You Have Read This Column Before Comment Count

Brian

9/3/2015 – Michigan 17, Utah 24 – 0-1

21128844485_d9aed912a3_z

[Bryan Fuller]

I feel like I wrote this column already. In 2008, Michigan played a Utah team people expected would be pretty good. (They ended up very good, going undefeated, beating 'Bama in a bowl game, and finishing #2.) Michigan lost a somewhat close game. After, I used the then-skeletal luxury boxes as a metaphor for the team: under construction.

Michigan is still under construction. It has been under construction for going on eight years now. We brought in one company that insisted on turning half the building into pudding storage, and then it was a snake museum, and then a sand silo. Eventually the thing looked like the world's most totally rad Porsche hooked up to a pile of pudding, snakes, and quicksand. The next company fixed that at the same time they turned the rad Porsche into a Yugo full of clowns and if NEITHER OF THESE THINGS SOUNDS AT ALL LIKE A BUILDING YOU MAY BE ON TO SOMETHING THERE.

I also feel like I wrote this column already. Last year Michigan played Utah relatively even down to down, in fact outgaining the Utes, and lost because they were minus three in turnovers. This year they played Utah relatively even, outgained the Utes, and lost because they were (functionally) minus three in turnovers. Oh look, it's the game we play against Utah.

That there is a game we play against Utah that is a loss in which Michigan's offense spends much of its time armpit farting says a lot about the state of the program now, but you can go two paragraphs up if you'd like to relive that some more. You might. You're a Michigan fan. By now you must be into some pretty weird stuff.

The game wasn't quite the same as those other two. This one was less depressing. The first featured a walk-on at quarterback; afterwards it was clear that Michigan was going to struggle to maintain their bowl streak.

Last year was this game:

You know, the one with the downpour that everyone left during that was the end of Brady Hoke before THE END OF BRADY HOKE against Minnesota. The one with the ten-man punt return. The one with the column titled "By This Grainy Screenshot We Will Curse Thy Name."

So it wasn't that. Neither was it the grand debut of a Stanfordized Michigan. Despite the occasional media doofus retcon about Michigan fans being brought back to reality, nobody actually expected that in year one, and especially not game one.

I will admit was hoping they'd have a run longer than seven yards.

Not so much. Utah's burly front straight up whipped the Michigan offensive line. One replay of a failed third-and-short sneak featured Ben Braden getting moonwalked back into the quarterback. Mason Cole specialized in second-level whiffs. Kyle Kalis got dumped on his ass in the first half. Large creases were virtually nonexistent. Other than De'Veon Smith missing a cutback lane on second and three in the second half, lanes eschewed weren't obvious enough to induce groans.

They just could not cope with the defensive line, and that sounds like the most familiar thing of all. So we reset expectations again. Once more they have an offensive line working towards competency in a new system, and this will hold them back until such time as it doesn't anymore.

I wish I knew when that was going to be. It should be coming, as it always seems to for Harbaugh. It's hard not to be impatient when you've seen this all before. I have, and it's fine, I guess. I have faith that Jim Harbaugh is going to get there and everything will be wonderful and full of sprinkles topped with sprinkles. Yes, the struggle to the top is critical to the reward at the end. I would still like to fast forward to that bit.

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]AWARDS

Yet To Be Named Harbaugh-Themed Guys Who Did Good Award. #1 Jake Butt quickly established himself one of those WR/TEs that is basically Ertz/Fleener Voltron.

#2 Chris Wormley tore through the Utah line like it was made of tissue paper several times in the first half; by the second Utah had just about given up on trying to run Booker inside.

#3 Willie Henry also thundered his way through the line with frequency, pressuring Wilson and dissuading

Honorable mention: Amara Darboh had a bunch of catches and one unfortunately critical drop; De'Veon Smith looked like a guy who will be a nightmare if he gets gaps consistently; Jourdan Lewis shut his guy off; Jabrill Peppers erased screens.

YTBNHTGWDGA Standings.

3: Jake Butt (#1, Utah)
2: Chris Wormley (#2, Utah)
1: Willie Henry (#3, Utah)

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

For the single individual best moment.

Jake Butt skies over two defensive backs to bring in a spectacular #buttdown.

Honorable mention: Blake O'Neill drops a delayed punt at the two yard line. Wormley storms through the center of the line for a TFL.

WGIBTUs Past.

Utah: Crazy #buttdown.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

This week's worst thing ever.

Rudock throws a pick six in the general direction of Grant Perry, who was in the general direction of Rudock's two other picks.

Honorable mention: The two other picks. That 74 yard Utah punt. That Utah fumble that bounced directly to the only other Ute in a six-block radius.

PREVIOUS EDBs

Utah: circle route pick six.

[After THE JUMP: a much shorter bullets section than normal because usually I have an extra day to pull this all together, Thursday games are stupid]

OFFENSE

Rudock. I dunno, man. He's up to 60% of his interception total from last year after one game. Football! It is stupid and weird sometimes. On those interception:

  • I am about 90% sure that the first one was entirely Grant Perry's fault for running a hitch when he was supposed to run an out.
  • The second was entirely on Rudock throwing a medium-distance ball to Tacopants—something I saw more or less once in the six games of his I reviewed last year. (He threw a pick against Iowa State on it.)
  • The third was a combination of Rudock, Perry, and a route the Utah nickel was sitting on. Rudock should never throw that; Perry didn't sell his route well; the nickel made a great play.

People are bitching way too much about the long passes that fell incomplete. The reaction to them is as if they've never seen a 50 yard pass that's off by a couple yards; that happens all the time in every game, especially when there is a significant amount of wind. I do think those were a good example of Rudock's tendency to try to make perfect throws instead of hanging balls up for his receivers; Chesson was so open on the first one that an underthrown ball may still be an unchallenged touchdown.

Rudock part two. Can someone explain to me why "Ruddock" is now an incredibly common misspelling of his name? I don't get it.

20507518653_fa04ba0e93_z

[Fuller]

Butt. Couldn't ask for a better start from him, with one spectacular touchdown and an assortment of chain-moving plays. He's the #1 WR.

Other wide receivers. If the OL was an unpleasant surprise they were its opposite. They looked very strong. Darboh had one somewhat difficult ball that he dropped—unfortunately, that led to the missed 44-yard field goal. Perry had the early screwup.  Other than that they caught everything that came their way and got reasonable separation. Chesson in particular found himself open on those deep balls.

Drake Harris played but was not targeted. It'll take some time even if he's fully healthy—he's barely played in three years.

Offensive line. Mostly addressed above. Transition to power-oriented blocking really hurt. By the end of 2014 Michigan was pretty decent at the brief doubles that inside zone depends on; they are not at all proficient at power.

The failed fourth and one conversion was egregious. Kyle Kalis headed outside on a play that De'Veon Smith took into the B gap, where two unblocked guys waited for him. Michigan was okay at power stuff last year, too, but running something as an occasional changeup is entirely different than running something as your base. You get way more margin for error.

I don't know that there's anything to do about this except live with it. Harbaugh has a proven offense that should be very good once it's fully installed, and Denard Robinson is not his quarterback.

DEFENSE

21118693652_2539e028b8_z

[Fuller]

Salty. Michigan did the same thing to Devontae Booker that they did last year, except this is a fully weaponized version of Booker. He split time in last year's game; shortly after the grabbed the reins fulltime and developed into a first team All Pac 12 tailback. Michigan just about shut him down, holding him to 3.1 yards a carry. Most of his damage came either outside the tackles or as a receiver. Michigan's run defense should be at least as stiff as it was a year ago; against a lot of teams that's going to mean disaster for them.

Spread sigh. I am going to be patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense. I am going to be patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense. I am going to be…

[several thousand mantra repeats]

…patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense.

But man, it hurts to watch a QB rip up the middle of Michigan's defense for a rushing TD right now. If Wilson hadn't picked up 6.7 yards a pop on ten carries Michigan might win this game even with the turnover differential. It's hard to stop. I know Harbaugh wants to have some of it eventually.

It's just tough to watch old-style-lookin' Michigan go up against a spread team and lose. That's been going on for 15 years now. I know this is irrational when Michigan held an opponent to 337 yards.

Peppers. Peppers had a rough night in coverage, getting beat twice on Utah's first-half touchdown drive. He was also a one-man screen-wrecking machine and helped Michigan get a couple of their sacks with blitzes. While they got picked up they also paved the way for a couple of major pressures.

Negatives. Some minor downers on a promising debut:

  • Channing Stribling got worked on a couple of early screens and was replaced by Jeremy Clark for much of the day. Neither was heavily targeted, so maybe that's actually not the worst thing for that second corner spot.
  • Joe Bolden missed a bunch of tackles on Booker. Booker's tough to bring down; I don't know if that had too much to do with it. Bolden's never been great bringing guys down in space. They replaced him with Ross late; I was surprised it took that long.
  • Ojemudia got most of the WDE snaps and did okay but looked very awkward in space.

Utah's offense didn't do much on the day, though.

MISCELLANEOUS

21118692142_42c6ac148c_z

Special teams. Turns out Blake O'Neill can do that thing where he just waits until his gunners can fair catch one of his punts. Kenny Allen hit a 30 yarder and missed a 44 yarder; Jabrill Peppers had one enticing kick return; nobody else got to do much. Kickoffs from the 35 at altitude are almost guaranteed touchbacks.

Spread punting, though. Remember that punt on which the Utah returner dodged two guys and things looked worrying for a second and then another guy hit him? The tackler would have been twenty yards further away last year.

They tried. Michigan executed an 80-yard touchdown drive in 1:52 late in the fourth quarter and got a shot at an onside kick as a result. A two minute drill that successfully concluded in two minutes!

But they missed the game theory thing no one will ever do. Michigan had an opportunity to go for two after scoring to draw within a touchdown. They didn't because the only person in the world who would actually do that is that dude down at Pulaski.

Fox stuff. Fox's game commercials are fine if they happen between plays when we're just looking at the coach or the guy who caught the ball or whatever… if there was the slightest evidence they were replacing traditional commercials. Nope: this game felt like an NBC Notre Dame game. I'd like to think there is a point past which TV networks will not push. I don't.

On the other hand, the Gus Johnson/Joel Klatt announce team was terrific. Johnson is Gus Johnson; QED. Klatt was a revelation as a color guy, consistently on point with useful, enlightening commentary. I am not just saying that because I tweeted that the first interception was probably on Perry and Klatt came back from commercial saying the same thing.

I could tell they were excellent because Michigan was losing a football game and I had not even a slight impulse to mute it.

Thursday stuff. Playing on Thursday is stupid. Let's put that in the Big Box o' Brandon and never ever do that again.

Comments

gasbro

September 4th, 2015 at 3:39 PM ^

I see Ore St plays tonight at home.

Anyone know if we can/will sneak in an extra practice (today/tomorrow) before the game? Our travel from the west may nullify the advantage of the extra day a bit at least.. but I'm sure Harbaugh and staff will find a way to put that advantage to good use.

Ronnie Kaye

September 4th, 2015 at 3:40 PM ^

Johnson and Klatt are better than any team ESPN has. I'd love to hear them calling big Michigan rivalry games if Fox ever gets the rights to B1G regular seasons.

jeff_91121

September 4th, 2015 at 4:01 PM ^

I could not stand the announcers.  They kept talking about Booker being this amazing stud...how he leans on you leans on you and next thing you know he has over 100 yds rushing.  Booker this, Booker that, over and over and over. 

When the onside kick goes out of bounds he says....flag on the play! Really?  Think that's because the kick went out of bounds genius? 

On the play where the Utah QB was scrambling parallel to the line of scrimmage under pressure and sees a receiver wide open standing directly in front of him near the sideline and he completes the pass for a good gain, the announcer just goes crazy about how smart of a play it was.  Saying the QB knew there would be lineman downfield so he knew he would need to throw a lateral.  Please, he threw the ball to the guy that was right in front of him that was wide open that he was looking right as he ran toward the receiver.

Matter of opinion but I thought the announcers sucked out loud.

vanillacow24

September 4th, 2015 at 4:15 PM ^

Any of the coaches lurking care to comment on the first int Jake threw? To me watching it seemed like a cover 2 and as such it looked like Perry was settling into an opening in the zone. Appeared to be a misread of coverage possibly by Rudock?

mgoblue98

September 4th, 2015 at 5:58 PM ^

Perry looked like he forgot his route to me.  He turned outside, which leads me to believe that he wasn't running a hitch route, although I suppose you can run a hitch "out".  I am used to the hitch being run and then turned back inside to the QB. 

Anyway, the pass would have been complete if he had run the out as he had plenty of space between him and the DB.  I could be wrong, but the fact that he turned outside leads me to believe that he made a freshman mistake and forgot his route.  Rudock's throw was decisive.

Wolv27

September 5th, 2015 at 10:44 AM ^

There's almost no upside to play Utah (who's somewhat underrated/overhyped). There's a whole lot of downside though. Plus, the time zone is different too which can add to the difficulty. If we're going to play a team why not Texas? That has benefit and we'd have a higher percentage chance of winning. I think Brandon scheduled games on the West Coast so we'd get higher ratings.

Sten Carlson

September 5th, 2015 at 11:10 AM ^

Not to be argumentative, but I disagree with this.  Others have posted Bo's feeling about playing ND in the first game: he liked it because he got a very good picture of where his team was.  Playing a directional school, or an FCS school can -- as we've become all to familiar with -- can give a program a false sense of competency.

Utah (especially on the road) is a PERFECT first opponent for Harbaugh's first game.  IMO, it illustrated/highlighted to vast gulf between Hoke coached teams and a Harbaugh coached team.  As many have detailed in the post-game discussions, the feel of things was night and day compared to years past.  Many of the same issues still linger, but as far as I am concerned, the game on Saturday confirmed what most believed: Hoke was totally inept across the board.

Taking a team out west, up to altitude, in prime time, to a hostile environment, against a good (but not great) opponent is going to give our brilliant staff mountains of coaching points, and that is going to make the team improve even faster. 

Yes, I wanted to win.  But, let's be honest here -- the likelihood of Michigan being in the Final Four this season is pretty slim.  We can still make a run and win the B10 and that might give us a shot -- but even that probably won't vault us to the Final Four.  As such, this year is about installation and improvement.

It's already underway, and as I said, I think playing Utah on the road gives substantially more fuel for that fire than a weak opponent would.

BlueinOK

September 4th, 2015 at 5:00 PM ^

This is the happiest I've ever been after a loss. I know the team will improve as the season goes on. Heck, they played better the longer this game went on. As long as they improve as the season goes, the team could still win 9-10 games. Remember how OSU started last season? Their offense was terrible about Virginia Tech. There's tons of time to improve and we have the right coaching staff in place for that to happen. 

Mgrad92

September 4th, 2015 at 5:09 PM ^

I can't agree on Gus Johnson/Joel Klatt. The two things that bothered me most was when the amazing O'Neill punt happened and I got the feeling they just weren't even watching the game. The explanation of why it was so smart of Utah to call a timeout when it was actually Michigan who called it, too. Stuff like that seemed to be happening all game.

Blukon Cornelius

September 4th, 2015 at 5:16 PM ^

Gus Johnson seems to think that simply raising his voice is adequate play by play announcing.  For instance, during Peppers' good return, Johnson's commentary consisted of: "Peppers!...Peppers! (a little louder)...Peppers! (even louder)."  It ended at three "Peppers" because the return was stopped.  Such sweet poetry.  Don't bother giving us a "turns it upfield" or "makes a tackler miss" or "gets a block" or other graduate-level communications courses content.  On the other hand, he did have me wishing for the un-precidented Quadruple Peppers Return (or, dare I say Quintuple Peppers Return) the next time he fielded a kickoff, of course to no avail.  

Sopwith

September 4th, 2015 at 5:48 PM ^

...as far as mixed responsbility goes. Perry has to run that route better. The three things you're supposed to do in a square-out*  or "return" route is (1) press the defender inside, (2) square your shoulders back to the QB and then (3) drop your hips to change direction and (4) burst directly in the opposite direction, in this case towards the sideline without any upfield drift. I don't have a recording of the game, but watching the replay I remember thinking the only thing he did was square up, and he was dropping his hips at the same time, which is just like holding up a sign saying "defensive back, you should break on the ball now."  Even if the defender is up in your face, when you do (3) you push off a little and give the QB a window outside of you, so it can be completed even in tight coverage.

Here's a great example from 2009 Notre Dame game (no push-off needed in this case, but usually you want a physical dude running it if they're not a Wes Welker shifty type): watch Greg Mathews sell inside against DB who was jumping what he thought was inside route, then drop the hips and burst directly to the sideline with no drift (watch how Mathews makes his cut at the goal line and never drifts over it), giving Tate a perfect target so that it would either be caught on outstretched hands or not at all (money replay is at 8:26, but suggest starting to watch at 7:14 because good times):

 

 

 

No chance for the defender even if he was piggybacking on Mathews with the QB staring the receiver down the whole way, which is what Tate did. In fact, staring down the receiver on this route is a GOOD thing, because he won't jump the inside route if he doesn't think the ball's coming.

Even if you don't do anything else right, as long as you don't drift, you should be able to break up the INT if the defender undercuts the route. Perry didn't press, made the cut without ever selling the inside route, and then drifted. Yikes, man. That's giftwrapping a TD to the bad guys and making your QB a chump in the process. Rudock bears ultimate responsibility, sure, but that's where a receiver sets his QB up to fail.

*(some use this terminology as the longhand version of "out" but I grew up using it to differentiate from a traditional out in which the receiver turns his back to the QB as he's making his cut instead of "squaring" to the QB before the out cut)

djmiller3278

September 4th, 2015 at 6:18 PM ^

No matter how you look at it or want to dissect it....we are not a good football team right now. Until we can stop turning the ball over multiple times a game and get some turnovers, this will be the outcome of every game.

massblue

September 4th, 2015 at 6:39 PM ^

Before the season, I thought 8-4 was most likely.  After last night, I think 9-3 is a good possibility.  Here are the reasons:

1.  Utah is a very good team: Excellent front 7; experienced QB; very good RB.  We will look back on this and we will realize that Utah, especially at home, is very good.

 

2.  Rudock will throw very few int's going forward:  A lot of evidence that he is not the type to throw int's;  Harbaugh will adjust; better talent around him compared to Iowa

 

3. OL is much better than we think:  Utah front 7 is built to stop the run; no sacks allowed (when was the last time this happened?); Drake will come back; 2nd half the running game got better

 

4. No road game will be as tough as this one; only two home games will be as tough as this one

 

5. Take away the pick 6 and UM was in a position to potentially win this game

 

 

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

September 4th, 2015 at 7:11 PM ^

Lots of little misses and almosts, but the game really boiled down to Utah had good to very good productivity from their QB while UM had average to bad productivity. Utah played 8-9 guys in the box for most 1st and 2nd downs, but Rudock simply missed multiple opportunities. Harbaugh's O requires the QB to make those plays. Hopefully this was an anomaly for the season.

Durham Blue

September 4th, 2015 at 8:06 PM ^

Man, I am seeing a ton of pessimism.  Look, I hate it when Michigan loses as much as anyone here but I saw a bunch of positive things in that game.  Utah is a good team and I think they'll be top 15 by the end of the year.  That stadium is one of the more difficult venues in the country, and let's not forget about the altitude as well.  Tough adjustment for our guys.  Utah has a stout front 7 and it showed.  I don't think any team this season is going to steamroll their D for 250 yards on the ground.

Rudock had some jitters and the O looked like they played tight.  They left at least one TD on the field with an overthrow.  The bubble screens looked good.  The defense was stout for the most part.  Great open field tackles.  We went up-tempo on occasion!  Peppers is playing like a 5-star and it's only like his third (?) game.  And I think we all believe in Harbaugh and Co. to develop the players.

We'll get better as the season progresses  The team will gel.  I think we'll all be happy with the end result.

jigsmcgee

September 4th, 2015 at 8:45 PM ^

anyone complaining about the trajectory of our program is fucking high.  In no way was there anything remotely concerning about this game relative to the past 8 years, including the insane amount or quality of turnovers.

For the first time in years, I didnt feel super upset about any one given call made on the field.  This team has plenty of upside and relatively no downside, IMO.

I was completely confused by the tone of Ace, Wojo, and Brian.  There wasn't a god dam thing that felt like the last 7 years in this game.  We have a chance in any environment.  Our next 2-3 years should be incredible, should harbaugh stick around.

Finally a fucking coach who demonstrates proper rationale.  This alone is the only improvement to care about.  Everything else falls in line.

 

UM76

September 4th, 2015 at 9:08 PM ^

"Kickoffs from the 35 at altitude are almost guaranteed touchbacks."

I believe this to be true, based on physics thingies I learned at Michigan and from playing high desert golf.

So wouldn't we apply this logic to Rudock's two overthrown passes that Chesson was so open for? Like many of us, I really want Jake to be a good QB, so maybe I'm searching for an excuse. But at 4,500 feet and maybe 4-5 feet too far? Hmmm...

I'm working on the interceptions, and I'll be getting back to you real soon.

Rabbit21

September 4th, 2015 at 9:20 PM ^

The Kickoff thing is definitely true, I barely remember any returns while I was at the Air Force Academy, not sure about the effects of the throws I think there needs to be more force(like with a kick, a golf shot or hitting a baseball to really get that distance boost).

I do remember someone saying pitchers don't get as much ball movement on their pitches at altitude so maybe there's something to it, but I don't think it would have enough of an effect to have caused the overthrows.

Yeoman

September 4th, 2015 at 9:22 PM ^

Interception #2: Another overthrow; you've already dealt with this one.

Interception #1: Less atmospheric oxygen at altitude causes confusion in unacclimated brains.

Interception #3: Less air resistance at altitude allows the DB to run faster and close more quickly on the route.

In all seriousness, altitude, like wind, is going to affect your touch on a long ball; you may very well be onto something. It's not like golf where you can just take one less club; you have to mess with your muscle memory, and that's not easy to do.

vulture

September 4th, 2015 at 9:39 PM ^

QB had all day to throw it and was sacked how many times? Remember how DG used to run for his life back there? The OL deserves some credit for the improved pass pro.

Clarence Boddicker

September 4th, 2015 at 9:45 PM ^

We lost by 7 on the road to a tough Utah team. And with 3 ints. Had the onside kick been successful we would've been driving for a tie or a win. And this was the very first game for a coaching staff that has never worked together as a group, or with this roster. The positives more than outweighed the negatives for me. That we have top notch coaches is doubtless. My thought in watching in the first half, when we were down 10-3, was "This is what it's like to see a UM team with an outstanding staff." As another poster observed, we didn't see any coaching mistakes. What we did see are the limitations of the roster Harbaugh was dealt. People are quick to note the ranking of Hoke's classes to claim that he left behind a talented, if poorly coached, team. Whatever their rankings, the roster Hoke produced is marked by the limitations guiding his philosophy. He recruited for size not speed, and this shows up in the skill positions, particular at rb, lb, and wr. Harbaugh is recruiting for speed. The issues with oline now seem to be a combination of recruiting as well as coaching issues. Anybody who thought we were going undefeated this year was delusional. The future is golden though.

Bertello NC

September 4th, 2015 at 9:47 PM ^

When people say this is a QB driven sport they're right. Not to say defense and other areas of the game aren't very very important. But look at 80% of the teams in the top 25 and they have some type of playmaker at the position. We are in not good hands but great hands in terms of who will have their hands all over our QB's. Even Rudock will get better as will the rest of this team moving forward. It's just the way Harbaugh teams are. Progress and development.

DocV313

September 4th, 2015 at 10:40 PM ^

Just curious why you name Morris a co starter, and not give him a shot as Rudock was not very effective. If you were going to keep him in all fame why not make him an outright starter! Also did anyone else notice how many time Poggi whiffed on his blocks? Major whiff on that throwback screen and I counted at least three others on running plays.

UofMedic

September 4th, 2015 at 10:45 PM ^

I'd have to go back and look at Rudock's deep tosses again, but from someone who played the position I can say with certainty he has an average arm. His body mechanics when throwing the deep ball change tremendously(for the worse). There is a huge difference between someone that can throw the ball 50 yards and someone who can throw it 49 or 53 when they want to.

philthy animale

September 5th, 2015 at 12:01 AM ^

"Note Utah's pounding of #2 ranked Alabama in the 2009 Fiesta bowl. Not a single Utah player would have even been recruited to Alabama. Offensive scheme in college is huge. This is not going to be popular with the rest of the Michigan faithful, but there is no way this style offense will do anything more than win the games you're supposed to win and lose to the teams that have a better game plan. So even when Michigan gets better it will be the same old same old. Utah has beaten Michigan 3 times and not once has Utah had better athletes. Just a better offensive scheme. A watered down pro-set with zero misdirection won't win championships. It doesn't spread the defense out and the college game has changed. It is the offense that the Michigan faithful wanted though. 3rd and 6 with 5 minutes to go. Down by 14, and Michigan has ONE wide receiver in formation??? Not gonna work. 4th and 1, run it up the middle when you haven't been able to do it all night? Not gonna work. Even if Harbaugh had Andrew Luck and Toby Gerhart like he did at Stanford, it's not gonna work. Not if you want to win championships. Michigan fans need to stop trying to reincarnate the days of Bo. They're gone and the game has evolved. Evolve with it! Sorry about my rant. And... Go Blue!" and... notice when Kapernick stopped running SF stopped winning?

Blue Bunny Friday

September 5th, 2015 at 1:25 AM ^

I thought you were going the other way with it because Utah stomped Alabama one of those years.  Anyway, dude above is obvious troll and you're not making sense.

Players are important, scheme can make up for talent deficit, coaching and time can make great players out of less talent, there are a lot of underscouted and undercoached HS players... It's college football.  Nothing is static or 100%.

philthy animale

September 5th, 2015 at 3:20 PM ^

Manball is back. Harbaugh brought it to Stanford with David Shaw as OC. They still run it though... Northwestern had their way with them today. 5-4 in Pac12 last year. Manball is dead and only reason Harbaugh runs it is because Mgobloggers want it. He ran Pistol (UNevada Chris Ault) at SF successfully until last year... stopped running read option, and SF stopped winning ... ""A significant change in 2015 figures to be a return to the read-option," Barrow writes. "There was a sense inside the front office that San Francisco's offense was too clunky in recent years, that it had too many moving parts that bogged it down."