Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Diaries ehatch's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 4 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,488 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 9 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Dantonio: players will decide if Reschke can rejoin the team
    0 replies
  • Brandon Wimbush Highlights in Notre Dame Spring Game
    9 replies
  • OT: Archer Danger Island
    18 replies
  • OT: Golden State Killer suspect arrested in California
    25 replies
  • SIAP: U of M Dearborn Bball Team Needs the Money Cannon!
    5 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    42 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    80 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    118 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    89 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    9 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    64 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    170 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    77 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    21 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Dantonio: players will decide if Reschke can rejoin the team
    0 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    118 replies
  • OT: Golden State Killer suspect arrested in California
    25 replies
  • Brandon Wimbush Highlights in Notre Dame Spring Game
    9 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    80 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    170 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    42 replies
  • OT: Archer Danger Island
    18 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    64 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    89 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    18 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    9 replies
  • SIAP: U of M Dearborn Bball Team Needs the Money Cannon!
    5 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    21 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    170 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    129 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    125 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    118 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    92 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    90 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    89 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    83 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

3 point FG Attempts vs Offensive Efficiency

By ehatch — March 8th, 2012 at 4:05 PM — 14 comments
Filed under:
  • basketball

[Ed-Ace: Bumped on a slow day. I'm working on the initial Big Ten recruiting rankings for the class of 2013, which should be up later today.]

Preface.

I have never played basketball at any level, outside of a few pickup games.  I'm not all that good at statistics, so I apologize for any and all statistical errors.  However, as a former actuary, I am good at finding trends and patterns in data.  Last week, Maize N Brew had a good article on whether Michigan lives and dies by the three. The conclusion was that the offensive efficiency was not really dependent on hitting 3 pointers.  When looking at it the data presented, it looked as though the more three point shots UM takes the worse the offensive efficiency.  I decided to take a closer look.

3 point Attempts vs Offensive Effiency.

I went throught the game by game box scores and looked at the 3-point attempts and plotted it against the offensive efficiency.  [I removed Ferris St. since they aren't a D-I opponent.]  What I found was slightly disappointing.  The correlation was -0.15 (the negative means the higher the number of 3-point attempts the lower the offensive efficiency) and the R-squared was a low 0.02.  However, when I took a closer look, I noticed that two of our lower offensive efficiency numbers came against Ohio and MSU, which is no surprise considering that they are the #1 and #2 best defensive efficiency teams in the country. 

So to adjust for that I looked at the amount the offensive efficiency exceeded the opponents average adjusted defensive efficiency from Kenpom.  The result was more in line with what I expected.  The correlation drops to -0.49 and the R-squared rises to 0.24. 

Looking at the results, when U-M shoots 20 3-pointers or less, Michigan is 10-0 (4 of them RPI Top 50 wins, 5 more Top 100 wins).  Shooting more than 25, Michigan is 6-3, but those wins came against Arkansas Pine Bluff, Oakland, 2 overtime wins against Northwestern, Bradley and Iowa St (the only quality win in regulation).  The 3 losses were the 3 worst performances of the season, @Iowa, @Arkansas, and the loss to Purdue. 

Other Teams

So is this unique to Michigan?  I looked at Northwestern, a team I think is most similar to Michigan's style of play (in the B1G).  They spread the floor, shoot a ton of 3s and look for back door cuts.  And I found they have a positive correlation between 3 attempts and offensive efficiency.  A correlation of +0.17 (after adjusting for defensive effiency).  The R-squared is a pathetic 0.03, but I think it is important to note that the correlation is the opposite sign. 

I also looked at Wisconsin.  Ohio relies on Sullinger and MSU relies on the offensive rebound so much that I didn't think that they would be good comparisons to Michigan.  For them it doesn't seem to matter if they shoot a lot of threes or not.  A correlation of -0.1 and an R-squared of 0.01. 

Free Throws

One of the 4 factors is Free Throw Rate.  I think this may be the most important of the 4 for Michigan.  Michigan is 10-0 vs RPI Top 100 competition when their FT Rate is greater than 25%. Michigan is 2-7 vs RPI Top 100 when the FT Rate is at or below 25%.  How does this relate to 3-pointers?  My theory is that Michigan is at their best when driving the basket and drawing fouls and not settling for jump shots of the 3-point variety (I'm looking at you THJ).  It might also explain why Northwestern gives us fits.  Their zone forces us to take a bunch of 3 point shots (like 38 of them). 

So as we go into the post season:

  • Cackle with knowing glee if Michigan is driving the basket
  • Worry if we draw a zone team that forces us to shoot a lot of 3 pointers. 

If anyone has a team they would like me to look at, let me know. I'm going to try to figure out how to add graphs so you can see the dramatic downward slope of Michigan's efficiency against 3 point attempts.

  • ehatch's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 8th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
#2
ChiBlueBoy
ChiBlueBoy's picture
Joined: 10/11/2011
MGoPoints: 5704
Strategery

Great analysis. Thanks. You do a good job of not confusing correlation with causation. In this case, it doesn't seem too surprising, given Beilein's offense, that this would hold true. M tends to either get back-door cuts and easy shots or 3s. If a zone team forces us to shoot 3-pointers (ala NW), our best strategy may still be to take the open 3 rather than force something inside. I don't think the answer is to necessarily drive more (though in some cases *cough* THJ *cough*  yes, we should) but to take the best look we can get, acknowledging that we're at our best when able to take more 2s than 3s.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 3:33 PM
#3
ish
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 13990
nice work.  20 3s is a lot

nice work.  20 3s is a lot anyway.  i wonder if the scouting report on us is to let us take 3s.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 4:32 PM
#4
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5224
Thanks for the link!

I did actually take a look at 3PA vs. Offensive Efficiency and pretty much came to the same conclusion that you did. Games like the last one at Northwestern where we shoot a bunch of threes and only make a few are less than ideal. Given our 3 point and 2 point percentages, our value of a three point shot is 1.071 points per shot, and our two point shot is worth 1.094 points per shot. Since I'm assuming that there's lower variance for two point shooting on a game-by-game basis, putting up more twos (which are often easier looks, particularly in the context of our offense) is the optimal strategy. Interestingly, we shot the fewest amount of threes all year at home against Ohio State, and won. We only made three.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 4:57 PM
(Reply to #4) #5
gwrock
gwrock's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 4577
Hmm

I arrive at slightly different numbers:

Michigan shot 46.02% from 2-point range this year.  That equates to .920 points per attempt.

Michigan shot 35.55% from 3-point range.  That equates to 1.066 per attempt.

Did your analysis factor in foul shots by chance?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 4:59 PM
(Reply to #7) #6
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5224
I took the numbers from

I took the numbers from Pomeroy's profile for us. The three point percentage is 35.7 but thetwo point percentage is 54.7 (which is good for eighth nationally).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 7:25 PM
(Reply to #8) #7
gwrock
gwrock's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 4577
I got my numbers from the stats

I got my numbers from the stats page mgoblue.com referred me to:

http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/mich/sports/m-baskbl/auto_pdf/2011-1...

Curious why our numbers would be different.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 4:42 PM
#8
BleedingBlue
BleedingBlue's picture
Joined: 07/25/2008
MGoPoints: 2129
Free Throw analysis flaw

You need to somehow account for the end of game hack fest action that occurs when we are leading by a couple possessions. That could dramatically increase the percieved importance of FTR in wins vs. losses.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 4:52 PM
#9
Goblueman
Joined: 11/09/2009
MGoPoints: 2674
Free Throws

-# of FTs attempted increases greatly for the team ahead in last few minutes of a game.I'm no actuary but I suggest two FT Rates:1 before last 3 minutes of game and 2 Rest of game          

 - An often overlooked stat is Reb Effiency  ie  % of missed shots rebounded by offense.Mich is woeful at both ends of the floor in this area.I'm curious if this is a "Beilins offense thing" or "Mich is a small team thing"  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 12:54 AM
(Reply to #6) #10
Vacuous Truth
Joined: 01/20/2009
MGoPoints: 162
Both, I think

I'm pretty sure M's poor reb% has a lot to do with beilein's style. reb% is tired directly to style of play, specifically with regards to the fast break. If you crash the offensive glass, you're more susceptible to giving up fb points. And if you crash the boards on d, it's tougher to get points in transition.

So I think beilein see's that, with our small lineups, we're not going to be great on the glass anyways, so we might as well surrender some rebounding chances in exchange for winning the transition game

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 5:02 PM
#11
ebv
Joined: 07/02/2010
MGoPoints: 351
You can't draw conclusions

You can't draw conclusions from data with such low R2.  The R2 is telling you that the percentage of the variation you're accounting for with this variable is 2-3%.  So of all the wild outcomes that can occur on the basketball court, the 3pt attempts can explain less than 3% of the result.

Don't get mislead by the fact that the conclusions line up in a way that you can rationalize - this data isn't conclusive at all.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 6:22 PM
(Reply to #9) #12
ehatch
Joined: 09/25/2008
MGoPoints: 667
I don't disagree, the R

I don't disagree, the R squared of Wisconsin and Northwestern are really too low to draw any conclusions.  Michigan's R squared of almost 25% is much better, but still very difficult to ascribe many conclusions.  The 25% explains more than any of the individual 4 factors. 

There are a number of things that could explain the correlation.  Maybe they are forcing a bunch of turnovers, and are getting easy layups.  Maybe we are getting the ball into Morgan (seems unlikely).  Maybe we are shooting a bunch of long twos. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 8th, 2012 at 6:11 PM
#13
ehatch
Joined: 09/25/2008
MGoPoints: 667
More on FT rate

Thanks for the comments on FT Rate.  I went back through the play by play to see how free throws came in the final 2 minutes of the game.  While it did have an impact in lowering the FT rate across the board, it didn't change much outside of that. UM went 8-0 against Top 100 teams with a FT rate greater than or equal to 25%, 4-7 with less than 25% FT rate.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 1:02 AM
#14
B-Nut-GoBlue
Joined: 09/30/2011
MGoPoints: 17145
So How Does Michigan Stack Up to Syracuse

I have watched them a few times this year, and saw the game against UConn today.  So the story goes in the Big East, limited scouting is done and you play how you play against everyone.  That seems to hold true with Syracuse.  They do something against everyone and they do it very well (primarily because it's practiced and practiced and practice); they run a 2-3 zone the majority of each game and do it well, forcing a team to be consistent at one thing (shooting 3's and getting to the middle and getting looks from there with a big man/more "outside" good shooting looks).  It's tough to beat them because it is hard to do that for an entire game and score more points than they're equally/greater quality offense.

As I was watching them today, I thought to myself, "How would Belein do with this matchup?".  I don't know why, but I would love to see a Beilein/Boeheim game.  I think THIS Michigan team, and I may be wrong and totally naive to Cuses' talent advantage(?) and quality of team they are, could hang and surprise people against that vaunted 2-3 Zone.  I think Michigan could hit "enough" shots, and I think if THJ was efficient playing aggresive ball and Smotz had a good rhythm they could give them fits, andTrey has the ability to attack that zone to propel the offense.  It may get a bit scary down low but I've seen these guys over-achieve enough against bigger teams that their size doesn't scare me.

Sorry, long post, but March gets me excited with all the many potential matchups.  Hope this was all relevent enough to the OP in regards to shooting.  Main point, against a tough defense like 'Cuse, I think Michigan's shooting efficiency (plus smart basketball Beilein can make them play) can play up to other teams.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
March 9th, 2012 at 4:53 AM
#15
Nothsa
Nothsa's picture
Joined: 10/07/2008
MGoPoints: 1059
A problem with the 3 point analysis...

Is that, like free throws, the numbers can be very different in the first 35 minutes and in the last five minutes. If you are 7 points down with 2 and change to play, you are likely to hoist a three, even if that's out of your offense. In other words, it could be that it was because Michigan was losing that they shot 20+ threes. Correlation does not imply causation!

 

Trimming the data - either by dumping the last shots taken, or by only including shots taken when the game was close - might provide some additional insight, though off course it may be really difficult to get that information. I kind of think hoops stats will be much better in another 10 years than they are right now.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.