a long time ago when I wrote that diary I was asked by Brian something along the lines of what I planned to do next. I told him, being keen on thinking more so than actually doing, that I planned on creating another diary about how to defend particular plays out of the 3-3-5.

Well, sorry, that kind of got put on the back burner. And I forgot to turn on the heat. And then forgot that I even put anything there. Then remembered, but then was too lazy so I decided to watch the first 4 seasons of Lost in about a one month time span. But now, NOW, I’m back, and I have a diary for you. And I plan on having a lot more diaries for you. And because six zero made a series with a cool game show theme I’m going to make a cool series with a less cool theme because damnit it’s about football and this is more than just a game or something like that. Anyway, this diary will go under my 3-3-5 Fundamentals mini-course. About three or four more diaries are planned to be added to this 3-3-5 mini-course. Soon you will be introduced to Football Fundamentals 101. I’ll explain at the end. As for now, this diary will discuss, as many requested, how to defend particular plays (more along the lines of formations) with the 3-3-5. The terminology is a little different, but most is the same. If you need a refresher on some of the basics make sure to check out the 3-3-5 Fundamentals diary. Ok, here we go.

E – End
N – Nose
T – Tackle
S – Strong Side Linebacker (Sam)
M – Middle Linebacker (Mike)
W – Weak Side Linebacker (Will)
$ – Spur
B – Bandit
C – Corner
F – Free Safety

Now what we are going to cover, in my opinion, will essentially be Michigan’s base coverages against these formations. Basically, this is when Gerg will do a lot of cool things with his hands, and the players, mesmerized by his hair, will just say “Ok, let’s just run base.” At least it works something like that I would only assume.

Today we will be covering what I call the heavy sets, in order: I-Formation; I-Formation Twins; I-Formation Twins Open; I-Formation Twins Over; I-Formation Flanker; Bone; Far Wing; Ace; and Ace Left.
For each formation we will look at: Run to Strength; Run to Weak; and Pass.

A Note on Diagrams:
Solid Arrows: Play goes there (Note: These are not necessarily blitzes, just the gap responsibility)
Dashed Line: Slow play in that direction (contain)
Red Circle: Deep Zone
Yellow Circle: Short Zone
Green Circle: Flats

I-Formation

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-Formation Twins

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-Formation Twins Open

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now let's look how the 3-3-5 adapts to an unbalanced line:

I-Formation Twins Over

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

And now let's see how it changes as formations get tighter:

I-Formation Flanker

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

And tighter...

Wish Bone

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
By now I think you’re starting to get the hang of it. Besides where the defense is aligned at the start of the snap, the responsibilities essentially always stay the same. Which is (Playside/Opposite Side):

E / T – C Gap / C Gap Crash
N – Opposite A Gap
W / S – B Gap / Contain
M – Playside A Gap
$ / B – D Gap / Contain

In fact, the nice part is that the defensive keys are extremely simplified as well:

E / T – Offensive Tackles
N – Ball
W / S – Near Back
M – Near Back
$ / B – Triangle (Tight End, near back, and ball. This means they must look through the tight end to the near back, while keeping an eye on the ball. In some defenses the linebackers have a triangle key through the guards to the ball.)
C / F – Quarterback

So, to look at the alignment for 3 more formations:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the simplifying of the defense that T-Wolf and Gerg have been hinting at. The responsibilities are easier and the keys should be easier. The tricky part is recognizing the offensive formation and getting correctly aligned.

Even if Michigan goes to more of a 3-3-5 Strong look expect the same type of keys and responsibilities.

For my next part we will look at some spread type formations and how the 3-3-5 aligns to those. In the future we will also look a little at what is called a 3-3-5 Bear and some more of the “rules” that are to be followed, such as zone drops, boot rules, etc.

As for what else I hope to bring you soon is what I am calling Football Fundamentals 101. This will start off very fundamental and hopefully progress into being able to break down opponents film and or own film during the season. Before we can do that though we must start with the basics, and that’s what this “course” will be covering. That will be explained more to you when I post the first of FF 101 series.

PS. I'll work on formating a bit more when I get some time. Sorry, it's just really early right now. Other than formatting I would really like to help answer questions. If you have some, leave them. I'm really busy today so may not get to them right away, but there seem to be some other people that can help you around these here parts.

  • Space Coyote's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 12th, 2010 at 4:39 AM | Wow, great work.  I will be (Score:1)
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 4564

Wow, great work.  I will be using valuable time at work to go through this in more depth.

Greetings from Bolivia.

"It's special how the real true people hang together. And if you don't support the program you're not a true Michigan guy. It's that simple."  - Gary Moeller

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 8:43 AM | hear hear (Score:1)
CleverMichiganR...
CleverMichiganReference's picture
Joined: 07/18/2008
MGoPoints: 4205

Productivity be damned, only 23 days to consume this knowledge

The world looks better through maize mirror tint. 

Still waiting on backup.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 7:41 AM | I expect... (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3747

...a couple things:

  1. We will still play a lot of under and over fronts like last year.
  2. When we do go 3-3-5 we will be slanting or angling the DL.

I don't forsee us playing 3-3-5 with no line movement and no blitzes.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2010 at 5:44 AM | 3-3-5 variations (Score:1)
truewarrior25
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1

Your absolutely right steve... I have had the opportunity to work with Rocky Long(D coordinator at San Diego State) who runs a 3-3-5. It's important to note that there are MANY variations of it. It's really just a way of getting a personnel grouping onto the field that maximizes your talent. At SDSU they run a 3-3-5 which consists of your 3 DL(DE, nose,DE), 3Lbs (Sam, Mike, Will), 2CBS, 2 Warriors( two safety type players), 1Aztec position( Lb/safety hybrid) who actually plays over the top.... The defense has a vast amount of presnap movement and always has players blitzing... It is the only way this defense can be effective. Often the sam or will roll up and come off the edge. His vacant spot is simply replaced by the aztec player. In all my time with coach long I have never seen them simply align in a 3-3-5 stack and simply drop into a cover 3 with nobody blitzing.... Pressure is always coming and can be extremely difficult to pick up. This defense can give pass protections some serious fits. This is an attacking style defense which should force turnovers but is also succeptible to the big play... Should be fun to watch! Go blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 7:46 AM | Question (Score:1)
RichRodFollower
Joined: 08/16/2008
MGoPoints: 1114

Based on what how I'm looking at your diagrams:  Can we expect to see our corners playing almost ten yards off the line of scrimmage consistently?  I don't have the tactical football mind of some, but I am concerned about that quick pass out to the WR that always seemed to go for a first down last year.  Thanks...

"That ball IS the program."

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 7:54 AM | Unless... (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3747

...we play press and bail technique with the corners, the quick hitch is open all day long against Cover 3.  (Even then the hitch is there but press alignment tells both QB and WR pre-snap not to throw a hitch.)  Hopefully when we play vanilla Cover 3, we play our corners at 7 yards and in a controlled backpedal so they can tackle the WR before he can get YAC and hold them to a 6-yard gain, best case scenario.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 8:54 AM | Just to add (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4381

It is important to note that this is just a base set.  Most teams base set would be something like a cover 2, which has it's own weaknesses.  We won't actually be running this every down.  That being said, yes, the corners will be at around 7-9 yards deep, however, because they are already at this depth it is not required for them to "bail out" to get to their zone.  Seeing anything quick they should be able to immediately break on it with out as much fear of getting beat deep.  Also, the Spur and Bandit are highly responsible for the flats in this case.  They typically stand about 3-4 yards off the last offensive player on the line (tackle or tight end) and 3-4 yards off the line of scrimmage.  Because they have D-Gap responsibility in the run anyway, they can afford to commit to any action going quick outside.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 9:14 AM | I've coached overhang players... (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3747

...like Spur/Bandit for a long time, and they are "run first" players.  On run action to their flank, they must close and not just take away the outside, they must also close distance so the ball carrier must radically change direction, either with a sharp cutback or a severe bounce outside.  Either way, the Spur/Bandit must pop his feet at the snap to read his keys, which are EMLOS (end man on the line of scrimmage) to near back.  Upon seeing the high hat of the OT, he can then buzz to the flat.  The read steps (popping of the feet) will not allow him to get to the reception point on a quick hitch or out.  To take away either requires that they spend a lot of practice time getting in the throwing lane.  And if they do that, then the slant is wide open.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 10:08 AM | Thanks (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4381

I stand corrected.  I haven't personally run it, all I've gotten from it is chalk talk and papers and stuff, and what they say can be done often differs from reality.  The keys are the same as I listed, but the experience running it is something I can't contend with.  Thanks for the input and answering any questions you may answer, it's a big help.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 10:07 AM | Eeep. (Score:1)
stubob
stubob's picture
Joined: 08/20/2008
MGoPoints: 1263

Thanks for the great work, it's enlightening to see it without 22 bodies flying around at once.  But I'm a little worried.  Pretending the offense does a zone blocking scheme from the I-formation in the first diagram, LG blocks N, C block M (downfield), RG blocks S (downfield), and RT blocks T inside or outside.  That leaves the FB and Y looking for someone, either W or $.  Any way you look at it, there's a lot of ground to be gained as the second level moves around to get into position to make a play.  The strength of the defense isn't up the middle, but the assignments look like that's where they're moving the play.

It looks to me like you're left with B, W and the two C's to make a play.  As we saw last year, if those guys move too quickly in the wrong direction, there's not much left to stop them (I have nightmares of Pryor running a zone-read).  I get the idea that every player has a lane assignment, and that helps them understand what they will do, but it just looks like the offense has an advantage based on the number of players on the line.

What's the advantage to moving the N away from the play?  It seems like he's making the blocking easier for the O-line by not being in the A-gap right away.

"Why would you ask a dumb question like that?"  -Lloyd Carr

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 10:11 AM | N away from the play (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4381

In the base set is often necessary to prevent traps and such.  If he moves play side then the backside counter trap will work every time once you get the flow of Mike going.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 10:49 AM | 3-5-3 (Score:1)
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1863

From my amateur perspective, this looks more like 3-5-3 in practice than 3-3-5.  Not that it really matters, but that makes more sense to me to think of it that way.  So there are 3 guys on the line who are always going forward, 3 guys in the back who are always in coverage, and 5 guys in the middle who do a little of both, depending on the play. 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 11:29 AM | 3-3-5 (Score:1)
HailGoBlue86
Joined: 08/11/2010
MGoPoints: 425

Great post thanks for sharing this. I can just imagine what a athlete like Josh Furman could do in the future playing the spur or bandit coming off the edge on blitzes or shutting down tight end and slot receiver routes in the flat.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 2:21 PM | The way they have been (Score:1)
ituralde
Joined: 11/14/2009
MGoPoints: 412

The way they have been talking about it, it sounds that you are going to see Craig Roh in more of a hybrid DE role.  What would that then look like under that situation?

I had thought you'd have the DE lined up outside the RT, the NT shifted at C/RG, T at LG and Roh outside the LT.  What would the rest of the defense look like in that instance?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 5:10 PM | Spur/Bandit (Score:1)
Moleskyn
Moleskyn's picture
Joined: 06/28/2010
MGoPoints: 3192

I can never keep these straight. Who are the guys likely to play these positions for us this year? I know it sounds like Roh is going to play one of them, along with Kovacs?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2010 at 5:47 PM | im pretty sure spur/bandit (Score:1)
canzhiye
canzhiye's picture
Joined: 08/12/2010
MGoPoints: 597

im pretty sure spur/bandit are the two strong safeties...i dont think roh is playing there

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2010 at 11:18 AM | Kovacs and Marvin Robinson (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27476

Kovacs and Marvin Robinson are your Bandits.

Thomas Gordon, Mike Williams, Josh Furman, and Floyd Simmons are your Spurs.

Craig Roh and Brandon Herron would be your SAM.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2010 at 11:44 AM | Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing (Score:1)
Moleskyn
Moleskyn's picture
Joined: 06/28/2010
MGoPoints: 3192

Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up. I'm sure I'll be just as confused as I was before within another week or so.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.