Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Diaries Space Coyote's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (43)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 5 hours ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 2 days ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 4 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 5 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,483 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 707 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 499 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 461 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 228 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 8 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    16 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    29 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    18 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    30 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    57 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    46 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    1 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    56 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    57 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    34 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    28 replies
  • Tigers vs Rangers 5/19
    57 replies
  • Michigan Rowing Places Second at Big Ten Championships
    27 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    33 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    29 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    15 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    56 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    46 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    30 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    18 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    57 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    28 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    34 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    57 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    40 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    1 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    43 replies
  • Tigers vs Rangers 5/19
    57 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  • Jay Harris (the rapping WR) had schollie pulled by MSU a month ago
    70 replies
  • 2014 IL LB Kyron Watson to Kansas
    68 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    0 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

FF101: Day 2

By Space Coyote — August 17th, 2010 at 2:33 AM — 36 comments
Filed under:
  • FF101
  • football
  • football
  • Football Fundamentals
  • Nomenclature

Previous Classes

FF 101 - The Fundamentals: Syllabus & Day 1

FF 201 - 3-3-5 Defense: Day 1, Day 2

 

FF 101: Day 2 – Offense

Major Edit: I modified some of the formation names for more simplicity and universality. Let me know if any more questions arise.

Author’s Note: If you played football, whether in real life or video games, you may already know a lot of this.  Hopefully this won’t turn you off from the course too quickly.

Introduction:

This day in class we will look at the mindset and philosophy it takes to be successful on offense.  After that I will discuss deeper in depth the positions, the breakdown of their positional units, and some further terminology to help you get acclimated with formations and play calling.  We will end with a few simple examples.

Mindset:

“We have an offensive concept, an overall season plan, and strong beliefs about techniques and strategy.  But we also copy what others have done successfully and adjust our plan from week to week.” – Joe Paterno. 

Offense is very different than defense – obviously.  On defense you rely on eliminating space with the help of the boundaries, you react, you pay for errors and try to hide weaknesses, and you stymie the unexpected (by the way, all generalizations are false, including this one, but you get the idea).  On offense you attack, you strike, you surprise, you thrive in space and exploit errors and deficiencies.  There are things that the two have in common though such as speed, adaptability, opportunity, utilizing strengths, having balance, and execution.  Execution: probably the most important aspect of football.  This is the mindset of offensive football, an approach in which you play to win, win, win, humiliate through finesse and raw toughness and everything in between.   Offense is a different species, and there are many different breeds of said specie.  The goal is always the same though, to degrade and exasperate the opponent and to score touchdowns.  The killing comes later.

Philosophy:

Obviously philosophies defer greatly.  Philosophies depend on offensive talent and personnel as well as defensive talent and personnel.   Some things remain fairly constant across philosophies though.  Finish every play, every route, every run, every block.  When you’re a receiver don’t take plays off, stretch the ball horizontally and vertically.  As a running back, help out your quarterback by blocking and running well and help out your lineman by being patient and explosive.  As a lineman, get to your spots and block through defenders.  No matter the case, execute the game plan and the offense should succeed.

Positions:

Positions can be broken up into three groups, with small subgroups included.

 

Offensive Line:Offensive Tackle (T), Offensive Guard (G), Center (C)

Backfield:Quarterback (QB), Running Back (RB). 

                Running Back: Tailback (TB), Fullback (FB), Halfback (HB), Wing (W/WB)

Receivers: Wide Receiver (WR), Tight End (TE)

                Wide Receiver: Wide Receiver (WR), Split End (SE), Slot (SR), Wing (W), Flanker (Fl)

                Tight End: Tight End (TE), H-Back (HB/H)

 

So most of you knew most of this and all I probably did was confuse you more.  Anyway, to clarify, a split end is a lot like tight end playing wide receiver, and a h-back is a lot like tight end that isn’t on the line of scrimmage (LOS), a wing, or wing back, is either the third RB in the back field, the third receiver in a single back, single TE formation, or the forth receiver in a single back, four receiver set.  Flanker is like a wide receiver, typically off the line.  I will get more into their specific functions, attitudes, and goals when I break down their individual units.  

For now, I will introduce some terminology that is common in football play calling and position play calling.

Backfield:

1: Quarterback

2: Wingback (at times considered Z receiver (see below))

3: The Fullback

4: The Tailback

 

This comes into account when calling plays, such as a 34 Trap (‘3’ means the fullback running to the ‘4’ hole.  The weakside guard does a trap block) or 47 Sweep (‘4’ stands for Tailback running a sweep to the ‘7’ hole) for example.

 

Receivers:

X: The WR that is on the LOS.  This usually means this is the split out that is away from strength (typically denoted as the side with the TE).

Y: This is typically your TE, or the last man on the LOS toward the strength side.

Z: Typically your flanker, or the receiver that is off of the LOS.  This can be toward strength or away, near the offensive linemen or far from them.

W: This receiver usually subs in for one of the RBs on 4 receiver sets.  Also considered different nomenclature for the Z-receiver on occasion.

 

Eligible Receivers

I was asked a question about eligible receivers which I will attempt to explain here and supplement a little below.  On every play there are 5 eligible receivers (6 if you count the QB for plays such as throw backs).  At least seven players must be on the line of scrimmage.  More can be on the line of scrimmage but it decreases your number of eligible receivers.

The eligible receivers consist of anyone lined up off the LOS and the two players furthest outside that are lined up on the LOS.  Technically then, if 6 guys were lined up on the LOS to the right of the center, and none were on the LOS to his left, the center would actually be an eligible receiver because he is the last person to the outside on the LOS.

Most problems occur from: a) the tackle lining up in the backfield, making it so only 6 players are on the LOS; or b) if an extra person is on the LOS, either the extra person (who is lined up inside the outer most person on the LOS) to become ineligible or causing someone who is supposed to be eligible to be ineligible because the 8th person on the LOS is outside the person who is supposed to be the last one on the line of scrimmage.

Basic Formations:

The formations below are very basic in nature.  On Friday through Sunday you will see some formations more complex than these.  This is simply to get you acclimated with my personal terminology. (Note: any player with a letter is an eligible receiver)

*Strong - When the FB is offset toward the TE.  Sometimes known as King.

*Weak - When FB is away from TE side.  Also referred to as Queen.

Some teams prefer to call strength (i.e. left or right) based on the location of the Y receiver, typically the TE.  However, I find this can cause confusion.  In my play calling I tend to call the strength the side with the greater number of eligible receivers.  Therefore “Twins I Left” means the twin set (where more people are) is to the left.  Important to note is that this is not always the same as defensive strength calls.

(Another way of playing by some teams is just have a single call, such as “I-Formation” and then say “Flip” when going from “Right I” (their version of “I Formation”) to “Left I”.  I still prefer my own method as I find it to be clearer in nature.)

There are also some more receiver-heavy formations.

There are some similarities in shotgun play calling, though some nomenclature is a little different.  A few examples are given below.

where

Flex = Receiver positioning

Gun = Shotgun

Right = Position of running back

 

Basic Plays:

Very few plays are diagramed below.  The goal is simply to get you acclimated on how plays are called, and what the meaning behind the play call is.  In this set I won’t show detailed blocking for certain defensive alignments for simplicity.

Note: I Right 34 Trap should read "I Right 32 Trap" as the fullback goes through the 2 hole

For simplicity of the play calls, some pass plays simply go by names.  For now I will just go over these type plays, in the future we will look at more complex plays/routes.

Conclusion

This is all an art form, from the necessary dialog of calling a play, to the picture that is painted prior to the implementation of the actual actors playing out their roles on stage.  Offensive football is a treat to watch because of small intricacy adds up into something so grand as to make it so 11 people cannot even bring down a single person.  It can stand for so many things, the strength and intelligence of humanity, as a metaphor for the power of cohesion, or it can just be seen as football.  People love points, and I can’t blame them, but it isn’t where the beauty of the sport begins, but rather where it starts.  In our next class we will begin our look at defensive football.  Have a good day.

Note: In the near future I will try to figure out some way to have an add-on that will include a whole bunch of formations rather than just these basics.  Whether I put it on a download site to as a .pdf or power point document, or if I should embed all the formations (which is a ton, and that’s just scratching the surface) on a simple blog post, I don’t know yet.  I would like to hear suggestions or preferences if there is any demand for such a thing (and maybe how I would go about doing it).  Either way, for a basics package to be complete so that communication can become more fluent on the board, I think a package such as this is necessary.

  • Space Coyote's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 17th, 2010 at 3:05 AM | authentic jerseys are on hot (Score:1)
belle
Joined: 08/17/2010
MGoPoints: -128

authentic jerseys are on hot selling !    jersey-boys.com

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 8:00 AM | C'mon people (Score:1)
NomadicBlue
NomadicBlue's picture
Joined: 05/07/2010
MGoPoints: 3694

Start negging the hell out of this account so we can get these damned commercials out of here.  Pony up.  It'll only cost you a point. 

Journal Entry - Day 782 of living amongst inbreds - Actually heard this today, "I don't see what the big deal is.  All he was doin' was protectin' the players. What's wrong with that?" 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 8:31 AM | Okay, I'm in. (yes! I just (Score:1)
dakotapalm
dakotapalm's picture
Joined: 07/15/2008
MGoPoints: 1879

Okay, I'm in. (yes! I just earned a point, so I can neg the jackwagon.)

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 9:46 AM |   Now, if only neg-bombing (Score:1)
Skunkeye
Skunkeye's picture
Joined: 08/24/2009
MGoPoints: 490

 

Now, if only neg-bombing this guy was free.  

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 11:02 AM | Simple workaround (Score:1)
DubbaEwwTeeEff
DubbaEwwTeeEff's picture
Joined: 09/06/2009
MGoPoints: 293

We can all post replies, then negbang away.  We even get rewarded a point for doing it!

 

EDIT: 1 - 1 != 1... fail :-(

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 3:36 PM | I'll neg it, but can't Brian (Score:1)
KBLOW
KBLOW's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4051

I'll neg it, but can't Brian just delete that account if he wants?  

There are no corners in space.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 5:41 PM | Brian can delete any account (Score:1)
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 11602

Brian can delete any account at any time at whim, but additional negs are like tiny arrows pointing to an account in obvious need of obliteration.

Colors That Float

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 7:05 AM | Great work. I'm still a (Score:1)
nikj
Joined: 01/04/2009
MGoPoints: 1099

Great work. I'm still a little confused because I thought the h back was in the backfield. Is this just a terminology difference between tb and hb where some people call big tb's halfbacks? Thanks again for these.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 7:44 AM | I made an edit to adjust this (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

Tailbacks have been commonly known as halfbacks as well throughout the years.  In fact, tailback and halfback are fairly interchangeable and no one would really question you.  The H-back (the tight end version) is how I described him above, and is typically referred to as such.  Someone who actually called the H-back the half back would get a lot of confused looks and people.  Therefore, I edited above to adjust this as you make a good point, he shouldn't be referred to as halfback, but rather H-Back

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 6:07 PM | Larsonlo - (Score:1)
AAL
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 470

Is there a way to get in touch w/ you away from here?

The Playbook  |  Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 10:01 PM | I guess you could e-mail me at: (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

ffundamentals@gmail.com

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 1:47 PM | Done! (Score:1)
AAL
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 470

Done!

The Playbook  |  Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 7:18 AM | Thanks! (Score:1)
BlueRoses
BlueRoses's picture
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 32

Love the series so far.

Thanks for putting all of this together - it will make MGoBlog a more informed and educated forum - and it will make football more interesting and enjoyable!

Thanks!

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 9:51 AM | Great work! Playcalling has (Score:1)
SwordDancer710
Joined: 08/17/2009
MGoPoints: 707

Great work! Playcalling has always confused me, but now I'm starting to get it.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 10:54 AM | Great work, larsonlo (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3747

Point of contention: I would suggest using more universal names for formations rather than using yours.  I think it's much easier for you to track this info down and translate your knowledge than it would be for someone who learns yours to extrapolate to what they might hear on TV, read on the internet, etc.  I understand that certain formations have less-known universal names, but do the best you can. 

The reason this is important is that you're educating unfamiliar people who are likely to take what they've learned here and see it as universal.  Example, what you call "Wing Left (Right)" is not called that by many, many coaches, most notably coaches in the Wing-T offense.  (I don't like the Wing-T, but I do respect it.)

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 5:26 PM | I tried to go with more universal names (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

For the most part.  I described below why I went to laser, rocket, liz, rip, tiger route.  Laser and rocket so you don't need to say gun left, gun right.  Liz and Rip are actually RR own nomenclature.  Tiger is a trips set with a different alignment.

I actually looked up playbooks and such trying to get  a feel for what was most common for some of the formations.  I do agree with what you said about wing though, and I will for sure change that when I have the time later tonight.  I will probably go away from the Rip and Liz as well, though I'm still on the fence about changing laser and rocket.  For future reference there is also barrel (like double barrel, or both) which is a gun split, and empty which is still empty. Maybe I should stick with easier convention there, I guess I'll see how many changes I make tonight, but I will take these suggestions and change them here and make sure when I finish a comprehensive formation document for them to be a little more universal.

Let me know if there are any other formations that seem uncommon.  Thanks for the input

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 11:44 AM | Post (Score:1)
HailGoBlue86
Joined: 08/11/2010
MGoPoints: 425

Thanks yet again, the thing that always confused me the most was the play calling and what it all meant but I'm starting to get it a lot more now.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 1:30 PM | Little Confused on X Receiver's Location (Score:1)
MikeUM85
MikeUM85's picture
Joined: 06/09/2010
MGoPoints: 190

Great stuff. I'm loving the series so far.

But I'm a bit confused with the location of the "X" receiver in some formations.

E.g., when you switch from I Right to I Left, the X receiver is switched to the opposite side as the Y receiver. I suspect if you actually audibled to reverse the play, one receiver would back away from the line, and one would step forward, switching their roles on the play, right? But is it necessary that they do that, or could you leave the strong side receiver (lined up on same side as TE in Y position) on the LOS? Is there some rule that makes that receiver have to back off the LOS if you flip the play's direction?

Also, in the Ace, the X receiver is off the line. I assume it's because with the H receiver you now already have 7 on the line, but is the X receiver still the X if he's not on the LOS (see your definition of the X receiver)?

 

“The strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.” Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936)

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 2:41 PM | I'm a little confused by your question (Score:1)
Tacopants
Tacopants's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 2242

If it's a run play, usually nobody moves.

When you're talking about reversing a run play (say like making a 32 trap into a 31 trap), nobody should move.  What happens in that specific play is that the QB reads the DT/NT positioning.  For a 32 trap to work correctly, you would want the strong side DT in a 3 tech so that the pulling LG can block him out of the hole.  This would mean the weakside DT is playing a 1 tech and the C can seal him off while the RG shoots up and blocks the Mike.

With that explained, if the QB sees the opposite lineup, he audibles into the 31 trap.  Nobody has to move.  The play will still work as intended, as the recievers and TE shouldn't even have to make key blocks for the play to succeed.

if it's a pass play and your TE shifts from left to right, yes, you would need to step off the LOS.  You also become the Z reciever in that case.

The X reciever does not have to be on the LOS.  It's just easier to think of it like that because in the majority of formations, the WR you see on the LOS will be the X.

Another example of something like that would be in something like a Flexbone formation, where you have 2 WRs on the LOS and your TE is off the LOS.  The TE is still the Y reciever, the WRs are still X and Z even though they are both on the LOS.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 2:53 PM | Wow, you really picked up a (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

Wow, you really picked up a lot of knowledge in your 6 (and counting) years of eligibility, didn't you?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 2:10 PM | Nomenclature Question (Score:1)
Bronco648
Bronco648's picture
Joined: 08/20/2008
MGoPoints: 998

In the Twins I Right formation, the receivers (Twins) are to the right with the Backs stacked (I).  In the subsequent Ace Left formation, why isn't that referred to as Twins Ace Left?  The receivers (Twins) are to the left of the formation and there is only one Back.  Would it be because both recievers are off the LOS?

This is great, BTW.  Thanks.

Nobody home...

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 2:57 PM | larsonlo, no offense, but I (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

larsonlo, no offense, but I find your terminology for formations to be confusing.  If your goal is to make it simple for your players to understand, then "laser liz" seems like a strange name to give a formation.  Neither word refers to anything football-related.

We would call "laser liz" the following: "Ace gun left."

ace = single back, four wide receivers
gun =  shotgun
left = running back aligns to the left of the QB

I know there's more than one way to skin a cat, and if that works for you and your team, then by all means go for it.  But it just always seemed to me that kids understand things easier when you simplify them and give them things they can relate to.  Everybody kid who's set foot on a playground knows what "shotgun" is and most people know what "left" is.  The only thing our kids might have to learn is the meaning of "ace."

Ace gun left > laser liz...

...because it's more descriptive and has the same number of syllables, in my opinion.

Like I said, it's great if it works for you.  I just think that simplicity is key when working with high school kids.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 4:27 PM | Laser Liz, Rocket Rip, and (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

Laser Liz, Rocket Rip, and Tiger were the only ones I hadn't heard of. Does Tiger have a more common name kind of how Wolf is also known as Ace Balanced?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 6:12 PM | As far as Laser and Rocket (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

They simply indicate the position of the running back, Laser being left, and Rocket being right in a shotgun (used because laser and rocket kind of sound like a form of weapon, i.e. gun).   When I originally wrote it up I actually had it written close to how you described.  I had "Flex Gun Left" rather than "Ace gun left", but you get the picture.  

The actual reason I switched to "Liz" and "Rip" was because it actually comes directly from Rich Rod's offensive playbook.  I figured I would use his convention assuming most people would want his terminology over conventional.  However, it appears I should stick with something more conventional and will edit these as such when I have time.

As for Tiger, it's a type of trips formation, just the placement of the X-receiver is different than my terminology for trips (inside receiver on LOS).  That is how I was taught that convention: trips, tiger, trio (outside receiver on LOS).  I agree simplicity is best for high school kids and I would never go into a coaching situation in high school having a trips, tiger, and trio set.  I would pick one and go with it.  If there is a more common name out there for these different sets I haven't used them, so I guess I would need some help from you there.

Edit: I will refer to the trips formations as "trips in" for when the inside guy is on, "trips T" for what was Tiger, and "trips out" for the outside guy on.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 11:13 PM | RB tags (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3747

...are for 2+ backs in the formation.  When it is 1-back and/or spread, the backs don't need alignment tags.

Here's and example using your Rocket formation:

"Rocket16 Read" means Rocket formation, outside zone to the right (6 hole), and it's zone read b/c of the "Read" tag.  Do we need a RB tag?  No, b/c the fact that it's outside zone read to the right tells the back that he must line up to the left of the QB.  "Rocket Left 16 Read" would be redundant.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 12:19 AM | While I understand what you're saying (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

I think the easiest form is to be slightly more redundant.  I understand that on pass (play action) and run plays the running back is essentially told where to go, which basically dictates where they line up.  I think here though, the redundancy is helpful.  So I'm going to adjust accordingly.  

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 11:14 PM | "Liz" and "Rip" make sense to (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

"Liz" and "Rip" make sense to me - we used that terminology when I played in high school.  I just think the school where I coach now has better formation terminology, and I never really figured out why high school coaches wouldn't use the simplest terminology available.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 12:11 AM | I'm going to go ahead and go with close your terminology (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

Mostly because I feel like it will be the easiest for those around here to pick up on, and if they forget, just thinking of the words to describe the formation should give them a reminder.  I like the laser and rocket because instead of gun right you just use one word, but I can easily see how that can be confusing (also, I've seen rocket and laser described as a formation rather than the placement of the back in gun) so I've made the switch here.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 1:31 AM | okay (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I hope I didn't come across as saying "You should change it."  I was just trying to add to the discussion and throw it out there for general knowledge, in case any other burgeoning coaches or avid learners want to read/learn.

PS: "Rocket" has been part of the terminology at both of my coaching stops - but in one place it's a screen pass, and in one place it's an off-tackle running play with a double-team on a 3-tech or 4i tackle.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 1:27 PM | No worries (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

I think I should change it basically because your reasoning was valid.  And yeah as far as rocket, where I played rocket was a formation (a shotgun trips type formation) and another place it was to say the location of the running back in shotgun.  So apparently the use of rocket is very inconsistent so it's best to stay away from it here.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 17th, 2010 at 8:00 PM | nice work (Score:1)
LeadersandBest
Joined: 08/12/2010
MGoPoints: 104

Nice job

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 10:27 AM | I'm already learning (Score:1)
big sister
Joined: 06/21/2010
MGoPoints: 442

I'm already learning lots!
So, for clarification, a slot receiver is one that lines up on the line of scrimmage? Shotgun formation is when the qb lines up further behind the line?
And I don't think this was in this post, but is the wildcat when a position player directly takes the snap? Is the quarterback usually on the field for this?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 11:45 AM | Wildcat was originally the (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

Wildcat was originally the formation at Arkansas that had Darren McFadden (Running Back) taking the snaps in the old Single Wing formation. It has since been used to describe anything where a non-QB takes the snap, which isn't really correct.

The Single Wing formation involves an unbalanced offensive line (2+ more linemen on one side of the center than the other) and a RB-type player taking the snap. Usually, you will see the 5 usual linemen, a TE, and an H-Back lined up behind the line between the TE and Tackle. Then, you have 2 "receivers" on the strong side of the field and a single "receiver" on the the weak side of the field. One of those "receivers" is the QB so that when the play is called in the huddle, the defense cannot adjust its personnel to new players coming in.

The most common play is an Off Tackle type run. Other plays have been thrown in to keep defenses honest, but they aren't used as much. An example of this is when the Dolphins started out with the Off Tackle run, but then reversed the ball to Henne, who threw the ball deep to a wide-open receiver because the defense had completely bit on the run.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 1:25 PM | For clarification (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4364

The slot receiver is usually off the line.  Basically, a slot is in the "slot" or gap between the outside receiver and the offensive line.  Shotgun is when the quarterback lines up about 4-5 yards behind the center and takes the snap, and wildcat is pretty much as mentioned above.  I'll get more into wildcat and stuff perhaps on the next cycle of things.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
August 18th, 2010 at 1:41 PM | Thanks! (Score:1)
TahoeBlue
Joined: 08/16/2010
MGoPoints: 42

As someone who never played and had zero interest in the sport until my freshman year at Michigan I have always been missing some of the basic fundamentals.  I look forward to future "classes".

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 2:41 PM | Great series (Score:1)
tabfan19
tabfan19's picture
Joined: 11/05/2009
MGoPoints: 22

I've followed football my whole life, and have considered myself fairly knowledgeable.  However, since I never played the game, your explanation of the eligible receivers was the first time I ever learned who was eligible and why.  The rest of the entry was very helpful as well - thanks for this, looking forward reading the rest of the entries.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.