Bowling Green Roundup, Ballot and Season Projections

Submitted by The Mathlete on

All numbers included in this preview are using my PAN metric, Points Above Normal. PAN is essentially how many points above an average FBS team was a team/unit/player worth. For reference, an average FBS is approximately equal to Illinois or a top team from the MAC.

All games against FCS teams are excluded, as well as any plays in the second half where one team leads by more than 2 touchdowns or any end of half run out the clock situations.

Post Game Notes

I noted in the preview it would be tough to reach the +18 projected on the ground for Michigan. In “countable” plays (basically the first half) Michigan only reached +13 and if you count the whole game it was a staggering +31, and that’s just on the ground.

In the first two games Denard put up matching +12’s on the ground. Against Bowling Green he must have pretended to be hurt to keep that number in tact. In only five carries Denard managed to add +11.5 in value. Before adjusting for strength of opponent, Denard now owns the #5, 7 and 8th best ground performances of the year. Of the other five performances, all but Daniel Thomas’s work against UCLA were against defensive patsies such as Washington St, New Mexico, Nevada and Tulane.

Adding to the damage running backs Smith, Toussaint, Cox & Shaw were all at least +2, as were both of the other QB’s. The QB’s were all highly effective through the air, as well. Robinson was +4.5, Gardner +5 and Tate was +8.

The defense allowed Bowling Green to hit +5 on the day, with the difference between break even and where they finished being almost exactly equal to the screen that broke for the long TD. Apart from that play, the defense kept Bowling Green equivalent to their expected points during both regular and garbage time.

Projections

Team projections are still pretty fluid after 4 weeks but are beginning to come into a bit of focus.

Michigan’s win total projection is still hovering in the 8-9 range with no Big 10 teams separating from the pack outside of Ohio State. With so many games near toss-up status, there are still quite a few scenarios showing 10+ wins or 6-7, but the odds of missing a bowl game at this point are less than the odds of going 12-0.

image

Remaining Schedule

@ Indiana – rank 58, 65% chance of winning

Michigan State - 36, 66%

Iowa - 17, 57%

@ Penn State - 28, 44%

Illinois - 70,90%

@ Purdue - 83,76%

Wisconsin - 34, 65%

@ Ohio State - 6, 17%

Most of the win odds are pretty similar to last week with the exception of Purdue which went from a toss-up to strong lean after another poor showing by the Boilermakers.

Projected Big 10 Standings

I currently have the Big 10 projecting to be Ohio State, then two groups of 5 teams. Iowa, Penn St, Michigan, Michigan St and Wisconsin are all projecting out to around 5-3 while NW, Indiana, Minnesota, Illinois and Purdue are all in the bottom bunch at 2-3 conference wins.

Ballot

Teams that have played 4 FBS opponents are now fully based on in-season results (although opponent strength adjustment still partially includes last season). Most of the rest of teams have played 3 FBS games and are 75% in season results and 25% pre-season.  

Rank Team Conf PAN
1 Nevada WAC 21.64
2 Boise St WAC 19.39
3 Alabama SEC 17.74
4 Oregon PAC 10 17.70
5 Florida SEC 17.35
6 Ohio St Big Ten 17.02
7 TCU Mtn West 16.72
8 Nebraska Big XII 16.62
9 Utah Mtn West 16.39
10 Stanford PAC 10 16.27
11 Oklahoma St Big XII 15.75
12 Arizona PAC 10 13.65
13 Texas Tech Big XII 11.27
14 Auburn SEC 11.26
15 Arkansas SEC 10.96
16 Oklahoma Big XII 10.23
17 Iowa Big Ten 9.60
18 Clemson ACC 9.57
19 LSU SEC 9.50
20 Miami (FL) ACC 9.21
21 Michigan Big Ten 9.02
22 Arizona St PAC 10 9.00
23 Air Force Mtn West 8.39
24 Missouri Big XII 8.34
25 Texas Big XII 8.32

Two WAC teams at the top obviously won’t last but for now their wins are as strong as most teams as the “computer” tends to overinflate big wins against bad teams early in the season.

Comments

Michigan4Life

September 27th, 2010 at 12:44 PM ^

PSU projected win is low compared to other team like Wisconsin and OSU. I think that it's more believable if you switch Wisconsin and PSU projected win %.  PSU isn't that good and will be exposed pretty soon if they haven't already from Alabama game.

 

I see that Michigan's projected win total for the regular season has increased from 8 to 9 wins.  That's great to see it on the chart.  Let's make it 10 wins!

Blue in Seattle

September 27th, 2010 at 1:07 PM ^

I trust Mathlete's numbers are the numbers to be following if you just want to follow numbers.  But if you want to start subjectively re-arranging things, then at least attack his assumptions, the biggest one being that this is how everything projects based on how people have played their first four games.  So based on the signature wins, I think Penn State is numbers-wise, stronger than Wisconsin.  Or do you subjectively think Wisconsin would have done better against Alabama?  seems like the numbers don't agree.

Of course, the reason they play the games is because past performance is not a guarantee of future returns,  I think my stock borker tells me that everytime I lose a few more points on my portfolio.

MSU-Wisconsin is one game that might significantly adjust those numbers.  But no telling until after they finish the game.

 

Michigan4Life

September 27th, 2010 at 1:26 PM ^

but I would expect the numbers to change as the season goes on.  PSU offense is not that good.  They're playing with a true freshman QB in Bolden and the running game has been a big disappointment.  Within the next few weeks, I would expect the numbers to be where I expect it to be which is a converging percentage in favor of Michigan.

Six Zero

September 27th, 2010 at 12:47 PM ^

that my PSU neighbors have been really really quiet about Oct. 30 this year.  I think we match up VERY well against them and they know it, even the diehards who follow the Nits as well as we follow the maize and blue.

I'm not going to go all-out and make the prediction, but as of now I'm feelin' pretty darn good about that game, regardless of Paternoville and white-outs and blah blah blah. 

uminks

September 27th, 2010 at 12:57 PM ^

I originally projected Michigan to finish 7-5 this season.  They have already won one game I projected them to lose in a close game at ND.  Now, I'm looking at an 8-4 season with wins against IU, MSU, IL and Purdue. Close games IMO include the remainder of the b10 schedule except for the last game against OSU, but if our defense can improve, I think we'll have a chance against OSU on the road.  I'm more positive to the upside for wins based on our more explosive offense. Just as long as the defense can improve enough by mid season to be an average b10 defense, then I think 10 wins could be a possibility!

Engin77

September 27th, 2010 at 1:00 PM ^

That's the game I'm concentrating on this week. RR has only one road win in the Big Ten ( '08 Little Brown Jug ) and it would be great to get the second this weekend. I would especially like to see the defense play well, and force a couple of turnovers (and hold onto the ball!).

joeyb

September 27th, 2010 at 1:01 PM ^

BTW, I look forward to this diary every week almost as much as the UFRs. Both seem to validate my feelings of what went on over the weekend. Kudos to you and keep up the good work.

pjandy

September 27th, 2010 at 1:11 PM ^

It was nice to see 3rd stringers holding their own on the O, and the D bringing some pressure, but  "with so many games near toss-up..." it would have been nice to see someone in a Michigan jersey (Robinson?) try for and successfully kick a field goal on Sat.!  Too bad the opportunity didn't come up.   So far we've been able to laugh it off the miserable place kicking, but it beings an element of russian roulette to every game, and heading into the Big10 season I can't help feeling that it's only a matter of time before it costs us a game -- and it better not be the OSU game!

TXmaizeNblue

September 27th, 2010 at 1:32 PM ^

I hope this Indiana game does not come down to 4th and 5 at the 24 with 6 seconds left.  On the road that is a scary propostion...especially if it ends up being the 1st attempt all day. 

I'm thinking RR should have given the kickers at shot at a field goal attempt just to give them some game time confidence....hope this does not end up biting us this week.

Wolverine90

September 27th, 2010 at 2:54 PM ^

I'll never argue with the Mathlete's math, and I'm a bigger UM fan than 95% of the UM fans out there, but these projections are way too homer.  Let's get back to some realism here given the state of our defense and special teams:

@ Indiana – rank 58, 65% chance of winning - ACCURATE

Michigan State - 36, 66% - INACCURATE.  This game is a coin flip.  If UM's offense is a 10, MSU's is a 7, and if MSU's D is a 7, UM's is a 4, so they are about even, with UM holding the slight homefield edge.  No way we are 66% to win.

Iowa - 17, 57% - INACCURATE.  I'd flip it and Iowa is the 57-60% favorite.

@ Penn State - 28, 44% - Close, but slightly INACCURATE.  I'd say PSU will be a 60% favorite.  Despite their youth, they have a solid D, are at home, and have Royster.  40

Illinois - 70,90% - INACCURATE.  Yes we will be favored, but 90% is absurd.  70% perhaps.  They have won twice in a row, yeah no Juice, but our D looks worse than last year.

@ Purdue - 83,76% - INACCURATE - Yes it's a new season, but they did win twice in a row, and did beat OSU last year.  If Purdue gets Marve back, since they are at home, we'd only be about 55-60% to win this. 

Wisconsin - 34, 65% - INACCURATE.  Not a chance we are this favored against this team.  More like 35%.

@ Ohio State - 6, 17% - ACCURATE.

My personal projection is 8-4 with wins over IU, IU, Purdue, and one other win somewhere, either MSU, Iowa, PSU or Wiscy.   But the majority still losses.  We just don't have the D yet.  OSU very little chance barring our D improving by 3 magnitudes and OSU's D regressing.

BraveWolverine730

September 27th, 2010 at 4:12 PM ^

I'm curious how our "D looks worse than last year".  They had an off day to UMass in a let down game(it happens look at OSU's D giving up 20 to Eastern), but held ND to less points than last year on the road, held UConn to 10 and BGSU to somewhere around 280 yards.  Also either you like Mathlete's math or you don't, just because you don't doesn't make him a homer.

Emarcy

September 28th, 2010 at 3:03 AM ^

it was the defense that knocked that mf out for a quater and a half.  so yes we can give them some credit.  Besides Crist wouldn't have done so hot since he couldn't you know see out of one eye or remember plays.  If Crist had played the whole game I can only surmise that we would have won by even more points.

While their backup QBs weren't good, neither was Crist when he came back in; all of them threw to tacopants and our DBs.  But thats what happens when you get your brain damaged.

Also, Whose side are you on anyway?

AeonBlue

September 28th, 2010 at 5:19 PM ^

lol, of course I'm on Michigan's side but shutting down two backups is, in my opinion, hardly a cause to declare the return of defensive legitimacy. Just because I'm a Michigan fan doesn't mean I have to be brainwashed and ignore fact.

"While their backup QBs weren't good, neither was Crist when he came back in"

Speaking of ignoring fact, Crist threw for an 53 yard touchdown immediately upon returning to the game (2nd Notre Dame play of the 3rd quarter).

Did we watch the same thing? 'Cause I watched a game where Crist went  for 277 YDS, 2 TDs, and 1 INT in just over 2 quarters while he was, as you put it, "brain damaged."

I don't call that a great defensive performance. I call that a lucky defensive performance. I'm gald we got the win though. I'll take luck over skill any day.

BraveWolverine730

September 28th, 2010 at 12:42 AM ^

So the fact that Michigan shut down ANY QB isn't a sign of improvement over last year? Do you think other Big Ten schools sit around saying "our wins against Michigan don't count  because Tate and Molk were hurt". Do you think OSU says "our 2007 win against Michigan doesn't count because Hart and Henne were hurt"? So while the D isn't fantastic, it has in 3 of the 4 games shown some the ability to be the mediocre defense we hoped it could be.

AeonBlue

September 28th, 2010 at 5:25 PM ^

I think you're missing the point I was trying to make. I'm not saying the win didn't count. If it's a W in the book then it's a W in the book. What I'm trying to figure out why everyone seemed/seems to be hailing the return of legitimate defense after shutting down 2 back-ups. It would be like hailing the return of the Raiders after they beat St. Louis two weeks ago.

BraveWolverine730

September 27th, 2010 at 4:12 PM ^

I'm curious how our "D looks worse than last year".  They had an off day to UMass in a let down game(it happens look at OSU's D giving up 20 to Eastern), but held ND to less points than last year on the road, held UConn to 10 and BGSU to somewhere around 280 yards.  Also either you like Mathlete's math or you don't, just because you don't doesn't make him a homer.

TheOracle6

September 27th, 2010 at 4:39 PM ^

Your post is innacurate at best.  Our defense is no where near worse then it was last year and whether Purdue has Marve or not they still suck.  I agree with all of the percentages of the OP except for the Penn State game.  This Michigan team is so much better then it was last year overall it's not even funny.  I said 8-4 at the beginning of the year but after watching the first 4 games I am inclined to say that we should win 9.  The defense is going to have games where it struggles but there is solid leadership and pride on that side of the ball that they will step it up when they need to like against ND.  Penn State has troubles defending our scheme as the past two years we have had early leads that fell apart because of our inability to continue our offensive success and the defense just plain sucked.  This year the offense only comes off the field when we beat ourselves and the defense's bend but don't break scheme has worked to some degree.  There will be some shootouts the rest of the way but I think we win some of those games.  It's great to be a Wolverine!

bronxblue

September 27th, 2010 at 3:26 PM ^

Great work.  I do have a questions about PSU - even though I know it is on the road and that is about 9%, why do the numbers still consider this a bit of a PSU lean?  They have not really impressed at all this year, and it seems like whatever advantages their offense will have against UM's defense will be more than offset by UM's offense.

BleedingBlue

September 27th, 2010 at 5:11 PM ^

"but the odds of missing a bowl game at this point are less than the odds of going 12-0."

Thank you little babby Jesus!  Please inform Michigan everything hating God to gtfo.  Thanks.

OneFootIn

September 28th, 2010 at 6:40 AM ^

But few people know the corollary: it's easier to lie without them. Mathlete's approach will improve week by week as data comes in and the basis for judgment is clear, making it easy to figure out how to interpret the conclusions. On the other hand, people who simply assert "obvious" assessments give other people no way of figuring out how they reached their conclusions, usually leading me to believe they have done a lot less thinking about the topic than Mathlete and are thus less worthy of my attention.