best wishes
Burn the Boats After the Voyage to Clemsonia
Filed under:
CLEMSON
#17ish National
#5 In-Conference
After going 16-0, Clemson showed its soft underbelly to the world and 8 of its last 15. Given that one of my friends goes to Clemson, I've paid more attention to them over the past three weeks simply to be able to rip on him better. The fact said friend will be flying into town for my bachelor party at some point on Thursday means he's either walking from the airport or I'm showing up in my new, hand-made Novak t-shirt.
Clemson is a solid team that pulled out signature losses against Florida State (twice) and Wake Forest (twice), while finding a way to "get by" in games against heavy-hitters like Duke (74-47!), at Illinois (76-74) Boston College and Georgia Tech (twice before losing to them in the tournament).
Forward/Center Trevor Booker is their Manny Harris, frequently posting the team's highest points and rebounds per game. Further, the team appears to be fucked any time he scores less than 15 points, as shown in their stats sheet here. He averages 15 pts, 10 rebounds a game - if Sims and Harris can force the ball to be shot by Clemson's guards, the math shows that Michigan stands a good chance.
Clemson shot only* 662 3 pointers all season, roughly 150 more than Illinois or, basically, the same amount as... somebody. Side note: did you know Purdue only attempted 625 3 pointers? OSU only attempted 500-some. Jesus. Michigan - 859! ftw!
They average 79 points a game to Michigan's 67. Given the ACC at times can be dump-and-go Olympics where defense gives way to LOOKHOWFASTWERUNUPDOWNTHECOURTOMGTYLERHANSBROOOOOOOugh, though, means they might be mildly taken aback to find defenders rotating. Clemson's recent troubles against teams like Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, and FSU are, god-willing, more indicative of Clemson's downturn than the fact they dropped BOMBS on Duke and Maryland.
I like Michigan's chances if they can force Clemson to a slow-paced, 28 seconds per possession game that clears the paint and forces perimeter shooting. If Beilein can make UM of UM vs. Purdue show up instead of the UM of UM v. Savannah State Boys Recreational After-School SayNoToDrugs Campaign Squad appear, UM has a great shot in this game. If not... well.. it's not the NIT right?
March 15th, 2009 at 7:30 PM | 
why doesnt gibson and sims
why doesnt gibson and sims
March 15th, 2009 at 7:31 PM |
Those two are the only "big
Those two are the only "big
Those two are the only "big bodies" on the team. You can't play them together because than you would have to sit them at the same time. If they had more length it wouldn't be a problem.
No question, Jim.
March 15th, 2009 at 9:04 PM |
that's what she said
that's what she said
that's what she said
March 15th, 2009 at 10:17 PM |
Well done
Well done
Well done
Michigan Arrogance ... Something to be proud of.
March 15th, 2009 at 7:33 PM |
what about puls? is he not
what about puls? is he not
what about puls? is he not tha good of a defender?
That's chapter 1, would you like to have chapter 2? You better you son of a bitch, I know the way.
March 15th, 2009 at 7:35 PM |
Obviously Puls is very green
Obviously Puls is very green
Obviously Puls is very green or very sucky.
No question, Jim.
March 15th, 2009 at 8:22 PM |
Or both
Or both
He did play 3 minutes at #1 UConn in the first half though. That was certainly a surprise.
March 15th, 2009 at 7:40 PM |
i guess so. next years team
i guess so. next years team
i guess so. next years team is set up to be dangerous
That's chapter 1, would you like to have chapter 2? You better you son of a bitch, I know the way.
March 15th, 2009 at 7:44 PM |
Exciting useless tidbit: we
Exciting useless tidbit: we
Exciting useless tidbit: we were also in the South (then called the Southeast) Regional in our tourney runs in '89 and '92.
March 15th, 2009 at 9:39 PM |
8. Sub-Six-Seed Sleeper Pick:
8. Sub-Six-Seed Sleeper Pick:
8. Sub-Six-Seed Sleeper Pick: Michigan, the No. 10 in the South. The Wolverines stumbled through the Big Ten, but they always seem to give good teams problems. Ask UCLA, ask Duke, ask UConn. I would not be stunned if John Beilein's boys pull off two straight upsets, over Clemson and Oklahoma, and reach the Sweet 16.
March 15th, 2009 at 10:25 PM |
Clemson is good from the perimeter, though
Clemson is good from the perimeter, though
So, while they will be stymied by this foreign notion of defense, it's not like they can't shoot the three.
March 16th, 2009 at 1:06 PM |
height
height
I know I beat this one into the ground, but the 1989 NCAA Champions had seven players listed at 6-9 or taller. I know a couple, like Oosterban, were like Puls in the talent department, but they routinely had a lot of height back then.
I don't know what it was about Fisher and Frieder that got so many larger players to attend UM, but they haven't gotten a lot of height on a regular basis since Fisher "left."
Whatever it was, if it was legal, we need it to reappear.
March 16th, 2009 at 3:26 PM |
Next year we'll have five
Next year we'll have five
Next year we'll have five players 6'8" or taller - six counting Puls.
March 17th, 2009 at 2:26 PM |
The magic phrase
The magic phrase
"if it was legal"
Consider whom we are talking about here. Yeah.
March 16th, 2009 at 9:33 PM |
1989
1989
I love me an Oosterban reference.
why doesnt gibson and sims play together?
That's chapter 1, would you like to have chapter 2? You better you son of a bitch, I know the way.