You Have Read This Column Before Comment Count

Brian

9/3/2015 – Michigan 17, Utah 24 – 0-1

21128844485_d9aed912a3_z

[Bryan Fuller]

I feel like I wrote this column already. In 2008, Michigan played a Utah team people expected would be pretty good. (They ended up very good, going undefeated, beating 'Bama in a bowl game, and finishing #2.) Michigan lost a somewhat close game. After, I used the then-skeletal luxury boxes as a metaphor for the team: under construction.

Michigan is still under construction. It has been under construction for going on eight years now. We brought in one company that insisted on turning half the building into pudding storage, and then it was a snake museum, and then a sand silo. Eventually the thing looked like the world's most totally rad Porsche hooked up to a pile of pudding, snakes, and quicksand. The next company fixed that at the same time they turned the rad Porsche into a Yugo full of clowns and if NEITHER OF THESE THINGS SOUNDS AT ALL LIKE A BUILDING YOU MAY BE ON TO SOMETHING THERE.

I also feel like I wrote this column already. Last year Michigan played Utah relatively even down to down, in fact outgaining the Utes, and lost because they were minus three in turnovers. This year they played Utah relatively even, outgained the Utes, and lost because they were (functionally) minus three in turnovers. Oh look, it's the game we play against Utah.

That there is a game we play against Utah that is a loss in which Michigan's offense spends much of its time armpit farting says a lot about the state of the program now, but you can go two paragraphs up if you'd like to relive that some more. You might. You're a Michigan fan. By now you must be into some pretty weird stuff.

The game wasn't quite the same as those other two. This one was less depressing. The first featured a walk-on at quarterback; afterwards it was clear that Michigan was going to struggle to maintain their bowl streak.

Last year was this game:

You know, the one with the downpour that everyone left during that was the end of Brady Hoke before THE END OF BRADY HOKE against Minnesota. The one with the ten-man punt return. The one with the column titled "By This Grainy Screenshot We Will Curse Thy Name."

So it wasn't that. Neither was it the grand debut of a Stanfordized Michigan. Despite the occasional media doofus retcon about Michigan fans being brought back to reality, nobody actually expected that in year one, and especially not game one.

I will admit was hoping they'd have a run longer than seven yards.

Not so much. Utah's burly front straight up whipped the Michigan offensive line. One replay of a failed third-and-short sneak featured Ben Braden getting moonwalked back into the quarterback. Mason Cole specialized in second-level whiffs. Kyle Kalis got dumped on his ass in the first half. Large creases were virtually nonexistent. Other than De'Veon Smith missing a cutback lane on second and three in the second half, lanes eschewed weren't obvious enough to induce groans.

They just could not cope with the defensive line, and that sounds like the most familiar thing of all. So we reset expectations again. Once more they have an offensive line working towards competency in a new system, and this will hold them back until such time as it doesn't anymore.

I wish I knew when that was going to be. It should be coming, as it always seems to for Harbaugh. It's hard not to be impatient when you've seen this all before. I have, and it's fine, I guess. I have faith that Jim Harbaugh is going to get there and everything will be wonderful and full of sprinkles topped with sprinkles. Yes, the struggle to the top is critical to the reward at the end. I would still like to fast forward to that bit.

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]AWARDS

Yet To Be Named Harbaugh-Themed Guys Who Did Good Award. #1 Jake Butt quickly established himself one of those WR/TEs that is basically Ertz/Fleener Voltron.

#2 Chris Wormley tore through the Utah line like it was made of tissue paper several times in the first half; by the second Utah had just about given up on trying to run Booker inside.

#3 Willie Henry also thundered his way through the line with frequency, pressuring Wilson and dissuading

Honorable mention: Amara Darboh had a bunch of catches and one unfortunately critical drop; De'Veon Smith looked like a guy who will be a nightmare if he gets gaps consistently; Jourdan Lewis shut his guy off; Jabrill Peppers erased screens.

YTBNHTGWDGA Standings.

3: Jake Butt (#1, Utah)
2: Chris Wormley (#2, Utah)
1: Willie Henry (#3, Utah)

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

For the single individual best moment.

Jake Butt skies over two defensive backs to bring in a spectacular #buttdown.

Honorable mention: Blake O'Neill drops a delayed punt at the two yard line. Wormley storms through the center of the line for a TFL.

WGIBTUs Past.

Utah: Crazy #buttdown.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

This week's worst thing ever.

Rudock throws a pick six in the general direction of Grant Perry, who was in the general direction of Rudock's two other picks.

Honorable mention: The two other picks. That 74 yard Utah punt. That Utah fumble that bounced directly to the only other Ute in a six-block radius.

PREVIOUS EDBs

Utah: circle route pick six.

[After THE JUMP: a much shorter bullets section than normal because usually I have an extra day to pull this all together, Thursday games are stupid]

OFFENSE

Rudock. I dunno, man. He's up to 60% of his interception total from last year after one game. Football! It is stupid and weird sometimes. On those interception:

  • I am about 90% sure that the first one was entirely Grant Perry's fault for running a hitch when he was supposed to run an out.
  • The second was entirely on Rudock throwing a medium-distance ball to Tacopants—something I saw more or less once in the six games of his I reviewed last year. (He threw a pick against Iowa State on it.)
  • The third was a combination of Rudock, Perry, and a route the Utah nickel was sitting on. Rudock should never throw that; Perry didn't sell his route well; the nickel made a great play.

People are bitching way too much about the long passes that fell incomplete. The reaction to them is as if they've never seen a 50 yard pass that's off by a couple yards; that happens all the time in every game, especially when there is a significant amount of wind. I do think those were a good example of Rudock's tendency to try to make perfect throws instead of hanging balls up for his receivers; Chesson was so open on the first one that an underthrown ball may still be an unchallenged touchdown.

Rudock part two. Can someone explain to me why "Ruddock" is now an incredibly common misspelling of his name? I don't get it.

20507518653_fa04ba0e93_z

[Fuller]

Butt. Couldn't ask for a better start from him, with one spectacular touchdown and an assortment of chain-moving plays. He's the #1 WR.

Other wide receivers. If the OL was an unpleasant surprise they were its opposite. They looked very strong. Darboh had one somewhat difficult ball that he dropped—unfortunately, that led to the missed 44-yard field goal. Perry had the early screwup.  Other than that they caught everything that came their way and got reasonable separation. Chesson in particular found himself open on those deep balls.

Drake Harris played but was not targeted. It'll take some time even if he's fully healthy—he's barely played in three years.

Offensive line. Mostly addressed above. Transition to power-oriented blocking really hurt. By the end of 2014 Michigan was pretty decent at the brief doubles that inside zone depends on; they are not at all proficient at power.

The failed fourth and one conversion was egregious. Kyle Kalis headed outside on a play that De'Veon Smith took into the B gap, where two unblocked guys waited for him. Michigan was okay at power stuff last year, too, but running something as an occasional changeup is entirely different than running something as your base. You get way more margin for error.

I don't know that there's anything to do about this except live with it. Harbaugh has a proven offense that should be very good once it's fully installed, and Denard Robinson is not his quarterback.

DEFENSE

21118693652_2539e028b8_z

[Fuller]

Salty. Michigan did the same thing to Devontae Booker that they did last year, except this is a fully weaponized version of Booker. He split time in last year's game; shortly after the grabbed the reins fulltime and developed into a first team All Pac 12 tailback. Michigan just about shut him down, holding him to 3.1 yards a carry. Most of his damage came either outside the tackles or as a receiver. Michigan's run defense should be at least as stiff as it was a year ago; against a lot of teams that's going to mean disaster for them.

Spread sigh. I am going to be patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense. I am going to be patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense. I am going to be…

[several thousand mantra repeats]

…patient as Michigan installs Harbaugh's offense.

But man, it hurts to watch a QB rip up the middle of Michigan's defense for a rushing TD right now. If Wilson hadn't picked up 6.7 yards a pop on ten carries Michigan might win this game even with the turnover differential. It's hard to stop. I know Harbaugh wants to have some of it eventually.

It's just tough to watch old-style-lookin' Michigan go up against a spread team and lose. That's been going on for 15 years now. I know this is irrational when Michigan held an opponent to 337 yards.

Peppers. Peppers had a rough night in coverage, getting beat twice on Utah's first-half touchdown drive. He was also a one-man screen-wrecking machine and helped Michigan get a couple of their sacks with blitzes. While they got picked up they also paved the way for a couple of major pressures.

Negatives. Some minor downers on a promising debut:

  • Channing Stribling got worked on a couple of early screens and was replaced by Jeremy Clark for much of the day. Neither was heavily targeted, so maybe that's actually not the worst thing for that second corner spot.
  • Joe Bolden missed a bunch of tackles on Booker. Booker's tough to bring down; I don't know if that had too much to do with it. Bolden's never been great bringing guys down in space. They replaced him with Ross late; I was surprised it took that long.
  • Ojemudia got most of the WDE snaps and did okay but looked very awkward in space.

Utah's offense didn't do much on the day, though.

MISCELLANEOUS

21118692142_42c6ac148c_z

Special teams. Turns out Blake O'Neill can do that thing where he just waits until his gunners can fair catch one of his punts. Kenny Allen hit a 30 yarder and missed a 44 yarder; Jabrill Peppers had one enticing kick return; nobody else got to do much. Kickoffs from the 35 at altitude are almost guaranteed touchbacks.

Spread punting, though. Remember that punt on which the Utah returner dodged two guys and things looked worrying for a second and then another guy hit him? The tackler would have been twenty yards further away last year.

They tried. Michigan executed an 80-yard touchdown drive in 1:52 late in the fourth quarter and got a shot at an onside kick as a result. A two minute drill that successfully concluded in two minutes!

But they missed the game theory thing no one will ever do. Michigan had an opportunity to go for two after scoring to draw within a touchdown. They didn't because the only person in the world who would actually do that is that dude down at Pulaski.

Fox stuff. Fox's game commercials are fine if they happen between plays when we're just looking at the coach or the guy who caught the ball or whatever… if there was the slightest evidence they were replacing traditional commercials. Nope: this game felt like an NBC Notre Dame game. I'd like to think there is a point past which TV networks will not push. I don't.

On the other hand, the Gus Johnson/Joel Klatt announce team was terrific. Johnson is Gus Johnson; QED. Klatt was a revelation as a color guy, consistently on point with useful, enlightening commentary. I am not just saying that because I tweeted that the first interception was probably on Perry and Klatt came back from commercial saying the same thing.

I could tell they were excellent because Michigan was losing a football game and I had not even a slight impulse to mute it.

Thursday stuff. Playing on Thursday is stupid. Let's put that in the Big Box o' Brandon and never ever do that again.

Comments

go16blue

September 4th, 2015 at 2:11 PM ^

It's always a good feeling when Brian echoes my sentiments exactly after a game, makes me think I'm finally getting the hang of this smart football thing hah. It hurt to see us try to run power over and over again with no push, only to switch back to inside zone late with some success (success mitigated by Smith's poor vision) - it was eerily 2014. On the 3rd and 3 where they ran off tackle to the left, I'd actually give Kalis a pass. It looked like that run was drawn up to go outside the tackle (where there was a hole - I thought Utah overplayed between the tackles on that play), but Smith just decided to pound it into the line as usual. I wouldn't mind giving Isaac extended time in the next few games. Assuming he has better vision, that is. He's still a decently powerful runner, and is a threat to catch out of the back field, as well as take runs to the house. Also, while I liked the announcing crew, FS1 never really bothered with replays, which made things very hard to judge live.

Former_DC_Buck

September 4th, 2015 at 4:58 PM ^

Did a "fan" run on the field at one point, in the second half? I was flipping back and forth between you guys and the Gophers and guys were taking water and acting like a timeout was taken but they didn't go right to commercial and the announcers never said anything. I'm not sure they ever did go to commercial. I know broadcasters have started trying not to show folks running on to the field as a means of not encouraging copycats.

Brhino

September 4th, 2015 at 2:11 PM ^

I had some annoyances with the broadcast.  

There was a bit in the second half where after a play, everyone milled around for a bit, and then a comercial break.  Not a mention of what was happening - time out, injury, something else?  Came back from commercial, both teams had all three time outs - so I have no idea.

Lots of close plays that never got a replay.  Some penalties... the onside kick, fergodsake.

I initially thought they were never displaying a playclock, but eventually realized that it came up but only when there wasn't much time left on it.  I guess I'm just not used to seeing a team getting up to the line of scrimmage with more than 10 seconds left ont he play clock.

JeepinBen

September 4th, 2015 at 2:16 PM ^

That stoppage was annoying. I figured it had to be an injury timeout when I saw waterbottles, etc. Twitter said that Jarrod Wilson was being looked at, but if I were just watching the game I wouldn't have known.

Also, not sure if this was FS1 or Comcast in Chicago, but the commercials were regularly at a higher volume than the game. I thought the FCC made that illegal?

EGD

September 4th, 2015 at 2:34 PM ^

Another idea would be "Harbumps," which is similar to Hokepoints (not sure if that's good or bad)--though that term is already somewhat well-established to mean the increase a recruit receives to his ranking on the recruiting sites upon receiving a M offer.  I also like "Faceblood."

DowntownLJB

September 4th, 2015 at 2:49 PM ^

Harbaugh Dramatic Pause..................................... ............................................... ................................................................... ................................................................ ........................................................... Good Play Award

Johnny_Rumcake

September 4th, 2015 at 2:14 PM ^

- The defense is going to be excellent this year. Holding a good opponent to 17 points on the road usually leads to victory. The three tunrovers obviously killed Michigan.

- We didn't see too much of Isaac but he looked smooth catching balls out of the backfield and didn't go down on first contact. I can see why Harbaugh likes Smith but it wouldn't surprise me if Isaac was the guy before conference play started.

- Is this the end of the Green and Morris? Two five stars that are barely seeing the field in their junior year... I can see both transfering at the end of the season. Add two more players to the recent growing list of five-star busts.

- I still think this team will win eight or nine games. BYU is shaping up to be an early-season must-win. If Michigan can come out of that with a win then everything should be fine.

 

NoVaWolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 2:38 PM ^

(And in fairness, let's stipulate Morris was dropped to four stars by the recruiting services after he missed most of his senior year w/mono).

We have to consider adding Kalis to this list. Sure, he starts and plays a lot, unlike the other two. But good grief, his whiff on the power-pull on that 4th and 1 (he left TWO guys unblocked, free to the ball-carrier!) was atrocious. This guy was touted as the next Steve Hutchinson coming out of high school; four years into the program, and he's still making mental errors like that. Just find the first red jersey in the hole and knock him on his butt!

I really thought that a spring and fall camp's worth of good OL coaching from Drevno would've solved some of these issues, but I guess I overestimated the aura of mediocrity that clings to these guys after the Hoke/Borges/Funk era. Can they clean up the mental mistakes once they get more comfortable w/the system, or is they just who they are, and it'll take new guys to make significant improvement?

Count me as someone hoping Dawson will seriously push either Braden or Kalis for playing time at guard by year's end. 

707oxford

September 4th, 2015 at 3:20 PM ^

Cumong, man.  I don't mean to be dick-ish, but Kalis pulled and didn't hit anybody.  I promise you that the coaches have not devised a play where the guard pulls and is not supposed to block.  He left two defenders untouched right in the gap to which he pulled.  We all know Smith's vision is iffy, but Kalis straight up failed here and has a track record of doing this when he pulls.

 

/sorry for being dick-ish

ST3

September 4th, 2015 at 4:06 PM ^

So if Kalis pulled and didn't hit anybody, don't you think it would be a good idea to follow him until he actually hit somebody, many yards past the first down line? That's how power works. ReadYourGuard, back me up on this.

And if there are two guys in the middle of the line, doesn't that imply that at least Braden and possibly also Glasgow blew their assignments?

hfhmilkman

September 4th, 2015 at 2:17 PM ^

It was not just the long throws that were an issue.  I was tracking what I call down field throws and throwing out the last drive our QB had 3.  My definition of downfield is anything that goes at least 8-10 yards beyond the line of scrimage.  So screens, slants, flats, and dumps are not considered downfield.  If the author stated that our receivers were doing a good job getting open, how come our QB had such difficulty doing anything?

DY

September 4th, 2015 at 3:48 PM ^

I watched the game with a couple non-Michigan fans and a couple long time Michigan fans and the repetitive giggling over "TE Butt" made me question watching another game with the same group in future. The guy has been on the roster for three years. The joke is old. Of course I may have been cranky because M was losing.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jimmyshi03

September 4th, 2015 at 2:20 PM ^

Was my first extended experience with Brandstatter as radio PBP guy. It was, I must say, extremely rough. Due to circumstances I was unable to go to watch and had to subsist on the radio call and gamecast, and the constant misidentification of players by Brandstatter was really an issue, as was confusion on down and distance. Anyone else have a similar feeling or am I off base?

CollegeFootball13

September 4th, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^

This part lost me:

Michigan had an opportunity to go for two after scoring to draw within a touchdown.

We scored one touchdown when down 17-3, and kicked the extra point to pull to within a touchdown. We scored our last touchdown when down 24-10, and kicked the extra point to pull within a touchdown. What am I missing?

Hannibal.

September 4th, 2015 at 2:32 PM ^

The idea is that if you need two TDs late in the game, you go for 2 on the first TD.  Then, if you recover the onside kick, you've got a chance at the win if you made the two-pointer.  If you didn't make it, then you've got a second shot at a 2 if you get the onside kick.  It's a move that increases your chances to win a few percentage points.

brad

September 4th, 2015 at 2:37 PM ^

Going for two on consecutive touchdowns, instead of kicking the point both times, gives you a statistically equal or better chance at getting 14+ points as kicking the point both times does. Going for two though also of course gives you the chance to score over 14, and thus win after coming from behind by 14 instead of just tying.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

MGoCombs

September 4th, 2015 at 3:06 PM ^

It should be noted that this is on average. You have to factor in your team's specific ability to convert a 2pt conversion, since not every team is equally effective. Not saying that applies here, but without much knowledge about this team's offense and ability on the goal-line, maybe it would be the statistically sound move to take the basically free points.

ak47

September 4th, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^

I hated the play calls on 3rd and 4th and 1.  The zone read is really not as difficutl to stop as everyone makes it out to be.  Just hit the damn quarterback every time.  Not a single coach in the country wants their start QB getting 20 times a game.  Tell the unblocked end to hit the QB every time and go 10 on 10 with the oline and running back.  If they average more than 4 yards a carry doing that they were going to beat you anyways because that means their oline is dominating your dline and linebackers.  All of these ofensive sets are working because they also are really simplifying the game for the offense.  Do the same thing for the defense and eliminate the hesitation that comes with making a decision.  Just destroy the QB.  The ravens do it in the NFL and they haven't had a zone read team go off on them offensively.  

ak47

September 4th, 2015 at 5:06 PM ^

It does work. I watched it work to win a superb owl after the miners had just run all over 3 teams. I can't tell you why other coaches dont do it but the Ravens defensive players are very upfront about their strategy. If you leave them unblocked and the qb makes himself a potential runner you hit him every time.

Wolverine fan …

September 4th, 2015 at 2:36 PM ^

every time the option is run is the best way to combat the option. I played DE in HS and preparing for the 2 option teams in the conference was great. Hit the QB as hard as you can every time you can and aim for his arm if it's still outstretched when you get there.We won both of our games against option teams; they had to rethink their game plan after the 1st or 2nd quarter. The QB's pitch motion and body language changed quite a bit after getting clobbered 4-5 times.

stephenrjking

September 4th, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^

Ok, so throughout last night and today many of us have yearned for something more in the offensive gameplan. Not that it was bad, just that we could include more. Peppers or different play options, that sort of thing. I think that may be coming. The staff appears to be focused on getting the team comfortable with the base concepts on offense and defense and doing them well. While this is still a "pro-style" run-first offense, everybody is learning new vocabulary and new reads and different plays. Similarly, on defense, Peppers still has work to do to maximize his talent, possibly precluding the use of him on offense early. All of this is a stark contrast from the Al Borges mad genius concept of inventing new plays out of whole cloth every week to confuse both opponents and his own team. I believe this because Harbaugh (admittedly with Greg Roman) has shown that he is capable of using extensive pre-snap movement, pistol formations, and other intriguing concepts both in the NFL and at Stanford. That stuff wasn't visible here, and I believe that is because the first priority is to do the primary stuff right. The crazy stuff comes later. I hope.

Wolverine 73

September 4th, 2015 at 2:26 PM ^

I liked that Peppers seemed very comfortable catching the ball in traffic on punt returns.  On the first Utah punt, I believe it was, he came running up to fair catch a short punt, surrounded by Utes, and never hesitated.  Last year, that ball probably hits and bounces downfield for another 15 yards.

ND Sux

September 4th, 2015 at 2:27 PM ^

"OMG we missed on the deep balls."  They'll come.  The wind was mentioned several times, and Jake is still getting used to our receivers.  I thought he was calm and decisive, things I didn't see much from Gardner (though I loved that dude's grit and effort).  Also, nice zip and accuracy on the short/medium stuff.  I'm firmly in the "Rudock will be more than fine" camp.  At least for now. 

LSA Superstar

September 4th, 2015 at 2:26 PM ^

I'm totally fine with criticisms of the offensive line's performance in the running game, but Utah's stellar pass-rushing unit was only within a whisper's distance of Rudock a handful of times.  I thought that the pass-blocking performance was far, far superior to any Michigan line's performance in this regard in years.

Profwoot

September 5th, 2015 at 5:45 AM ^

The PFF scoring review notes that Rudock was pressured on more than a third of his throws, which is very high. He was able to get the ball out quickly a lot, which I think is most of the difference between this game and what we saw last year. It's not clear to me that the OL was that much better in pass protection than in run blocking.

Wolverine fan …

September 4th, 2015 at 2:27 PM ^

is that the O-line won't face a front 7 like the one they just played until MSU comes to town. There is plenty of time to regroup, build confidence, and learn how to run the ball effectively between now and then. Is there any word on Drake Johnson? Also, the experience the D gained seeing a dual threat QB will be invaluable, and should help some against BYU. Peppers will learn from his mistakes and play even harder. Butt is the man. There is good speed at WR. Punting is solid. Rudock won't throw 3 picks in a game again this season. That's all I got.

Hannibal.

September 4th, 2015 at 2:28 PM ^

I like the game being on a Thursday night.  I just wish that it hadn't been the season opener.  I'd love to play on Thursday again someday when we actually have a damn program.  When this game was scheduled, we all thought that we'd have that by now.