Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Diaries Marley Nowell's blog

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 6 days ago
  • Baseball Recruiting—Hello: Nick Azar (+ other items)
    Raoul - 1 week ago
  • 2013 Women's Football Academy
    maizemama - 1 week ago
  • This Day In History: June 10, 1944 - Alumnus Ed Tipper
    wildbackdunesman - 1 week ago
  • Future Non-Conference Recruiting Watch, Vol. I, No. 3
    EGD - 1 week ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››
more
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 2,921 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,399 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,044 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 996 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 974 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 31 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 11 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 6 comments
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    3 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    4 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    15 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    19 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    4 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    22 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    84 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    82 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • VOTE-B1G Preseaon Offensive POY (Devin)
    24 replies
  • OT - Pavel Datsyuk signs 3-yr extension with Red Wings
    43 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    59 replies
  • The Full NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke
    10 replies
  • Michigan fits Steele's "National Championship Mold"
    38 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    3 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    15 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    19 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    59 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    4 replies
  • OT - Pavel Datsyuk signs 3-yr extension with Red Wings
    43 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    82 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    84 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    22 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    4 replies
  • The Full NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke
    10 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    72 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    36 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • David Terrell doesn't like being considered a bust and would give up his...umm....just click.
    55 replies
  • Henne to Denard (just a single pic)
    55 replies
  • ESPN Predicts Hand to M
    54 replies
  • Season opener and Akron game time & network set
    53 replies
  • B. Miller ripped - Ohio PR Machine
    52 replies
  • Caption Contest: SMSB Photo
    52 replies
  • Lewan #11 Overall player, M player rankings and team rankings on NCAA 14
    51 replies
  • OT - MGo School/Life Advice Sought
    51 replies
  • John Bacon
    49 replies
  • Michigan no longer considering transfer QB
    49 replies
  • NBA Scout says Trey Burke best fit for Pistons
    48 replies
  • Hey Everyone it's Brandin Hawthorne
    46 replies
  • OT: College Football Universe's 2013 NCAAF Strength of Schedule rankings are out.
    44 replies
  • Jamarco Jones Visits to Happen
    44 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 3 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  • Michigan men's basketball receives high academic honor with APR Public Recognition Award

    good job gents

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

2010 Michigan Defense: Are You Experienced? [redux]

By Marley Nowell — August 20th, 2010 at 9:28 PM — 38 comments
Filed under:
  • 2010 defense
  • football

I published my original diary shortly after spring practice.  Now that there is some more clarity to the 2010 Defense I thought I would revisit the numbers and see where we stand.  I just hope our defense does not look like Jimi's guitar.

2010 Michigan Defense

*I list who I think will be starters first

DE

RS Jr. Ryan VanBergen

RS Fr. Anthony Lalota or Fr.  Jibreel Black

NT

Jr. Mike Martin

So. Will Campbell

DT

RS Sr. Greg Banks

Sr. Renaldo Sagesse

Deathbacker

So. Craig Roh

RS Jr. Brandon Herron or Jr. JB Fitzgerald

MLB

Sr. Mark Moundrous or RS Sr. Obi Ezeh

WLB

RS Sr. Jonas Mouton

So. Mike Jones

Spur

RS Fr. Tom Gordon or So. Floyd Simmons

Bandit

So. Jordan Kovacs

Fr. Marvin Robinson

FS

RS Fr. Cam Gordon or So. Vladimir Emilen

CB

RS So. JT Floyd

Fr. Cullen Christian

Sr. James Rogers

So. Teric Jones or Fr. Courtney Avery or Fr. Terrence Talbott

Big Ten Averages

Starters

Upperclassman: 7.6

Underclassman: 3.4

Two-Deep

Upperclassman: 10.2

Underclassman: 11.8

Michigan

Starters

Upperclassman: 5

Underclassman: 6

Two-Deep

Upperclassman: 9

Underclassman: 13

 

These numbers are just terrible in comparison to the Big Ten.


Not All B10 Defenses Are Created Equal

After looking at the B10 Total Defense rankings from 2009 there appeared to be 3 fairly seperate categories of defensive quailty.

Craptastic: 404.0 yds/game (Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, MSU, Minnesota)

Decent: 354.1 yds/game (Purdue & Northwestern)

Great: 295.3 yds/game (Wisconsin, PSU, Iowa, OSU)

Starters Craptastic Decent Great Michigan 2010
Upperclassman 6.7 8.5 9.8 5
Underclassman 4.3 2.5 1.2 6
 
Two-Deep Craptastic Decent Great Michigan 2010
Upperclassman 11.3 11.5 11.7 9
Underclassman 10.7 10.5 10.3 13

Again the numbers are just plain scary.

What does this all mean?

Seems that only LIttle Brother fields the same experience level defense that Michigan does.  I am predicting a shootout for the Paul Bunyon Trophy.  I wish I could come up with something more positive.

 

GO BLUE!

  • Marley Nowell's blog
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 20th, 2010 at 9:39 PM | Man, this is not good. This (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

Man, this is not good. This defense just screams 6-6, or 5-7 to me. 

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 4:15 AM | Don't fret just yet (Score:1)
kalamazoo
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: 354

I'm worried too, but if we can hold onto the ball (where we were last in the Big Ten) and have 2 quarterbacks with much better experience and maturity under their belts, who knows.

Yeah...I'm not talking so much about defense, BUT, there were a lot of missed coverages...with more simplicity and better Rod defensive terms this year, at least everyone is on the same page.  If Floyd, Christianson, Gordon, and others impress, there's hope yet. 

I'm actually saying this thinking we may be 2-2 after 4 games, but then the freshmen will have better experience and we will do better, even vs tougher teams, as the season continues.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 9:49 PM | Curious, and lazy. What were (Score:1)
Glutton
Glutton's picture
Joined: 08/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2132

Curious, and lazy. What were our numbers last year?  Am I correct in assuming that we are going to field an "older" team than in 2009?

"But it is better to live here in sackcloth and ashes than to own the whole state of Ohio."

-- Lafcadio Hearn

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:03 PM | Pretty Much the Same (Score:1)
Marley Nowell
Marley Nowell's picture
Joined: 07/31/2008
MGoPoints: 2947

1 more Underclassman starter and 1 more Upperclassman on the 2 deep.  You can check the original diary to see all of last year's numbers.

"Relax you panic monger" -Megatron

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:06 PM | Thanks, although I was hoping (Score:1)
Glutton
Glutton's picture
Joined: 08/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2132

Thanks, although I was hoping for a bigger improvement in the numbers from year to year.

"But it is better to live here in sackcloth and ashes than to own the whole state of Ohio."

-- Lafcadio Hearn

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 9:51 PM | Yes the defense won't be great (Score:1)
goody
goody's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1532

but you have to factor in the offense, which should be one of the best in the Big 10.  Having a good offense makes your defense better because they're not on the field as much.   Having a great running team only emphasizes this advantage.  

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:05 PM | The problem with RR's offense (Score:1)
Hoek
Hoek's picture
Joined: 01/29/2010
MGoPoints: 1772

The problem with RR's offense with helping the defense, is it's a quick strike offense which means our defense will still be on the field alot of the game. Look at the TOP in most of the games last year we were on the loosing end most of the time.

Go Blue

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:26 PM | Except the team really wasn't (Score:1)
ironman4579
ironman4579's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: 897

Except the team really wasn't quick strike last year.  We averaged 22.13 PPG in conference play (which was the exact same as '08 by the way).  That's not quick strike.  That's just not a good offense.  We didn't lose TOP because we scored so fast.  We lost it because our offense didn't move the ball. 

My Adobe is screwed so I can't check the WVU site (which has the info I want in PDF form unfortunately), but I'd be interested to know if Rod's WVU teams consistently lost the TOP battle in games that they won.  I'd think they probably didn't.

"They've roused the Fire Wyrm!"

-the 13th Warrior

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 11:00 PM | STATS!!!!!! (Score:1)
goody
goody's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1532

http://www.bigeast.org/fls/19400/stats/football/2007-2008/wvu.htm#team.tem

WVU 2007 - 30:14

http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/ncaa-m-footbl-fbs-team-time-of-posession.html

U of M 2009 - 26:25  rank 116 out of 120  yikes!!

FWIW, if you took WVU's T.O.P. stats from 2007 and ranked them against 2009 teams they would be 55th one spot below ...... West Virginia. 

TOP is not a critical stat but it sure doesn't hurt

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 12:48 AM | No, TOP isn't critical.  My (Score:1)
ironman4579
ironman4579's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: 897

No, TOP isn't critical.  My point is that regardless of how quick strike the offense is (which I'm not sure of anyway, I seem to remember a diary with Charts?  CHARTS!! that showed Rod's WVU teams were more consistent in the 5-10 yard range, while the 20+ yards range stuff was actually quite a bit lower than previous Michigan teams, which I don't think were ever considered quick strike offenses.)  I doubt that they consistently lost the TOP battle, or that they at least managed to keep it close. 

To find the info someone would have to actually go to the WVU site and look at the box scores from all their games '05-07 ('04 doesn't seem to have game logs, or at least not in the same place).  As I said, I'd do it, but my Adobe is boned and it's all in PDF.

"They've roused the Fire Wyrm!"

-the 13th Warrior

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 1:02 AM | Offense vs Defense (Score:1)
Uncle Rico
Uncle Rico's picture
Joined: 05/18/2009
MGoPoints: 119

Agree.  I can't tell you how many ways I've looked at a variety of data, from TOP, 1st downs, to run vs pass play %age, to total yardage.  I've done this several times over the years, to see if I can find (prove to myself) any causal relationship between O and D.

There's not one single data point which has any kind of significant correlation with a better offense improving a defense, especially when viewed from year to year.

Either the Defense if good or it's not.  It stands alone, regardless of how good or bad the offense is.

- Uncle Rico

"Back in '82, I used to be able to throw a pigskin a quarter mile"
  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 2:30 AM | I've been trying to work (Score:1)
ironman4579
ironman4579's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: 897

I've been trying to work onsomething similiar recently.  I wanted to see if I could find some kind of correlation between PPG for/against in conference and in conference record (there isn't, by the way).  There really appears to be no correlation that suggests that an improved offense means an improved defense.

The best example of this I've found so far is 2005 Minnesota, which averaged a whopping 31.88 PPG For in conference, but also gave up 34.13 PPG against (how that team finished 4-4 in conference is beyond me)

"They've roused the Fire Wyrm!"

-the 13th Warrior

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 6:34 AM | Re: quick strike offense (Score:1)
teldar
teldar's picture
Joined: 07/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1314

I think the quickness of this offense is more about how quickly the team is supposed to line up and get another play going. I remember the same diary as you about yardage per play, and agree, this is not an offense designed to always get the big play. It seems more an offense designed to have a cross of intermediate plays and have them quickly.

Wasting away in Ohio, a Wolverine in a sea of red and grey

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:43 PM | Brian has debunked TOP (Score:1)
Marley Nowell
Marley Nowell's picture
Joined: 07/31/2008
MGoPoints: 2947

TOP is an antiquated stat when offenses were more run-based.

"Relax you panic monger" -Megatron

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 12:34 PM | Turnovers (Score:1)
sman13
Joined: 05/06/2010
MGoPoints: 212

Our turnovers were very related to our TOP since they both reflected the state of our O-Line which should improve vastly with the return of the injured as well as the general improvement of our QBs under pressure. I think our TOP would follow suit (even if it is an antiquated stat)

When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft; on the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them.  Keep believing. -Bo

GO BLUE

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:13 PM | I think what needs to be (Score:1)
ironman4579
ironman4579's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: 897

I think what needs to be looked at is not just under/upperclassmen, but starting experience/ overall playing time.  Is a senior who's a first year starter better than a sophmore who's in his second year as a starter?  Maybe that actually is the case.  But I would certainly prefer the returning starter.

"They've roused the Fire Wyrm!"

-the 13th Warrior

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:18 PM | If they can just hold up and (Score:1)
M16
M16's picture
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: -340

If they can just hold up and be semi-mediocre we could have a great year.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 12:58 AM | That is very ture, we can (Score:1)
GRIGGS616
Joined: 05/27/2010
MGoPoints: 23

That is very ture, we can live with a mediocre D. I honestly believe we will give up 34 points a game, but I have faith are offense will score 35

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:29 PM | It's pretty much on our D (Score:1)
Kal
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 4598

It's pretty much on our D Line to keep quarterbacks bothered enough that they don't wreak havoc on our secondary. The longer a quarterback gets in the pocket, the scarier this season is going to be. That being said, I have faith in Roh, Martin, and VanBergen. Also, it can't hurt that the young secondary gets to practice against a damn good group of receivers. 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:46 PM | I hope so (Score:1)
Marley Nowell
Marley Nowell's picture
Joined: 07/31/2008
MGoPoints: 2947

But that didn't work out last year when we had argubaly the best DE ever at Michigan Brandon Graham.

"Relax you panic monger" -Megatron

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 10:44 AM | 3-3-5 (Score:1)
Pea-Tear Gryphon
Pea-Tear Gryphon's picture
Joined: 10/31/2009
MGoPoints: 2271

One of the things I really like about the 3-3-5 is the ability to bring pressure from anywhere to confuse the offense and QB. We will need this to relieve some pressure on the secondary. If we get 3-4 blitzes home per game and kill drives with big sacks, the D should be serviceable. And as everyone else has mentioned, the O should be better. Better Comp%, Turnover ratio and yards per play should all be better this year with what we have coming back.

Hope springs eternal...in August at least.

"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about." - Peter Griffin

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 10:49 PM | Moundros (Score:1)
smwilliams
smwilliams's picture
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: 1763

By the way one of those upperclassmen was a fullback as recently as Spring.

The DL looks extremely solid with a very good DT rotation and Van Bergen plus AWESOME FROSH manning the end spot.

Death Roh has got that hybrid DE/LB spot on lock. Good depth in the LB corps (Fitzgerald/Demens/Jones/Leach).

Secondary looks atrociously bad unless Marvin Robinson and Cullen Christian are killers and Vlad Emilien is a world-beater.

Difference between being absolutely atrociously season-killing and below average is unfortunately, Jonas Mouton and Obi Ezeh.

The fact the season and RichRod's Michigan tenure may ride on those two is Texas Chainsaw Massacre-level frightening.


EDIT TO ADD: Probably a bad sign I used "atrociously" twice in the span of 2 paragraphs to describe the defense.



 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 11:03 PM | 6-6 has been my prediction, through (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5175

thick and thin, since spring. And I think that will be an accomplishment, that Brandon will know it, and the RR keeps his job even with that record. 2011, we kill. 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 20th, 2010 at 11:59 PM | You can stick with 6-6... (Score:1)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10491

..and I'll stick with 9-4 counting a bowl. 

Looking at the roster, if I have my count right, there are 6 CB's and 17 (yes, 17) safeties listed.  All of the safeties are listed at 207 or less, though some may have fluctuated since the weights were entered into the database.  They will find enough bodies to put at CB. 

Also, dividing into "upperclassmen" and "underclassmen" is valid, but games played may be a better determinant of experience.  It may look like it sucks right now, but we don't know and won't have any idea until we actually see them play someone.   Luckily, this will happen in a couple of weeks. 

After that, though, we won't really know how much they will improve until they get into the "meat" of the BT schedule.  I'm not ready to pack it in quite yet, and I'm sure they aren't, either.

To the OP: nice "Jimi at Monteray" pic.  I find this really fitting because right now, I am listening to a nice Jimi show from 1-22-69 in Vienna.  And it is one of the rare shows where he does AYE, to which I am listening as I type this sentence. 

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 1:03 AM | Greg Banks is definitely (Score:1)
JC3
Joined: 07/17/2009
MGoPoints: 1316

Greg Banks is definitely starting over Sagesse, otherwise you're correct there.

Twitter l Contact 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 1:16 AM | Thanks For The Uplifting News (Score:1)
Slinginsam
Joined: 06/17/2009
MGoPoints: 16

 What will stop the tsunami?  Damn, even IU is probably licking their chops after reading all of the banter on Mgoblog.

Revising my forecast to seven, maybe eight losses.  Won't matter how many points we score, we are in major defensive doo-doo.

And sadly, RR will be canned.   I hate to see this happen, but our defense is thin, inexperienced, and bad.  And there are no excuses after three seasons.  There aren't.  The head coach has badly underestimated what kind of defense is necessary to win in the Big Ten.  Period.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 2:46 AM | So your theory is that RR has (Score:1)
BlueTimesTwo
BlueTimesTwo's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1827

So your theory is that RR has intentionally been fielding crappy defenses because he has underestimated the Big Ten?  You think that he doesn't want a quality defense?

Don't you think it is possible that he was dealt a crappy defensive hand, and the lack of depth has provided zero margin for error for injuries?  Is it his fault that his best defensive back recruits have either flamed out (BooBoo and Turner), been denied admission (DD, Witty), or are just getting a chance to contribute after their redshirt years?

If we can just slow teams down enough this year to let our offense win some games, we should be solid going forward as the younger defenders gain experience and physical maturity.

"People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either being made."

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 8:59 AM | Are We Experienced enough? (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19379

For the last two years after each tough loss, it's been "ehh, I Don't Live Today, just Wait Until Tomorrow." Still, when I read these numbers after a Long Hot Summer Night, it's easy to feel that my One Rainy Wish of a competitive defense is nothing more than Castles Made of Sand. In that case, I'm looking at staving off a Manic Depression.

What I have to do is remember the Burning of the Midnight Lamp as GERG and the rest of the defensive staff stay up late figuring out how to keep Michigan Stadium from becoming a Red House of blown assignments, missed tackles, and third-and-18 conversions.

If they can, Ain't No Telling how far this team can go with the increasingly potent offense we'll see over the course of the season.

If they can't, it'll be hard to prevent the mob from Ann Arbor Torch & Pitchfork from braving Crosstown Traffic to lay seige to David Brandon's office, screaming Fire RR or you'll see the Big House Burning Down.

My hunch all along has been that we'll only win half our games. If 6 was 9, then You Got Me Floating on this Third Stone from the Sun.


  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 10:26 AM | heh (Score:1)
snowcrash
Joined: 07/22/2008
MGoPoints: 1586

It's too bad I couldn't give that post +1 for each Hendrix reference. Let's just hope the back 7 don't play like they're in a Purple Haze as they did all too often last year.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 11:36 AM | hope the back 7 don't play like they're in a Purple Haze (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19379

Yup. Gerg's gonna have to channel his inner Voodoo Child and work some magic with the youngsters on D or the Wind won't be the only the thing crying Mary Sue, get rid of this RR guy.


  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 12:47 PM | well played sir (Score:1)
entirely reasonable
entirely reasonable's picture
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 2517

bold as love was that post.

"Play hard and with great effort"

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 10:54 AM | Can they possibly be worse (Score:1)
bcoaker
Joined: 05/23/2010
MGoPoints: 48

Can they possibly be worse then last year? One more year in the weight room and a simplified scheme should help, last years D had plenty of upperclassmen and we know how that went. I think the D will be improved enough to get us to a minor bowl with next year setting up for Big Ten contention.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 11:20 AM | I just hope (Score:1)
stillMichigan
stillMichigan's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 1822

Our coaches can coach these kids up. Lots of desire and heart. Thats where coaches need to give them the best chance to succeed.. 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 11:34 AM | Most of those numbers come (Score:1)
Bobby Boucher
Bobby Boucher's picture
Joined: 05/02/2009
MGoPoints: 668

Most of those numbers come from the secondary.  Up front we have veterans/upperclassmen.  We just need to blitz like hell and hope that forces bad passes.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 11:48 AM | Defense (Score:1)
HailGoBlue86
Joined: 08/11/2010
MGoPoints: 425

As long as we are even mediocre we should be fine this season because I expect a lot less turnovers from the offense setting up our defense in a bad spot.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 1:29 PM | Are the numbers similar for offense? (Score:1)
cps2010
Joined: 08/08/2009
MGoPoints: 3750

We'll have 9 upperclass starters on offense (if Shaw is the RB), the only underclass guys being Roundtree and Omameh.  If the numbers are similar for offense, then our offense will be great and our defense will be craptastic.  In other words, just what we've been expecting: shootouts.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 21st, 2010 at 4:52 PM | And our underclass QB yet to (Score:1)
OSUMC Wolverine
OSUMC Wolverine's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1105

And our underclass QB yet to be determined.  At least Tate got his wings

Reality is an illusion created by an unsafe drop in blood alcohol levels that exposes one to the idiocy of others.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 22nd, 2010 at 9:02 AM | Don't pull the fire alarm yet on the Michigan Defense (Score:1)
nmajali
Joined: 08/19/2010
MGoPoints: 149

Crashing and burning like the Jimi's guitar might be far fetched for our defense this year. I've been following our new freshmen's high school careers and checking the possible starters on defense and although this isn't a Bo's or Lloyd's defense, it might have a chance to be a middle of the Big Ten Pack defense this season.

At CB the fear is that JT FLoyd isn't great, well don't worry, he was going to play anyways, and as for the number 2 CB Fr. Cullen Christian is a super great athlete at that position, that means a lot at this point, James Rogers and Courtney Avery are great support also. As for Talbott and Jones, great support at DBs. Yes the position is thin, but still if we can keep these guys semi healthy during the season we can target being a decent defense this season in the B10. I think if Michigan plays contain defense and doesn't take much chances we can maintain having longer drives for the other offense, which means more snaps, more chances for mistakes, more time ticking off the clock and much more resting time for our offense.

The hope then is to get that offense to produce, we need an average of 28 to 35 points a game to win around 9 games this season. From what I see on Michigan's offense, I think that is very possible. we need to try to repeat what Michigan did in the 2000 season when Henson and the offense needed to SCORE big every game to be able to win. keep your fingers crossed and hope for the best... GO BLUE

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.