Barbarians Win Championships

Submitted by MCalibur on

I am a sinner who’s probably gonna sin again. Lord, forgive me. Lord forgive me things I don’t understand.

-Kendrick Lamar, Bitch Don’t Kill My Vibe

 

lucifer-mayor I confess: I care about the national championship more than orthodox Michigan dogma allows by, like, a lot. I think I understand what Bo may have meant; 1973 must have been a bitter pill to swallow. The split baby in ‘97 was crap, too. Actually bringing home the hardware often requires a bunch of rhetoric just to get the opportunity. Less so recently than in Bo’s day but there still some arguing that is needed. And, If people still need to be convinced with words that you’re worthy after all the games are over, how good are you really? Relying on the scruples of seemingly unscrupulous individuals is a bad idea so a “to hell with them” mentality is totally understandable. I believe that Coach Schembechler would have won one if he cared to do so. Define your own worth and all that but there is another way, isn’t there? Make it your goal to kick everyone’s ass and you’ll accomplish all viable goals anyway. Am I wrong? /WalterSobchack.

Times they are a changin’, amen, but I think the current system actually benefitted Michigan (and others) in many “just ‘cause” ways. For too many teams winning all of your games, though difficult and unlikely, still isn't enough to get a shot at a national title. Teams in the Hegemony don’t have to worry about that and can often afford to lose a game if its to the right opponent. The playoff system improves the situation but I suspect that there will still be some jostling to get a golden ticket. What does a team need to do to maximize its control of its own destiny?

To the Stat Cave!

LumpedOneFactor

The preceding chart is the basis of the revised Blue Moon Model, discussed and applied in my last diary. Hollow red circles (right axis) represent how many teams fell into each bin used in the lumping process. Scan this dusty diary for discussion of the lumping maneuver. The solid blue diamonds is the average win percentage (left axis) for each bin. See how the blue diamonds start getting out of line when the binned sample size drops into the muck? That’s the “low sample size” criticism we are all so familiar with. But note that it doesn’t take that many samples to get a reasonably well behaved average—getting 10 is usually enough but more is always better. The hollow blue triangles are the focus of this diary. Those are all of the teams that have played in the BCS title game since 2000. In terms of Net Yardage Differential, there is quite a spread ranging from 45 to 275 ypg.

In pre-school most of us learned that a good way to identify differences is to ask ourselves “which of these things are not like the others?” We also learned to mock the weirdoes because why else would you go through the trouble of identifying them in the first place? The preceding charts make the MNC and B1G contending weirdoes stand out pretty well. Go forth and mock them.

ICouldaBeenaContenda

ICouldaBeenaContendatTable 

Championship game losers are included because they had destiny by the bit. The mountains meet the sea at least 130. The typical team showed up with a yardage differential of about 165.

In the B1G, the Mendoza line is 100 ypg in yardage differential. What’s interesting to me is that it looks like there was a sea change in the B1G around 2005 with most of the teams underwater showing up before then. The only Michigan team that could pass muster as a national champion is the 2003 squad. Season summary:

  1. Lost @ Oregon by 4 with a net turnover margin of –3; ‘nuff said.
  2. Lost @ Iowa by 3 with a net turnover margin of 0 but: punted from the Iowa 35 in the first quarter, failed to score a TD after 1st @ Goal from the Iowa 8 in the second quarter, had a punt blocked in the third quarter leading to a 3 and out FG for the Hawkeyes.

Ah, memories / light the corners of my mind / misty watercolor memories / of the way we were … Memories / may be beautiful an yet / what’s too painful to remember / we simply choose to forget. Tell ‘em, Babs.

With the playoff system coming winning a National Championship is now harder for most. By most I mean everybody except for Nick Saban. Saban built a monster at LSU, handed off to Les Miles to terrorize for a while until he could get all three rings installed for his clown show, then came back to build an even badder monster at Alabama. Now Saban can be ranked as low as 5 and have the rhetorical juice to jump some teams. If he gets in, chances are, he will win. ‘Sall good though, dude is mortal…right? Um…maybe Kirby Smart is the real master mind??? Oh shit, do they have a succession plan in place?!? Madre de dios!!!

(Sorry about that. I actually think I’m doing well this time.)

NickSabanTrackRecord 

Sure, Justice will be served more often because being undefeated and winning 1 game you have 6 weeks to prepare for aren’t enough to claim the throne anymore; now you have to beat two more teams that are pretty damn good and doing that is, like, hard. I support the cause for sure, but I recognize how much steeper that mountain is about to get. But, but, but, over signing!  Look, man, you can’t blame a shark for being the baddest mofo in the ocean; you’ve got to blame the ocean. The whole over signing phenomenon that we’re seeing in the SEC may be distasteful to some but so are fried insects. I’ll walk this back: scout’s honor.

FriedSpidersThat’s a real picture of what is considered yummy street food in Cambodia.Also,  I once ate Chapulines on a business trip to Mexico because I knew I wouldn’t die and it was a reeeally nice restaurant and I didn’t order it and “we’re closing this deal one way or the other, fellas” and “Yes, I’m this crazy, ese”. Also: tequila and yolo. Chapulines are fried grasshoppers and they don’t taste bad (wouldn’t say they taste good either) but its the texture and mouth feel that get you. Crunchy, gritty, all the moisture in your mouth runs for the hills…just all around nasty. I stayed cool and chewed them like a man but at a certain point I was all like “fuck this I’m swallowing” just to get that shit out of my mouth in the least ridiculous way possible and, after all, I had done this to my self. The legs, man, the legs. Those tiny little barbs aren’t meant for swallowing. Don’t judge me, man, I have lived. Thank God for Dos Equis.

Football, yes. Check it out: obviously, over signing isn’t against the rules. We don’t have to like it and we don't have to do it, but if you can choke it down -- or maybe you think its yummy with barbeque sauce -- NCAA enforcement says “bon appetit. Besides, top notch recruiting isn’t enough -- we know that first hand here at Michigan (also see Les Miles) -- you need to turn those recruits into great players and support them with great game plans and great play calling and great-never-ever-punting-on-the-opponent’s-35. Take away over signing from Alabama and Saban & Co will still kick everyone’s ass, probably.

ConanTheBarbarian To be a team the can get to the playoff and win the damn thing -- to be a champion’s champion -- you need to be “free to roam the plains, your majestic rippling muscles trampling over mascots that dare oppose you” as Brian once said. You must leave a barbaric path of destruction in your wake. You must leave only the lamentations of their bloggers to tell your tale. Being above 130 in NYDS since 2000 has meant you were, on average, in the top 8 nationally in that category.

There is a limit to how good your defense can be: the number 1 team in NYDS averages out with a Defensive YPG of about 270. The best team in the country in DYDS averages 230 ypg allowed. The best defense I have on record is Alabama 2011 at 183 (jeepers). Seriously, there are typically 13-ish possessions per game so you could score at TD every time and allow 107 ypg and still not get cored on. I guess you could try for onside kicks too but … what an asshole! The typical team “worthy” of a national championship has a defense that yields 315 ypg.

OneChartToRuleThemAll

HokeWater If you read my last entry, you should be encouraged to see that championship defense isn’t much better than what Brady Hoke and  Greg Mattison have been able to field since their arrival on campus, even with all those roster issues we’ve come to know so well. Today, the roster is better and improving. It’s not easy to have great defense, but these guys know what they’re doing.

The mantra of defense wins championships isn’t [baloney], it’s just not enough. See, defensive performance is so hard to predict. With offense you have a reasonable shot at summing up the parts to get to OYDS. No such luck on defense. Proxy analysis can give us an idea of how good our defense could be but you will never know what you’ve got until you see it perform.

Football is not a math test.

I think I can see how Michigan can get to 100 NYPG this year….130 isn’t that far away.

Comments

909Dewey

August 26th, 2013 at 9:38 AM ^

So to win a championship you have to be good at defense AND good at offense?  Do you think the coaches know?  Maybe you should send them some of your charts and graphs.

Wolfman

August 26th, 2013 at 3:19 PM ^

to understand that poster was correct in stating if Bama didn't oversign, they'd still kick everyone's ass. State of FL had 53 to the top 300 and the next closest was about 25 back. Hell one h.s. about the same size as a MI Class B h.s. had 13 D1 players and one of the players that really stood out was a lowly Duke commit, a situation that will probably change if he finishes the season like he started in Saturday.  Most of the others were offered or had already accepted offers from the SEC with a few going to MAC quality schools.    ^Add in the surrounding states - getting the best from LA pretty much takes care of LSU when you add in the others they get. Was actually startled that the two states you might think of as producing equal talent, TX and CA, had to combine to reach the level of top 300 players from one state in that region. Although oversigning is a rule that isn't enforced and pays dividends, the level of play at the h.s. level in that region is the primary reason the SEC has been dominating. Majority of kids want to play in front of their families and while we're scouring the nation to produce tremendous recruiting classes, SEC coaches are able to cut down on their work load in this regard by just concentrating on regional players.  ^ Although the SEC has always been a great conference, it was only 30 years ago that you could draw a circle with Purdue in the center and over 50% of the nation's televisions were in that area. Such is not the case any longer. UM, along with ND is going to be represented in the top 10 on a perennial basis based on the fact alone they are UM and ND.  However, imagine MI with about 4 or 5 programs playing at a level that Cass Tech has for the past three seasons, subtract the relatively small number of that would select MSU, and you would get an idea of just how much harder UM coaches have to work to acquire simarly talented players.    ^Hell the team that produced Bridgewater is sending the future Louisville qb who is from the same h.s., based on nothing but a camp performance. His first start at qb was Saturday and when you watched him you understood why. Kid is an excellent ballplayer.   ^ Now we all realize 53 is an arbitrary number, but we also realize it's a realistic number based on where the large number of current NFL players come from.  Toss in the other great ballplayers from that area-yes, Bama and other SEC teams- have been known to turn 3*s into AAs and you  get a damn good idea of what we're up against.  And we're one of the forunate schools.

uncleFred

August 27th, 2013 at 7:32 PM ^

Well not so much. If Bama didn't oversign they would not have convinced ESPN that they and the SEC are the dominate conference/team and they would not be recruiting at their current level.

I don't care much about national championships. I care about two things (well three but the third takes care of its self).

1: Beating Ohio in the Game.

2: Winning the Big Ten Championship (most years achieving #1 takes care of that)

3: Getting the Big Ten back to where it is a conference with as much respect as any in college football.

If those three things are accomplished the national championship will take care of itself. 

Hoke and co are on track to accomplish 1 & 2. Ideally Michigan will contend for the Big Ten championship 4 out of five years or better all the time. Unfortunately, #3 requires a bunch of Big Ten schools to hire better coaches (and recruiters) and step up their game.

In my ideal world, 2 or 3 seasons in a row the Big Ten ends up in six or seven bowl games against various SEC teams and waxes them all including the national championship. Were that to happen the media hype for the SEC would crumble and the recruiting field would quickly level. Of course it is highly unlikely that the middle tier of the Big Ten will make that commitment.

Ah well.