Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Diaries JeepinBen's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (50)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 16 hours ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 2 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 2 days ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 782 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 751 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 725 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 578 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 485 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 17 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 16 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 10 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Mott Takeover
    14 replies
  • Jersey Name Patches
    23 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    62 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    52 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    31 replies
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    49 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    34 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    43 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    139 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    64 replies
  • BTN Tourney Baseball
    14 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    39 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    138 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    52 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    48 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Mott Takeover
    14 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    62 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    52 replies
  • Jersey Name Patches
    23 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    138 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    34 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    52 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    31 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    139 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    64 replies
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    49 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    43 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    145 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    48 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    48 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    145 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    139 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    138 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

The 46 or Bear Defense

By JeepinBen — October 19th, 2011 at 11:06 AM — 17 comments
Filed under:
  • 46
  • Bear
  • defense
  • football

The “46” or “Bear” Defense

So we’ve seen a lot of different defensive fronts, and quite a few people have talked about how to play the 4-3 Under that is Michigan’s base set. With our D getting gashed recently by MSU the question has been asked “Why not play more 46?” In this diary I hope to go over the strengths, weaknesses and a little history of the Bear Defense.


First it’s a Forty-Six (46) not a Four-Six. Most Defenses talk about personnel from the line back. A 4-3 has 4 down linemen, 3 linebackers. Same with 3-4, 3-3-5, etc. The 46 doesn’t talk about personnel on the field, it refers to one man. Doug Plank wore 46 and was the starting safety for the Chicago Bears when Buddy Ryan (yep, this guy’s dad)  


designed it. The 1985 Chicago Bears were (agruably, but you’d be wrong if you disagreed) the best NFL defense ever. They gave up 10 points in their 3 playoff games. 198 in their 16 regular season games, or under 11 a game, under 4 in playoff games against the other elite teams!  They were 15-1 on the year, their only loss to Marino’s Dolphins. Their playoff scores were 21-0, 24-0, and 46-10. Not too shabby against the NFL’s best. They also made the Superbowl Shuffle which might be the most 80's thing ever.

So, how does it work? How do you beat it? The 46 uses the same 4-3 base personnel that Michigan does. 2 Defensive ends, 2 tackles, 3 linebackers, 2 safeties and 2 corners. The first thing we’ll look at is the line

4-4-something

D-Tackle right on the nose (For Michigan this is Mike Martin, for the 85 Bears it was William “Refrigerator” Perry). You cover up the center to make him block every play. 3-4 Defenses use similar players here.

D-Tackle right on the guard (For Michigan this is BWC/Heininger in the picture, for the 85 Bears it was Steve “Mongo” McMichael). Same as the nose, you cover the guard and make him block. You don’t want a covered defender to pull, as it allows instant penetration into the backfield. The inside Tackle (and End) have to make sure that they don’t get pinched inside.

D-End right on the other guard (For Michigan this is RVB, for the 85 Bears it was the “Danimal” Dan Hampton). Just like above. This would be your larger end (called “strongside or 5-Tech in other defenses, but he’s not playing a 5 tech here).

D-End outside the weak OT (for Michigan this is Roh/Black in the picture, for the 85 Bears it was Richard Dent). Main job is keep contain and pass rush. This position is very similar to the 7-Tech or Weakside end, or Rush End  in a base 4-3.

Linebackers:
SAM - Line up on the outside shoulder of the Tight End (9-Tech). (For Michigan Jake Ryan, for the 85 Bears Otis Wilson). Very similar to a Sam in a 4-3 Under but in a 46 he’s typically in a 3 point stance (Ryan's ina 2). Make sure nothing gets outside on the edge. Often referred to as JACK in a 46

QUICK BREAK - Only differences so far from a 4-3 Under:

 




  46 Defense 4-3 Under
Martin Nose (0 Tech) Shaded (1-Tech)
BWC Face up on Guard 3 Tech
RVB Face up on Guard 5 Tech Strong
Roh 7 Tech Weak 7 Tech Weak
Ryan 9 Tech Strong, 3 point stance 9 Tech Strong, 2 point stance

4-4-something

Not so different thus far. Pretty much only where your interior linemen line up.

WILL - Inside shoulder of Tight End (7-Tech). (For Michigan Fitzgerald, 85 Bears Wilber Marshall). 2 point stance. This is also a similar alignment to a SAM in a 4-3 under at times. Not responsible for contain however, that falls on the JACK. This linebacker (CHARLEY) covers up the tight end in pass plays or can blitz.

MIKE - 4-5 yards off the line of scrimmage, shaded to the strong side. (for Michigan Demens, 85 Bears Singletary)Near identical responsibilities as in a 4-3 under. Make tackles. Have Crazy Eyes


Secondary:

SS - 4-5 yards off the line, shaded weak side (for Michigan Hawthorne, 85 Bears Dave Duerson, RIP). Near identical responsibilities to the WILL in the 4-3 under. Make Tackles. (IMO Kovacs would fit well here)

FS - Play 12 yards off the line, play center field. (for Michigan Gordon/Kovacs in this picture, for the 85 Bears Gary Fencik)

Corners - Either bump an run or just basic man coverage. You’re on an island, don’t get beat. (For Michigan Woolfolk/Floyd, for the 85 Bears Mike Richardson and Leslie Frazier).

So that’s the main alignments and responsibilities for the defenders.
Why it’s good for Michigan on rushing downs:
Neutralizes the interior O Line. When there’s a D lineman face up over you, you can’t pull, trap, get to the 2nd level, or do many of the things interior O linemen do. For Michigan, this prevents Martin from getting double teamed, and lets BWC bull rush a guard 1 on 1.

Gets the Beef on the field. Michigan runs this with BWC and RVB and Roh in the game. With Martin and Ryan down that’s a 1450lb D line.

So why don’t we see this Defense often anymore? Well offenses adapt. 3 step drops and the horizontal West-Coast attack eat this defense alive. The 46 is based on pressuring the QB (you almost always rush at least 5) and if the QB is throwing within a second of the snap, you can’t pressure him. Offenses rarely ran 5 wide, but now they do it often. 5 wide would mess this up as well. The other main reason? Personnel. The 85 Bears had 3 future NFL coaches on the defense alone (Rivera, Signletary and Frazier). You need 2 shutdown corners who can survive on an island (which is why we see the Jets run this D every so often). In the modern NFL a QB would audible to a slant and the WR would be gone without a good corner. Also, you need a SS who can live in the box, still make plays in the passing game, dominate, and be so good there is a defense named after you. This is what Wikipedia says happens against 3 wide:

“When three or more receivers are used by the offense, the defense makes what is called a jayhawk adjustment. The charlie linebacker will step back to where the middle linebacker was in the normal alignment, the middle linebacker will move to where the strong safety was aligned and the strong safety will move out to cover the third receiver. If the offense uses a fourth receiver, the middle linebacker lines up in front of the center and the charlie linebacker would cover the fourth receiver.”

Sounds like the 4-3 Under at this point no? The problem is do you know many Strong Safeties who would do very well in man coverage in the slot? Or how about corners that can play on an island every play? or a FS who is good enough you just play cover 1 all day.

Anyway, hopefully this diary helps you understand a little about the Bear front and responsibilities when Michigan uses it. Go Blue.
 

  • JeepinBen's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October 19th, 2011 at 11:29 AM | Some inconsistent things (Score:3 Normal)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

So I wrote up how to play the 46 as the Bears did. What you can see from the Pictures of Michigan's 46 front is they have a slight under shift. So while MM is still on the Nose, RVB and Heininger are both playing closer to a 3 tech (in between guard and tackle) than heads up. Also Black seems to be in a 9-tech, or wider than the traditional 46 end. Also as I mentioned above Ryan is in a 2 point stance rather than a 3. Also the D Line in the diagram up top isn't aligned properly.

Also, I noted it in the personnel above, but I'll specify here, Michigan ran this with 4-4 personnel, bringing in Fitz for the "Will" Spot, putting Hawthorne in the "SS" spot and using Kovacs as the deep man.

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 11:20 AM | Great job (Score:2)
EGD
EGD's picture
Joined: 09/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1878

Whenever I see Michigan line up in the 46 front, I expect the opposing QB to check into a quick slant or some other type of pass play.  But, and I am not sure why, it seems like opposing offenses have usually run right into the teeth of it.  Hopefully that keeps happening.

"You will suffer humiliation when the team from my area defeats the team from your area." -- The Onion

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 1:23 PM | I think that's why we didn't see it against MSU (Score:1 Overrated)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

5th year QB + NFL Ready Wideout = 80 yard slants against the 46. I dont think any of our corners could have manned up repeatedly on Cunningham and Cousins would have checked to it.

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 20th, 2011 at 1:04 AM | I don't understand? (Score:1)
ManiacalWolverine
ManiacalWolverine's picture
Joined: 11/06/2009
MGoPoints: 124

     Am i missing sarcasm or something because we ran this defense several different times against M.S.U.?

"I would rather lose in a cause that will some day win, than win in a cause that will some day lose."

  • Login or register to post comments
October 20th, 2011 at 8:58 AM | slight typo (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

I don't remember seeing it a ton vs msu, but people were calling for more of it after the loss. I think we didn't run it more because putting our corners 1on1 too often against msu would have been a mistake imo. I think the ufr comes out today so we can see just how often we ran it

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 20th, 2011 at 10:04 AM | Double post from the old Android App (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

Can't wait to comment from the new one

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 20th, 2011 at 2:27 PM | By Brian's count (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

We ran the 46 a total of 5 snaps vs. MSU

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 11:50 AM | The MNF game against the (Score:1)
CRISPed in the DIAG
CRISPed in the DIAG's picture
Joined: 11/08/2010
MGoPoints: 534

The MNF game against the Dolphins is on of my favorites.  Marino didn't use much three-step, but he had an unnaturally quick release and threw to Duper/Clayton in a basic long-short progression of patterns.  

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 11:55 AM | Lots of blame to go around for the loss (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

Ditka threw the ball a ton rather than handing off to Walter Payton. Buddy Ryan and Ditka famously feuded all year, but would have come to blows in the locker room at halftime had Hampton not stepped in between them. Crazy egos on that Bears team. the WCO really ended the 46's run later with the 49ers teams of the early 90s. After that happened the 46 was turned into a situational set.

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 2:42 PM | I put up some diagrams in (Score:2)
griesecheeks
griesecheeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 638

I put up some diagrams in another thread, but what I'd like to see Michigan do is take a little bit from the Bear, but rearrange the LB's and S's so that it's almost more like a 4-2-5 Over, if that makes sense... Chart? Chart!

 

                                         F

 

                                                    M                        SS

C                           S           E  T   N  T      W                               C

X                                         T  G  C  G  T                                     Y

                                      E            Q

                                                    F

                                                   RB

 

Personnel Notes:

W = Will = Jake Ryan (which would be the opposite of what he's been doing). This position is ideally a hybrid LB/DE - think Woodley in his steeler days... a 3-4 End.

S = Sam = Cam Gordon/Hawthorne. Ideally a Safety/LB hybrid who has great open field tackling ability but who can cover as well.

M = Mike = Demens. Needs to be a stud and sure tackler, who can clean up the trash left when you send 4 linemen against 4 O-linemen. Note: I'm not sold that Demens actually fits that description. but he's what we've got.

SS = Strong Safety (ironically on the weak-side, here) = Kovacs. I like Jordan closer to the LOS, which puts him in position to make plays on the ball carrier. from where I diagram him here, he can still cover deep if necessary, or blitz, or be run support.

Depending on the confidence level of our Corners, you can drop that SS back to a 2-deep to provide over the top help. That could be useful on passing downs.

============

How would this look against a Rich-Rod spread team?

Chart? Chart! [Offense is lined up in Calvin Magee's supposed bread and butter formation]

                                                                       F

                                                

                         SS                  M                        

C                              W      T   N   T   E         S                          C

X                                   T  G   C   G  T                                      Y

                                                                                   Z

                                        RB   Q  RB

 

A supposed weakness of Bear Front d's is perimeter running. With Kovacs rolled up towards the LOS, I don't see any glaring weaknesses, and having 4 O-linemen covered up hampers an offense that wants to pull linemen to the perimeter or 2nd level. The bubble wouldn't look all that inviting from an offenses standpoint. QB Oh Noes would be the major concern.

'my head take's a lickin' but it keeps on tickin' just the same'

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 2:54 PM | Another concern (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

What if Michigan ran the Speed option left? Or just QB Iso to the left? You've got hat on a hat and a race between your QB and the MIKE to the edge, which if the QB wins, he's gone

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 3:07 PM | I don't actually think this (Score:2)
griesecheeks
griesecheeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 638

I don't actually think this would hold up ALL that well against a true spread team. I think at some point you'd have to get one of those DT's off the field for a safety/nickel corner. A slant to the weak side could disrupt the option, but your point is valid. This is also why I made that note above about the Mike having to be a sure tackling stud who can clean up. With David Harris, I'm Ok-er with it. With other recent Mikes, not so much.

Thanks for putting up this diary! I like the concept of the Bear. Like anything, I don't think it can be an exclusive look. It should have its moments.

'my head take's a lickin' but it keeps on tickin' just the same'

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 3:09 PM | Not a problem! (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9539

Every offense and Defense can be beat, like you said, to every counter punch there is another counter... and the chess match continues! all that is old is new again, the wildcat/single wing was huge! then gone, then huge! now gone.....

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 3:16 PM | So true. I would say, though, (Score:2)
griesecheeks
griesecheeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 638

So true. I would say, though, to that option you spoke of. I would expect, as a D coordinator, that one of my SS, C, or W guys could win their matchup and make a play. Probably not my WILL, since he's likely faceup on a stud left tackle, but SS on running back? I think it would be OK more times than not. But it's that one time it gets broken that can kill you (Denard. Notre Dame. 87.)

'my head take's a lickin' but it keeps on tickin' just the same'

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 3:13 PM | Plays that could exploited this defense from RR's offense (Score:1)
Michigan4Life
Joined: 07/29/2010
MGoPoints: 5674

bubble screen being an obvious one, it would leave slot WR one on one against FS.

Shallow cross concept(basically the play where Illini repeatedly scored on RB wheel route) which would have put SAM and/or FS in a bind.

Power option to strong or weak side. Have numbers advantage in favor of the offense.  If done correctly, MIKE must make plays on the QB or RB, but he'll be put in a bind either way.

Smash concept, put FS/CB in a bind.

3 vertical with slot WR having option route, preferably cutting in front of FS.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 3:23 PM | Good points, although SAM (Score:2)
griesecheeks
griesecheeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 638

Good points, although SAM would be in a position to make a play on the bubble first, or at least discourage it. 

To run this, though, you need to be sure that the guys up front can win matchups and get pressure. A team looking to pass against this thing will find many things, I'm sure.

That Illi-wheel would be a killer, that's for sure.

'my head take's a lickin' but it keeps on tickin' just the same'

  • Login or register to post comments
October 19th, 2011 at 9:02 PM | If OSU cannot find a passing game (Score:1)
SpyinColumbus
SpyinColumbus's picture
Joined: 09/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1864

I would love to see more of this in The Game.

Brady Hoke - High quality recruits one or two at a time.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.