You Say It Is A Toenail; I Say It Is In Your Heart Nonetheless Comment Count

Brian

3/23/2017 – Michigan 68, Oregon 69 – 26-12, season over

33574662526_891917bf71_z

[Joseph Dressler]

There are few things more haunting in sports than coming up on the short end of a bonafide one-point basketball game. There are so many points and so many opportunities to get two more or prevent two more that it is impossible not to inventory all the slight tweaks in the universe that could have gotten you one step closer to the promised land, or at least destruction at the hands of Kansas.

The wide open DJ Wilson layup and two Duncan Robinson threes that were halfway down stand out in this regard. So too does the late Oregon free throw miss that Wilson couldn't box out on. And then there is the blizzard of threes that did not go halfway down, for reasons.

Oregon's approach seemed to be "leave Michigan blitheringly wide open from three and see what happens." Michigan took more threes than twos, and if any of them seemed unreasonable it was only in aggregate. There will be some complaints about Michigan launching early in the shot clock, but the vast majority of Michigan's 31 attempts from behind the arc were preceded by my inner monologue—and sometimes the external one, too—yelling "shoot that." A couple of ugly ones should have been rhythm catch and shoot opportunities that Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman and Mo Wagner, collectively 0-8 in this game, passed up on to dribble themselves into worse shots.

This is certainly a way to play against a John Beilein team. Usually it's a way to get your face melted off. The shattered corpse of Oklahoma State basketball would like a word at this point. That word is "aaaargh."

-------------------

And yet.

Michigan hit a respectable 11 of 31—36 percent. This was not enough. It was not enough even though they won the style contest on defense. Oregon only got up 10 transition shots, which they did poorly on. A third of their shots were the two point jumpers Michigan strives to force and Oregon is very bad at. They hit 25%.

If you'd told me all the peripheral numbers from this game beforehand I'd have taken it in a hot second. I would not have believed you if you'd told me that despite those numbers Michigan's offense would look like a hamster searching for a wheel for big chunks of the game.

Dana Altman's combination of the half-ass press a bunch of teams run now that the shot clock is down to 30 and 40% matchup zone got Michigan off balance. A plan to punish the incessant switching by replicating the second half against Louisville ended up with some poor Wagner shots and turnovers; Wagner spent the last ten minutes on the bench in favor of Duncan Robinson, who seemingly couldn't guard anyone on the floor.

The game was just... off. With virtually every ticket in the sweaty palms of Kansas fans the arena was near-empty at tipoff and dead throughout. That gave a tense, taught game an unfortunate NBA D-League or NCAA hockey regional vibe, and while I don't think that caused the ugly game it certainly reinforced it. It was weirdly muted for one of the most important games of the college basketball season.

It was ugly to the point where a final score close to 70 for both teams is unexpected. Michigan perpetually felt eight points behind and suddenly they were in the lead with two minutes left, sort of like the Oklahoma State and Louisville games. And then.

In the aftermath you're left grasping at opportunities spurned, at whatever air eddies pushed this ball a micron away from a good-enough trajectory, at this breakdown or that breakdown that would go almost entirely unremarked upon if not for the fact that Oregon had N and Michigan had N –1.

An inch; a point; it's been a year of almosts for Michigan athletics.

Bullets

Rather satisfying all the same. Losing a one-point Sweet Sixteen game is no shame. It's a hard thing to do, winning basketball games against good teams. Michigan picked up a banner, got a measure of Louisville revenge, and was amongst the best teams in the country for a full half season. Over the full span they finished 20th on Kenpom.

This wasn't a return to the Burke/Stauskas years but it was a solid top 25 season.

The Walton; the Irvin. I pulled the "Zak Irvin is happening" tag out of mothballs for this game because he was happening, man. His late surge as he re-found his excellent-third-banana level was such that everybody had to stop complaining about him. This is a monumental internet accomplishment. He held Michigan in this game, hit tough late-clock shots, and was clearly on another level from Duncan Robinson as he checked Oregon's perimeter guys.

Building on that? Obviously much hinges on the return of Wilson and Wagner. I'd guess with their tough final games and the super deep draft—DX has Caleb Swanigan 30th!—both will return for another year of that sweet Beilein development. Both guys are potential lottery picks if they continue to improve at a decent clip. Right now there are sufficient questions that they'd be borderline first rounders.

If Michigan does not have any unexpected departures you're looking at something like:

  1. Xavier Simpson/Eli Brooks
  2. MAAR/Jordan Poole
  3. Charles Matthews/Duncan Robinson
  4. DJ Wilson/Isaiah Livers
  5. Mo Wagner/Jon Teske/Austin Davis

Michigan does have an open scholarship they could use on either Mo Bamba—uh not likely—or one of the late risers they've done so well with; there are also a number of intriguing transfer options. Since Brooks and Poole may not be impact freshmen, an immediately eligible backcourt scorer would be real nice. You've probably heard about faintly ludicrous Chippewa Marcus Keene and his 37% usage. Keene shot 82/51/37 on incredible volume and had an excellent assist rate on a bad MAC team that was nonetheless 56th in offensive efficiency.

There's also New Mexico guard Elijah Brown, another 30%+ usage player with decent efficiency. His three point shooting fell off this year but he was near 40% a year ago (on 226 attempts); he gets to the line and his excellent FT shooting implies that his rough two point percentages are more about his situation than his talent.

Or Michigan could go the Matthews route again and attempt to acquire the services of blue-blood transfer Chase Jeter, who's leaving Duke after two injury-plagued years. Jeter is a 6'10" post and would have to sit out, so he's not an ideal fit for the roster. I'd still poke around there because the rate of big washout is so high. You can't count on both Teske and Davis being around in two years. See: all of college basketball.

Tourney coverage complaint. There are way too many fouls that don't get replays to check on them. DJ Wilson's second was a potentially dubious call on which a second look would have been very helpful; instead nothing.

Also in complaints: I have no idea how anyone can listen to Reggie Miller and think "I should pay this person to do this thing."

Comments

ijohnb

March 24th, 2017 at 1:00 PM ^

think he was saying something different from what you think.  He wasn't saying that Michigan needed to "hurry" because time was running out, he was saying that they were not getting into anything fast enough and were playing East and West, not North and South.  After we broke their trap/press, we threw the ball around aimlessly for 12 seconds per possession instead of taking the game to Oregon.  That is at least how I interpreted what he was saying, and I agreed with him at the time.

In reply to by ijohnb

stephenrjking

March 24th, 2017 at 1:04 PM ^

If I remember the possession correctly, I think he was correct. Things weren't developing. This may or may not have been the possession where Robinson was dribbling the ball around while well-defended outside the arc for 5 seconds, but that moment sticks out to me as well. 

There were some problems with the commentating (one minute to go, one-score game: "This is a key possession" or something. Yeah, thanks, I kinda figured that out). But not everything they said was ridiculous. Hit and miss whether or not they got good stuff, but there was some good stuff there.

MGoTexas

March 26th, 2017 at 3:03 PM ^

With about 5 and a half mins left in the game, Reggie Miller complained that Michigan was using too much shot clock in their possessions if they wanted to win the game. Isn't this the same guy that scored 8 points in 9 seconds BY HIMSELF?!

Michigan, down 58-53 about this time, proceeded to take the lead 61-60 in just under 1 minute of game time.

Reggie just fills the air.

mGrowOld

March 24th, 2017 at 12:44 PM ^

Might be a first for me personally but coming from somebody who ALWAYS bitches about the officials after a Michigan loss I didnt see anything last night that bothered me.  Didnt yell at the TV once and never even got to do my impersonation of the announcer calling yet another brutal, one-sided, unfair call after another against my beloved Michigan Wolverines.  I think M got a fair whistle and the disparity in calls was more a result of the style of play of the two teams than anything else.

My wife asked me almost immediately after the game ended "well....what do you think?"   My response was "didnt play our best game but had a shot at the end and it didnt go down - oh well."  I wasnt mad and I certainly wasnt dissapointed in either our effort or the refs.

This is kinda wierd to be honest.

MH20

March 24th, 2017 at 12:45 PM ^

The refs missed a blatantly obvious travel on Dorsey that led to a three.  He drove the lane, picked up his dribble, swung around to look for an outlet and clearly slid his pivot foot.  Even the announcers were immediately on it as a clear travel and a break for the Ducks.

J.

March 24th, 2017 at 12:57 PM ^

I don't believe traveling was called the entire game. Oregon got an extra step on many of their drives to the lane; Wagner traveled twice and Walton did once, and those are just the ones I remember. I felt it was unbiased incompetence.

J.

March 24th, 2017 at 1:23 PM ^

Either call it or get the rule off of the books.

The one I noticed from Walton was actually the kind that normally does get called -- he shuffled his feet at the top of the key before beginning a drive -- like, move one foot, move the other (establishing the first as the pivot foot), pick up the first again and start driving.  It was noticably awkward and I was surprised it wasn't whistled.

M-Dog

March 24th, 2017 at 2:16 PM ^

The refs are always going to miss some calls.  It happens.  I can live with that.

What i can't live with is inconsistency, bias toward a particular team / coach / style of play, and especially the TV-Teddy thing where they want to determine the outcome of game themselves.

umfanchris

March 24th, 2017 at 1:06 PM ^

I don't think officiating was that bad either. Yes there was the travel and questionable DJ 2nd foul. But there isn't a game in the world where 1 team hasn't thought there was a bad call or two.

Also I don't want fouls to be reviewable. If the officials review every foul, this will greatly decrease the flow of the game. I already think there are way too many tv timeouts (why do you need a TV timeout every 4 minutes? Especially if there was just a timeout or stopage within the last minute?)

charblue.

March 24th, 2017 at 1:15 PM ^

If I had a complaint at all about the officiating, it was in the first half. And again the problem with NCAA Tournament officiating is putting strtangers together to work as a team and then expect them to call the same type of contact. That rarely happens because guys see things differently and call it the way they do when working with regular conference partners. 

I thought the white-haired official and the black guy were the most agressive in calling fouls and certain contact going to the basket. Again the lead (ACC  Conference) official for this game was the lead official in Michigan's first round game with Oklahoma State, and he blew his whistle as little as possible, which is what you want.

The other guys seemed like they wanted to be noticed  and called the most stuff.  The black official seemed to call the most questionable contact in the first half. He called Wilson for his second foul. MAAR got called on an offensive foul in the first half for pushing off even though he had leverage going to the basket and was impeded by a late arriving defender. That call didn't match an earlier call in which an Oregon driver got the benefit of contact going across the lane on a layup attempt.

Having said all this, I really didn't think officiating was a major issue. Michigan just was out of sorts last night,offensively and defensively. And all of their issues helped lead to their demise; poor offensive rebounding and blocking out on the foul line. In large measure much of this was the result of good Oregon defense and slowdown measures that really bottled up Michigan efforts to run its motion offense.

Michigan's foul total was limited early on in the second half but then rose midway and into the bonus with the Ducks still with fouls to give as the game ended. Obviously Michigan's primary scorers were the guys leading the offense as time expired. So, the only strategy question might be whether Beilein might have tried to get Mo back in the contest to get to the hoop late. Michigan's inside game was sporadic at best and mostly ineffective, so even that move seemed like only a suggestion than a serious complaint.

Michigan was just off last night. Even though it was a one-point loss, it seemed like a much larger defeat. And that is why, I think, the game commentators kept making reference to Michigan scoring necessity at certain points in the game when a failure to score might create a two to three possession deficit.

Although the Wolverines never really treiled by more than six points. It just seemed like it was really hard to match baskets or run anything other than getting three point shooters loose.

lhglrkwg

March 24th, 2017 at 12:43 PM ^

Michigan had been playing in front of fairly friendly crowds all throughout that run in DC and in Indy. Then we ran into another year where Kansas fans had all the tickets so our game was dead (vs. UF 2013, vs. Oregon 2017). Unfortunately this time Nik Stauskas wasn't here to go 15-for-15 from 3

Not much to complain about. We coulda shoulda won and we coulda shoulda lost by 20. A huge string of upsets and two new banners is nice to me

jmblue

March 25th, 2017 at 4:06 PM ^

Yes, we have NIT championship banners from '84 and '04 (and had one for '97 but it was taken down).  

Hey, it's a postseason tournament and you have to win five games - not a simple task.  I'd never trade an NIT title for an NCAA bid but I'm OK with honoring the teams that made the most of it.

lhglrkwg

March 24th, 2017 at 2:41 PM ^

and how I haven't been to a game in Crisler in about 8 years. I was thinking we had a banner like how Yost used to have Frozen Four and GLI champ banners. Just one that showed all the years we made it

UM Fan from Sydney

March 24th, 2017 at 12:43 PM ^

I know Michigan is in love with the three-point shot, but they lowered their chance of winning with that last possession by taking a three instead of driving the lane or at least taking a closer jump shot. The three is a lower-percentage shot. They hindered their chance of winning with that last shot. It just blows my mind when teams do that.

corundum

March 24th, 2017 at 12:47 PM ^

Disagree since Oregon still had fouls to give. I think Oregon was set to foul Walton if he got any closer or if any more time ran off. A good look from Walton is significantly better than trying to find an open shot off an inbounds pass with seconds left in my opinion.

TrueBlue2003

March 24th, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

Walton played that perfectly.  He had to stay in shot-ready position so he could rise up if they tried to foul.  If he puts his head down to drive, they easily get a non-shooting foul with very little time on the clock.  We were actually really fortunate to get such a good shot there (Altman was yelling at Ennis to foul but he didn't, probably because he was worried Walton would shoot it).

Just didn't hit it.

MH20

March 24th, 2017 at 12:49 PM ^

Oregon had two fouls to give after the ball was inbounded with 9.x seconds left.  A drive to the hoop most likely leads to a common foul which results in Michigan needing to inbound again with less time on the clock.  Considering all the issues they've had getting the ball in I think that would have led to a worse final shot.  Walton got separation and had a clean look.  He hits that shot all the time.  It wasn't a bad shot.

funkywolve

March 24th, 2017 at 12:52 PM ^

I'm guessing the UM staff and team would take Walton's shot 10 times out of 10 to win that game.  When he started shooting with the defender a bit off, I thought UM was going to win.  I was figuring UM was going to get off a shot a lot worse than their clutch player having an open step back 3.

Jonesy

March 24th, 2017 at 6:27 PM ^

My only complaint is that we didn't crash the boards on Walton's last shot, one person, I think RAAK crashed the boards, Wilson ran half way to the hoop and stopped for no reason, and the rest of the team was nowhere near the basket.

umfanchris

March 24th, 2017 at 1:14 PM ^

Like others said I'm sure Oregon was instructed to foul the instant anyone gets by you. That would just led to an even later inbounds play. The other thing I don't think people are thinking about is that Walton isn't the type that is going to burn people off his first step dribble. In order for him to get free he typically needs a screen. With 9 seconds left and pressure forcing them well past the 3 point line, it would have been hard for him to make it to the hoop even if they didn't have fouls to give.

That exact shot is why he has been so good of late and one of the main reason we even made to this point. So I was and am extremely happy with that shot choice!

stephenrjking

March 24th, 2017 at 1:14 PM ^

Congratulations, you listened to talk radio this morning.

Everyone understands that shots closer to the basket have a higher probability of being made, generally, but it seems like so many people are ignoring the situation.

  • As mentioned by others, the foul situation was huge. Oregon had two fouls to give over the course of 11 seconds. Walton drives, he gets fouled by the guy he's blowing by well before he's in position to shoot (unless he starts a shooting motion while driving just inside the arc, which is insane) and you start over against with 6 seconds or less.
  • This Michigan team is not a great penetration team. We're not talking about Trey Burke, or 13-14 when Stauskas was terrific going to the hoop. Walton could do it, but it was a smaller part of his game and he just isn't as good at getting tough shots to fall as other guys we've had at Michigan. He is much better pulling up and taking a jump shot, which is what he did. Michigan doesn't have a guy who can both pull up and beat any man to the lane.
  • Even if Walton breaks clean to the lane, and even if he doesn't get fouled, Oregon had been dominating once Michigan got to the lane all day. Walton himself drove and put up a tough shot at the rim that missed because of how well defended it was just minutes earlier. Michigan wasn't getting good shots on drives.

When you combine Walton's excellent, cold-blooded distance shooting over the course of March with those factors, I like what Michigan got. It just didn't go in.