Anatomy of an Implosion

Submitted by MillerTime on

Over the last few weeks, I’ve spoken to a number of people who’ve been wanting to place blame on the success – or lack thereof – of Michigan’s football team this season. Those who are casual football fans or network pundits blame Rich Rodriguez – his spread offense is too big of a change for a pro-style team. Those who know a bit more about Michigan football blame Lloyd Carr – he left the cabinet dry with only two starters returning on offense and plenty of out-of-shape players. But who is really to blame? To take a logical look at the situation, let’s start from a novel place. Check who exactly makes up the Michigan offense, and then let’s start looking at blame.

 

Capital One Bowl Starting Line-Up:

 

Skilled Positions: Mario Manningham(jr); Carson Butler(jr); Chad Henne(sr); Mike Hart(sr); Mike Massey(sr*); Adrian Arrington(sr*)

 

Line: Jake Long(sr); Adam Kraus(sr); Justin Boren(so); Steve Schilling(so); Alex Mitchell(sr*)

 

* Still had remaining eligibility

 

Initial 2008 Starting Line-Up Before Transfers and Early Departures (accounting for 3-receiver set):

 

Skilled Positions: Mario Manningham(sr); Carson Butler(sr); Ryan Mallett(so); Brandon Minor(jr); Greg Matthews(jr); Adrian Arrington (sr)

 

Line: Jeremy Ciulla(sr); Mark Ortmann(sr*); Justin Boren(jr); Steven Schilling(jr); Alex Mitchell(sr)

 

Actual Starting Line-Up For Toledo (Using 3-receiver set):

 

Skilled Positions: Greg Matthews(jr); Kevin Koger(fr); Steven Threet(fr); Sam McGuffie(fr); Toney Clemons(so); LaTerryal Savoy(jr)

 

Line: Perry Dorrestein(so); Mark Ortmann(sr*); David Molk(fr); David Moosman(jr); Steve Schilling(so).

 

Okay. So screw “returning starters” – of which we only started one. Let’s look at “projected starters” – players who were in the pipeline to start but never ended up starting. Three. Three. That’s it. Yes, those who aren’t here all have their reasons, but the fact of the matter is that we had one returning starter on offense in the Toledo game, and three people starting who would have started the day after the Capital One bowl.

 

So who's to blame? You can't fault Rodriguez and his staff for coming into a program which has a roster looking like that of a low-tier Mountain West team. He's doing his best with what he has - which, as we can see, isn't much. You can't fault Lloyd Carr because although we wouldn't have had the Hart, Henne, and Longs of the world returning, we would have had a blue chip QB, a decent (read: non-sieve) offensive line, and some legit playmakers at the skilled positions. It would have been a down-ish year anyway. You can't fault the players - they didn't ask to get put in a starting position without the experience, skill, or surrounding talent to succeed. They're getting their asses busted by Barwis as the toll to merely strap on the winged helmet.

 

So who's to blame? Blame yourself. If you're looking to place blame here, blame yourself for taking your school's football prowess for granted, for having out-of-this-world expectations for the first year of a regime change, and for not studying your team enough to know that your expectations were out-of-this-world. We have a starting quarterback who backed up Reggie Ball at Georgia Tech (who had a 44% completion percentage in his senior year). Half of our skilled players were playing in their high school homecoming games at this time last year.Our line... it's porous at best, filled with inexperience and a lack of top-notch skill.

 

I've quoted Bo before in this space, but I'll do it again, "When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing." Stop being soft. Take some lumps. Keep wearing your Michigan apparel. Keep loving our tradition, our University, and our team. If you want to jump ship, I'll pack your bags for you, but don't come back when this team - and this program - rights itself. Don't boo this week when you were cheering after the Wisconsin game. 

 

To sum things up, I turn to Mike Hart on how it feels to represent a team during tough times: 

 

"I don't regret anything at all. I'm glad I'm on this team. This is my team. I'm the leader of this team. It's crazy to say, but deep down at the end of the [Oregon] game, I was telling myself, 'I wouldn't rather be on any team right now. I wouldn't rather be getting paid.' It's going to test me as a person, a player and a leader. I've never been a part of something like this in my life. It's going to test me, and it's going to make me a better person. I know we can turn this around. At the end of the season, when I look back and we come out with a great record, I'm going to say, 'Don't ever quit."'

Comments

chitownblue (not verified)

October 13th, 2008 at 4:36 PM ^

Yes, a thousand times, yes. We had so much attrition, it's absurd. That's why there's a lack of talent and a lack of depth. Not RR's coaching, not Lloyd's recruiting. Attrition.

blue edmore

October 13th, 2008 at 4:52 PM ^

Finally...a fairly lucid analysis of what has happened. Hopefully, we will have more of these, now that all of the faux "bandwagon riders" have fallen off of the train, maybe they will find better things to do than waste space here.

jamiemac

October 13th, 2008 at 5:45 PM ^

Get this man a T-shirt. Prospective starters, what a great way to look at it. That lineup for the Toledo game involves a lot of people who were second or even third string back in August even after all the attrition.

Anonymous Coward (not verified)

October 13th, 2008 at 6:20 PM ^

<!--[if gte mso 9]><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]>

does anyone else have that issue?

helloheisman.com

October 13th, 2008 at 6:49 PM ^

Why does everybody act now like Michigan was simply incapable of winning against Toledo given our talent? A free pass for this season, yes. But it doesn't excuse a poor (defensive/offensive) gameplan from RichRod.

jblaze

October 13th, 2008 at 7:07 PM ^

  1. From your "Initial 2008 Starting Line-Up Before Transfers and Early Departures (accounting for 3-receiver set):" you are including Minor, Matthews, & Butler, all of whom were options for the Toledo game, so they could have started but were beaten out. This skews your experience/ inexperience argument.
  2. While I hate (yes, I'm using the word hate) Boren, he left as a direct result of RR (I'm glad he left). The same could be said for Mallett (although I don't hate him, in anyone even cares).
  3. The question is: Does that Toldeo team have more talent than our team. My guess is since they were 1-4 in the MAC, the answer is no (although this is subjective).
I 100% agree that we all need to stick by RR and Michigan, and I believe our future is extremely bright, but our coaching staff dropped the ball in that game (which is OK, as we all make mistakes, as long as they all learn from it). GO BLUE!

ThaLastProphet

October 13th, 2008 at 11:52 PM ^

As any good football coach knows, talent is overrated.

That's not to say it isn't the most important thing in the world, (which it is) but look at Stevie Brown. He runs in the low 4.4s, has a 37inch vertical leap, is over 6 feet tall and is a solid 205lbs. That is an NFL safety in terms of physical ability. However, he has absolutely no idea what the fuck he is doing and consistently makes terrible reads and therefore is extremely awful. His great speed is generally utilized for chasing down a guy he should have either tackled or covered.

A senior laden team full of smart but meh talented kids who have played all four years in one system under one coach will almost always beat out a team of freshman physical freaks who have no idea what the fuck they're doing.

Once we have the experience and knowledge of RR's system to go along with talent we will be dominant but as of right now we are lacking on all fronts.

Anonymous Coward (not verified)

October 14th, 2008 at 12:01 PM ^

Class down to 18, lost will campbell and now a receiver, Bryce McNeal I think his name was. Crap team, no recruits. Michigan will suck for 2 more years.