2010 Recruiting Class: Filling the Gaps

Submitted by Lordfoul on
Hopefully this won't bore you all to tears... something about being buried under feet of snow makes me feel like waxing poetic.

Welcome all of you Michigan Football Faithful to 2010 - the Year of Redemption (hopefully).  2008 and 2009 were bizarre years for all of us, both painful and embarrassing to some degree and always with that feeling of an especially bad dream that we just couldn't wake up from.   Never in most of our lifetimes have we seen our beloved Wolverines flail about in such a disgraceful manner.  Now the corner is there to be turned and with this recruiting haul I see prosperity coming on like a freight train... but like a freight train it may take a while to get here.

And how refreshing was it to see this class come together without the constant re-shuffle that was the 2009 recruiting class?  I was happy with the players we landed in 2009 but the steady drip of decommits was frustrating.  Losing the two defensive tackles at the last moment was especially humbling.  Who does that to Michigan?  Nothing like that this year, thank goodness.  Just commitments staying the course and signing their papers on time, plus a welcome 4/5 star surprise on signing day to give it that proper Christmas-like feel.

Now with two full Rich Rod classes on board, a vision seems to be coalescing out of the fog of the past two years.  We are starting to see positions filled with layer upon layer of players with blue-chip credentials or high upside potential.  The cupboard is certainly no longer bare, though its talent is young.  The players themselves start to look more interchangeable, like we don't have to fall off cliff should so-and-so get hurt or pick our poison in the defensive backfield.

I mean, just look at the Defensive Backfield for a moment and consider:

2009
Corner - Warren (The MAN!  Unfortunately decided to move on)
Corner - Cissoko (Reminder to take every hyped recruit with a grain of salt)
FS - Kovacs (Freshman Walkon played inspired football, but so SLOW!)
SS - Williams (Reminder to take every hyped recrui...

(What too much salt will do to your blood pressure.)

Depth: Yes Woolfolk and JT Floyd were also in the mix with the former decent at times and the latter burnt crispy.

2010 (Hypothetical)
Corner - Turner (Please no grains of salt...)
Corner - Woolfolk
SS - Robinson (Maybe not a LB?)
FS - Dorsey (Please no grains of salt...)

Depth: Christian, Johnson, Kovacs, Emilien, Floyd, Gordon, Talbott, Avery, Vinopal

Yes the 2010 bunch looks young and inexperienced.  It also looks light-years better than their 2009 counterparts with the exception of Warren and has some much improved depth to plug in in case of injury/incompetence.  If Warren had stayed the D-Backfield could have been a strong point of the 2010 team.

Another area where the depth chart is looking solid is on the OL.  Many will bemoan the fact that only one OL recruit was landed in the 2010 class but the depth chart shows that things are looking just fine:

Position     
Freshmen
(c/o 2014)
        Sophomores
  (c/o 2013)
Juniors     
(c/o 2012)
Seniors
(c/o 2011)

OL (13 - 3)
M. Schofield*
Q. Washington*
T. Lewan*
C. Pace

P. Omameh*
R. Barnum*
E. Mealer*
R. Khoury*

D. Molk*
M. Huyge*
S. Schilling*
P. Dorrestein*
J. Ferrara*

Those five returning starters are encouraging for the coming season, no?  Plus the gap created by taking only one OL recruit this season will provide a nice "early playing time" selling point for 2011 OL recruits. 

Looking at the rest of the team gets me downright giddy...

QB - Should be a strength with DG an EE and hopefully a RS as well.  Tate will hopefully put on several pounds and take his game up a notch.

Receiver - Stocked to the gills and I, for one, can't wait to see if Gallon can live up to his hype.  Stonum, Roundtree, Koger, and Hemingway have all already shown flashes.  We certainly stocked up nicely through recruiting as well.

RB - Plenty of talent here though low on proven commodities after V.Smith (may his surgery/recovery go smoothly).  Shaw and Cox have had their moments and I think Fitz is going to be special.

DL - We seem to be in great shape as far as starters go.  I would love to see RVB slide over into Graham's vacated DE spot and Will Campbell show his quality inside as a starter.  Hopefully LaLota has progressed well as a RS and can provide useful depth.  Sagasse played well in spot duty last year IIRC.

LB - The huge recruiting haul here was desperately needed but won't yield effective depth until 2011 IME.  Here's to hoping that under GERG's tutelage, the likes of Ezeh and Mouton can turn a corner, or that JB Fitzgerald can take it up a notch.  LB looks like the weak link once again for the 2010 team unfortunately.  GERG needs to bring cohesion and make the LBs a unit, instead of the Stevie Brown w/2 lost sheep look of last season.

P/K - Welcome Mr. Hagerup, your arrival is indeed timely.  Gibbons, just don't fuck this up, OK?

Looking Farther Ahead:

These three recruiting classes signed since Rich Rod took over have been solid and very good indeed considering the circumstances.  The players signed do seem to fit into the type of team RR favors, now both on offense and on defense.  This means there is no going back, really.  Michigan no longer has the players for a Pro-Style offense shoehorned into the Spread Option and the defense has stockpiled players for GERG's gimmicky defense.  If this team can continue to improve, make a bowl, and let RR and staff make it to 2011, this program is ready to explode.  If we are forced to go looking for a new coaching staff however, it will take just the right one to be able to pick up these highly customized pieces and make them work.

Here's to a great 2010 season and an off-season filled with optimistic joy free from turmoil and controversy. 

Comments

NewBlue Era

February 6th, 2010 at 9:56 AM ^

I've heard that the starting point for Dorsey is CB...but we will have to wait and see. Personally, I think that CB is a better position to play when you are young and can "just play" rather than read and react as a Safety. I also remember reading and article (sorry cant find the link) that compared our Defense last year...half of the games with Woolfolk at CB....Half at S. If I remember correctly, the difference was significant....leading me to believe that this staff wants to play him at safety, but the lack of (edit: non existent) depth at corner last year did not allow it. So here is to hoping that J. Turner and/or Cullen/Dorsey/Floyd/omg somebody please! can hold down the CB spots. Remember giving up huge chunks of yards on 3rd and long last year? (especially to TE's)...blame that on the S play....we need a proven commodity at S. Woolfolk plase, at least for now.

GOBLUE4EVR

February 6th, 2010 at 10:16 AM ^

part of the problem, but our poor LB play didn't help either... if you go back and watch any game, obi had a hard time figuring out what the difference was between a play action pass and run... and when it was a straight pass obi and mouton never got deep enough in zone coverage...

Muttley

February 6th, 2010 at 2:59 PM ^

E.g. the last tOSU middle screen TD and the Iowa Moeaki TD. Now, if you were GERG, what would have you done? Give the QB time, or roll the dice? And if you were an opposing OC, you would be well aware of the dilemna facing GERG. I hope we don't feel a need to blitz on every 3rd down out of fear of a lack of coverage ability.

Ziff72

February 6th, 2010 at 10:13 AM ^

Dude I like the enthusiasm, but 2 true freshmen starting at safety?? There just gonna show up in June and take it over? Not going to happen please reboot. Fail.

Lordfoul

February 6th, 2010 at 10:35 AM ^

I have looked at the options on the roster and either freshmen or a freshman and Woolfolk seem like the best possibilities to me. Glad you liked the post enough to bless it with your critique that contains no alternative. Fail back at ya.

Maize and Blue…

February 6th, 2010 at 10:43 AM ^

I was just poiting out that Woolfolk is far from a proven commodity. I would have to guess that you are also assuming MRob will be starting at safety. By the way take your child crap home I'm a man who happened to play a little college ball myself. Reality is the secondary is going to be young and inexperienced. So I guess you prefer a RS freshman and true freshman at CB with a true freshman at safety and Woolfolk. My reason for wanting one at safety is to stop all the constant position changing currently going on. Kids having to relearn assignments yearly is not a good thing. You failed by assuming and you know what happens when you assume......

Ziff72

February 6th, 2010 at 1:35 PM ^

That is a quote/joke from Ocho Cinco from "Hard Knocks" that flew over your head, I don't think you are a child. First M. Robinson is less than 50% to actaully play safety in his career at Michigan and safety is much harder to learn so to think that Dorsey who wasn't recruited as a safety and MRob who may or may not be a saftey are both going to come in and beat out Vlad, Kovacks, Woolfolk and M. Williams without coming into camp early is not likely enough to be diary worthy. If you "played a little ball" then you would know safety is a cerebral position that requires some experience. IF Dorsey and Robinson are our starting safeties against UConn I will consider you brilliant and I will cower in horror at the 50pts we give up. If you have the balls to put out that you think 2 freshmen are going to start as freshmen even though the coaches are not starting them off at that position when they start fall camp well you need to be tough enough to absorb some criticism for such a bold prediction. As for getting dinged for not offering my own solution. CB Turner CB Floyd S Woolfolk S Emilien/Williams/Kovacks With Christian or Dorsey as the Nickle

Maize and Blue…

February 6th, 2010 at 10:27 AM ^

but Woolfolk is far from a proven commodity. It's true the defense was better with him at safety, but better than down right awful isn't saying much. Some of those large chunks of yardage on third and long came with Woolfolk at safety. As did a certain OT TD on which a true freshman ran through him though, in all fairness, he may have been playing hurt. Woolfolk has spent a vast portion of his time at CB in college and I don't recall him bringing the wood like Dorsey does albeit against HS competition. Dorsey is taller, faster and has that swagger to his game, but maybe that translates better to a lockdown corner. With Dorsey, CC, and JT on board I feel that we need our best talent (only secondary players to play in AA games) on the field at all times. IMHO this means one should be at FS instead of all three at CB which is why RR's decision here somewhat baffles me.

steve sharik

February 6th, 2010 at 10:44 AM ^

Depth Chart: CB: Turner, Jones CB: Floyd, Christian (I think this may switch after the non-conference season once Cullen gets his feet wet.) FS: MRob, Kovacs SS: Woolfolk, Dorsey

NewBlue Era

February 6th, 2010 at 11:13 AM ^

Have you seen Dorsey? He is about the same size as Kate Moss....and expecting him to com into the big ten and "lay the wood" before being barwisized is a extremely optimistic. BTW...comparatively speaking, Woolfolk is a insanely more proven commodity than ANY freshmen, at any school. We have to remember that Dorsey may never even see the field, in 4 years, so please don't put him on a pedestal yet. I remember last year when Justin Turner was a preseason lock to be awesome, much like he is this year. FTR, I hope Dorsey is a stud, as well as Turner, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

uniqenam

February 6th, 2010 at 11:46 AM ^

...why is Emilien behind Carvin Johnson? I know he didn't get any time last year, but I have to believe that Vlad would be starting over true freshmen that are coming into the season with only 3 weeks practice.

Lordfoul

February 7th, 2010 at 12:48 PM ^

Emilien played on special teams last season, burning his redshirt. Yet he was beaten out by another freshman that happened to be a walkon. I live in your world jg, we just seem to perceive it differently. Why the hate? Hopefully Vlad can improve and contribute beyond special teams but he was quoted saying he was healthy and didn't know why he wasn't playing more. I want to talk about the "Impaler" as much as the next guy but last year doesn't get my hopes up.

jg2112

February 7th, 2010 at 6:41 PM ^

True freshman, Lordfoul. Sometimes it doesn't "happen" for true freshmen. It happened for Kovacs, it didn't for Emilien. It doesn't mean that Vlad is a lost cause. I would argue his failure to play last year will make him work even harder to be on the field, to the benefit of the team.

briangoblue

February 6th, 2010 at 12:13 PM ^

I'm really hoping they move Robinson down to LB if he can add a little weight and maintain speed. The depth at LB is so thin as it is and Furman and Ryan will probably take longer to develop. I must say I'm glad GERG is coaching them and not the new defensive hire. He's got his work cut out. Ezeh and Mouton are physically capable of being very good players, but have you ever seen Michigan linebackers look so lost out there? Who knows, Leach could improve and add a little depth, walk-on or not. Also if two freshmen are starting at safety without injuries necessitating it I would be totally shocked. We are talking about coaches that redshirted their best freshman DB last year while Cissoko and Floyd competed for the Jeremy Lesuer Award for ruining Saturdays.

bluebyyou

February 6th, 2010 at 12:28 PM ^

While it is fun to speculate, if the events of the past year have taught us anything, be patient and see how things pan out in the spring and summer. By the end of August a more clear picture will develop. While QB should be better, this is still my area of greatest concern.

Slinginsam

February 6th, 2010 at 12:39 PM ^

RR will probably go with Floyd, Woolfolk, Williams, and Kovacs to start the season. The four of them have probably 25+starts between them, which is about 25+ more than the frosh group about which you are speaking. I do agree that as the season goes on, the new kids will play, and we will see lots of different combos here. I also believe that Kovacs will eventually be moved to Stevie Brown's position. His footspeed isn't great, but he is a smart player and a sure-handed tackler.

jg2112

February 6th, 2010 at 7:13 PM ^

You're concerned about Kovacs's footspeed, and you therefore want to move him to the Linebacker position on the field required to defend against slot receivers? If anyone's moving there from the defensive secondary, it's Marvin Robinson. Kovacs is a serviceable option at close safety, along with the other suspects.

Lordfoul

February 7th, 2010 at 12:54 PM ^

jg, I sure hope you are very close to the program. Otherwise you are a some special kind of jerk for pissing all over other posters' ideas. Kovacs would be well suited to covering slots IMHE. He is a DB for a reason but can't quite hack it because he is slow. He isn't that slow for a linebacker though, just a bit small. I loved the guy's effort last year but too small and too slow hopefully = doesn't play. If Kovacs is a first option anywhere, that is our weakest link.

chris16w

February 7th, 2010 at 3:40 PM ^

Nothing wrong with using information to back up posts. There's too much wild speculation on this thread. Remember that Stevie Brown was a fast safety before he switched positions. The mental aspect to the safety position was his major setback. I don't think we'll see Kovacs switch positions. Spinner requires the athleticism that recruits such as Hawthorne, Jones and Furman have.

JC3

February 6th, 2010 at 12:41 PM ^

I have a feeling that Turner and Dorsey will be our starting cornerbacks.. or maybe even with Cullen Christian mixed in there. Floyd may start out there at first, but I just think the other guys are quicker (Dorsey) or a little better suited to cornerback (Christian) than he is. Would still like to see Floyd play some safety some time down the road though.

Jivas

February 6th, 2010 at 4:16 PM ^

Is that nobody at the presser asked RichRod what position he would forecast Woolfolk to play this coming year (CB or SS). That might have been one of the most informational questions that could have been asked, but alas....

AC1997

February 6th, 2010 at 4:46 PM ^

I think the safety position is as much about understanding where to be on every play as it is physical ability. The stats suggest that the defense was significantly better (though far from good) with Woolfolk at safety. I think that's where he'll play for sure next season. Then I think the other three spots in the secondary are going to be an open competition....and I like that. FS = Robinson, Williams, Kovacs, Carvin & Vlad CB = Turner, Floyd, Cullen, Dorsey, Avery, and Talbott I could see them letting one freshman play at safety, but unless the corners are terrible I can't see them moving Woolfolk back to corner. And I think it is so much easier to "hide" a freshman at corner than at safety. The real question is the linebackers, more in a minute.....

AC1997

February 6th, 2010 at 4:53 PM ^

If I had to guess..... DE - RVB DT - Martin NT - Campbell Quick - Roh LB - Mouton LB - Fitzgerald Spinner - (I have no clue what so ever) CB - Turner CB - Floyd SS - Woolfolk FS - Williams Some thoughts: --The coaches will want to get Floyd out of there as soon as any of the true freshmen are ready --Williams will be on a SHORT leash for Kovacs or others to replace him. --I could see Leach starting over Fitz too. --I personally would put Ezeh at DE in passing downs and move RVB to Campbell's spot. --Everyone is ready to annoit Dorsey the starter somewhere, but watch out for Cullen and Avery too. I think one of them could surprise you.

kman23

February 9th, 2010 at 12:06 AM ^

Dorsey has amazing talent but he is really raw. He should be red-shirted. Cullen is a much more polished CB at this point. Also, I think Robinson is an ideal spinner. DE: RVB, Black, Wilkins (redshirt) DT: Martin, Ash (redshirt), Talbott NT: Campbell, Sagesse Quick: Roh, LaLota, Herron, Paskorz (redshirt) MLB: Fitzgerald, Ezeh, Ryan (redshirt), Leach, Rogers (redshirt) OLB: Demens, Mouton, Furman (redshirt), Kinard (redshirt), Cameron Gordon (move from WR) Spinner: Hawthorne, Robinson (redshirt), Bell, Jones CB: Turner, Jones, Talbott (redshirt) CB: Christian, Floyd, Avery (redshirt) SS: Woolfolk, Dorsey (redshirt), Williams, Vinopal FS: Vlad Emilien, Kovacs, Johnson (redshirt) I think in 3 years Ash will move down to NT and Black will move to DT but they aren't ready for the jump yet. I could see Black (DE), Furman (OLB) and Robinson (Spinner) jump past more senior athletes and turn into 2010's version of Craig Roh. Besides those 3 I'm 95% confidence Cullen will start opposite Turner and that Dorsey will RS unless we need him on KR/PR duty. I think his cousin should handle that so we don't burn a precious RS, especially when Woolfolk is a senior.

Section 1

February 6th, 2010 at 5:48 PM ^

Dwight Hicks and James Pickens, from my own student days. Two guys who started for three years and played pretty much like seniors the whole time. By the time they really were seniors, they constituted half of the All-Big Ten defensive backfield. Hicks went on to be an All-Pro for the 49ers. One of the handful of great hitters along with Larry Foote and Thom Darden. "Dwight Hicks and his Hot Licks."

Todd Plate's n…

February 6th, 2010 at 6:15 PM ^

I am an idealist, optimist and fairly drunk. My suspicion is Ezeh and Mouton have solid years, by no means world beaters, but the wheels won't be spinnin' like last year and they step-up as leaders on this D, not only with their experience, but with their play. Fitz also makes significant contributions. I also think RR noting they would start with Demar at CB says that Woolfolk is and will be the starting SS all season. Woolfolk at SS and JT at CB are the 2 sure things in our secondary going into this season (meaning sure things to start). SS - Woolfolk, Vlad FS - competition amongst Williams/Kovacs, Robinson CB - Turner CB - competition amonst Floyd, Demar/Cullen, Avery/Talbott