5 step program to reach the NCAA Tournament

Submitted by A2MIKE on
I believe that the basketball team still has a shot at making the NCAA's.  I know it seems far fetched, but when you break down the schedule it comes down to winning at home and pulling a couple upsets on the road, ala @Minnesota last year, and for you old timers @Illinois circa 1995.  I have broke the schedule down into 3 game (with one 4 game stretch) segments.  Here it goes:
Step 1:  @Wisconsin; @Purdue; v.MSU  -  The important thing here is to secure 1 win.  2 wins would be great, but not likely.  Winning 1 of these 3 would keep Michigan's NCAA tournament hopes off life support and makes the next stretch of games all the more important.

Step 2:  v.Iowa; @Northwestern; v.Wisconsin; @Minnesota  -  This will be the point in the season where we look back and say, "Michigan played their way into the tournament here."  Or we will say, "That stretch sealed their fate, and popped the bubble."  Iowa is obviously a must win.  The game @NW will be intriguing.  How will Michigan counter the 1-3-1 trap that NW sprung with great success.  In all honesty, if Beilein figures a counter to the trap into the gameplan and it works, no reason we can't come away with a victory here.  The Wisconsin game will be a huge game at home, and an important chance to secure a RPI top 25 victory.  The benefit of this game would likely be similar to that of the Purdue game last year.  Win and you set yourself up for a chance at making a run at the bubble.  Lose and it might be over.  I just feel like Michigan will show up in this game. We haven't beat Wisconsin in a while and with Jon Leurer out, our chances increase dramatically.  @Minnesota, we match up well with Minnesota as evidence take last year. Minnesota struggles to play a half court game, if Michigan controls the tempo they at least have a punchers chance.  Given all that I think its important to go 3-1 in this stretch with one of those wins coming against Wisconsin.  

Step 3:  @Iowa; v.Penn St.; v.Illinois  -  Michigan can't afford any more bad road losses (like Indiana).  Take care of business and move on.  Same goes for games at home against inferior opponents.  That takes us to Illinois, who is a poor match up for Michigan, but at the same time this is a winnable game.  If Sims shows up and plays to his capabilities we can take this game as well.  Probably need to go 3-0 in this stretch, which is by far the easiest of the 5 steps.

Step 4:  @OSU; v.Minnesota; @MSU  -  Tough way to end the regular season.  If Michigan takes care of the first 3 steps they only need to win 1 game in this stretch. Seems like the Minnesota game would be the best opportunity for that.  

So assuming Michigan goes 1-2, 3-1, 3-0, and 1-2 in those 4 stretches of games that leaves this team at 18-12 overall and 11-7 in the Big Ten.  Probably not enough to push them in the tournament, but definitely enough to get them on the bubble.  They would most likely be the 4 or 5 seed with that finish and get a first round bye and a chance at a quality neutral court victory in the BTT quarterfinals.  Most likely against Ohio State, Illinois or Minnesota.  

Step 5:  win 1 game in the BTT and that finishes the season at 19-13, with probably 6-7 wins over RPI top 50 teams, the exact same as they had last year.  

Its not foolproof, as many analysts will say that the bubble is a year to year thing, sometimes it is harder to make the tournament than other times.  Small 1 bid conference tournaments will more than likely determine our fate, given the current assumptions.  I really think this team has a shot to get hot, they still haven't played their best basketball.  Go Blue!

Comments

ijohnb

January 20th, 2010 at 9:28 AM ^

I have done the same thing with their schedule and different scenarios. Coming off the UConn win, they have some momentum. A quick way to put them right back in the conversation would be to somehow win 2 of the next 3. HUGE game tonight, (in the worst of all places).

saveferris

January 20th, 2010 at 9:57 AM ^

Walking back to the car from the UConn game, my buddy and I reached a similar conclusion as yourself. Michigan has 13 conference games left to play and need to win 8 of them to have a chance at a bid. Anything less and we're faced with having to make a deep run in the B10 tournament. A tough road to March either way. There is still a chance, but I have a terrible feeling we're going to be looking back and going "what if" on all the bad losses we posted in December and early January.

Braylon 5 Hour…

January 20th, 2010 at 11:12 AM ^

Given how inconsistent this team has played, I think we should just try to take one game at a time. That said, we are certainly going to have our opportunities to play our way into the NCAA tournament with the schedule that we've got coming up. We should play Wisconsin twice, both without Leuer, so we've got to be able to AT LEAST split with them, right?

heckdchi

January 20th, 2010 at 11:20 AM ^

Another way to look at it is through the current rpi numbers, from realtimerpi.com (http://www.realtimerpi.com/rpi_188_Men.html) Michigan's remaining schedule has 7 games (2 with Minnesota and Iowa, one each with Illinois, Penn State, and Northwestern) against teams currently ranked 60 or lower in the rpi and 6 games (2 with MSU and Wisconsin and one each with Purdue and OSU) against top 50 teams. In my opinion Michigan cannot afford any more bad (outside of the rpi top 100) losses and needs another 3-4 quality (rpi top 50) wins. Remarkably, the Wolverines have a 2-1 record against the rpi top 50 (wins over UConn and OSU, loss at Kansas) despite 3 rpi 100+ losses (BC, at Utah, at Indiana). If Michigan can win 6-7 of the games against rpi 60+ opponents and go at least 3-3 against the remaining rpi top 50 opponents this would equal, at least, a 12-6 conference record with 5 rpi top 50 wins, and an 18-11 overall regular season record. This would be a fairly similar resume as last year going into the Big Ten Tourney(18-12 regular season, 9-9 conference, 6 rpi top 50 wins). As was mentioned earlier, the bubble is different year to year, but I think Michigan would have a great case if the above scenario plays out. This would give Michigan a resume that would compare favorably against any other bubble team and a resume that shows improvement through out the year (all bad losses being in the first month of the season, increasing number of quality wins during the final 3 months of the season) This is a tall order but not unrealistic based on how this season has played out so far. The most difficult part in my opinion is finding 3 wins in the remaining rpi top 50 games. The most likely wins, I think, are against the John Leuer-less Wisconsin Badgers. After that they would still need one win out of: at OSU, at PU, and 2 with MSU, difficult but doable. GO BLUE!

myrtlebeachmai…

January 20th, 2010 at 11:26 AM ^

Most sources, ESPN included have 5-6 teams from the BT going. (Yes, it's early, I know.) Today, we're fourth, but Minny and Purdue below us are more widely regarded as likely selections. If you move them up, we drop to sixth, and likely outside looking in. It's definitely still in our hands right now, but we must play well enough to stay deserving.

gnrgoblue

January 20th, 2010 at 11:54 AM ^

I agree Michigan needs to win a bare minimum of eight of its remaining 13 games to even qualify as "on the bubble" and entertain hopes of squeaking in as a 11, 12 or 13 seed. I think hope dies for good if they lose any of the following: Iowa, at Northwestern, at Iowa, Penn State. If they sweep those four, we have a 14-7 team looking for four wins in the other nine games. I can't find those wins. I expect a sweep by MSU, so we're looking for four wins in seven games. Purdue is having trouble, so maybe that's one. Maybe they get a win or two out of their home games against Wisconsin, Illinois and Minnesota. But I'm having a hard time seeing it. EDIT: I meant to conclude by saying that the good news is that, if they make it, there's no question in my mind that they'll have earned it. This schedule is rough going the rest of the way.

jmblue

January 20th, 2010 at 1:52 PM ^

If we can beat UConn, we can beat Wisconsin (sans Leuer), Illinois and Minnesota. Maybe MSU, too; they've been turnover-prone this season. Whether we actually will, I don't know, but I don't see those games as lost causes. We did not play anywhere near a great game against UConn (8 points for Sims, 37% shooting as a team) and won. We are making strides on D and one of these days, you've got to figure we'll get it all together on offense, too.

wld3

January 20th, 2010 at 12:13 PM ^

I'm a big fan of KenPom, and although I realize the statistics only give a rough approximation, I think their predictive value is a lot better than what you see on most sites. He had us at 51% to beat UConn, for example. Anyway, according to KenPom, our chances of beating Wisky, Purdue and MSU are 8%, 12% and 36% respectively. If you make the somewhat bogus but necessary assumption that the games are independent events, that makes our chances of winning none of these games (.92)*(.88)*(.64)=.52, roughly. So our chances of winning at least one of the three games are 1-.52=.48, or just a hair less than 1/2. Looking at it another way, our expected number of wins is .08 + .12 + .36 = .56, which takes into account that we may win more than one. That's not as bad as I would have thought. Given our obvious potential to get hot from 3 on any given night, if we can muster the same defensive effort on the road as we have at home (big if), I actually like our chances of taking 1 of 3. If we play to our potential, 2 of 3 is reasonable. Should be a fun stretch, given the very low expectations (i.e., nothing to lose, so stay loose) for the next two in particular. Go Blue!

Kilgore Trout

January 20th, 2010 at 2:12 PM ^

One thing to consider is that KenPom's computer doesn't know that Leuer is hurt. I think the 8% chance of winning is about right if he played. Anyway, think of the last two games up in Madison under Beilein. In '08 they lost 64-61 to an eleventh ranked Badger team and in '09 they dropped a 60-55 game where they had the ball and a chance to tie with less than a minute to go. You could argue that this year's matchup is better for Michigan than either of the last two and they barely lost those. Anyway, I think tonight is a huge chance for a good win and they need to jump on it.

backusduo

January 20th, 2010 at 12:14 PM ^

I really appreciate the effort and time you put into this, but I'm afraid that 18/19 wins will not be enough. While they may have at the end of the season the same amount of wins this year vs. last year over top 50 RPI opponents they will not have the name recognition. The voters are people and it would have been tough for them to overcome ousting a Michigan team who had beaten DUKE and UCLA. Unfortunately as great a game as UCONN was this weekend, they did not look like a top 20 team at the end of the year, and will not live up to the name recognition of a UCLA and DUKE. My thought is that without a surprise at MSU, we needed 20/21 wins this year and we squandered those away early. Great post.

backusduo

January 20th, 2010 at 12:14 PM ^

I really appreciate the effort and time you put into this, but I'm afraid that 18/19 wins will not be enough. While they may have at the end of the season the same amount of wins this year vs. last year over top 50 RPI opponents they will not have the name recognition. The voters are people and it would have been tough for them to overcome ousting a Michigan team who had beaten DUKE and UCLA. Unfortunately as great a game as UCONN was this weekend, they did not look like a top 20 team at the end of the year, and will not live up to the name recognition of a UCLA and DUKE. My thought is that without a surprise at MSU, we needed 20/21 wins this year and we squandered those away early. Great post.

The NUTcracker

January 20th, 2010 at 12:17 PM ^

I understand that winning the Big 10 tournament is unlikely, but what about a finish that puts us on the bubble after regular season, and then one or two wins in B10 tourney? A quick look at UConn losses look like this: vs #7 Duke vs #4 Kentucky at Cinci at #12 Georgetown vs #20 Pitt at Michigan So if the boys play like they did against a truly no slouch UConn in our tourney, is it possible we make it in? And I don't mean NIT

jamiemac

January 20th, 2010 at 1:06 PM ^

I agree with your premise. I wrote over at the JCB on Sunday that 8-5 the rest of the way should put them in position to make the field with anything better than a 1-and-done BTT performance. That said, I think your closing graph says it all. We just dont know the true shape of the bubble yet. 2-3 weeks more of play will really tell the tale of the state of the Bubble. But, if Michigan follows through and succeeds at Step One and is on the way to succeeding during Step Two, then when the Bubble begins to crystallize, then Michigan will have a firm place on it. Thanks for posting.

ypsituckyboy

January 20th, 2010 at 3:05 PM ^

I know the UCLA and Duke wins last year were our signature wins; but if I recall correctly, UCLA's ranking had dropped a fair bit by the end of the season. It was a signature win at the time, since they were a #4 team, but not as big of a deal by the end of the season. Does the Tourney Committee tend to judge the value of the win at the time it happens or by its value at the end of the season? If it judges wins at the end of the season, I wouldn't think that the difference between this season and last would be as drastic as people are saying.

heckdchi

January 20th, 2010 at 3:14 PM ^

My guess is that the Committee would have viewed the UCLA win last year as a good top 50 rpi neutral court win (UCLA 33 rpi at end of the season) and probably the human element may have seeped into their minds knowing that UCLA was coming off of 3 straight final fours and had built up a reputation as a top flight program under Ben Howland. Just my opinion.