Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 17 hours ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 20 hours ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 days ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Yet Another Da'Shawn Hand post
    canzior - 2,948 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,454 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,059 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,041 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,000 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 32 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 16 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 12 comments
  • Some Interesting Facts About Big Ten Scoring Offenses: 2000-Present
    LSAClassOf2000 - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    0 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    9 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    42 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    107 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    24 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    24 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    59 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    92 replies
  • ESPN projects next three seasons, ranks M #5 ($)
    56 replies
  • VOTE-B1G Preseaon Offensive POY (Devin)
    24 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    42 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    107 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    24 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    0 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    24 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    9 replies
  • OT- Alabama Installing Waterfalls In Football Locker Rooms
    62 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    59 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    92 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    76 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    37 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT'ish: Michigan or Harvard?
    176 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    139 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    107 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • OT: Tigers/afternoon baseball Open Thread
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    92 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  • Michigan men's basketball receives high academic honor with APR Public Recognition Award

    good job gents

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Wednesday Presser Transcript 10-31-12: Brady Hoke

  • View
  • Revisions
By Heiko — October 31st, 2012 at 3:25 PM — 41 comments
Filed under:
  • 2012 minnesota
  • brady hoke
  • denard robinson
  • devin gardner quarterback possibility
  • injury reports
  • press conference recaps
  • quinton washington
  • raymon taylor
  • russell bellomy
  • actual reporting

Bowlettes [Updated for clarity]:

  • Devin Gardner has been taking most of the snaps at QB this week. Denard is obviously limited during his recovery, but I think it's curious that Bellomy has gotten only "a couple," regardless of whether he's the No. 1 or No. 2 backup. You'd expect Gardner and Bellomy to split reps equally and compete for the top backup spot. Plausible explanation: Bellomy is also limited by some undisclosed injury. (I don't know for sure, but it's an educated guess.) Either way, it sounds like Gardner is the bona fide starting QB until Denard recovers.
  • As of now, Denard is expected back for Saturday. Hoke says the final call on the quarterback situation will be made just before game time. If you have been paying attention to Michigan's football program over the last season and a half, however, you have surmised that Michigan is highly unlikely to make this kind of decision just before game time. That decision will probably be made very soon if it has not been made already.
  • If the distribution of QB snaps (see above) and Michigan's track record for saying things that turn out not to be true (e.g. previous injury reports and recovery projections, most notably during the Nebraska game, "Michigan says Denard will return to the game in the second half ...") are any indication, I would guess the probability that Denard plays on Saturday is around 50%, maybe less. In the absence of real information though, anything is possible; I'm not optimistic, but I never am. 
  • Amara Darboh and Joe Reynolds have gotten the reps at receiver that Gardner is now missing.

---------------------------

file

Opening remarks:

“Thought we came out yesterday and had a really good practice. That’s good to see. We didn’t play as well as we’d like to. I think everybody understands that, but I think we’ve moved forward and did a lot of things as a team very well. Competed very well. We’re pretty physical with each other, which is always a good thing. You don’t have guys feeling sorry for themselves, so the intensity level was good.”

Can you talk at all about the division of snaps at quarterback?

“You know, I couldn’t give you an exact number, to be honest with you. You know, Denard took some, Devin took a lot, and then Russell took a couple.”

Will Denard play on Saturday?

“We’re planning on it.”

Does he have any physical limitations?

“Not really. Not right now. He’s better. It’s not all the way cleared up yet, but it’s better.”

Did Denard take as many snaps as he could have next week?

“No. No. Part of that was to get more snaps for Devin. Devin hasn’t taken a ton of snaps throughout the process. He’s taken snaps, not a ton of them, so we wanted to get him back a little fresher.”

How did Devin look?

“Eh, he looked all right to me.”

Is that to get him prepared just for this week or is this for a longer term?

“This week. I think it’d be more of a this week thing.”

Is Denard having any discomfort?

“Not really. Not really. You know, he threw it. He took snaps under center and snaps from the gun.”

Have you decided on any protective equipment?

“I think him and Smitty probably talked about it. I don’t get into the equipment side of things.”

You said Devin got a majority of snaps and Russell only took a couple. If Denard were unable to play Saturday would Devin be the next guy in?

“Well, we’ll see. We’ll see how the week plays out.”

Is the main concern that Denard might fall on it again?

“That’s what it seems like. You know, if you can protect it, like anything, maybe it’ll help.”

MGoQuestion: Have any of the other backup quarterbacks taken snaps?

“…”

MGoClarification: Further down the depth chart, I mean. [Ed: This was probably not the best question in the world, but the rationale was to get an idea of how many reps Denard and Bellomy have been missing. The further down the depth chart this goes, the more worrisome the situation is. I don't think the following response shines light on the full situation, but I didn't expect it to.]

“Jack’s taken some, yeah. Jack does every week.”

So Russell is the backup?

“Yeah. It’s still -- we’ll see who competes the best. If we decide Denard isn’t good enough -- and we expect him to be good enough -- then we’ll make a decision.”

Is there a chance then that Denard can’t play?

“I don’t think so. We’re counting on him.”

When do you make that final decision?

“Probably Saturday -- what time’s the game, 11?”

So it could legitimately be a game time decision?

“Could be.”

Does it make a difference for which arm Denard tucks the ball under?

“I don’t think so.”

Does it make a difference in terms of offensive playcalling for each quarterback?

“Well, some of it changes a little bit. You always have a little bit of a plan, which we do weekly. We do full line against each other twice a week, and most of those plays are I-back, two-back set, two-tight end, hard-hitting stuff that we like to do, so we’ve been doing it the whole season.”

Are there things you can do in game planning to protect him a bit?

“I think you just turn him loose. That’s what he wants. He’s very competitive. Very -- competitive’s the best word, I guess.”

What as he had to do in terms of therapy? Is he taking cortisone shots or anything?

“I don’t know … ”

They don’t talk to you about it?

“Well, just ‘How is it?’ ”

Is Devin still taking snaps at wide receiver?

“Took a couple. Took a couple.”

Is he available at wide receiver this week?

“Mmhmm.”

Does taking reps at quarterback change what he can do at wide receiver?

“No. No. He’s far along enough within what route combinations and those things. He’d be okay.”

Who gets Devin’s reps at wide receiver that he’s vacating?

“Amara’s taking a few more. Joe Reynolds is taking a few more. Depends personnel groups, what you’re in.”

You and Al both talked about running the ball more in the red zone. Is that more of an emphasis this week?

“Well, you emphasize it a little more, but I don’t know if we’ve put more plays on the script, you know, because we do a pretty good job of getting the looks and what we feel the red zone defense is going to be and all those things.”

You are statistically the number one passing defense in the country. Do you bring that up at all?

“I don’t know. We don’t bring it up.”

Is it more difficult to gameplan the offense because Denard has special skills that Devin and Russell don’t necessarily have?

“Probably a little bit, but I don’t know if it’s something that Al hasn’t -- I know it isn’t -- been through before.”

How has Raymon Taylor progressed since he’s entered the starting lineup?

“Well I think he gets better each week. I think the one thing about Raymon, he’s pretty physical. He’s tough. I think he’s making progress.”

In what areas would you say?

“I think in support as much as anything. I think that’s an important part of what our corners -- if they’re going to crack safeties and all that, I think that’s part of it. Recognition is really key, and then your eye discipline that you have to have in playing that position.”

Is run support one of the more difficult skills for a corner to develop?

“I think they all want to be cover corners, so any time it comes to physicality, that’s always difficult.”

How would you characterize your offensive depth across the board.

“Oh I don’t know. I think we have a lot of kids that are working hard.”

Are there areas you feel like you have good enough depth?

“I, you know -- we have guys working hard everywhere.”

You obviously want to score touchdowns in the red zone --

“Yes. It’s a good idea.”

But when you have a guy like Brendan Gibbons, do you have to think twice about putting him out there?

“No. Not really. He’s, to me, he’s so steady from a mental point, you know. His confidence level, I think all that stuff is -- you see it in him. Practice, in games. When he does miss a kick, he self-evaluates pretty well and he knows what he did wrong. So if you ask me do I have confidence in him? Yeah. No doubt.”

That brunettes thing. Did you really say that to him?

“Come on. 18 to 23, let’s go … next question."

Is Brendan the guy for longer field goals now?

“I don’t know about that. Matt’s still got the stronger leg.”

Have you had a chance to look at the new NCAA policy changes?

“My thoughts are I have not looked at it to be honest with you. When I get a chance I’ll look at it. We hope to do things the right way to start with, but I’ll look at it some time.”

Jibreel said he’s fallen in love with his new position at DT. What have you seen from him?

“That’s probably right. I think he’s improved. I judge a lot by practice. I work with him and grade him every night and all that. I think he’s really playing a little more vertical. He’s using his strengths, which are his fundamentals and techniques, but his quickness that he has. He’s got some quick twitch going. I think you’ve got to really express that to him and verbalize, ‘Look, use your strengths that you have. You’re not going to be --’ His brother Larry plays at Indiana. He’s 300-some pounds. Larry’s a big ol’ cat. Well, Jibreel, he doesn’t have that, but what he does have is a quick twitch to him and an explosiveness. If he’ll be fundamentally sound with it, then he’ll be very good.”

Craig Roh says Quinton Washington can throw guys out of the way. Is that a rare quality?

“Well, Q’s a pretty strong young man. I think his confidence level has grown unbelievably. I think he’s really just finding out what he can do, to be honest with you. It’s fun. It’s fun to see him in development.”

Was that all that was with him? Just confidence?

“I think it’s part of it. I think with a lot of guys, it takes some confidence. Especially some guys who haven’t played a lot of snaps, and now you’re the starting nose tackle at Michigan replacing Mike Martin. There’s a confidence level there.”

Can you talk about special teams as a whole and how you feel about that group?

“You know, I think we’ve been a little more consistent than a year ago. We’re better in kickoff return. Punt return we’re better, I believe, statistically. And you can’t always believe the statistics, but we’ve got to be a little more consistent in punting the football, pooch and regular punts. I think both of those. Kickoff coverage is the thing we’ve been a little bit hot and cold. That’s one of the places that I think we need to be better. We have all defensive guys but two on that team, and the understanding that we try to convey to them is you’re helping your defense. I think we got a lot of guys a lot of snaps on special teams, which is a plus because they’re a lot of young guys.”

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October 31st, 2012 at 3:35 PM | Where is Rawls (Score:5 Normal)
swoosh
Joined: 08/16/2010
MGoPoints: 30

For the love of God would someone find out what the heck is up with Rawls?

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 9:53 PM | Please do this! (Score:-1 Flamebait)
Mike420GoBlue
Joined: 09/02/2012
MGoPoints: 297

I'm betting he has a boo-boo, or he's in the doghouse for some 18-23 stuff... Also-I'm sure coach knows what's going on with 133 more than I do, but not putting Devin in at QB in Cornville makes less sense to me the further it gets in the rear view. Is it me, or is it odd?

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 3:39 PM | I have to say that Hoke's (Score:-1 Normal)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

I have to say that Hoke's press conferences are about worthless.  He answers questions like he doesn't even know the real answers (which he obviously does but is not telling) and he only opens up when people ask about the D-Line.  He's obviously not the poker player that Carr was, not that I expect him to give any real information.  It'd just be nice to see some banter at those things rather than pulling teeth.

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 3:44 PM | I think it's about perfect. (Score:5 Normal)
DIABEETUS
DIABEETUS's picture
Joined: 09/29/2009
MGoPoints: 2321

I think it's about perfect. He doesn't give the media fuel to start anything controversial and he doesn't give away information to the opponents. (I think Denard will probably be out Saturday, based on Hoke's comments, but the way he says it forces Minnesota to prepare for his presence.)

Michigan: 903–315–36 (Best in NCAA)
vs Ohio State: 58-44-6
vs Notre Dame: 23-16-1
vs MSU:  68-32-5
vs B1G: 522-197-24
vs SEC:  20-8-1
vs PAC 12: 48-24-1
vs Big 12: 10-5-1<

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 3:50 PM | Oh no, I definitely agree (Score:1 Normal)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

Oh no, I definitely agree with you that he shouldn't actually answer most of those questions.  But at least go out there and pretend to play the game rather than saying "I don't know" constantly.  Its just style over substance, I guess, and a non-issue.  It'd just be nice to see it be more entertaining like Carr's pressers if Hoke's not going to actually answer questions a la Carr.

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 3:57 PM | I'm torn. More lively (Score:5 Normal)
DIABEETUS
DIABEETUS's picture
Joined: 09/29/2009
MGoPoints: 2321

I'm torn. More lively pressers can generate good press or bad press depending on the mood of the media or the team's record. I'd rather have pressers so boring that I only read the highlights, I think, because it provides no opportunity for the media to shine their most negative spotlights on the program like they did with Rodriguez.

Michigan: 903–315–36 (Best in NCAA)
vs Ohio State: 58-44-6
vs Notre Dame: 23-16-1
vs MSU:  68-32-5
vs B1G: 522-197-24
vs SEC:  20-8-1
vs PAC 12: 48-24-1
vs Big 12: 10-5-1<

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:00 PM | Thats an interesting (Score:1 Normal)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

Thats an interesting viewpoint.  Kind of like the "no good can come of it" line of thinking.  I think I tend to agree with you.  When I first started working one of the first things partners told us all was to not talk to the press because they'll twist what we say.  So I totally get not revealing anything but it'd just be fun to see some kind of interesting banter about not answering questions rather than "I don't know" responses.

 

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:04 PM | I agree with profit (Score:4 Normal)
trueblue262
trueblue262's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 2030

I understand the whole "fort schembechler" deal, but it would be nice to have some answers not be so "coach speak" , Mattison has a way of staying under the fort, but explaining things in more depth. Me like that!

GRwolverine73

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 8:04 PM | different questions for Mattison (Score:3 Normal)
Blue in Seattle
Blue in Seattle's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1590

Generally Mattison and Borges both get more schematic team performance based questions. Hoke gets all the "is this player hurt?", "why does this player play so poorly", "why did Lewan tell us to back off", most of which does fall in the category of "no good will come of this if actually answered."

Along those lines, I find it interesting how the commentary of Hoke's not wearing a headset goes.  Many see it as either he doesn't care, or he doesn't have the talent to be in on the play by play decisions.  But Hoke will put on the headset from time to time, and has said he does it when it's needed.  Overall I think Hoke doesn't because he's not a micro-manager, but he does pay attention to everything and he does make the command decisions.  Borges has stated that he just focuses on getting the next play in, and doesn't make the "punt or go for it" calls.  Also Hoke is just more defense oriented, and frequently is standing next to Mattison, so no need for a headset to know what the guy is thinking.

I know Borges is taking the heat now, but I think Hoke is the one who approves the weekly plan, and then Borges has to work within that framework.  They both stated there were going for very tight control of the QB in the MSU game.

So, if you disagree with anything happening in Michigan football, then disagree with Hoke, because he's the one driving everything as the top commander, but he doesn't have to be involved in the stream of communication to do it, and I think it's better to lead at the top when you maintain a view of the entire picture.

"That's all there is...there isn't anymore"

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 6:53 PM | Denard will probably be out Saturday, based on Hoke's comments (Score:5 Normal)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19380

How on earth do you come to that conclusion when Hoke's comment is:

Is there a chance then that Denard can’t play?

“I don’t think so. We’re counting on him.”


  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2012 at 9:10 AM | Sometimes it seems like he's (Score:1)
skitchbeatz
skitchbeatz's picture
Joined: 11/10/2009
MGoPoints: 66

Sometimes it seems like he's asked repeat questions in a different way and it seems like he doesn't appreciate it.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:04 PM | Why do I get the impression (Score:3 Normal)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6532

Why do I get the impression that Denard is not OK, and we won't see him in action for some time?

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:09 PM | I get the same feeling. I'd (Score:2 Normal)
DIABEETUS
DIABEETUS's picture
Joined: 09/29/2009
MGoPoints: 2321

I get the same feeling. I'd be quite surprised if he's back in this week, but I expect he'll be in against Northwestern.

Michigan: 903–315–36 (Best in NCAA)
vs Ohio State: 58-44-6
vs Notre Dame: 23-16-1
vs MSU:  68-32-5
vs B1G: 522-197-24
vs SEC:  20-8-1
vs PAC 12: 48-24-1
vs Big 12: 10-5-1<

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2012 at 9:42 AM | Similar thoughts.... (Score:2)
davidhm
Joined: 07/21/2010
MGoPoints: 226

... But I think we could see him as running only, if he can't get good enough grip to pass. Gardner takes snaps, Denard in as a decoy/jet sweep threat in the slot/wideout or backfield.



He is too talented to not use if he can still run but just not pass.



My .02

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:06 PM | The reporters for the most (Score:4 Normal)
bornintheArbor
bornintheArbor's picture
Joined: 02/11/2012
MGoPoints: 304

ETA: Sorry, I meant this to be a reply to profitgoblue's post.

The reporters for the most part, ask him either totally worthless questions, baiting questions, or for more information than will ever come out of Fort Schembechler. For example:

That brunettes thing. Did you really say that to him?

After reading/watching all of his pressers, you come to realize that Hoke will never give you an answer about: injuries, depth, scheme, gameplan, personal questions about the players.  He also doesn't take bait nor does he throw people under the bus.  So what you're basically left with is something positive about someone or "I don't know", which when translated means "I do know, but you've got to be on something to think I'm actually going to tell you."

He usually does have a few funny one-liners. Basically the only reason I bother to read Hoke pressers.  That and the possibility that one day he'll be hopped up on cold medicine and answer everything honestly.

Flickr

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:28 PM | Definitely true.  I'd say 75% (Score:2 Normal)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

Definitely true.  I'd say 75% of the questions are stupid and deserve the answers he gives.  I think its the "I don't know" responses that bother me.  I'd rather see some interesting one-liners instead.

 

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2012 at 12:15 AM | The problem is that (Score:2 Normal)
Ron Utah
Joined: 02/28/2012
MGoPoints: 608

The problem is that one-liners can become headlines and sarcasm and wit can be turned into a divisive story about a program.  Not worth it, as long as there are Drew Sharp types out there.

Thank you, Coach Hoke, for bringing Michigan back.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:08 PM | You may be onto something (Score:5 Normal)
raptor
raptor's picture
Joined: 04/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1553

You may be onto something with Bellomy. I sit near him, Kerridge, and BWC in one of my classes and I heard Will ask him if he was ok today. Bellomy responded with something like, "yeah, I'll be alright." Now this could very easily be related to anything, but I thought I'd share it anyway.

/ISwearI'mNotAStalker

EEB c/o 2014

www.amassingmiles.blogspot.com

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:44 PM | If I was a betting man they (Score:3 Normal)
ItsSeaboltSon
ItsSeaboltSon's picture
Joined: 11/12/2011
MGoPoints: 112

If I was a betting man they went over film and BWC was asking him if he was ok because he very possibly got torn up by coaches for some of the reads he made.

"When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing."
-Bo

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:51 PM | With the amount of criticism aimed at him (Score:5 Normal)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2689

I would imagine his teammates keep checking on him to make sure he's not upset. Of course BWC could have been asking if he was OK on problem 4 or something.

My take is this: Denard and then Russell have been getting the bulk of the reps in recent weeks. Devin needs more reps early in the week to get back up to speed. Who get snaps in practice tomorrow is more telling.

I don't see anything that says Denard won't be playing, and if he is taking snaps in practice I expect him to play. I think they are just working up Devin in case.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 4:37 PM | Re: Devin's reps (Score:5 Normal)
Voltron Blue
Voltron Blue's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 422

By giving DG meaningfully more snaps than Bellomy, could it be that they are just "catching up" Devin since he hasn't been at the position for a while?  

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 7:18 PM | Sounds right . . . (Score:0 Flamebait)
InterM
InterM's picture
Joined: 01/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1116

except for the fact that Borges specifically said at his presser two days ago that Gardner had taken snaps at QB "probably . . . a couple of weeks" ago.  But keep feeding us that "insider" info, by all means.

Not to say, of course, that Gardner wouldn't need some "catch-up" reps at QB, with his time spent at receiver.  But your premise that he's been put completely on the shelf at QB since fall camp was specifically refuted by Borges just a couple of days ago.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 5:12 PM | I always thought Devin had a (Score:2)
robmorren2
robmorren2's picture
Joined: 06/04/2011
MGoPoints: 1568

I always thought Devin had a bigger upside than Denard. Just being 6'5" and being able to see the field is helpful. He can obviously run, and I thought he has looked pretty good at QB when he's played. He seems to break the pocket & scramble more than Denard, but to be honest I wish Denard would scramble MUCH more. Sometimes I think the coaches hypnotized Denard into thinking there is an invisible fence around the pocket. If its 3rd & 3 and you see the sticks and no defenders, then GO.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 5:27 PM | Agreed (Score:1)
San Diego Mick
Joined: 05/11/2011
MGoPoints: 1573

I was hoping Denard would have a Troy Smith type senior season, that guy was great at scrambling on a planned pass play, Denard has lacked that ability or wanting to many times that it drives me nuts.

 

He just seems hesitant too often when he really doesn't need to be with how athletic and fast he is, thinking too much.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 6:10 PM | Troy Smith was exactly who I (Score:2 Normal)
robmorren2
robmorren2's picture
Joined: 06/04/2011
MGoPoints: 1568

Troy Smith was exactly who I had in mind. He just kept the chains moving with his feet, and hit the big plays through the air. I think Denard looks like he's been over-coached or just had too much change. I start feeling uncomfortable when he's in the pocket looking around. I'm guessing at one point in his career his instincts were to just take off after a few seconds. Then he was coached to stay in the pocket and go through his reads. Now we're left with a super athletic guy who is over thinking things and throwing passes that he isn't sure about, just because he thinks he has to stay in the pocket. I'm not even sure he can see much of the field from the pocket, given his height. He would be much more of a headache for defenses if he scrambled more. You're doing other teams a favor by keeping Denard in the pocket. I know I wish Tressel would have kept Smith in the pocket. If he had, we'd probably have gone on to play Florida for the NC.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 7:33 PM | Never (Score:2 Normal)
Reader71
Reader71's picture
Joined: 08/30/2009
MGoPoints: 317

Denard has never, at any point in his playing Michigan career, been a good scrambler. Or any sort of scrambler at all. He's always been a great runner on designed plays, but never a scrambler.

Strange.

But I do share your negative view on him in the pocket. My biggest complaint about Borges is the almost total lack of three-step drop quick throws. This would hide Denard's tendency of making terrible reads by basically eliminating them.

For the record, I never saw Denard as Troy Smith. Much more of a Pat White runner/short-tosser.

"In war, resolution; in defeat, defiance; in victory, magnanimity." 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 7:51 PM | I was referring mostly to (Score:2)
robmorren2
robmorren2's picture
Joined: 06/04/2011
MGoPoints: 1568

I was referring mostly to Troy Smith's ability to move the chains with his feet when the receivers weren't open, or he saw a lane in the pass rush. I do remember Denard making a lot of good, quick throws in RR's system. Maybe we just don't have the receivers we had then. I've always wondered why we could throw some slants behind the blitzing LB's, or hitches to the receivers in soft coverage. It seems like everyone we play puts their corners 7+ yards off the LOS, and we don't exploit it. Hard to blame the receivers for not getting open when their routes are downfield and the corners have a 7 yard headstart. The thing I miss most about RR's offense was his ability to stretch the field horizontally with the passing game to open lanes up in the middle for #16.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2012 at 2:47 AM | I think his best pocket (Score:1)
WolverineFanatic6
WolverineFanatic6's picture
Joined: 10/29/2012
MGoPoints: 415

I think his best pocket scrambling game may have been Nebraska last year.

There is god, there is family, and then there is MICHIGAN FOOTBALL

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 5:14 PM | Wow, Hoke seems annoyed (Score:3 Normal)
Tyang
Joined: 09/14/2011
MGoPoints: 390

Wow, Hoke seems annoyed

John 14:6 - Jesus said " I am the way the truth and the life, no one comes to the father except through me."

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 5:26 PM | Give Devin a chance. (Score:3 Normal)
nrock_12
nrock_12's picture
Joined: 05/17/2011
MGoPoints: 23

I think the only significant time he hasreceived is against Illinois last year IIRC.  I thought he looked pretty good.  I realize it was against Illinois but...Just think if he were allowed to get into the flow he good impress

Did you have to rip your pants off when he made that kick?

 

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 7:25 PM | Huh? (Score:0 Overrated)
Coldwater
Joined: 12/14/2008
MGoPoints: 768

If Hoke doesn't know about the offensive depth, as he says he doesn't, then who does?



But at least he has guys working hard



  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 9:03 PM | Are you serious? (Score:2)
Two Hearted Ale
Two Hearted Ale's picture
Joined: 06/10/2011
MGoPoints: 447

He clearly didn't want to answer the question. The answer is probably "we are two injuries away from being Colorado," but Hoke is a positive motivation kind of guy (as opposed to say, Nick Saban or Brian Kelly) so he gives an answer no newspaper will print and moves to the next question.

Hoke doesn't give out a lot of information at his press conferences but he isn't an ass so he still gets good press. I like his approach but I'm not a writer with a deadline.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 8:27 PM | This is a real, honest (Score:1)
Gobgoblue
Joined: 07/07/2012
MGoPoints: 794

This is a real, honest question:

Is it okay for coaches to completely lie about things (not NCAA sanction style or anything really huge) like injury, strategy, personel updates, etc.?

Just thinking: Denard isn't fit to practice this week and definitely won't start on Saturday.  Can Hoke say "Yeah, he's probably starting, coming along great, I expect him to start."

Honestly, I don't mind if he is being deceptive.  I think it is a wise decision not to share many things with the media, I am purely wondering if this is standard practice or another Hoke-ism.

 

Thank you in advance!

I love Greg Mattison

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 9:36 PM | Compared with how the rest of (Score:5 Normal)
Heiko
Heiko's picture
Joined: 08/19/2011
MGoPoints: 7911

Compared with how the rest of college football handles things, Michigan's current approach is much more iron curtain than glasnost, but I don't think there's anything wrong with it. Hoke's media policy is less about "lying" than it is about "concealing." As someone who is genuinely curious about how Michigan football is coached and played, I'm not a huge fan of this approach, but like you I don't necessarily disagree with it.

I'm going to write a post at the end of the regular season about Michigan's media policy in which I'll address this as well as other frequently asked questions from you guys.

@Heiko25

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 10:05 PM | My prediction is that we'll see Denard Saturday (Score:1)
uncleFred
Joined: 10/14/2011
MGoPoints: 167

That said, I can imagine a situation where he doesn't start. Minnesota isn't exactly a power house, and we could conceiveably beat them without Denard. So if Denard is at say 75%, I can imagine a strategy where they rely on the defense to win a close game with either Bellomy and/or Devin at QB. If that doesn't work then put Denard in long enough to get control and sit him again. Why expose him to risk while he's healing if it is not necessary.

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 11:22 PM | They can't all be winners Heiko. (Score:2)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 39217

Still a better question than-

"You are statistically the number one passing defense in the country. Do you bring that up at all?"

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
October 31st, 2012 at 11:24 PM | Personally excited to see Darboh possibly get a shot (Score:1)
jdib
Joined: 10/31/2012
MGoPoints: 46

I  know he's only a freshman but it will give us a small sneak preview of what we can see developing for the future.. After all, who expected Funchess to make waves like he did early on without the lack of TE depth?

#Team 134

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2012 at 12:07 AM | If Devin comes in and plays (Score:2)
robmorren2
robmorren2's picture
Joined: 06/04/2011
MGoPoints: 1568

If Devin comes in and plays amazing at QB, that could make things very interesting down the stretch. The ol' backup QB prophecy.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2012 at 6:00 PM | I'm kind of surprised that (Score:1)
jdib
Joined: 10/31/2012
MGoPoints: 46

Devin wasn't taking a decent amount of snaps anyways. Last i knew he was adamant about QB being his primary position and WR being temporary.  If that's the case, he had to be chomping at the bit when Denard went down to get in there..

#Team 134

  • Login or register to post comments
November 2nd, 2012 at 10:04 PM | The only thing I miss about RR (Score:1)
TXmaizeNblue
Joined: 09/22/2010
MGoPoints: 930

is how candid he was with the press. Brady is way too Carr.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.