Best and Worst: Oregon State

Submitted by bronxblue on

I haven’t been this happy to write a recap since, I don’t know, UTL II?  Yeah, let’s go with that. 

Best:  Reasonably Excited!

I know, this was the JV game of the Battle for Mid-Sized States with Coastlines or whatever ESPN tried to turn this particularly random scheduling quirk into, and I know that the upper-echelon of the conference as it were (OSU, then some distance away MSU, then some farther distance away I guess Minnesota and Wisconsin) is still between outrageously and significantly better than the Wolverines, and I know that Oregon State doesn’t have a QB on the roster who played a down of college football before the season started, and I know that it’s one of the youngest teams in the country and not particularly talented youth to boot, and I know that whatever gypsy or witch Al Borges insulted back in the 90’s who subsequently cursed all of his QBs hasn’t broken her spell despite him leaving UM 2 years ago, and I know that we’ve seen the running game look this good against undersized defensive lines only to be exploited (like it was last week) against defenses who can push back, and I know that the pass rush is still really inconsistent (witness only 2 sacks, one by Morgan), and I know that the linebackers remain adventures against small guys, big guys, really any guys in space or in coverage, I know that the corners not named Lewis still have major question marks that probably won’t be answered/exposed until BYU, and I know that the offense still took about a half to get anything resembling coherency and that isn’t going to work against more competent offenses, and finally, I know that beating a pretty bad Pac-12 team isn’t going to be substantially change the outlook for the season for any reasonable fan…

But…

I’ll take it.  I’ll take it because this was the type of win you always wanted to see out of those old Hoke outfits, not the nail-bitters against UConn(!) and Akron(!!) where the offense looked like it was shot with the Devolution Gun.  I’ll take it because it felt like the team embodied its offensive and defensive philosophies, not just pay them lip-service while flailing around for anything that works.  I’ll take it because after that first drive, Michigan’s defense stiffened and held OSU to 84 total yards of offense, including 2 drives that went backwards (I don’t count the Tacopants punt and the kneel down to end the first half; it’s 4 if you count those).  I’ll take it because Michigan had three more 10+ drives that ended in scores, and probably would have had more such drives in the second half if the field didn’t shift steeply toward the OSU side of the field and UM had great field position.  I’ll take it because while Rudock threw another pick, it (a) late in a blowout, (b) a defensible throw in that he was trying to hit Butt and threw it a bit too inside after Butt seemed to settle into his spot a bit early, (c) featured a good play by the LB to jump in front of the pass, and (d) came after a 13/16 stretch in which Rudock looked much more comfortable throwing the ball.  I’ll take it because Smith, Green, and Isaac, and the offensive line just ground down a P5 defense for 224 yards with a long of 19.  I’ll take it because the A. J. Williams caught a long pass for the first time in what seems like forever, Ian Bunting had some nice catches, Darboh continued his ascension to #1 WR, and 9 guys caught passes for the second time this year, which happened twice all of last year and never as fluidly.  I’ll take it because Chris Wormley has been a revelation on the defensive line, recording another 3 TFLs and giving the line the type of dual-prong rushers you need to generate an organic/disruptive pass rush as well as contain the running game.  I’ll take it because, even with Jourdan Lewis out for the second half due to a potential concussion, the pass defense steadied itself after a rough first quarter and gave up a total of 30(!) yards the rest of the game.  I’ll take it because the special teams turned the game around to end the 2nd half (though obviously the OSU long snapper did most of the work) despite getting screwed earlier in the drive by a wonky, at best, roughing the kicker penalty on the OSU punter.  I’ll take it because searching for “Jim Harbaugh freak out” is WAY more fun than “Brady Hoke freak out” (which features Brady Hoke half-hugging Brian Kelly and a half-dozen pictures of him looking like he’s in various stages of passing a massive bowl movement).  I’ll take it because UM won comfortably despite the referees doing their best to muck up the game (they apparently thought they were in East Lansing and the other Oregon team was playing).  And, finally, I’ll take it because UM looked better than they did last week, better as the game progressed, and at the end looked like a team that bulldozed over a mediocre Pac-12 team like a Jim F*ing Harbaugh team SHOULD from now until forever!


Best:  Like Novacaine

I know I use this video all the time, but it perfectly encapsulates how good offenses should work. I know you read and hear all the time about dynamic offenses that roll with a million different formations and playcalls; I've been a proponent of those types of offenses as the natural evolution of collegiate offenses and a system I'd kinda hope UM had been able to make work with previous coaches.  But I’ll admit that a lot of those complaints are about window-dressing or presentation; a good offense, at its core, looks like every other “type” of good offense, whether it be spread, Air Raid, triple-option, run-and-shoot, MANBALL, etc.  It’s about executing the plays you are best equipped to run with consistency and reasonable effectiveness. 

And while you definitely should adapt as the game dictates, it also means running your offense sometimes in spite of individual results if you are confident that the final outcome will be a net positive.  That’s what Hoke’s offenses struggled from as the years went on; he’d run plays X until the defense wised up, then switch to plays Y, but always seemed concerned about going to back to plays X if it made sense to, even if Y seemed to be working.  It’s why we saw tackle over for most of the game against Minnesota instead of trotting it out periodically and using it as an occasional constraint for his “base” offense.

At some point in the 1st half, UM had 17 yards rushing.  The line couldn’t sustain a push, the RBs weren’t getting much yardage beyond the line, and even little screen passes were being blown up for minimal gain because Mason Cole, for example, basically got flipped over by an OSU linebacker.  But to his credit and as proof that Harbaugh is a masterful offensive technician…he didn’t really change anything.  He just kept pushing forward with Smith, asked Rudock to make safe-ish throws, and trusted that an undersized OSU defensive line would start giving up ever-bigger holes for Smith to rumble through.  And, ultimately, it did.  A defense that had completely nullified the OSU offense helped, but the offensive performance felt organic and persistent in a way that hasn’t existed for years in A2; save for when Drake Johnson was the lead back at the end of last year, a Michigan rushing attack hasn’t looked close to this natural since 2011.  And looking at the bulk of the upcoming schedule and assuming a natural improvement as the players become more comfortable with the new offensive playcalling, I don’t see too many teams that will be able to completely disrupt the general offensive flow.  I know “most teams won’t be able to stop UM from running forward with the ball” is pretty faint praise, but I’ll take it after 2 games of another coaching regime.


Worst:  You’ll Probably Still Want Someone to Drive You Home

Not to be a downer because I thought the running game executed really well against OSU, but this remains an offensive line with major question marks both at positions you expect (Braden) and not (Cole has been less-than-stellar thus far, at least in run blocking).  Oregon State has both a young and not particularly defense, and still it took Michigan nearly a half of football to establish consistent running lanes.  And even when they did execute, at times it felt more a by-product of an overmatched Beaver defense than fantastic play by the offensive line.  In particular, I remember one of the longer Smith runs in the 4th quarter featuring Braden pulling across and into the second level.  Instead of crushing the LB/safety waiting for him, he kinda just, I don’t know, fell on the defender and that allowed Smith to break outside a bit, but also slowed him a down enough to let other defenders tackle him. 

I know that Braden is very tall and leverage becomes a major issue when trying to block guys half a foot or more shorter than you, but I saw a number of instances where the offensive linemen did “enough” right things for a positive, and that simply isn’t going to work against better defenses.  I fully expect them to improve, and the improvements even since Utah, opponent quality acknowledged, were encouraging.  I did think Braden handled the pass rush better, and Smith and co. ran through gaping holes not only because they saw them but also because they were sustained and, in some instances, carved out of the defensive line exactly how the play call asked for it.  But I still see it being tough sledding against teams like Minnesota, MSU, OSU, and, maybe, PSU on the ground.  I don’t expect there to be another 27-for-27 or what happened a couple years ago against MSU, but this remains a semi-fragile running game that isn’t going to necessarily carve up defenses the way it looks like they will the remainder of the OOC season.


Best:  Getting Closer

As ST3 noted in his always-good Inside the Boxscore, Jake Rudock doesn’t need to be a world-beater for Michigan to win.  Jake Rudock doesn’t have even be a gunslinger or a “playmaker” in the Denard/Gardner-before-broken-soul mold.  Jake Rudock just has to be Iowa Jake Rudock, or more definitely:

My definition of efficient is 7+ YPA, 60+% completion percentage, and no more than 1 turnover per game. He was at 6.9 YPA and 69%, but he turned the ball over twice (1 INT, 1 fumble.) We're getting there.

We are getting there.  I’m more bothered by the fumble than the INT, because as I noted above the INT was late in a blowout and just felt like ongoing growing  pains for the offense.  But the fumble was because a LB came in unblocked on a delayed blitz and, for whatever reason, Rudock either didn’t see him, failed to throw to the hot route, or just throw it at someone’s feet.  He’s a 5th-year senior, and he played for Iowa last year behind a suspect offensive line; getting rid of the ball before you get hammered by an unblocked defender shouldn’t be “new” to him the way it seems to be whenever, say, Connor Cook feels the faint breeze of a defensive end’s outstretched fingers grasp within 2 feet of his face. 

Anyway…beyond the fumble I thought Rudock looked pretty good once the running game established itself and drew in the safeties a bit.  Unlike last week’s game when it seemed like every downfield threat was double-covered, this week you could see Oregon State start to cheat up a bit, and that opened up throws to guys like Darboh and Bunting with room for yards after the catch.  That’s what a good running game does for a QB; it opens up the field and forces defenses to guess more than they like, which almost always favors skill players on offense.  The deep passing game remains a bit of an enigma, but if Rudock can be deadly accurate within 15 yards and those little bubble and WR screens stick and remain effective, that might be enough against most of the defenses they’ll see this season.


Best:  I’ll Happily Admit Defeat

At the beginning of the year, I was down on Amara Darboh as a #1 receiver, likening him to a #2/#3 who plays as a #1 by default.  While I’m sure he’ll have trouble against some of the better corners in the conference, I am pleasantly surprised how good he’s been thus far.  He isn’t a burner, but he’s quicker than I remember from last year, and his upper body strength coupled with that speed has really helped him maximize the WR screens and crossing routes that have been big gains for the passing attack.  I also suspect he’ll be a solid downfield blocker if/when the running game starts breaking off those longer runs you kind of expect will start happening any game now.

As for the rest of the receiving core, just remember that both A. J. Williams and De’Veon Smith had 20+ yard receptions a week after both dropped critical passes.  If Harbaugh and co. aren’t careful, I’m going to stop clutching those pearls around my neck on every 3rd down, and I’m not sure if I’m ready for that.

Best:  The Line Was Drawn Here; They Went No Farther

With the exception of that first drive (and let’s just assume I say that before everything else going forward in this diary), the defensive line played a great game.  Chris Wormley is a revelation at defensive tackle/end, and really has given this defense an identity along with Glasgow and Henry on the front line.  It still lacks an elite pass rusher, but except for what I assume are the elite running games (OSU, maybe MSU and Minnesota), I don’t see this line giving up much on the ground consistently and, more promisingly, giving more teams trouble in the passing games than in years past.

I remain…surprised that Lawrence Marshall hasn’t gotten really any meaningful playing time after the preseason hype, and (sadly) it’s not because Ojemudia or RJS is performing above expectations on the weak side.  BYU will be a test because even if Mangum lacks Hill’s explosive running ability and seems to be balancing on that razor’s edge between competent and self-sabotaging at times, he can absolutely throw the ball if given time.  My hope is that someone emerges to provide even token pressure from the position by then.


Worst:  Still Not Sure About the Second Corner

This is a light Worst because, again, under 100 yards over the last three quarters, with virtually nothing in the air.  Yes, OSU was starting a caravan of people who hadn’t thrown a down of college ball, but that’s still an accomplishment.  I thought the TD on Lewis was just a really well-thrown ball that Jarmon was able to haul in after getting a step; it happens.  That it was at the end of a bad drive probably made it sting a bit more than normal, but other than that Lewis looked great until he was knocked out with the concussion.  I assume he’ll be back next week, but they might just keep him out as a precaution, as I doubt UNLV will test UM much especially if their QB Decker is out.

As for the man opposite Lewis at corner, that remains a mixed bag.  After Villamin burned Stribling for a couple of early receptions, Clark came in and, I guess, did a bit better on a failed 4th down conversion.  Peppers also got a bit of a run in there as well, but the 2nd corner spot remains in flux.  It might behoove the defense to keep Lewis out/use him sparingly and let the other guys get some game experience and see if anyone can really stand out, as right now any offense with more than one semi-competent WR is just going to attack that second spot mercilessly.  Luckily this is the B1G so half your schedule has, at best, one competent receiver, but you’d still hope someone, anyone, would have locked down that spot in the event that it becomes an issue.


Meh:  The Men in the Middle

I’ll admit I never can get a good read on LB play during a game.  Some games I think everyone is going great and then you look back and you see a bunch of missed tackles.  Other times it seems like every tackle is happening 3 yards after the line and they grade out as above-average because the defensive tackles aren’t holding up well.  And coverages are especially hard based on the camera angle, as sometimes the zones put LBs in no-man’s land where conceding 5-6 yards is how you want the play to end.

As usual, Desmond Morgan hit people and they stopped.  He also did a pretty good job flowing to the ball on those jet sweeps and QB runs that OSU relied on to move the ball.  Bolden got better as the game went on, and he showed a nifty set of hands picking up that fumble from Bolden.  He still seemed slow to react on some plays, especially early on when OSU was finding success testing the edges, but again, he helped hold a P5 team under 150 total yards of offense.  Ross and Gedeon also got some time and played well enough.  I remain a bit scared about the linebackers going against BYU and that ilk, but it’s not like Maryland, UNLV, or NW are loaded offensively.  Like the rest of the defense, the LBs are growing into the schemes and showing incremental improvements, so let’s assume they keep that up.


Best:  That’s Why You Give Long Snappers Scholarships!

I know some people joked about Scott Sypniewski getting a scholarship as primarily a long snapper, but after watching the OSU snapper rocket two increasingly-terrible throws back to his punter, the first leading to an illogical “roughing the kicker” penalty to extend a drive, and the latter a Tacopants special that led to a late UM score on the same drive, there is value in making sure the guy setting up your punter is good at, you know, doing that with a football.

I’m assuming everyone saw that sequence toward the end of the half, but for those who didn’t here’s a brief recap.  OSU was forced to punt on 4th down, and on the punt the snap was high and to the right a bit, causing the OSU punter to bobble the ball before running pretty far to one sideline and getting the ball off.  He was then bumped into by Clark, leading to (a) the refs calling a “roughing the kicker” penalty that netted OSU a first down, and (b) Jim Harbaugh absolutely losing his mind on the sideline.*

So the drive continued and OSU had to punt again because they basically used up all their bag of tricks on that first drive and were running into various walls offensively after that.  On the next punt, UM made sure to not even fart in the general direction of the punter, and he was able to pin UM deep in their own territory with about 1:30 left in the half.  But that punt was called back after an illegal formation penalty on OSU, so on the subsequent play the OSU long snapper sailed a ball a good 10 feet over the punter and 30-ish yards deep, resulting in UM getting the ball back at the OSU 3 yard line.  It was a 90+ yard swing, and let UM go into the half up 10 and really helped salt the game away. 

* As a brief aside, it was nice to see a coach ride the officials a bit.  Hoke never did that, and while I don’t believe that referees consciously do “make-up” calls, I do believe that they are human and hate being yelled at by a crazed man in a baseball cap.  Over time, they will subconsciously want to stop that crazy man from yelling at them and, as a result, make calls that appease said crazy man.  It won’t work all the time, but it never hurts.


Worst:  These Refs, Though

I’ll keep this brief – OSU had nearly as many first downs due to penalty (3) as they had rushing (4) or passing(5).  Their only first down in the second half came on a facemask penalty against UM, and UM recorded nearly as many penalty yards (105) as OSU recorded total yards (138).  Beyond the punter penalty I spoke of above (I always thought a punter was “live” outside of the tackle box), the refs also missed a number of obvious PIs on OSU (including one in the endzone on Darboh that would have been a TD) while also calling a dubious PI on Peppers in the first half.  I get that UM was sloppy at times, but how UM went from 3 penalties on the road to 10 penalties at home against a team they were killing for most of the game was just infuriating.


Best, I Guess:  Snack on Danger, Dine on Death!

So yeah, I missed a wrestling reference last week, but I couldn’t help myself after the past couple of weeks.  Against Utah last week, Booker tried to hurdle a UM defender and was instead depositing on his head and shoulders by Joe Bolden.  Last year, Utah’s Travis Wilson tried something similar, and, well…

So in this game, Seth Collins tried to, I don’t know, fly over the UM defense.  It didn’t work and he wound up being crunched mid-air by either Bolden and/or Desmond.  It was nasty, dangerous, and continuing this weird tradition where opponents set themselves up for variations of the Doomsday Device popularized by the Legion of Doom

I’ll give you a brief synopsis of the Legion of Doom.  They started off as the Road Warriors (Animal and Hawk) in the old territory days of professional wrestling, these hulking bodybuilders who worked super-stiff (i.e. in the world of fake fighting, it’s when guys don’t really hold back on their punches/kicks/slams etc.), were underrated athletes (in particular Hawk, who moved amazingly well for a big guy) and had a great look.  Over the years they evolved into, well, Mad Max-style brutes with shoulder spikes, snarling, barely-coherent promos, and a reputation for just demolishing guys.  They were known as the Legion of Doom in the WWF/E, and became some of the biggest draws of that era.  Oh, also, if you were ever in an arcade in the early 90’s and walked by the Wrestlefest cabinet you heard their catch phrases.  They were dumb, cheesy, and 100% in your wheelhouse if you were a young kid who loved professional wrestling.

Over the years their gimmick got a bit stale, drugs and alcohol problems took over, and they kind of fell apart.  Hawk passed away at the age of 46 from a sudden heart attack, the guy the WWE tried to semi-replace Hawk with before his death (Droz) wound up breaking his neck in a freak in-ring incident a couple years later, and Animal still kicks around on the indy circuit and will pop up on Raw every once and a while.  Everything in this paragraph can be said for about 80% of the wrestlers from the 80s and 90s, I know.  Oh, also, Joe Laurinaitis (Animal) is the father of famed Ohio State LB James Laurinaitis

This should also not surprise you at all.

Anyway, my point is that wrestling is fake, yet college football players still seem to think throwing themselves in the air is going to end well with 225+ lb men trying to knock them out of said air.  The LOD wrecked guys for years so that you can watch them on youtube; you don’t need to try to recreate modern-day beheadings for a couple more yards.


Best:  Runnin’ Rebels

I predict UM scores many points, accumulates many yards, and my entire diary is full of animated gifs of professional wrestling and raccoons on little bicycles.

Go Blue!

Comments

Danwillhor

September 14th, 2015 at 6:06 AM ^

me? haha. Well written and couldn't agree more with everything. Did you also find it a bit "off" when everyone was singling out Braden as "the one guy that would start for osu/anyone in the conference"? It's as if they didn't realize that Oregon State was Oregon State and Braden is currently a 9 foot, slightly below average OG. Only McShay (sp?) noted that it's Butt that could absolutely play for just about anybody, iirc. Finally, I did appreciate Spielman not taking a huge homer dump on UM for the first time in half a decade. He'd really become an osu homer as of late compared to em he was always very complimentary of UM.

bronxblue

September 14th, 2015 at 8:41 AM ^

Spielman was solid, but I also think he respects Harbaugh immensely and likes what he's doing, so he's extra complimentary.  Spielman does seem like a guy who cares about football almost as much as particularly rivlaries, though I'll admit he's gotten a bit worse over the years.  ESPN infections, I'm guessing.

Yeah, Braden I think looks the part but seems to struggle from what a lot of taller guys do: leverage and flexibility.  He's gotten better, but I can definitely see his limitations as a guard.  

Danwillhor

September 15th, 2015 at 2:04 AM ^

but Chris went from being like that his entire career (as far as I'd ever heard as he obviously favored osu but he was always very fond and kind regarding UM) to becoming quite the homer and I know exactly when it happened: When tattoogate was just coming to light and word was that it was going to be REALLY bad (it was but they were lucky 2 guys wouldn't talk), Chris was ESPN's main guy on the ground in Cbus. He looked and sounded absolutely defeated whenever more and more bad news and rumor came to light. At one point he even admitted that everyone in the osu family knew they weren't on the up&up but either didn't know the depth or didn't dare go up against Tressel. He repeatedly said that osu would take a decade to recover from what they were about to rightfully get. The man was very dejected as he was POSITIVE they were going to get hammered. Then, time passed and Tressel had to go but other than that they actually got off quite easily. He started to become a pretty intolerable osu homer during the 2011 season, especially when doing games with Meyer himself. He basically recruited Meyer on air, more than hinted - well before the season was over - that Meyer was going to osu and often spoke about how weak UM was. He openly dogged on Hoke & his staff for everything you can think of but mainly player useage, development, coaching and overall talent level. He wasn't wrong about many of the things he'd said but would absolutely rail on Michigan (even if winning) and that hurts recruiting/perception. When the guy is going in on faults even when winning it's annoying. I recall a game we had locked up at the half and he spent the entire second half talking about osu's dominance over us. Totally unnecessary, IMO. He kept commenting on the brilliance of the coming Meyer and well after his hire would talk like the guy built a crumbled empire instead of inheriting the great players he did. I ALWAYS liked Chris but it changed a few years ago. Saturday was the first time I'd heard "the old Chris" since 2011, the guy that obviously went to osu but treated both programs the same respect. He was borderline Galloway/Smith level there for a bit. He was going out of his way to not only point out our obvious problems but deliver unnecessary jabs and insults. He was using his voice to openly disparage UM. I hope he's back to being the Chris I'd always liked. He doesn't have to kiss our ass but he was going down homer-troll road there a bit.

LBSS

September 14th, 2015 at 9:06 AM ^

Great column as always. In the cool light of Monday, it's helpful to be reminded that we physically overmatched this team, won as we should be expected to, and cannot yet take it for granted that we'll be competitive against teams that are our size.

27-for-27 was against Penn State, not Staee, fwiw.

Cranky Dave

September 14th, 2015 at 10:00 AM ^

This was best to me:

 

"but the offensive performance felt organic and persistent in a way that hasn’t existed for years in A2; save for when Drake Johnson was the lead back at the end of last year, a Michigan rushing attack hasn’t looked close to this natural since 2011." This gives me hope for a better offense as the INTs should get cleaned up and even if the line doesn't turn into an irrestible force we should be in every game with the way the defense is playing.

Everyone Murders

September 14th, 2015 at 10:20 AM ^

Illusory or not, it was great to see the RBs (esp. Smith) get large chunks of yardage through large holes created by the OL.  I watched with my son, and it was the first time since ... Mike Hart? ... that I've seen that sort of running dominance against a P5 opponent.  As a legitimate fan, this is the first time he's seen it, and it was great to see his enthusiasm increase.

It wasn't only that they won a game they should have won.  They won it like they should have done - totally dominating OSU rather than letting them hang around.

Eye of the Tiger

September 14th, 2015 at 10:37 AM ^

It was interesting hearing Spielman lavish praise on Braden, given how Braden has struggled (including last week). While he's still a work in progress, I did think he had his best game as a Wolverine. So that's a best for me.

More generally, I think these kids need confidence that they can be good. After the past two years, I don't think that confidence is there. So hopefully this and next week provide some gains in the mental game.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

bronxblue

September 14th, 2015 at 3:16 PM ^

Yeah, it felt like Spielman had a talking point and he wasn't going to be knocked off of it despite the reality that Braden still has some problems.  That said, I thought he played better, and if you are going to be a big, hulking dude you might as well sit on guys if you can't block them.

I agree the team looked more confident out there; Harbaugh freaking out from the sideline seemed to really galvanize them.

Eye of the Tiger

September 14th, 2015 at 7:02 PM ^

Both have lingering problems, and I doubt we've seen the end of them. But I feel like a lot of their problems stem from not really having their heads in the game. Part of getting your head in the game comes from repetition and good coaching, but another part of it is psychological. I hope that a couple games where they feel like they can really do it gives them confidence to make those split-second decisions according to instinct and not do that "panicked, deer-in-headlights, who-is-that-dude" thing we've all seen from both Braden and Kalis with alarming regularity.

But yeah...still works in progress. Very much.

Danwillhor

September 15th, 2015 at 2:14 AM ^

is on the "bust" tightrope, IMO. He's either going to put it together this year or we have to admit that he's nowhere near the guy we thought we'd landed. I don't even see the flat out push/strength he had in HS. I've seen FR DL from bad teams dominate the guy in pure 1v1 battles. He was supposed to be startable at OG as a True FR due to his power and toughness but I'm yet to see it. It's this year or bust, IMO.

ST3

September 14th, 2015 at 11:07 AM ^

Good stuff, but I have a minor quibble with the running game narrative. De'Veon Smith's first 8 carries went for 6, 6, 3, 6, 1, 5, 10, and 5 yards. That's 42 yards on 8 carries, or 5.25 YPC.He ended up averaging 5.5 YPC for the game. I don't think we wore them down (a narrative you see more in the press conferences) as much as we just decided to tone down the passing game and give Smith, Green and Isaac the ball more in the 2nd half. In the first quarter, I got the feeling we could get 5 yards on the ground against OSU's undersized d-line any time we wanted to. It was the passing game that struggled early. Our first drive featured an incomplete pass and the fumble sack. The second drive also had issues other than the running game - false start penalty, 3 yard pass, incomplete pass, and so we settled for a FG. The third drive was more passing game/penalty derpitude including a completely bogus holding penalty on Poggi that wiped out a nice run gain. Poggi's hands were inside the shoulders and the OSU guy, knowing he was beat, started flailing one of his arms wildly trying to get the call, and he did. Vlade Divac would be impressed by that acting performance.

bronxblue

September 14th, 2015 at 3:23 PM ^

I agree that a difference was that the team just started to rush the ball more on 1st/2nd downs later in the game, and that attempts to establish the passing game early on played a part in it.  I will argue, though, that the blocks on the edges where Smith got a decent amount of his yardage in the second half weren't there to start the game, and the guards were having trouble moving OSU inside early on.  So I guess it wasn't a demolishing the way it was by, say, MSU last year, but it did feel like the OSU LBs were slower to the hole and were getting smacked back quicker as the game progressed.  It might have just been a confidence/execution thing, but I'm all about narratives!

The refs were atrocious in that first half; I thought the first long ball to Darboh could have been a penalty, but it wound up not being nearly as egregious as other bad calls.  The Poggi call was up there as well.

Moonlight Graham

September 14th, 2015 at 11:12 AM ^

two on little scrambles and two or three nice checkdown passes just before getting hit, including the 2-pointer and that thing of beauty to Bunting. So that was encouraging. 

It was weird to hear Coach Harbaugh say in his press conference that he regretted calling the play that produced the INT because he got INT'd in practice. Sounded like an odd approach for a fifth-year senior. I could see it for a "not-quite-ready" underclassman but Rudock's GOTTA be able to adjust from a practice mistake on-the-fly, in-game. 

shoes

September 14th, 2015 at 12:16 PM ^

Though I've looked at quite a bit of video from Rudock's season last year, I did not see all of it and I am almost going to assume he may have been lucky a few times in avoiding Ints. It seems unlikely that he would go from such a low INT rate to a high one, merely from changing teams. Of course the other possibilities are that this small two game sample is in no way indicative of where he will be at the end of the year. That and whether 1 or 2 of the INTs this year were really not his fault.

M-Dog

September 15th, 2015 at 12:56 AM ^

He has not settled down yet and played within himself.  He is a 5th year senior, but not at Michigan.  For whatever reason . . . the OLine, new system, Harbaugh as his shadow, the pressure to succeeed in his final year with no safety net . . . for whatever reason he looks rookie-nervous out there at times.  

bronxblue

September 14th, 2015 at 3:28 PM ^

I didn't catch the presser before writing that part, but it makes sense that it was a buggaboo.  I honestly don't like those short passes in bunches where you stop moving; it invites the exact play we saw.  And Butt does need to fight for the position more; he got knocked short and had he kept blocking out a bit better at worst it would have been an incomplete.

But I do get a sense that Rudock is just having a bit of bad luck.  He throws a good ball when he has time, and I'm assuming he's getting more settled in with his receivers.

You Only Live Twice

September 15th, 2015 at 7:14 PM ^

and, a couple of the missed PIs were especially maddening to the crowd because they were just so unambiguous.  Maybe the refs thought it wouldn't affect the outcome.  I don't know, but I do believe that Harbaugh getting a bit testy with the refs is a good thing.  His team gets the sense that their coach will stand up for them.  That does make a difference.