Charlie Weis Ate All The Good Things About ND Football

Submitted by Geaux_Blue on
Dear Charlie, Good afternoon. How are you feeling? I know that your weekend was exciting, what with McDonald's special 50 pack McNugget special running for three days you must have lived like a KING. I hope your tummy feels fine and, may I say, you do look a little slimmer. Are you wearing vertical stripes? You devil! Anyways, I just want to commend you on your amazing job at Notre Dame. As a Michigan fan, I should probably not be writing you, what with our coach's ability to produce the same season as you did in 2006 but, you know what, I just drank a Red Bull in my room at the Holiday Inn Express so it's either Extreme Sports or write you. I digress. You have Jimmy Clausen, a player that Rivals claims is the best pro-style quarterback in the past five recruiting classes, and somehow made him look not just like an Emu but an Emu who shit himself. You somehow didn't get Brady Quinn killed in your first year at Notre Dame so if I were Clausen, I would know that the countdown has to be getting close before the pocket collapses around me and I find myself shanked by a guy named Bubba. It's been incredibly amusing to watch Clausen come on the field as a freshman, young and full of pep and then see him now. He is so terrified of the predicament you place him into almost every down that if he could have the ball hiked to him next to the sideline, he would. He made Michigan's historically awful defense look decent last year. It took MICHIGAN to put a cocky swagger into his gait. I'm shocked he didn't go pro just to go undrafted and escape you. Btw congrats on that big Hawaii win. It's a shame you didn't get to play against Colt Brennan... you know, the kid who'd been in jail and that you could improve your team with if only you recruited hoodlums and thugs... oh well. Let's sum it up this way: you somehow are able to make Clausen look MORE like an idiot on the field than he does off. I think that's the issue: you fail to acknowledge your own failure so the rest of the world feeds off of it. See, with your losses to military schools so rampant, players are beginning to play Battleship more. They're slimming down, eating salad and watching you go to the buffet more. You see, Charlie, you're self-destructing. You walk into schools and show off your rings and expect people to come to you. You expect your legend to be big and impressive enough that you don't have to get into the trenches and earn your way. And people are hearing more about it. How else can you explain the fact Notre Dame has the 23rd best recruiting class in the nation? Parents DREAM of sending their kids to Notre Dame. For God's sake (literally) you have JESUS in an ENDZONE. Your helmets are GOLD. But, see, you don't really care about the land of Rockne and Rudy... The Four Horsemen and green jerseys. You must have looked at Lou Holtz and laughed an inch off of your waist thinking how easy it must be to do what he did. Your class was #2 in the nation in 2008. #2! Perhaps it helped your team went 3-9 the year before and recruits saw an opportunity to impact (a la Michigan). But to slip 20 spots Charlie? Something changed. It wasn't just that you went 3-9 in 2007, when you had four players on pre-season watch lists for six national awards. It was that you refused to acknowledge it as a rebuilding year. You drove off your starting quarterback and buried Sharpley. You refused to even accept the horror that was. At least Rodriguez was frank about it. You just seemed to act like it wasn't happening. It almost came off as... arrogant. And I think it's that people began to see that as long as you were at Notre Dame, the school would be in the background. You're a big figure and you're proud of it but it seems the organization and institution can't be seen around you. You got negative and got caught saying some ridiculous stuff about Michigan and thugs and tactical advantages. The Patriots got caught videotaping in a manner that was widely scrutinized but overlooked while you were at New England. You sued your doctors over a stomach staple surgery that, honestly, nobody can believe you even had and that got thrown out rather embarassingly. You barely scraped yourself to a bowl game that you, loudly, declared you deserved over anyone else. You ripped on other coaches in the country to recruit when, in fact, all people had to do to show maybe ND wasn't a good idea is point at the headlines. Tell us Charlie: how much did your schematic advantage come from video cameras? You search Google for 'charlie weis recruiting' - this is what you get: Charlie Weis thinks recruiting is nasty Charlie Weis alienates Irish supporters Weis denies accusations of negative recruiting Notre Dame's Charlie Weis, the worst football coach in the universe Charlie Weis wrong face to represent Notre Dame Google returns 10 results on the first page. Ignoring your YouTube video, an article about you barely keeping your job, a speculative article written in November about the ND class looking good (fyi, it's not), an article cautioning people from encouraging your firing and an article flat out saying the recruiting class could save your job is all there is. One encouraging article and another that says if you do well, which it looks like you didn't, you might keep your job. Let's ignore the article about you decrying the recruiting process that you're supposed to act like you like a la "OHMYGOD MRS. JOHNSON THESE ARE THE BEST CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES EVER, YOUR SON SHOULD BRING THEM WITH HIM TO NOTRE DAME" and dive into the negative recruiting article. You're infamous for walking into high schools and plunking your rings down without a word, even going so far as to ask people if they want to see them. But when you have Clemson of all schools pointing out that their recruit had you ripping on their education, noting your school's television exposure and being the only school who ignored his commitment, it looks bad. Almost like you look down on anyone that's not you or your school. Which is true. In the end, Charlie, your time is wrapping up at Notre Dame. Hell you might beat Michigan again this year but odds are it won't save your job. Because people in South Bend do care about their institution. They do care about its legend and place in the lore of college football and elsewhere. And the fact is, Charles, your shadow is too big for such a place. As a Michigan fan even I can say it: Notre Dame deserves better. Notre Dame Recruiting Class By Year (per Rivals) 2009: #23 (subject to change) 2008: #2 2007: #8 2006: #8 2005: #40 2004: #32 2003: #12 2002: #24

Comments

jmblue

February 3rd, 2009 at 6:40 PM ^

Let's not go overboard. First, you're judging Clausen after only two years in college. A lot of QBs struggle as underclassmen. Ryan Mallett was a complete mess as a freshman and I don't know how much better he would have been in 2008 had he stayed. As for Weis as a recruiter, even if he's having a down year this year it's not horrid - it's still better than the two classes that were signed before he arrived. And it comes off the heels of three straight top 10 classes. I don't like him and I think he's a suspect coach, but I'm not sure if this is a really a sign of a long-term recruiting downswing.

Geaux_Blue

February 3rd, 2009 at 7:09 PM ^

I think the Weis mystique has worn off. If you look at what he's done with those recruiting classes... it's awful (THAT'S CRIMINAL JIM!). You put in the fact he's not scooping players that he should have been and is dragging Clausen through God's green Earth almost literally with the sacks against and such... he gone. Clausen is a hell of a bigger talent than Mallett is and I have seen almost zero development in his time being a starter for damn near two years now. Practice seems to have done nothing to develop his rhythm and if you look at the game tape of ND's wins or mediocre loss performances, he needs the BOMB to get a rally going. Notre Dame's running average by the time they lost to Syracuse was around a yard a carry. A yard. Why was Weis not recruiting Caper or Baker, two four-star rbs in the top 100 of many services that could inject SOMETHING into their offense while being regional which has SOME advantage? And they only took ONE running back last year (two this year). The buzzer beaters ND could pull in tomorrow might help but they currently have 16 commitments with 3 already enrolled. That's lower than every Big 10 program currently. They also have ZERO qbs. They took a grand total of 1 last year. That means even if the Jimmy Clausen experiment goes well and Crist doesn't go in until his Junior year, you're STILL going to have a guy two years behind in seniority to rely upon. I just have zero clue what sort of depth chart Weis is trying to do... the fucking Dollar Menu has more depth than his offense does and no matter how much he wishes, the $1 Double Cheeseburger will not go in to run a Bootleg.

dpowell7

February 3rd, 2009 at 6:54 PM ^

the first paragraph and a half, freaking hilarious. I'm sitting in class literally laughing out loud, feel like an idiot but idc. it was funny as shit.

Griff Cannon

February 3rd, 2009 at 7:09 PM ^

Seriously? We went 3-9 we lost to Toledo and we haven't proved much at all on the field. But you feel you actually have the ability to go and attack another teams coach/players. I would have loved to have had a sophomore QB who threw for 25TDs and over 3,000 passing yards last year or even next year. We don't even know who our QB will be next year! We have plenty to be positive about, great recruiting class, and added some great experience to the starters. But until this team proves they can at the very least put a full game together regardless of winning or losing posts like these are so worthless. Everyone is begging for a .500 season, what happens if that doesn't happen? Thats what you should be worried about not what ND is doing.

Geaux_Blue

February 3rd, 2009 at 7:49 PM ^

if you can't see a) a complete willingness to acknowledge the pitfalls of our own season b) the huge difference between said 3-9 seasons c) the attention being focused on developed legacy then i don't know what to say. except that if rodriguez goes .500 i will go ape shit excited instead of expecting to go .800 like weis and the nd faithful expect. historically there are great differences in how both coaches handles the failures, what they had at their disposal and what they did to fix things. rr went to his coaches and the nation to improve. weis expected the nation and his intelligence to help the situation. weis' salvaged recruiting class was #40 in a formation that was consistent, rodriguez's was #10. if rr follows up this recruiting class with one that is in the mid 20's, i would be equally pissed. there's a huge difference between a program overhaul and a program improvement. the former is michigan, the latter was SUPPOSED to be notre dame frankly when a coach says his team will beat a michigan team he knew he would be and says he doesn't want to hear excuses when they fail, while at the same time being the ad-wizard who came up with hoodlums and thugs line as an EXCUSE... he's fair game regardless of our program.

Tater

February 3rd, 2009 at 11:41 PM ^

I agree wholeheartedly with the entire post. Wies is a reprehensible POS and deserves all of the grief he gets. He is arrogant, dishonest, and a mediocre football coach whose reputation as a "genius" at New England was "earned" by cheating. Charlie Weis would be appropriate representing lots of things: waste management compaines (but definitely not WAIST management companies), fly-by-night auto repair facilities, truck stops where the food is so greasy it won't even stay on the plates long enough to get to the table, lower-level organized crime (Yo, Vito, you think I should whack this dude?), and pork farms, to name a few. HOWEVER, CHARLIE WEIS SHOULD NEVER, EVER BE ALLOWED TO REPRESENT AN INSTITUTION LIKE NOTRE DAME. Weis is so bad that, even though I hate Notre Dame, I feel indignant on their behalf. UM will beat him like the vile cur he is as soon as they get the QB situation straightened out. And he will deserve it. But Notre Dame doesn't.

Ernis

February 3rd, 2009 at 10:16 PM ^

Apparently new advances in nanotechnology will enable the cholesterol filling Weis's arteries to be harvested and used as a cooking base in the ND campus eateries, reducing overall cafeteria expenditures by 6.2% and increasing his expected lifespan by up to 7 years