Wednesday Presser Transcript 11-20-13: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Heiko

Bullets:

  • Quinton Washington and Jibreel Black have been splitting snaps situationally. QWash could get more snaps against Iowa because of Iowa's offensive style.
  • Hoke is disappointed that Taylor Lewan wasn't an Outland Trophy finalist.
  • Justice Hayes's future is at slot receiver, but he'll do some spot duty as a third-down back.
  • The Borges transcript will be up tomorrow morning because I am forever delinquent.

-------------------------

Opening remarks:

“Really good practice yesterday. The energy level, the execution of things was really good on both sides of the ball. I’m real proud of what the kicking game did last week. We need to do the same thing this week, only we want to see if we can get a little more out of the return game. Some of that was predicated by wind and everything else, but we though the kicking game was something that we wanted to improve. The young guys on that team have continued to improve. That’s helped us a lot in a lot of situations, but we’ve had a good week so far.”

Have you been able to sort out your tailback situation at all?

“No, we have another day today and we’ll go through practice, bu tlal three of them there’s things they do well.”

How do you divide the snaps between them?

“Almost in thirds. It really depends on what part of the game you’re in. You get to some of the passing game, one of them may be better at that. That’s part of it, too.”

You said there’s a role for all three of those guys. How do you envision that?

“Well I’m not really going to talk about what the role is.”

Will it be even or will one of those guys have to step up?

“I think at the end of the day you need to somebody step up.”

MGoQuestion: Greg Mattison said Quinton Washington had a good game last Saturday. What’s keeping him from seeing more snaps?

“Well, we rotate those two positions between him and Jibreel. They both have – they’re both very good football players. They both have had good games. Both of them probably not as good a game as they liked to have had. So it’s really 1A and 1B.”

MGoFollowup: Will the ratio of snaps between the two change when you play a team like Iowa?

“It depends. It depends what you’re going to see. Jibreel’s a little better of a pass rush guy. Got into a game where third downs become a big third and longer downs, then he could get some more snaps. Or if it’s a smash-mouth game like it will be with how they like to play, Q could get more snaps.”

Do you think Jake’s 100 percent?

“Yeah I think so. I don’t see anything that’s slowing him down.”

No pain when he comes off the field?

“Nope.”

MGoQuestion: Play action is a big part of your offense. What do you think of Iowa’s ability to defend play action?

“I think they do a pretty good job because they stay in quarters most of the time. I think Phil Parker, the guy who coaches the secondary – I worked with at Toledo years ago – is a very good football coach and does a nice job.”

MGoFollowup: What does running play action on an obvious passing down accomplish for you?

“Well, it depends. Field positions matter. You have field zones where second and long or whatever, you may run the ball still. Some teams do, some teams don’t. Sometimes play action is good there. You really have to check the discipline of guys playing. And what I’m saying is the discipline of the defensive backs. Everything is feet discipline and eye discipline at that position.”

Third down woes against Northwestern – what was the issue there?

“Well I think some of it is we’ve got to block better. We had some chances in there to make some of those on the ground, so I think some of it was that. The other thing is we missed some throws and dropped some balls that were manageable.”

You said you moved Justice Hayes to receiver and then moved him back …

“Justice has been in the program long enough and he knows the protections, even though we moved him out to the Z receiver, slot a bit. Because of his maturity and being around, he can do both.”

Is the long term goal for him to be receiver?

“I think that’s where we’d like to get him trained most of the time.”

Derrick Green said he is now down to 230. He said the coaches did want him to lose weight. Do you notice a difference now?

“Oh yeah. I think so. His speed in and out of holes, his acceleration, that burst you need to have.”

He hasn’t played as much as some thought he would. How has his patience been?

“Well, missing a little bit in fall camp probably – I have to go back and look at the days, but it was a decent amount of time. That part of it hurt him, set him back. Getting more in football shape was part of it.”

Do you think he’s in prime shape?

“No. He won’t be in his prime shape yet. He has to be Wellmanized and all those things. Summer, winter, spring football. Those guys haven’t tasted it all yet.”

Do you think Taco Charlton could have a future on the interior of the defensive line?

“Yeah. I think he could. Looks tall, got long arms. Long legs.”

MGoQuestion: You handled Iowa pretty easily last year. They look like a similar team this year …

“No, they’re much different. Much different. They’re a much more physical team on offense, Scherff didn’t play a year ago. He was out for the game. Weisman was beat up in our game, coming in with an ankle. I think Bullock has given them a lot of good things as a change-of-pace back. Defensively, the three senior linebackers, they’re seniors. When seniors hit that mark, they’re playing very active and very well. They’re a very different football team.”

Schemewise, how similar are they with how they were 10 years ago?

“There’s a lot of similarities. The one thing I will say is they’re pressuring a little more. I think they feel from the standpoint – and I shouldn’t even answer the question because I’m not them and I’m not there every day – but I think they feel more confident in their linebackers and their back end. So you see them blitz a little more.”

You’ve struggled on the road. What do you emphasize to a young team?

“There’s no doubt in the consistency you want to play with and the carryover you want from one week to the next. The belief that they have in each other and how they perservere and all those things. You want to build off that and build off the momentum of that.”

What do you like about how Taylor Lewan has improved this season?

“What he’s done physically to himself and the discipline throughout. With that offensive unit line-wise, his direction, the coaching he gives them, he’s into it with them. That’s another step in growth.”

He was left off the Outland finalist list.

“Yeah. Am I disappointed? Yeah. Really disappointed.”

You think he belongs in that conversation?

“Yeah. No doubt. No doubt.”

Comments

petered0518

November 20th, 2013 at 5:47 PM ^

I understand that audio transcripts don't always make the most sense when written down, but Hoke's answer to the play action question definitely sounds like he is squirming a bit.  Test the DBs discipline, really?

And please tell me you asked a similar question of Borges.  I am dying to hear the justification for play action on long third downs just so I can laugh at it.

HipsterCat

November 20th, 2013 at 6:01 PM ^

thats the whole point of play action to test the defenses discipline and get them to pull up, they bite up a little and the reciever gets a step or the linebackers take a step up and open up the middle a little more or the d-line slows down the rush for a second trying to hold positon and possibly get the running back and the Oline can get to them. obviously it works better when the running game is humming but it still does all those things on a given play.

petered0518

November 20th, 2013 at 6:16 PM ^

Yes, it tests their discipline when they have the slightest worry of actually needing to defend the run.  I don't complain about PA on 1st down ever, and even second and long is fine by me.  3rd and long, really?  It doesn't test DBs discipline because they have absolutely no concern for a run.  

Watch the safeties on any given third and long play action against us.  Do they show even the slightest hint of biting?  Why would you ever have a QB who is struggling making the right reads take his eyes off of the downfield coverage to waste time faking something that no one is ever biting on?  It is nonsensical.

ish

November 20th, 2013 at 6:37 PM ^

i hope heiko was referring to the 3rd and 11 where they ran play-action with kerridge lined up as an FB.  that was my most hated play call from saturday.  let us count the ways:

  • no defender is worried about the run, he has no reason to pause;
  • you turn your QB's back to the LOS when he may be getting blitzed;
  • by using a FB rather than another WR, you've wasted a player or at least had a downgrade in his utility because the WR is going to be the better pass-catcher;
  • similarly, by delaying both your FB and your RB, at least one of them is double delayed.  one is staying in pass protection, but the other can't get out on an 11 yard route fast enough because of the play-action.

ish

November 20th, 2013 at 6:39 PM ^

you're right: every second doctors or med students spend doing something other than caring for patients is a time spent killing people.  med students must spent more time with patients, residents in particular.  they don't work very hard.

Mr. Yost

November 20th, 2013 at 6:06 PM ^

Many of us have had him moving to slot for awhile. Next year he and Norfleet are the only returners. We'll get a true freshman, but I really look for us to go 2WR, 2TE from the shotgun or pistol more often.

Hayes' name always pops up in the transfer rumors with Rawls. Hopefully he's found a home as the slot and 3rd down back. I think he can get significant snaps if he can catch. He looks solid blocking vs. NW...better than Fitz has looked the past month.

Danwillhor

November 21st, 2013 at 6:01 AM ^

to being in the fire Hoke crowd but I would trade him for either Harbaugh yesterday, today and tomorrow. Oddly, there was a rumor when the lady search was concluded that Hoke was AND KNEW HE WAS a stop gap, would get the shop turned to take a positional role for "one of the Harbaughs". Can Hoke, or any coach, love a program THAT much? I say no but it would have us kicking absolute ass in the immediate. Both brothers teabag Saban as coaching minds.

San Diego Mick

November 20th, 2013 at 11:25 PM ^

coaching Michigan would be so awesome, talk about having veritas on the sidelines, yes please. Sorry Brady, I'd like to give you more time unless we can get John harbaugh, we would be able to stay in the direction we're going and Mattison can stay.

cloudman

November 21st, 2013 at 9:02 AM ^

Perhaps I'm a heretic here, but I do not feel confident that Brady Hoke, Al Borges and their minions can deliver a winning Michigan football team against OSU soon.  Certainly even RichRod could provide a more potent offense than what we currently must endure.  Good defense is appreciated, especially that provided by Greg Mattison.  Sometimes, that's not enough!