Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (55)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Does Expansion Actually Lead to More Recruits From a Certain Region?
    maizeonblueaction - 19 hours ago
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 2 days ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 3 days ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 3 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 4 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 921 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 798 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 776 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 736 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 615 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 18 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 17 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 13 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Michigan wrestlers accused of Molotov cocktail possession suspended indefinitely
    12 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    74 replies
  • Softball Super Regional v. Louisiana-Lafayette, game 1
    47 replies
  • Sam Webb write up on five-star center Elijah Thomas
    8 replies
  • There should be 110,000 Rubber Chickens at the ND Game
    30 replies
  • OT- Miguel Cabrera is good at baseball, visual proof
    25 replies
  • Michigan/Minnesota football - Oct 5 - 330 pm EST
    13 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    105 replies
  • The Official SIAP Alan Branch Photoshop Thread
    28 replies
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    57 replies
  • OT: Star Trek + Dilithium = Esplode…. Esplode clarity
    26 replies
  • OT - ND paid Charlie more than Brian Kelly in 2012
    36 replies
  • Softball SuperRegionals Open Thread
    27 replies
  • OT: ESPN hires Paul Finebaum
    40 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    193 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    57 replies
  • Michigan/Minnesota football - Oct 5 - 330 pm EST
    13 replies
  • Who's Your Favorite Michigan QB?
    74 replies
  • Softball Super Regional v. Louisiana-Lafayette, game 1
    47 replies
  • Michigan wrestlers accused of Molotov cocktail possession suspended indefinitely
    12 replies
  • Softball SuperRegionals Open Thread
    27 replies
  • OT- Miguel Cabrera is good at baseball, visual proof
    25 replies
  • There should be 110,000 Rubber Chickens at the ND Game
    30 replies
  • Sam Webb write up on five-star center Elijah Thomas
    8 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    146 replies
  • OT: ESPN hires Paul Finebaum
    40 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    154 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    58 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    93 replies
  • OT - ND paid Charlie more than Brian Kelly in 2012
    36 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    193 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    154 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    151 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    146 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    144 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    141 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    105 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    93 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Burke says Michigan can be 'just as good' next year with McGary, Robinson III leading

    yes plz

    0 comments
  • SEC coaches with tiny faces

    I don't think they changed Les at all actually

    1 comments
  • This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews

    national champs baby

    1 comments
  • Rounding up the latest in NCAA absurdities.

    Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.

    0 comments
  • Cornell wrestler tops Michigan's Trey Burke for Sports Illustrated award | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

    first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"

    0 comments
  • Burke hearing he'll go two through six in NBA draft

    stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly

    0 comments
  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Where It's At: Offensive Recruiting

By Brian — June 8th, 2009 at 12:25 PM — 59 comments
Filed under:
  • devin gardner
  • drew dileo
  • recruiting overview
  • stephen hopkins
  • tony drake

The week-to-week minutiae of recruiting can sometimes obscure the larger picture.From time to time this here blog likes to provide a 1,000 foot view so people can have context going forward. Details below are designed to be sparse.

Numbers

Michigan is about halfway to a full recruiting class, and will probably sign somewhere between 22 and 25. The details:

  • Eleven players see their eligibility expire.
  • Michigan entered the year with three unused slots.
  • Transfers from Wermers, Threet, and Clemons minus the transfer-type action of Kelvin Grady brings Michigan up to 16 slots.
  • There are two players on the team—David Cone and Bryan Wright—highly unlikely to get a fifth year.
  • Dann O'Neill's departure is not yet official but is highly likely.

So without further attrition Michigan has about 19 slots—depending on the statuses of Sheridan, Morales, and the younger Grady—to provide, but there will be further attrition. There always is.

Quarterback

devin-gardner Needs: Almost as severe as they were last year. Michigan has two realistic scholarship options and would like at least two this year with possibly a third guy who will "get a shot" before getting moved to somewhere else.

Commitments: MI QB Devin Gardner (right), Michigan's top target and a guy who's around the Scout top 50 and Lemming top 10, has hopped aboard.

Realistic Future Options: There's not much green left on the recruiting board here: just SC QB Cornelius Jones, LA QB Munchie Legaux, and FL QB Stephen Morris. Morris doesn't have an offer, and Legaux has gone from declaring Michigan a provisional leader to only mentioning M intermittently—that smilin' green guy is probably outdated. So you've got Jones, which I guess would be okay.

Level of PANIC: 1/5. Gardner was clearly the #1 priority of the coaching staff and is in the boat; the lack of attractive second options is a minor concern.

Tailback

Needs: They took three last year but lose three this offseason and had two transfers. In 2010 they'll have a junior Mike Shaw and four underclassmen (Smith, Toussaint, Jones, and Cox). That's is pretty light for a team that would like to run the ball lots, especially since Jones might be pirated away by the receiving corps and Toussaint remains a question-mark to qualify.

Commitments: Michigan's picked up two generic three-star sorts from Texas in Tony Drake and Stephen Hopkins, with Drake a zippy scatback sort and Hopkins a sort of Brandon Minor 2.0.

Realistic Future Options: Tate Forcier is still exhorting Michigan fans to keep hope for the pendulum that is CA RB Brennan Clay alive—he committed to Oklahoma over the weekend—but even if he's still in play he's declared Oklahoma a strong leader and will be difficult to pry away.

That leaves MI RB Austin White as Michigan's top remaining target, surprisingly. White has two brothers at State but the vibe on him has been strongly Michigan for the last month or two. While White's not the universal blue-chip Clay is he does have an LSU offer and a couple of four-star rankings.

There are also a dozen other kids with offers out there, with the top names to watch FL RB Cassius McDowell, a teammate of Michigan's Deerfield Beach duo on both the football team and the Florida state championship 4x100m, and CA RB Dietrich Riley, a hotly-pursued athlete who could play on either side of the ball.

Level of PANIC: 2/5. If Rodriguez gets a pass anywhere for recruiting random guys it's running backs, but Michigan's persistent inability to land a blue-chip guy despite Rodriguez's pedigree is slightly annoying. White's sort of close to that level, though, and if they bring him in that's a solid class.

Wide Receiver

Needs: Whatever they were they've been met.

Commitments: Michigan picked up early-early commits from FL WR Ricardo Miller and MI WR Jeremy Jackson, then followed that up with Ohioans Jerald Robinson and DJ Williamson, and the entire state of North Dakota.

Miller is a four-star to everyone but the other guys are in the generic three-star range, with Robinson the closest to four-star status. Jackson did claim offers from Texas and Florida, FWIW, and Williamson just won the state championship in the 100 meter dash.

Realistic Future Options: Unsurprisingly, there aren't many. IL WR Kyle Prater showed at the BBQ and a recent combine event that Gardner also attended; the two have hit it off and Prater's had some recent positive mentions of M. He's also declared a top three of USC, Oklahoma, and Illinois, though, so keep your hopes in check.

Other than that the only guy reporting an offer who seems interested is PA WR Andrew Carswell, who may or may not be able to commit if he so desires.

Level of PANIC: 2/5. I'd rather Michigan had picked up some higher-rated kids with better offers. IIRC, neither Robinson or Williamson had any other offers period, let alone something comparable to the Michigan offer, and neither is getting the sort of guru accolades that might offset that. Williamson is something of a mystery man, though: Rivals just got his film.

Slot Receiver

Needs: I have no idea, really. Is Teric Jones a slot receiver? What about Tony Drake? Is Kelvin Grady a realistic option? Will Jeremy Gallon qualify? Does Je'Ron Stokes end up playing inside? If the answers are all "yes," then the need here is minimal. If they're all "no," the need here is considerable.

Commitments: LA WR Drew Dileo committed to Michigan over an array of schools that are really good at school a few weeks ago.

Realistic Future Options: Again, it's not a surprise that there aren't a whole lot of options on the board here. FL WR OJ Ross has an offer and has been very impressive this spring at a variety of combines and his high school's spring game; he's about the only guy on the radar here.

Level of PANIC: 3/5. Dileo seems like one of those guys you wait on. Just my e-pinion.

Tight End

Needs: Rodriguez never used tight ends at West Virginia unless it was Owen Schmitt lining up somewhere funny, but has apparently cottoned onto the idea at Michigan once he talked with good friend Bob Stoops and got a view of Kevin Koger's talents, so they're recruiting a few guys.

Commitments: None.

Realistic Future Options: Cincinnati commitment Alex Smith took a visit for the BBQ and now features in articles where he talks about a variety of trips he'll take. That commit is soft, then. He's the only guy on the board.

Level of PANIC: 0/5. If they find a guy they like here, fine. If they don't, fine.

Offensive Line

Needs: Suddenly a little more needy with the departures of Kurt Wermers and (again, very probably) Dann O'Neill. Michigan is now recruiting to a class of four redshirt freshmen backed by a class of three true freshmen and should be taking another three or four players.

Commitments: OH interior lineman Christian Pace committed about a week ago.

Realistic Future Options: There is, of course, MN OL Seantrel Henderson, the nation's top recruit and a guy Michigan is in a tentative top two for along with Minnesota. He's not going to decide until February, though, so any lead here is tenuous. Much more likely to hew to his recent proclamations of a Michigan lead is FL OL Torrian Wilson, who's still got Michigan on top and would like to decide within a month.

Besides those two Michigan is in on a couple of Ohioans, Skyler Schofner and Andrew Donnall, plus some other guys. They'll probably have to find another half-dozen guys to offer to get up to four.

Level of PANIC: 1/5. Though the recruiting board has dwindled a bit, offensive line is a spot at which you get a lot of late-developing talents and the recruiting ratings aren't that accurate anyway. Pace is a good pickup to start.

The Takeaway

Yeah, Michigan has expended a lot of scholarship slots on guys you'd like to see them wait on as Plan B type recruits to be reeled in after you are told to talk to the hand by big-time guys. By the end of the year only Gardner, Miller, and maybe one other committed player (Pace or Robinson, probably) are likely to pick up four stars, which is well below average.

The counter-argument to this basically goes "Pat White and Steve Slaton," and I hear you, but even Rodriguez's first full class at Michigan—which was loaded with four-star recruits—puts the lie to the idea it's not preferable to lock down guys who many people think will be good players instead of just you. At the halfway point it's looking like this will be class that ranks lower than normal.

That's not too alarming. Teams that have ugly years just about always experience a significant dropoff the year after, and Michigan is going through its own version. This is more likely to be a result of 3-9 than anything else, and 3-9 isn't an event that will repeat, knock on wood.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:58 PM | The overall level of panic for the offense... (Score:1)
The Barwis Effect
The Barwis Effect's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2244

...looks to be just shy of 2/5. Not bad. Anxiously awaiting the defensive numbers....

"[T]here were a lot of people predicting glorious heights for Rich; mostly the same people who are predicting doom and gloom [for Hoke]. Excuse me if I doubt their prognostication skills." -- M-Wolverine

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:10 PM | 6/5 (Score:1)
jrt336
jrt336's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 4490

6/5

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:03 PM | What's the likelihood of (Score:1)
jrt336
jrt336's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 4490

What's the likelihood of State having a better class than us?

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:24 PM | As likely as them winning the (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

As likely as them winning the national championship.

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 3:56 PM | ...and who cares anyway? (Score:1)
matty blue
matty blue's picture
Joined: 08/01/2008
MGoPoints: 377

i don't think that most of us use sparty as a measuring stick.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 4:37 PM | I hate MSU football fans. (Score:1)
jrt336
jrt336's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 4490

I hate MSU football fans. Then they would have something else to brag about.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:06 PM | Great Recap (Score:1)
casmooth
casmooth's picture
Joined: 11/21/2008
MGoPoints: 163

Per usual, nice recap Brian. Looking year-over-year, I am slightly concerned about the diminishing returns of RR's recruiting efforts. While I understand the whole Pat White side of the argument, the lack of 4* and 5* recruits is concerning. I understand that 3-9 isn't necessarily a huge turn on for recruits, but shouldn't the fact that we are the University of Michigan carry some weight? I mean, ND has been terrible lately, yet they still bring in top classes with some pretty highly rated 5* guys. What gives?

HAIL.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:13 PM | RR doesn't get that he isn't (Score:1)
jrt336
jrt336's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 4490

RR doesn't get that he isn't in the Big East anymore. But seriously, I don't like it either. 3 **** recruits on offense? We're not getting a whole lot of 4 star players on defense either.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 10:55 PM | Yeah, those wins against (Score:1)
jwfsouthpaw
jwfsouthpaw's picture
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 138

Yeah, those wins against Georgia and Oklahoma be damned! That won't work in the Big Ten!

"RR doesn't get that he isn't in the Big East anymore." What does this even mean? A good football team is a good football team. Period.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 11:06 PM | Sarcasm. (Score:1)
chitownblue2
chitownblue2's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 7062

Sarcasm.

wolverineliberationarmy.com/blog

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:10 PM | Michigan went 3-9 in 2008..... (Score:1)
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 5837

...and today's date is June 8, 2009. National Signing Day is in February 2010.

Notre Dame gets its pick of kids from Catholic schools. We've got a new coach, so new relationships in new areas. Also: a lot of the highly rated kids are committing to schools which, if you look closely, did rather well last year and in 2007. There aren't a lot of four star kids committing to Iowa State right now.

If Michigan goes 8-4 in the regular season this year, you will see kids like Gholston, Prater, Henderson and Clay give Michigan more than a sideways look. We're already in their top 10!!!

I think we'd all be happy if we locked up those four, kept what we've got, and filled in the rest with 3 star players. Wouldn't we?

Now, remember that highly regarded kids will pop up later this summer and in the fall (remember Roh, LaLota, Gibbons last year, and Emilien fell into our lap). Remember Quentin Washington "dropped" us last August.

If Michigan has a good record, the last 10 kids in this class will be of the four star variety.

If Michigan stinks again, well, we'll get three star kids.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:26 PM | Barwis is generally regarded as a recruiting advantage for us (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19221

but I wonder if there are potential recruits who imagine that gravelly voice barking at them as they puke their guts out on Barwis Beach, and say "um, no thanks." Especially linemen.

Since we're only one year in, it's as yet unproven that there is in fact a Barwis Effect (the concept, not the MGoBlog poster), but I'm optimistic that it's real, and that proper identification of potential talent—even if it lacks the desired four and five stars—combined with the S&C program will yield the results we want. However, eventually you need top-rated players to get to the top echelon of the BCS world. If we get back to being truly competitive, it will happen. This year is really critical, though. Another losing season and the effects recruiting-wise will linger longer than last season's disaster. One losing season can easily be seen as a flukey outlier, but two in a row is a completely different thing.


  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:45 PM | nice post (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5147

Don you had a nice post there.. that is pretty accurate. I think there are some guys turned off by Barwis's barking. To them I say the same thing RR says...Adios Pussy. RR is not just paying lip service to the you have to "love football" mantra. I'm sure this is the pitch to recruits. This is going to be the hardest thing you have ever done in your life, but if you pass you will be in the best shape you can possibly be in and you will be the best player you can possibly be and some other bullshit about great academics. Do you accept the challenge??

RR wants Navy Seals. I'm not sure the Navy Seals are the biggest and the fastest, but they are the toughest mentally and physically. It's not for everyone though.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:12 PM | Any substance to your suggestion.... (Score:1)
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 5837

....that "some guys" are turned off by "Barwis's barking?" Or, is this just rampant speculation?

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:25 PM | No (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5147

I have nothing to back that up, I was agreeing with Don's assumption and running my theory up the pole. It would go to reason that there are some pampered 4 and 5 star recruits that look at Barwis and say "that dude is too over the top for me." I think RR usues him as a weeding out tool. Anyone that can't get with Barwis's message isn't going to make it thru Michigan.

I think Dan Oneil may be 1 if the rumors are true.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:47 PM | You act as if Barwis is the (Score:1)
Jay
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 560

You act as if Barwis is the only S&C Coach out there that runs a tough program. USC's is just as tough as ours. Do they have problems recruiting because of it? Your theory is as flimsy as it gets.

"I'm Leslie E. Miles and I approve of this message."

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 3:07 PM | Never said that (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5147

This thread is getting off tangent. Let me clarify my stance.
1. I love Barwis, think he helps recruiting.
2. Yes most top programs have tough S&C programs similar to ours.
3. Most of the top schools do simlar things, but does each school give off a slighlty different vibe and personality that somewhat effects a recruits thinking..probably.
4. Could some kid come in and like a more independent approach than Michigan(like Mich used to be)and be slighlty turned off. Maybe.

In summary Barwis good, just responding to Don's comment. End.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:32 PM | I didn't "suggest" anything (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19221

I'm not quoting "inside sources" or alleging that I know someone in the athletic department or that my BIL is an assistant coach at another school or that I overheard Brennan Clay in the men's room at Skeeps during a secret recruiting visit.

My phrase was, "but I wonder if there are..." I'm simply throwing the question out there for discussion, you know, like people do on these here blog things. Do you dismiss the possibility that some guys might not find Barwis to their liking? And don't mistake my contemplating the question as an indication I'm not a Barwis supporter.


  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:54 PM | Question was posed... (Score:1)
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 5837

...at Ziff, not you. Apologies.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:36 PM | Other examples of "rampant speculation": (Score:1)
Vielfrass
Joined: 12/24/2008
MGoPoints: 9

"If Michigan goes 8-4 in the regular season this year, you will see kids like Gholston, Prater, Henderson and Clay give Michigan more than a sideways look."

"If Michigan has a good record, the last 10 kids in this class will be of the four star variety."

"If Michigan stinks again, well, we'll get three star kids."

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:53 PM | Absolutely..... (Score:1)
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 5837

....I'm not denying it.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 4:51 PM | I don't know. I would call (Score:1)
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 869

I don't know. I would call those statements "mild speculation" or even "possible outcomes" not "rampant speculation." All of those comments have solid reasoning behind them. Saying "Barwis' barking turns off recruits" has no evidence to back it up. Saying that our record this fall will influence our recruiting is pretty likely, actually.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2009 at 11:36 AM | You (Score:1)
Vielfrass
Joined: 12/24/2008
MGoPoints: 9

can call them whatever you want considering jg2112 seems to have understood the overall point.

In response to your post though, couldn't a recruit visiting Michigan and being turned off by Barwis just as easily be called "mild speculation", or even a "possible outcome"? You might even say that there is "solid reasoning" behind it, considering the Dann O'Neill situation.

My point was that ALL of those points are speculative. If you want to argue "degrees of speculation", go ahead.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2009 at 12:25 PM | I think there is a huge (Score:1)
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 869

I think there is a huge difference between making a claim backed up by absolutely nothing, and making a claim that, while may be speculative, is also a likely and probably conclusion. From what I've heard, Dann O'Nieill didn't like to work hard. That's not a Barwis vs. another SC coach, that's working vs. playing video games.

I, along with many others, don't like people making claims when there has been no evidence to suggest that conclusion.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2009 at 3:22 PM | Exactly my point. (Score:1)
Vielfrass
Joined: 12/24/2008
MGoPoints: 9

There is just as much evidence for this:

"...but I wonder if there are potential recruits who imagine that gravelly voice barking at them as they puke their guts out on Barwis Beach, and say "um, no thanks." Especially linemen."

as there is for these:

"If Michigan goes 8-4 in the regular season this year, you will see kids like Gholston, Prater, Henderson and Clay give Michigan more than a sideways look."

"If Michigan has a good record, the last 10 kids in this class will be of the four star variety."

"If Michigan stinks again, well, we'll get three star kids."

One poster is saying that Barwis may "scare off" some potential recruits, and another is saying that some other potential recruits may "give Michigan more than a sideways look" if we go 8-4.

I fail to see the huge difference there.

We HAVE had a few lineman leave the program since Barwis arrived, so it isn't thaaat big of a stretch for him to surmise that some potential line recruits might be turned off by Barwis.

I've yet to see evidence that any of those particular recruits are going to give us MORE of a look based on an 8-4 record.

He's also claiming that if we "have a good record" (whatever that might be), that the "last 10 kids will be 4 stars". If not they will be 3 stars.

Um, wow. Do I even need to go here?

  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2009 at 6:11 PM | Personally, I've never once (Score:1)
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 869

Personally, I've never once heard of a recruit dismissing us as a school because they were intimidated by Barwis. Saying it's possible or that you "wonder" what potential recruits think is not at all evidence.

However, many recruits have chosen or turned down a school because of performance. This is common place. Same with a positive trend. How many times have you heard a recruit say they they committed to a school or showed interest because a program was "on the up and up?" Winning 5 more games than the previous year is certainly indicative of that.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:36 PM | Patience (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5147

"The lack of 4 and 5 star guys is alarming" Come on!!!! We had a top 10ish class 2 years in a row while going thru a coaching change and a 3-9 year. Name a school that has done anything close to that??
QB Forcier, Gardner, Robinson-all 4 stars
RB Shaw-4star
WR Stokes, Miller, Jackson-4 stars
TE Koger -4 star
T Lewan- 4 stars
G Barnum, Washington- 4 stars

DE Roh, Lalota- 4 stars
DT Martin, Campbell- 4 stars
LB Fitzgerald-4 star
CB Cissoko, Turner-4 stars
S Emilien, Robinson- 4 stars

How are we going to field a competitive team?? Enough already. Give it some time. We hit the absolute worst possible shit storm at the wrong time. Give it a chance.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:59 PM | Explanation (Score:1)
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2505

Lots of people have been excusing the relatively low ranking of the current verbal commits by saying that RR would rather have three-stars that fit his offense than four- or five-stars that don't. But when given the chance to get the four- or five-stars, he took it. So saying that he would rather have lowly-ranked players that fit his offense than highly-ranked players that other major programs are recruiting is a lie.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:33 PM | I don't necessarily agree (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27477

I don't necessarily agree with the people who say that, but nobody's saying he wants ALL 3-star prospects. They're saying he'd rather have a 3-star that fits than a 4-star that doesn't.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:03 PM | another way to put it (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

"Rodriguez's first class showed that it's best to lock down guys who are universally highly rated rather than players who only you have highly rated."

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 3:57 PM | Translation (Score:1)
evenyoubrutus
evenyoubrutus's picture
Joined: 11/04/2008
MGoPoints: 4727

"don't try to be the smartest guy in the room." Now do you see? (Insert Sam Neill's bloody face: "NOW DO YOU SEE!?")

Not that I loved Rich Rod less, but that I loved Michigan more.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 1:55 PM | Jeremy Jackson (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

Having offers from Florida and Texas equals four star player in my mind, regardless of what the recruiting sites say. Those guys have the pick of the litter.

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:25 PM | Florida currently has 2 (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27477

Florida currently has 2 three-star commits and last year had 4. Texas currently has 3 three-star commits and last year took 6.

Florida and Texas offers =/= automatic 4-star ratings

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 3:14 PM | point taken (Score:1)
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 6784

I meant, though, that it means he's a four-star-caliber player. Florida and Texas don't need to take chances on anybody who's not a top-flight player.

It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra

                         

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:08 PM | Obviously some of these 3 (Score:1)
gremlin
gremlin's picture
Joined: 01/13/2009
MGoPoints: 602

Obviously some of these 3 star guys who committed are going to have their offers pulled when better guys sign on. Everyone needs to relax.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:27 PM | No, that's not how it works. (Score:1)
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 869

No, that's not how it works. Guys who are committed do not have their offers pulled.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:55 PM | The offers are conditional. (Score:1)
gremlin
gremlin's picture
Joined: 01/13/2009
MGoPoints: 602

The offers are conditional. You're wrong.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 3:18 PM | No he's not. If better guys (Score:1)
ish
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7692

No he's not. If better guys commit and they want to get a kid to decommit they stop paying attention to him in the hopes he'll get the message. They don't actually yank the offer.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 3:27 PM | They do. In a polite manner. (Score:1)
gremlin
gremlin's picture
Joined: 01/13/2009
MGoPoints: 602

They do. In a polite manner.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 4:47 PM | Sorry Gremlin, that's not how (Score:1)
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 869

Sorry Gremlin, that's not how things work. Unless your name is Nick Saban, if a kid receives an offer from you and maintains that he wants to go to Michigan, you don't yank his offer. That's why schools are often selective about who they offer. If you could yank a kid's offer, why not offer, literally, everybody?

There are situations like the Barnes or Peace situations from last year where you either give the kid the cold shoulder or let him know you need him at a different position, but if he's OK with it, he still gets his scholarship. I've never heard of Michigan, or any other school not in a coaching transition, tell a kid, "Hey guess what, that offer we gave you? We want it back." That would ruin M's and RR's reputation for future recruits for a long time. We would be better off keeping a kid we didn't want.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 5:53 PM | Why don't you go look at a (Score:1)
gremlin
gremlin's picture
Joined: 01/13/2009
MGoPoints: 602

Why don't you go look at a copy of an offer letter. You'll see it's conditional. Also, please take note that RR is coaching now, and not Lloyd Carr. Have you seen how many offers we have out there? Do you really think we're going to be able take every kid who commits? This is obviously a different era, and you are too slow to figure it out.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 6:00 PM | Technically, you are correct (Score:1)
GCS
GCS's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 777

Technically, you are correct as they can pull an offer if they so choose. In practice, though, they only rescind offers to people who have not yet committed. As has been repeated ad nauseum, committed players will get Peaced.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 6:28 PM | If you want to re-read my (Score:1)
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 869

If you want to re-read my post I'll give you a minute or two.....OK, ya done?

Notice that I never said that we "can't" yank an offer. I said that we "don't" and that we "shouldn't." If you want to rip on me for being slow, at least read the fucking post. You've shown in numerous posts on here that you don't know what you're talking about, so I'm not going to get upset.

We have more offers out than spots. True. Not all of those guys will commit. I fully endorse pulling an offer from a guy who hasn't accepted it yet (committed). RR has also told guys that they cannot commit yet, because they are waiting on responses from other recruits. Please give me example when a player (from any school, save Lane Kiffin's situation as a new coach) where a player's offer has been yanked. I'd be curious to hear about it.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 6:50 PM | (No subject) (Score:1)
ShockFX
ShockFX's picture
Joined: 07/16/2008
MGoPoints: 3959

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 5:31 PM | seriously, they don't. just (Score:1)
ish
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7692

seriously, they don't. just not how it works. don't know how long you've been following recruiting, but they don't yank offers. they call, write, and text less often if at all, maybe tell a kid who doesn't want to redshirt that he will, etc. they hope the kid gets the point, like with dewayne peace. but they don't actually yank offers.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:10 PM | it's june (Score:1)
bsb2002
bsb2002's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 494

it's june

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:17 PM | ^^^^Above. Agreed. It's June. (Score:1)
Nate-Dawg
Nate-Dawg's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 20

^^^^Above. Agreed. It's June. We'll be fine.

I miss Keith Jackson.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:23 PM | Recruiting ain't everything (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19221

Charlie Weis and Ron Zook are pretty adept recruiters, but their on-field achievements have been middling at best overall. Wake Forest's classes don't show up on the radar at all, but Jim Grobe has somehow gotten the Demon Deacons to real competitiveness in the ACC. Stoops, Brown, Carroll, Saban, and Pope Urban are guys who can recruit and coach with the best, albeit with natural recruiting bases that Rodriguez can only fantasize about. If you're not going to have recruiting classes that have as many 4- and 5-star guys as the "top" programs, then not only are you going to have to "develop" them in terms of practice coaching/S&C/etc, but you have to get that to translate to wins on game day. Lloyd was routinely pilloried for game-day strategy and tactics, sometimes fairly, sometimes not, so it will be interesting to see how RR does over the next 2-3 years in that category. Will his Michigan version of the spread be able to make up for supposed deficits in talent when playing teams like OSU? Can Gerg mold a defense mostly comprised of 3-stars and a few 4s and have it truly competitive with BCS-level bowl teams?


  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:36 PM | Mostly 3 stars?? (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5147

The 4 stars or better just off the top of my head

DL-Graham, Martin, Roh, Lalota, Campbell
LB-Mouton, Fitzgerald, Smith
DB-Warren, Cissoko, Turner, Vlad, Williams, Brown

Starting this year

DL Graham, Martin
LB Fitz, Mouton
DB Warren Cissoko Brown Vlad

8 of 11 probable starters are 4 star or better...where is this d comprised of 3 stars...

I think we need a special category for guys from the muck...these guys are proving to be better than rated. Any 3 star from the sticks that can't get a proper meal, no weightlifting program and can't afford to go to combines every weekend in the deep south should be rated a 4 star for us. Auburn LSU Alabama Arkansas Ole Miss make a living off these type guys.

  • Login or register to post comments
June 8th, 2009 at 2:52 PM | Northwestern (Score:1)
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 5837

9-4 last year. Routinely attracts the 9th, 10th or 11th ranked recruiting classes in the Big Ten.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.