You Have Read This Column Before Comment Count

Brian

9/3/2015 – Michigan 17, Utah 24 – 0-1

21128844485_d9aed912a3_z

[Bryan Fuller]

I feel like I wrote this column already. In 2008, Michigan played a Utah team people expected would be pretty good. (They ended up very good, going undefeated, beating 'Bama in a bowl game, and finishing #2.) Michigan lost a somewhat close game. After, I used the then-skeletal luxury boxes as a metaphor for the team: under construction.

Michigan is still under construction. It has been under construction for going on eight years now. We brought in one company that insisted on turning half the building into pudding storage, and then it was a snake museum, and then a sand silo. Eventually the thing looked like the world's most totally rad Porsche hooked up to a pile of pudding, snakes, and quicksand. The next company fixed that at the same time they turned the rad Porsche into a Yugo full of clowns and if NEITHER OF THESE THINGS SOUNDS AT ALL LIKE A BUILDING YOU MAY BE ON TO SOMETHING THERE.

I also feel like I wrote this column already. Last year Michigan played Utah relatively even down to down, in fact outgaining the Utes, and lost because they were minus three in turnovers. This year they played Utah relatively even, outgained the Utes, and lost because they were (functionally) minus three in turnovers. Oh look, it's the game we play against Utah.

That there is a game we play against Utah that is a loss in which Michigan's offense spends much of its time armpit farting says a lot about the state of the program now, but you can go two paragraphs up if you'd like to relive that some more. You might. You're a Michigan fan. By now you must be into some pretty weird stuff.

The game wasn't quite the same as those other two. This one was less depressing. The first featured a walk-on at quarterback; afterwards it was clear that Michigan was going to struggle to maintain their bowl streak.

Last year was this game:

You know, the one with the downpour that everyone left during that was the end of Brady Hoke before THE END OF BRADY HOKE against Minnesota. The one with the ten-man punt return. The one with the column titled "By This Grainy Screenshot We Will Curse Thy Name."

So it wasn't that. Neither was it the grand debut of a Stanfordized Michigan. Despite the occasional media doofus retcon about Michigan fans being brought back to reality, nobody actually expected that in year one, and especially not game one.

I will admit was hoping they'd have a run longer than seven yards.

Not so much. Utah's burly front straight up whipped the Michigan offensive line. One replay of a failed third-and-short sneak featured Ben Braden getting moonwalked back into the quarterback. Mason Cole specialized in second-level whiffs. Kyle Kalis got dumped on his ass in the first half. Large creases were virtually nonexistent. Other than De'Veon Smith missing a cutback lane on second and three in the second half, lanes eschewed weren't obvious enough to induce groans.

They just could not cope with the defensive line, and that sounds like the most familiar thing of all. So we reset expectations again. Once more they have an offensive line working towards competency in a new system, and this will hold them back until such time as it doesn't anymore.

I wish I knew when that was going to be. It should be coming, as it always seems to for Harbaugh. It's hard not to be impatient when you've seen this all before. I have, and it's fine, I guess. I have faith that Jim Harbaugh is going to get there and everything will be wonderful and full of sprinkles topped with sprinkles. Yes, the struggle to the top is critical to the reward at the end. I would still like to fast forward to that bit.

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]AWARDS

Yet To Be Named Harbaugh-Themed Guys Who Did Good Award. #1 Jake Butt quickly established himself one of those WR/TEs that is basically Ertz/Fleener Voltron.

#2 Chris Wormley tore through the Utah line like it was made of tissue paper several times in the first half; by the second Utah had just about given up on trying to run Booker inside.

#3 Willie Henry also thundered his way through the line with frequency, pressuring Wilson and dissuading

Honorable mention: Amara Darboh had a bunch of catches and one unfortunately critical drop; De'Veon Smith looked like a guy who will be a nightmare if he gets gaps consistently; Jourdan Lewis shut his guy off; Jabrill Peppers erased screens.

YTBNHTGWDGA Standings.

3: Jake Butt (#1, Utah)
2: Chris Wormley (#2, Utah)
1: Willie Henry (#3, Utah)

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

For the single individual best moment.

Jake Butt skies over two defensive backs to bring in a spectacular #buttdown.

Honorable mention: Blake O'Neill drops a delayed punt at the two yard line. Wormley storms through the center of the line for a TFL.

WGIBTUs Past.

Utah: Crazy #buttdown.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

This week's worst thing ever.

Rudock throws a pick six in the general direction of Grant Perry, who was in the general direction of Rudock's two other picks.

Honorable mention: The two other picks. That 74 yard Utah punt. That Utah fumble that bounced directly to the only other Ute in a six-block radius.

PREVIOUS EDBs

Utah: circle route pick six.

[After THE JUMP: a much shorter bullets section than normal because usually I have an extra day to pull this all together, Thursday games are stupid]

OFFENSE

Rudock. I dunno, man. He's up to 60% of his interception total from last year after one game. Football! It is stupid and weird sometimes. On those interception:

  • I am about 90% sure that the first one was entirely Grant Perry's fault for running a hitch when he was supposed to run an out.
  • The second was entirely on Rudock throwing a medium-distance ball to Tacopants—something I saw more or less once in the six games of his I reviewed last year. (He threw a pick against Iowa State on it.)
  • The third was a combination of Rudock, Perry, and a route the Utah nickel was sitting on. Rudock should never throw that; Perry didn't sell his route well; the nickel made a great play.

People are bitching way too much about the long passes that fell incomplete. The reaction to them is as if they've never seen a 50 yard pass that's off by a couple yards; that happens all the time in every game, especially when there is a significant amount of wind. I do think those were a good example of Rudock's tendency to try to make perfect throws instead of hanging balls up for his receivers; Chesson was so open on the first one that an underthrown ball may still be an unchallenged touchdown.

Rudock part two. Can someone explain to me why "Ruddock" is now an incredibly common misspelling of his name? I don't get it.

20507518653_fa04ba0e93_z

[Fuller]

Butt. Couldn't ask for a better start from him, with one spectacular touchdown and an assortment of chain-moving plays. He's the #1 WR.

Other wide receivers. If the OL was an unpleasant surprise they were its opposite. They looked very strong. Darboh had one somewhat difficult ball that he dropped—unfortunately, that led to the missed 44-yard field goal. Perry had the early screwup.  Other than that they caught everything that came their way and got reasonable separation. Chesson in particular found himself open on those deep balls.

Drake Harris played but was not targeted. It'll take some time even if he's fully healthy—he's barely played in three years.

Offensive line. Mostly addressed above. Transition to power-oriented blocking really hurt. By the end of 2014 Michigan was pretty decent at the brief doubles that inside zone depends on; they are not at all proficient at power.

The failed fourth and one conversion was egregious. Kyle Kalis headed outside on a play that De'Veon Smith took into the B gap, where two unblocked guys waited for him. Michigan was okay at power stuff last year, too, but running something as an occasional changeup is entirely different than running something as your base. You get way more margin for error.

I don't know that there's anything to do about this except live with it. Harbaugh has a proven offense that should be very good once it's fully installed, and Denard Robinson is not his quarterback.

DEFENSE

21118693652_2539e028b8_z

[Fuller]

Salty. Michigan did the same thing to Devontae Booker that they did last year, except this is a fully weaponized version of Booker. He split time in last year's game; shortly after the grabbed the reins fulltime and developed into a first team All Pac 12 tailback. Michigan just about shut him down, holding him to 3.1 yards a carry. Most of his damage came either outside the tackles or as a receiver. Michigan's run defense should be at least as stiff as it was a year ago; against a lot of teams that's going to mean disaster for them.

Spread sigh. I am going to be patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense. I am going to be patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense. I am going to be…

[several thousand mantra repeats]

…patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense.

But man, it hurts to watch a QB rip up the middle of Michigan's defense for a rushing TD right now. If Wilson hadn't picked up 6.7 yards a pop on ten carries Michigan might win this game even with the turnover differential. It's hard to stop. I know Harbaugh wants to have some of it eventually.

It's just tough to watch old-style-lookin' Michigan go up against a spread team and lose. That's been going on for 15 years now. I know this is irrational when Michigan held an opponent to 337 yards.

Peppers. Peppers had a rough night in coverage, getting beat twice on Utah's first-half touchdown drive. He was also a one-man screen-wrecking machine and helped Michigan get a couple of their sacks with blitzes. While they got picked up they also paved the way for a couple of major pressures.

Negatives. Some minor downers on a promising debut:

  • Channing Stribling got worked on a couple of early screens and was replaced by Jeremy Clark for much of the day. Neither was heavily targeted, so maybe that's actually not the worst thing for that second corner spot.
  • Joe Bolden missed a bunch of tackles on Booker. Booker's tough to bring down; I don't know if that had too much to do with it. Bolden's never been great bringing guys down in space. They replaced him with Ross late; I was surprised it took that long.
  • Ojemudia got most of the WDE snaps and did okay but looked very awkward in space.

Utah's offense didn't do much on the day, though.

MISCELLANEOUS

21118692142_42c6ac148c_z

Special teams. Turns out Blake O'Neill can do that thing where he just waits until his gunners can fair catch one of his punts. Kenny Allen hit a 30 yarder and missed a 44 yarder; Jabrill Peppers had one enticing kick return; nobody else got to do much. Kickoffs from the 35 at altitude are almost guaranteed touchbacks.

Spread punting, though. Remember that punt on which the Utah returner dodged two guys and things looked worrying for a second and then another guy hit him? The tackler would have been twenty yards further away last year.

They tried. Michigan executed an 80-yard touchdown drive in 1:52 late in the fourth quarter and got a shot at an onside kick as a result. A two minute drill that successfully concluded in two minutes!

But they missed the game theory thing no one will ever do. Michigan had an opportunity to go for two after scoring to draw within a touchdown. They didn't because the only person in the world who would actually do that is that dude down at Pulaski.

Fox stuff. Fox's game commercials are fine if they happen between plays when we're just looking at the coach or the guy who caught the ball or whatever… if there was the slightest evidence they were replacing traditional commercials. Nope: this game felt like an NBC Notre Dame game. I'd like to think there is a point past which TV networks will not push. I don't.

On the other hand, the Gus Johnson/Joel Klatt announce team was terrific. Johnson is Gus Johnson; QED. Klatt was a revelation as a color guy, consistently on point with useful, enlightening commentary. I am not just saying that because I tweeted that the first interception was probably on Perry and Klatt came back from commercial saying the same thing.

I could tell they were excellent because Michigan was losing a football game and I had not even a slight impulse to mute it.

Thursday stuff. Playing on Thursday is stupid. Let's put that in the Big Box o' Brandon and never ever do that again.

Comments

snarling wolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 2:46 PM ^

Really?  You like having Michigan football play on a weekday night?  

I think most people find it a pretty big inconvenience to have a game on a day when they've had to go to work/school, and then have more work/school the next day.  Now it's at least Labor Day weekend, so a lot of people have today off, but any other fall week and it'd be horrible.

 

stephenrjking

September 4th, 2015 at 2:53 PM ^

I like it, only for the first game of the season, only on the road. Of course, my occupation being what it is, Saturday nights are not great gobs of free time for me. Having the early game, especially in a year when Michigan is a curiosity but not a power, seems to strike the right balance. We're hyped and ready, the season is here, let's get it going. Plus: two extra days to diagnose and correct issues for next week.

Hannibal.

September 4th, 2015 at 3:07 PM ^

Plus, it means that you get to watch Michigan football without missing any other good neutral team games.  If you enjoy the BYU-Nebraska game this weekend or Auburn vs. Louisville, then thank the Good Thursday Night Football Fairy for your good fortunes, because that's probably when we would have played a Saturday game against Utah.

lilpenny1316

September 4th, 2015 at 2:33 PM ^

I think we helped Utah by running a traditional, easier to defend style of offense.  The spread is just harder to defend, so I'm not surprised they struggled a bit for the first game of the season.  As Klatt mentioned, Utah was running the same offense for the second year in a row. 

If we're going to stay in the days of TEs, FBs and two WR sets, then we have to throw more on the early downs so we're not so predictable.  And put some guys in motion at the snap.  You can't play offense with play action as the only type of deception.

 

RockinLoud

September 4th, 2015 at 2:46 PM ^

Do you not realize Harbaugh is a master at pre-snap motion and things that mess with the defense like that, but that they're still working on just nailing down the fundamental things you have to do really well in order to do that sort of thing? It's the first game of an entirely new offense man, give 'em some time for crying out loud.

NoVaWolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 2:53 PM ^

This is one of the many questions I have coming out of last night's game. He wants to run power etc. w/ heavy sets, but our guys just don't seem capable of it right now. And doing so means giving lots of offensive snaps to guys like A.J. Williams and Poggi, neither of whom showed anything as blockers last night, and are non-entities in the passing game. (Please, more Hill and Bunting and Kerridge, less Williams and Poggi -- at least the former trio have shown they can catch passes.) I'll have to watch the replay, but my impression was we had more success running when we stretched the defense horizontally w/3 wides, the quick screens to Darboh, etc.

ST3

September 4th, 2015 at 4:14 PM ^

As the season progresses, I expect to see more Bunting, Isaac (sp?), and Harris on offense, and possibly see Dawson replace Braden. For a first game on the road, he went with the veterans. AJ Williams is not a viable receiving threat. Green getting only 2 carries has to send a message to him, and even though I really like Chesson, Harris has too much potential. Braden just wasn't getting any push all night.

Asgardian

September 4th, 2015 at 2:41 PM ^

It's all ___________ 's fault:

(Replace Rich Rod with Brady Hoke)

Because he didn't recruit any ___________.

(Replace offensive linemen with quarterbacks).

 

 

BursleyHall82

September 4th, 2015 at 2:42 PM ^

Agreed, Brian. Thursday night is for MACtion. Thursday night is not for Michigan. This is the only time in my adult life that I've watched a regular-season Michigan game, and then had to go to the office the next day. I don't like it.

Erik_in_Dayton

September 4th, 2015 at 2:45 PM ^

A few thoughts: This offense was never going to come together overnight.  And the defense is very good but not a lights-out unit - few are.  And it's very hard to fly across the country and beat a quality team in their place at night.  Let's not forget that Utah was 9-4 last season.

My only fear heading into the game was that the team would be inexplicably disorganized like they often were last year.  That was not the case.  Rudock looked tight, and he wasn't on the same page as Perry or some of the other receivers at times.  And, sure, the OL struggled to run the ball. But the offense, defense, and special teams all looked coherently designed, and the players all pulled in the same direction, so to speak, until the clock hit zero.

The buildings blocks of major success are being put in place.  Michigan's rise is going to take time - just like Saban, Carroll, Stoops, and others all needed time - but that's okay in my book as long as the Wolverines are on the right track.  And nothing that happened last night shook my faith that they are.

MarcusBrooks

September 4th, 2015 at 2:55 PM ^

agree, we have some players that have had 4 weeks of JH coaching them playing major roles including the QB. 

things will get better

the D is a couple of really good LBrs away from being really tough

the ghuys we ahve are jsut not athletic enough (Mike McCray get healthy)

I have NO idea what we will do next year when all the starting LBrs are gone. 

JFW

September 4th, 2015 at 3:03 PM ^

I might be rationalizing, but it never seemed hopeless like it did last year.

There were times last year that o shit off the game and went to play with my kids at the park. I never did that to UM before: just the Lions.

This seemed far away from that. The team didn't fold, and while mistakes were made they weren't to the point where you wondered if they'd really practiced the stuff they were trying I execute.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Yeoman

September 4th, 2015 at 7:30 PM ^

Oklahoma was 5-6 in '98, went 7-5 in Stoops's first year. His opener was a blowout of a bad FCS team.

USC had gone 6-6 in '99, Carroll's first year was 5-7. He did open with a couple of P5 wins but they weren't Utah caliber; the two opponents went a combined 8-15 on the season.

Alabama improved from 6-7 to 7-6 in Saban's first year; his opener was a blowout of an even worse FCS team.

 

 

Yeoman

September 4th, 2015 at 10:52 PM ^

(I've still got this stuff on my computer, left over from that "what happens when you fire a coach" diary last year.)

EOY Massey rankings, coach's tenure in bold:

SC/Carroll: 29, 47, 47, 38, 1

Bama/Saban: 14, 43, 43, 9, 1

OU/Stoops: 71, 49, 28, 1, 10

There was very little evidence of improvement the first year (and in Stoops's case, where there was some, there's also evidence the process might already have been underway the year before he got there).

While I'm at it, here's...

Stanford/Harbaugh: 46, 88, 66, 57, 33

None of these guys were able to walk in, flip a switch, and start winning from day 1.

 

Yeoman

September 5th, 2015 at 12:06 AM ^

Carroll's and Harbaugh's teams were only marginally better the second year; it wasn't clear they'd made a leap until year 3, and in Harbaugh's case there were probably still some skeptics until year 4. The record was better the third year but some of that was down to an unusually soft schedule.

unWavering

September 4th, 2015 at 2:47 PM ^

"Rudock part two. Can someone explain to me why "Ruddock" is now an incredibly common misspelling of his name? I don't get it." I've been wondering this for weeks.

MarcusBrooks

September 4th, 2015 at 2:52 PM ^

completely agree

a few times he pointed out something and I thought to myself

WOW he is right!

that rarely happens. 

HarbaughorBust

September 4th, 2015 at 3:00 PM ^

Rudock's lack of arm strength is why it appears he is trying to be perfect on his deep balls. I assure you, that is not why he over threw that. His arm is so weak it's difficult for him to get any touch on the ball. Watch his lower body when he threw that. Just awful technique. Then watch his throwing motion from the waist up. There's some taylor Martinez in that form. That's why Iowa never let him throw it deep. It's a crap shoot because he doesn't have the natural arm strength. It's why he lost the job at Iowa. Michigan will once again be easy to game plan for because of our QB's limitations.

matty blue

September 4th, 2015 at 3:07 PM ^

rudock is has proven himself as an efficient qb that is not turnover-prone.  the only way he might regress into some sort of pick six machine would be if he was getting lousy coaching, and we know that's not going to be the case.  he's going to be just fine.

Cranky Dave

September 4th, 2015 at 3:23 PM ^

Felt different that most of those over the past 2 years. Other than the puck 6 no egregious mistakes, outside of the OL play. That's what worries me though is the fact that "Braden got moonwalked back into the QB" and "Kakis got dumped on his ass". For all the talk by Kalis recently about how much better the OL was in camp and now we know what to do that didn't show in the game. There aren't any Jonathan Martins or David Decastros on this line, at least not yet

Doctor Wolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 3:27 PM ^

Thanks for this recap. Rudock (tried to type it with two D's for kicks, but my phone's autocorrect already know his name!) did everything I expected except for the picks (a big except). I am surprised you are putting all of the run game troubles on the OL. Watching live I thought the OL was actually creating lanes and Smith was just missing them. It will be interesting to see the screen shots from those plays to get a better idea.

Yeoman

September 4th, 2015 at 3:29 PM ^

 

Ojemudia got most of the WDE snaps and did okay but looked very awkward in space.

 

I'm pretty sure he got dinged. There was a play early in the third quarter where somebody hit his leg when it was planted; he hopped around a bit after the play was over, and I didn't think he ever looked quite right the rest of the game.

I'll be curious to see if, on second viewing, the awkwardness in space was mostly in the second half or if it was going on all game and I just didn't notice it early.

DarkWolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 3:35 PM ^

Looks Like Free Passes on Coaching Comments? Come on Brian!
For the last few years Brian has been beautifully snarky on blasting coaches, I miss that. Have to say, very impressed by ST coach Baxter, especially since ST coaches get less time. Optimistic that he will get us consistently great ST play. On the other hand, Drevno/Wheatley get a failing grade for OL/RB performance. Hoping they can improve as the year progresses. Anyone else notice Harbaugh almost cost us a TO by arguing for a missed field goal ball spot(he was thinking NFL not college)? Brian would have been all over Hoke on that one.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

mgoblue98

September 4th, 2015 at 4:14 PM ^

There's a pretty huge difference between Harbaugh and Hoke.  Harbaugh is a proven commodity that has won everywhere he went.  Hoke...not so much.  Harbaugh and his staff just coached their first game at Michigan.  It's probably a little too early to get out the torches and the pitchforks.