Bubble News: The Ink is Drying on the Obit

Submitted by jamiemac on
The obituary for Michigan’s NCAA Tournament hopes has not been finalized. However, a rough draft sits on the copy editor’s desk. The loss Sunday at Iowa crippled Michigan’s steady climb up the bubble. Heading into the game, a clear majority of the brackets that had updated when the weekend began had Michigan in the field. They had reached the final cut line in the Bracket Matrix. Michigan appeared to control their own fate as far as winning games and snaring a tournament bid. The road map to ending the tournament drought was clear: cobble together a .500 league mark and don’t lose their first round Big 10 tournament game. Achieve that, and it would be March Madness time. The Iowa loss changed those dynamics. Michigan’s fall from the graces of the bracketologists was steep. At ESPN, Joe Lunardi dropped UM from the last team in the field to eighth from last out of the field. The Bracket Junkie dropped Michigan 10 spots from a comfortable seventh to last In, to third to last Out. Michigan is back in the Bracket Project’s NIT Field. With 18 days until Selection Sunday, Michigan is getting its sparsest support of the season among the mock bracket crowd. With a total of just six mock invites (a number that certainly will decline today as some of those which still have Michigan on a bracket line have yet to update post Iowa loss), the Wolverines are no longer even in the group of last eight teams cut from the Matrix field. Basically, the Iowa loss was entering a job interview with your fly down. Or mustard on your shirt. Or liquor on your breath. Something akin to all of that. The result being Michigan’s resume has now been cast aside and all sorts of other at large bid candidates have now seemingly passed the Wolverines. Michigan’s tournament math has changed. If Michigan wins two of three to close out the season and gets to the magical .500 mark in the Big 10, will that be enough to pass teams now ahead of them? Clubs like Maryland, Kansas State, UAB, Oklahoma St, Temple, Texas A/M are suddenly all ahead of Michigan. Notre Dame, Providence, Cincinnati, Miami and Virginia Tech are in the mix, arguably even or ahead of Michigan at this point. Before the Iowa loss, the thought was Michigan needed three wins to get in. That number may need to be upped to four. Michigan might need a win against MSU in a 1/8 game in the Big 10 quarterfinals in order to pass some of the teams ahead of them in the pecking order. There has been a smattering of good news since the Iowa loss. Georgetown is more cooked than Michigan after Louisville throttled them Monday night. Florida, a Matrix 9 seed, lost to LSU last night. The Gators close with three straight against fellow SEC bubble teams, and they're staring down the barrel of the NIT gun. Penn St, a matrix 11, fell last night to Ohio State and San Diego State, a matrix 12, lost at home to BYU. One glaring negative from last night was Providence’s impressive win over top ranked Pittsburgh. That’s as big a win as any other bubble team will get from here on out. The Friars, like Michigan, are trailing the pack, but last night’s win sets them up for perhaps the biggest surge up the chart among all the bubble teams. That, of course, is not good news for Michigan. It’s unclear if Michigan getting to 9-9 in the Big 10 will put them in any better position than they are today if things around the country do not change. Luckily, the beauty of this chase is that things don’t stay the same. Bubble tracking might be the most fluid situation in sports. So, against the backdrop of a fast drying Wolverine obituary, here’s a rundown of rooting interests for the busiest night of hoops before the weekend. Kentucky at South Carolina, 7pm, EPSN Full Court. Line, Pick When a pair of 10 seeds in the Bracket Matrix square off this late in the season, then you know it’s a big bubble contest. Paradoxically, it’s also a game with first place in the SEC East on the line. The Gamecocks have lived on the edge all season, pulling out wins throughout the season (including earlier in the year in Lexington) in their final possession. The Cats, meanwhile, have been carried by Jodie Meeks. I don’t think either team is in trouble with a loss tonight, but consider each of their slates from here on out. UK has LSU, at UGA and at Florida. South Carolina goes at Vandy, Tenn and at UGA. Both teams may be safe by splitting their final four and picking up a win in the SEC Tournament. But, there are traps out there and the loser tonight will walk a fine line on the bubble. Michigan fans should root against the loser tonight the rest of the way. Rutgers at Notre Dame, 7pm, EPSNU. Line, ND -14.5 By all accounts, the Irish should just roll right past the Scarlet Knights. However, when you’re a sub par defensive outfit, every game has the possibility to be an adventure. If the Irish want to make a late charge into the tournament, perhaps Mike Brey should play Zach Hillestand less. I don’t think they’re in too much trouble tonight, especially if they play like they did against Louisville and Providence. Like Michigan, Notre Dame is not in the final eight cut from the Matrix Field. Unlike Michigan, they’re trending upwards. In the scheme of things, this game might only be important should the Irish lose and absorb a bad loss. Their next two are biggies: at UConn and home against Villanova, Saturday and Monday respectively. If they win tonight, lose those two and win their closer against St Johns, the Irish will be 17-13, 8-10 in the Big East. Does that get them? Discuss. Dayton at Rhode Island, 7pm, no TV. Line, URI -6 The Flyers look secure, with an 8 seed in the Matrix and a gaudy 24-5 record. However, the Flyers had a dreadful-looking loss to St Louis over the weekend and now face the hardest four game closing stretch in the A-10, beginning with a tricky road game tonight at URI. Dayton has won five games since the start of January by 3 points or less. Can they stay on the right side of ledger tonight followed by Temple, at Xavier, and Duquense? Will the sky start to fall on the Flyer’s tournament hopes? Splitting those games might push Dayton far enough down the bubble that an early exit from the A-10 could be lethal. If they do worse than split, they might have some work to do in that tournament to qualify for the NCAAs. Virginia Tech at Clemson, 7:30pm, ESPN2. Line, Clemson -10 Somebody needs to throw the Hokies a life vest. They’ve lost three in a row and are about to be drenched in a Tsunami of ACC power teams. After tonight, Virginia Tech takes on Duke, UNC and Florida State to close out the season. The good news for Tech is if they can split those four games, they would have a .500 ACC record and enough late season big wins to surge into the field. The bad news is the run down the stretch has to come against four of the nation’s top teams. Any Hokie hot streak from here on out will drastically change the bubble picture in their favor. However, the Hokies are fading fast, a predicament traced back to their first meeting with Clemson last month. Duke at Maryland, 9pm, ESPN. Line, Duke -6 When these teams played last month, the outcome was probably the most embarrassing result a Gary Williams-led team ever faced. The storyline is simple tonight for Maryland: Payback and settling an old score. Historically speaking, the Terrapins have a nice history of avenging blowout losses. The Terps are the Cat’s Meow after their take down of UNC over the weekend. After banishment all winter long, Maryland jumped from non contender to a consensus 12 seed in the Matrix. Two out of every three mock brackets place the Terrapins in their field. The question is can they keep that momentum going? If they lose tonight and again over the weekend at Wake Forest, can Maryland keep those mock invites? Not likely, especially if other teams surge this week. Nevertheless a win tonight or against the Deacons will go a long way to cementing Maryland’s position in the field. Considering where this program was when February started, it might be one of Williams’ better coaching achievements. Kansas State at Missouri, 9:30pm, EPSNU. Line, Missouri -9 Looking for a darkhorse team who could play deep into March? Introduce yourself to Missouri, one of the most efficient offenses in the land. We’ll see where this team gets seeded, but I could see an Elite Eight trip. However, this is bubble talk, so let’s move on to the Kansas State Wildcats. Despite winning eight of their last nine games, KSU still has not convinced a majority of bracketologists. While they’re a 12 seed in the latest Matrix, KSU is clearly the last team in the tournament based on that comprehensive metric. Less than 40 percent of the brackets tracked have KSU in their field. They had to climb out of a 0-4 Big 12 hole and have nothing but weak losses on their OOC slate. A win tonight gives them a sweep of the Tigers and likely cements their spot in the field with a manageable slate down the stretch. A loss, though, might sap up all their remaining support and without any obvious big ticket scalps out there, who knows if they will reappear on anybody’s radar? The Cats have won four league road games in a row for the first time in 30 years. Tonight, that streak goes up against an undefeated team at home. Time to break out the something has got to give cliché. Mississippi St at Tennessee, 9pm, ESPN Full Court. Line, Tennessee -9 The Vols play at South Carolina and at Florida in their next two games, so they could find themselves in a boatload of trouble if they fail to hold serve tonight against the Bulldogs. The Vols have backed themselves into a corner.I can offer one tip to the Vols. If you want to swing yourself out of said corner, try the novel approach of actually listening to your coach. If they can’t get by MSU tonight, they’ll be on a three game losing streak and staring at consecutive road games against teams ahead of them in the standings. While they’re a consensus 9 seed in the Matrix right now, where will they be if this is just the middle of a losing streak? Michigan and other bubble teams could use a Volunteer losing streak. UNLV at Utah, 10pm, no TV. Line, Utah -5 All winter, four Mountain West Conference teams have belligerently stuck around in most bracketologists fields. Maybe, just maybe, the worm is finally turning on this one. SDSU’s loss last night was big for teams on the bubble. The same could be said should UNLV lose this evening in Salt Lake City. The Rebels are an 11 seed in the Matrix, but a loss tonight drops them to 8-6 in league play. I still don’t think a MWC team hovering near a .500 league mark will merit at large consideration. If they lose tonight, the Rebels will have to sweep their final two (home vs. Air Force and at SDSU) to get back into the at large mix. If not, they’ll need to win their league tournament. The good news there for Rebel fans is, like every year, they’re the tourney host.

Comments

bronxblue

February 25th, 2009 at 1:23 PM ^

Great read as usual. Providence winning last night was rough for UM's hopes, but schools like Ok St. and Maryland have some ground to make up as well. I agree that the draft is on the table, but take 2 out of 3 wins, especially one of them being over Purdue, and UM might still be in it. I would like to know, though, why schools like Notre Dame, Temple, and VT continue to receive so much love from the bracketologists - Notre Dame has been pretty sad the last few weeks outside of that game against Louisville, Temple's best win may be the one over a mediocre Tenn. team early in the season, and VT still has to go 2-2 against @Clemson-Duke-UNC-@FSU to finish .500 in the ACC. If any of those teams don't turn it on the last few games and still beat UM for a bid, I would love to hear the rationale.

ameed

February 25th, 2009 at 1:30 PM ^

Excellent work. Question, though, as unlikely as it may seem after the Iowa game, presuming UM gets 3 more wins (2 in season and round 1 of BTT), wouldn't that be enough to impress the committee? 2 of 3 in the regular season at this point means Purdue (A solid Tourney team) and taking one on the road versus legitimate bubble competition in the hostile Big Ten. Closing out strong and all that...

bigmc6000

February 25th, 2009 at 2:56 PM ^

It's not as if Iowa is Indiana. I don't think Iowa falls into the "bad loss" category like a loss to Indiana would. So couple that with beating a top 15 Purdue team and 1 upper-bubble team on the road OR losing at home to a top 15 team and winning 2 road games against teams we'd be fighting for a bubble spot against. Obviously if we're fighting against Minnesota for a spot and sweep the home and home we have to get the nod over them. I still really feel as tho 9-9 is possible, I'm not sure which would be more likely tho - I can't remember if this team has had a bye week this year so I don't have a clue what it might look like against Minn (I think they had a week off in '08 and came out stinking against Savannah State but that was, IMO, Duke hang-over) I've got the timing on all that right, right?

funkywolve

February 26th, 2009 at 12:01 AM ^

UM has been pretty bad on the road this year. I don't think they've beaten a team with a winning record on the road (UCLA was a neutral court). They've lost at Maryland, at UConn, at Purdue, at OSU, at Illinois and at PSU. Those 4 big ten losses have been by an average of about 15 pts. Throw in a huge scare at IU, a close one at NU (which probably isn't that bad) and a loss at Iowa and UM just has not done much on the road. Beating either Wisky or Minny on the road, let alone both, will probably be very tough.

bigmc6000

February 26th, 2009 at 8:10 AM ^

The game we played against UConn would probably win us every single game left. I mean, we went against a team with a freakin' 7'1" center and still scared the hell out of them AT STORRS! I just don't get how they can get all motivated to play these big teams when it's blatantly obvious that the game at Iowa was (at this point) just as important in terms of making the tournament and they totally suck it up. Oh wait, n/m. I figured it out - we didn't have the Big Ten refs on the road vs UConn, that explains a lot...

jmblue

February 26th, 2009 at 1:15 PM ^

The fact that Iowa had guys missing is irrelevant. The tournament committee doesn't memorize all that stuff. What they pay attention to is what Iowa's final record and RPI will be. Right now Iowa is 14-13 with an RPI (according to realtimerpi.com) of 102. That makes it a mildly bad loss - the fact that it was on the road mitigates it a little - but not necessarily a resume-killer. If Iowa moves into the top 100, the loss won't be a big deal at all.

Tater

February 25th, 2009 at 1:41 PM ^

If anyone had told me they would upset UCLA and Duke and be back in the NIT before the season, I would have hoped they were right. UM is on the way back. If games in the Big Ten were called like they are in the Big East, UM would probably be in the NCAA Tournament this year, but it isn't and they aren't. What this year has shown is that UM needs more strength, height, and experience to compete on an elite level in the Big Ten. They will come with time.

UNCWolverine

February 25th, 2009 at 2:23 PM ^

I ripped you a bit a few weeks ago for paralysis by analysis as I think putting that much effort into bracketology in early February is futile. Now that we are at the tail end of February I believe it is time to pay attention. Still licking my wounds after a very frustrating weekend as my two bball teams lost in OT on the road. And to rub salt in the wounds both teams gave up leads in the final minute to let far inferior teams win in OT. Homecooking was also a common denominator in both losses: Ty Lawson basically tackled trying to break the press resulting in an easy layup for Maryland and Sims' jumpball rebound that resulted in FTs for Iowa. Of course the Michigan loss stings beyond words. I also agree with the poster below in that if someone told me that we'd beat UCLA and Dook and play in the NIT I wouldn't jump off a cliff. However this has still been a very frustrating season all in all. But I guess just being frustrated this year is better than the 10 years of indifference I've been forced to feel lately. Hopefully next week you're blog will be much more optimistic. Go blue.

old fan

February 25th, 2009 at 11:06 PM ^

You, sir, are good at what you do. Maybe it's not for everyone and a bit deeper than other people want, but there are some, like me, that appreciate every detail. There is so much going on in college basketball that it is easy to glaze over when looking at the scoreboard. Question to Jamie Mac (or anyone), do you think that the selection committee is sophisticated enough to account for the fact that we played Indiana only once (and on the road at that). If we finish tied with Ohio State (or Wiscy or Penn State) or even one game back, do they account for strength of league schedule. Particularly when there is an anomalous team like IU (sorry to say it to you but they are really terrible this year, even if playing hard). Or do they look at league record only?

funkywolve

February 25th, 2009 at 11:56 PM ^

IMO, the thing that will hurt UM with OSU (and possibly Wisky) is that OSU swept the season series. Maybe UM got a little easier conference schedule then OSU, but getting swept would probably hurt. Wisky also sweeps the season series over UM if UM loses that one. PSU could be interesting since they split.

Don

February 26th, 2009 at 1:55 AM ^

What Beilein needs more than anything else are players who can make a goddamn basket. Most people are saying that Michigan has been playing far better this year than last, hence the optimism about the future. Unfortunately, that improvement has not taken place in our shooting. We were the worst shooting team in the B10 last year and are in the same spot this year. You're not going to win enough games—especially on the road—with your starters shooting 35% or worse. Manny and Deshawn were a combined 8 for 27 against Iowa, and nobody else picked up the slack. That's not just subpar, that's horrible. If we'd had just a mediocre shooting night, we wouldn't have been in the position we were in at the end of regulation, regardless of the home cooking by the refs.

the_white_tiger

February 26th, 2009 at 10:07 AM ^

Reading your article is almost always enjoyable even if the prognosis is not as much. Michigan has played excellent this year (comparatively), and with the emergence of Novak and to some extent Douglass, Michigan could very well be a Sweet 16 team next year, with Morris, Novak, Harris, Sims, and McLimans, and with Vogrich, Douglass, possibly Grady, and Cronin putting in minutes. As for this year the lack of any really good road wins the Wolverines are relegated to the NIT. Optimism dictates that Michigan will win out, then win a few games in the Big Ten, pull an upset or two, but that's extremely unrealistic. Probably 1-of-3 is believable, and a win then a loss in the tourney. What can be taken from this year is great experience, a possible deep NIT run, wins to boost confidence and momentum for 2009-2010.