Cause & Effect, Sunday Morning Quarterbacking
People have spent years trying to work around this; some very successfully. The whole value in having 'experience' in a skill is the ability to ascertain what factors might be affecting the outcome when the information is limited. This is exactly why doctors are paid more than residents, senior electricians are paid more than journeyman, and so on.
With that said, I'd like to ask everyone who has suggested that "if only we would have done X/Y/Z" what makes you so sure that you've identified not only the most significant factor affecting our outcome, but how are you sure that your suggested change would have had enough effect to change the outcome? In reality, this is a hypothetical question, as we can't go back and replay games to be sure, but I think it's still a question worth asking yourself. Along those same lines, what makes you think that you have a greater ability to identify these factors than our current coaching staff? Are you suggesting you have more experience than our current coaches, or perhaps you were born with a God given talent for coaching football, but just decided you'd rather work in sales, health care, or whatever the hell you do? While I'll always acknowledge your argument that "Coach X produced better results than Coach Y", suggesting you know more about football than our current staff (or any NCAA staff for that matter) just makes you look like a fool.
November 1st, 2008 at 9:25 PM ^
November 1st, 2008 at 9:56 PM ^
Two things:
1. Bragging about your occupation = a turn-off to other posters.
2. When a defense, which had been reasonably competent the year before, returns eight starters and then, despite remaining very healthy, degenerates into one of the worst in I-A (the stats don't lie), it can be reasonably inferred that it is not being properly coached. Players are supposed to improve with experience, not drastically fall off. I think it's safe to say that NO ONE expected this defense to give up 35+ points five times, and 45+ points three times. And there's still three games to go! Given these facts, it's pretty tough to accept that Shafer is the absolute best guy we can find for that position.
November 2nd, 2008 at 3:26 AM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 9:36 AM ^
He clearly wasn't bragging.
Your position is that defense was reasonable competent last year? Last year's defense gave up the 2nd most points (278, in 2004 the D gave up 279, 1 fucking point from being the WORSE ALL TIME IN MICHIGAN FOOTBALL) ever. That's competent???? A division 1A team put up 32 points, Oregon could have put up a million!
EDIT: That 2004 team that gave up the most points (by 1) in Michigan history played only 12 games whereas last year's team played 13, so it could be argued that the 2004 defense was probably the worse all-time in Michigan history.
Last year's defense at least had last year's veteran, NFL laden offense to keep them off the field. This years defense has no such luxury.
Last years defense was terrible, and had "the worse linebacker ever" (to quote Brian) in Chris Graham and the worse Michigan player ever in Johnny Sears to start the season. The guys this current defense has couldn't even beat them out for a job, and this year have demonstrated time and again why!
Scott Shafer may not be the best DC in the land, but he has proven himself to some extent in the past. The LB's and DB's on this team, however, didn't prove themselves last year and certainly haven't this year.
Shafer does deserve some "blame" for the defense, but he doesn't have RR's wizards hat or Harry Potter's wand, and can't turn chicken shit into chicken salad.
P.S. Biased or not, you really should should read GSimmons web site; he might just learn you somethin.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:00 PM ^
Epic numbers:
Juice Williams breaks all pupose yardage record in Michigan Stadium this year.
Some guy named Moore from Toledo (!!!) breaks record for number of receptions at michigan stadium.
Most points EVER scored by Purdue against Michigan.
Worst defense EVER in history of Michigan football.
How am I doing?
November 1st, 2008 at 10:19 PM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 12:57 AM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 8:58 AM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 3:28 AM ^
November 1st, 2008 at 10:53 PM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 1:14 AM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 5:53 AM ^
November 2nd, 2008 at 7:51 AM ^
Comments