Unverified Voracity Will Fight You In An IKEA Parking Lot Comment Count

Brian

This man's name is Vince Staples. The younglings on the staff inform me he is a rappist of some renown, and he digs Harbaugh, in NSFW style:

This will help his Q score, as one has. Vince Staples will get us in living rooms across the nation because he is going to fight Urban Meyer in an IKEA parking lot. As one does.

Rolovich is impressed. Hawaii's deadpan coach with some high praise:

"I would be much more afraid to play Michigan again than Florida, the '08 team," Rolovich said. The 2008 Florida team went on to win the national title behind one of the nation's best defenses. "The Gators were good. They won the national title, but there wasn't a weakness on the field (at Michigan). Their coaches deserve credit. Their players deserve credit. That's some big-time football right there."

He said this about a Michigan team that was without two potential first-round draft picks.

The Ringer is hitting its stride. See this excellent article from Katie Baker on the tao of Harbagh…

It’s easy to dismiss Harbaugh as a showman, and there’s no doubt he has a great sense of the impact some of his statements, tweets, or music videos will have. Still, a large part of how he comes across is simply who he is. Some of it is the Harbaugh lineage, though much of it is just him.

“I wouldn’t have wanted to be in that family,” laughed Michigan defensive line coach Greg Mattison, who in his career has now worked with Harbaughs Jack, John, Jim, and Jay. “When you go to play a pickup basketball game, I got a feeling you gotta be pretty physical.” Indeed, when Harbaugh first met his wife’s large family, he wound up complaining about her sister Amy’s officiating in a 3-on-3 basketball game.

But in contrast to the more reticent John, or the more affable Jack, or the more soft-spoken Jay (whose Twitter bio does include the words: “Relish a good nepotism tweet”; like father, like son), Jim Harbaugh can never just stay put. He points out that he’s the only member of his family taller than 6 feet and ascribes it to a childhood spent downing whole milk and praying for height. Sometimes, it’s overwhelming to think about what it must be like to live inside his brain.

…and the next section, which is our old friend Smart Football. It's not quite Grantland yet but it's not bad except for all the articles in which NFL coaches complain about spread offenses.

They always catch up. Fascinating article by Chris Brown on the decline and fall of Chip Kelly in Philadelphia, which wasn't just based on the imperious personnel decisions and general Jed Yorkery of his term there. Kelly went away from running quarterbacks because the NFL has a salary cap and very few plausible starters at that spot, and teams caught up to his tempo.

Then he started tipping all of his plays and acting like Brady Hoke afterward:

Philadelphia’s opponents seemed to know what was coming throughout 2015, even when he tried to mix in other plays. For example, as long as he’s been in the NFL, whenever Kelly’s opponents have geared up to stop his inside zone play, he has typically gone to his counterpunch, a sweep play in which the guard and center both pull to lead the way. But, tipped off by the alignment of the running back and the tight end, defenses were ready for that, too.

It’s one thing for a team to miss a block or for the play caller to guess wrong, but these are abysmal, totally hopeless plays rarely seen in the NFL. Yet Kelly repeatedly deflected criticism that his offense had become predictable by saying that the issue came down to only one thing: “We need to execute.”

If you stay static, the hyenas download you and take over. Michigan's offense has to move as much as anyone else's—one reason I think the fullback traps might go on vacation this season. They haven't shown anything new so far and won't this weekend. Starting with Colorado the wrinkles will start to work their way in.

Hopefully you run into Scarlett Johansson. Zack Shaw on Gardner and Gallon's Japanese adventure:

Wary of the likelihood tryouts and camp invites actually led to something, Gardner’s agent pitched a new idea to Gardner this spring: Go be a star … in Japan.

“He said he had an interesting idea after someone had given him a call about it,” Gardner said. “It was (pitched as) a chance to see a new place, get back on the field again for some time because I hadn’t played in a while.”

The next day, Gardner was on a flight to Japan. He signed with the Nojima Sagamihara Rise a couple weeks after that, and was asked if he knew of any American players that would also be interested. Though the X-league is competitive, players from the United States typically thrive against less-experienced competition, to the point in which the league put a cap on four Americans per team.

So Gardner had to pick his receiving target wisely, but it wasn’t a hard call to make.

Large profile of interest. We took their Kaiju, only fair we give back.

Wait, what? Apparently basketball coaches are bracing for a transfer free for all?

While the overwhelming belief of the college basketball coaching fraternity is that players being able to transfer without having to sit a year is imminent, NCAA chief legal officer Donald Remy told ESPN he isn't ready to go that far.

"I am confident we will be victorious in these cases," Remy told ESPN. "If they win, we wouldn't be able to have the rule anymore.'

I'm very much on the pay-these-men-their money side of things but that sucks. I'd like to draw a line somewhere more conservative than "anything at all that can be construed as a benefit for athletes is what we should do," and both transfer restrictions and the sit-out year are things that I think are reasonable. (To be precise: I don't think teams should be able to restrict players from teams not on their schedule the next year.)

We're already seeing a ton of guys bail on their mid-major teams to go play a year or two at bigger schools, and this would only accelerate that. A separate article by Jeff Goodman goes over the parlous state of incentives in college basketball:

Another mid-major head coach, who lost one of his best players to a BCS school this past offseason, told ESPN he would be "slowing down the graduating process" for his players in order to ensure that he doesn't lose another to the high-major ranks.

When asked to elaborate specifically on what "slowing down the graduating process" would entail, he said instead of enrolling a player into a pair of summer school classes in two sessions, they might not have that particular player take summer school at all -- or take just one class per session. Another prevailing thought is to put players in just the minimum 12 hours of classes each semester.

"What kid is going to argue and want to take more classes?" one mid-major coach said. "There aren't many."

That's bad for the sport since it paves an even easier path to the top for the top schools and reduces the number of upsets that make the NCAA tournament so fun:

A year ago, Cleveland State head coach Gary Waters could have trotted out a starting lineup that included Trey Lewis and Anton Grady. Instead, Lewis spent the season at Louisville. Grady took a grad transfer year at Wichita State and Waters went just 9-23 and will have some pressure on him this season instead of working on a contract extension. Both Lewis and Grady are playing professionally overseas this season.

There's a totally legit competitive balance argument here. And you can't even make that academic argument that is offered up by defenders of the grad transfer rule. Switching schools in the middle of a degree will make things tougher. (Unless you can't do algebra and transfer to MSU.)

If we could just admit that basketball players are majoring in basketball and that this is completely fine a lot of balderdash could be excised from these discussions. Basketball players transfer because of basketball. Therefore it is proper to consider the effects on basketball these transfer rules have.

Unintended consequences. NFL players and owners conspire against players yet to join the league by agreeing to a CBA that pays rookies vastly below market value for four or even five years. Artificially under-valued players thus pile up across the league, forcing veterans out. Coaches then bitch about how young everyone is. If only someone could have seen this coming.

Also in that article, it runs in the family. John Harbaugh might not be the craziest Harbaugh, but he's a Harbaugh:

On March 18, 23-year-old Ravens cornerback Tray Walker died from injuries suffered in a motorbike accident in Miami one day prior. Eight days later, at the funeral in a Baptist church in south Florida, Harbaugh approached the head of the NFL Players Association, DeMaurice Smith. “I said the rules have to be adjusted for first-, second-, third-year guys,” Harbaugh said, referring to rules that limit offseason contact between players and coaches. “The rules are built for guys who have families and need time off.”

Smith said the interaction was brief. “One, we were at a funeral,” he said.

Knives out for Les Miles. This Bleacher Report article features several former LSU players expressing their concern with the direction of the program in uncommonly blunt and clear terms:

"There were players running free, and it was from experienced players not adjusting to a blitz," said Hester. "It wasn't a situation where they were doing something tricky or mugging up in the A-gaps and bringing somebody from somewhere else. It was literally linebackers blitzing from depth when the ball was snapped. Those are things that you expect experienced guys to pick up.

Already in the meat of the season there's not a lot that LSU can do, and the bet here is that with Tom Herrmann out there, Miles won't survive any forthcoming misstep. One dollar says LSU gets blown out by Alabama and there's an interim the next day.

Etc.: Remy Hamilton, named after cognac. Identifying pass defenses is damn near impossible in many cases, contra a couple people who are absolutely certain about things they shouldn't be certain about in UFR comments. A highly timely Hawaii recap. Also another one from Holdin' the Rope. Phelps's son will go to Michigan. Luck can read the standings.

Comments

Chris S

September 9th, 2016 at 9:55 PM ^

I intended to sit down and read the entire post, but the first sentence made me laugh so hard I just figured I'd call it a night. Great end to my day.

I'm a major hip hop fan, and for some reason every time you call a rapper a "rappist" i just laugh really hard.

Well done again, sir.

Pepto Bismol

September 9th, 2016 at 4:29 PM ^

I know Brian is an advocate of paying players and I read the piece here about "majoring in basketball".

Would you be okay with that in High School?  Or maybe even once a "student" reaches 16 or whatever the legal drop-out age may be in a given state, they can just elect to skip the learnin' from that point forward and try to focus on making it to college as an athlete?

 

I'm against paying players*, but I'm not trying to have a giant debate about it.  Just genuinely curious if people that hold that opinion hold it all the way. 

 

(*I'd be okay with a defined cut of TV contracts)

AFMich

September 9th, 2016 at 4:42 PM ^

We are now seeing the fruits of that line of thinking come to bear. I get that there is a ton of money involved in the whole enterprise, and concede athletes should get full cost reimbursement. Even more, I wouldn't be apposed to a small stipend that is equal to 16 hrs a week of working in the campus book store, or the like.

But once you start outright payment, based on value, or allow majoring in a sport, the whole academic mission of universities comes into question. No one can play a sport as long as one can use a real education. Emphasizing education is what the mission should be, and what I hope is the focus going forward.

MI Expat NY

September 9th, 2016 at 5:46 PM ^

Fifteen years ago, I would certainly have been against letting certain high schoolers "major in basketball."  But now a days, isn't it already what's happening?  How many top basketball players end their careers playing for the high school they'd go to simply based on where they live (public school or private school of choice for reasons other than basketball)?  Seems like very few.  Now they're all transferring to some "school" that mainly exists as a basketball power. 

In Europe, athletes get paid to play as teenagers all the time.  I'm not sure it's the wrong route.  The difference seems to be that in the U.S. we have the tradition of tying youth athletics to the schools.  But, as the connection between school, athlete, and community becomes more and more tenuous, I'm less and less inclined to argue that kids with real athletic talent shouldn't be in professional development programs and getting paid to compete against other similar teen athletes.    

OwenGoBlue

September 9th, 2016 at 6:33 PM ^

We can have both! The larger system should compensate players for their value and encourage education, not just one or the other. On high school students specifically: Olympic gymnasts end up with sponsorship deals before licenses and that seems to go just fine. Why can't the same be managed with other high schoolers?

AFMich

September 9th, 2016 at 9:12 PM ^

But I don't believe you can truly have both without divorcing universities and pay-to-play sports. Sports are supposed to be the supplement to academics to create a well rounded Renaissance man. As soon as you pay for one but not the other, you elevate athletics over academics.

I think we do need a minor league system for basketball and football. But as long as schools are the de facto minor leagues for those sports the focus should remain on academics. And the only way I see that happening is to maintain some semblance of amateurism. I also believe a university fails (and many do; looking at you UNC) when it elevates athletic achievement over academic credibility.

MichiganTeacher

September 9th, 2016 at 8:46 PM ^

As a high school teacher and coach, I absolutely support HS players making as much money off their sport as they can. The only arguments against it all boil down to someone thinking they know best about how kids should be raised. I think we would all be better served if people stopped trying to make rules for other people's children.

ak47

September 9th, 2016 at 4:35 PM ^

Is it not a competitive balance issue when schools can hire coaches from mid major programs?  Why should kids have to sit out a year for competitive balance reasons when coaches don't?  Compettive balance is a bullshit reason to restrict a persons ability to get themselvs into the best possible situation.  And for players that transfer up to a school there are also the players that transfer out of Kentucky and duke looking for playing time.  Basketball programs are a zero sum game because of roster size limits.

charblue.

September 9th, 2016 at 4:41 PM ^

about the consequences of bad negotiation and de-emphasis on paying young talent across the board in any professional league. But in the NFL, where careers are short because the speed and violence of the game continually conspire to shorten them, the players association which opted to accept a tiered payment system for entry-level players to ensure that veterans would get their just due in time, does nothing to improve game longevity for players across the board, even as we see players continually pursuing early entry into a professional system that only rewards those who can avoid injury and the pitfalls of working through stuff.

And the thing is, it's not like their association speaks for the collective interest when the interests of rookies and veterans are separated and all are subject to the vagaries of the game which diminish value and give accountants and adjusters the upper hand in determining your future and relative value.

Football at the pro level is the hunger games personified.

PopeLando

September 9th, 2016 at 4:48 PM ^

I read the Inside the Pylon article...and once again feel like a complete nincompoop when it comes to the finer points of defense... No wonder Rex Grossman was always like, "fuck it, I'm going deep." Shit's complicated.

Richard75

September 9th, 2016 at 5:08 PM ^

The Chip Kelly stuff is interesting. It might just be difficult for spread-to-run attacks to win big in the NFL. There's a lot working against you:
--longer season and bigger/faster opponents make it harder to keep QB healthy
--limited supply of starter-quality QBs and need to spend cap money elsewhere
--because of the above two QB concerns, you run the QB less, thereby ruining your numbers advantage
--illegal man downfield is 1 yard not 3, and it's actually called, making constraint plays more difficult

All of these issues make for an environment where it's much harder to be deceptive in the run game. What you need is a tank like Cam Newton who can throw from the pocket, run a dozen times a game and take the hits, but he's a rather limited-edition model.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

outwest

September 9th, 2016 at 6:27 PM ^

The big topic around here is why has University of Oregon seemingly “struggled” the last few years.  The consensus seems to be that every team runs some version of the spread so it is not unique anymore.  Teams do not need to change the entire game plan to face Oregon because they see the spread/ tempo every week.  Teams are better conditioned, the spread is not new, and it is not unique to just one team anymore. 

HarbaughsLeftElbow

September 9th, 2016 at 6:48 PM ^

One thing I've always wondered is if your supply is really that limited if you are truly utilizing the QBs legs. I wonder if you could rotate through RG3 (until he gets hurt), Kaepernick (until injury), Vick (until injury), Pryor as a QB (until injury), Pat White (until injury), without spending that much cap space. You wouldn't need the same passing performance if you kept using the running threat with all of these guys. 

StateStreetApostle

September 9th, 2016 at 5:11 PM ^

Besides Lewis and Grady, don't forget that Bryn Forbes already left CSU for Staee...

Come to think of it, that team could have made people forget about Kenny The Mouse!

(Yes, I'm old. And still not over Brandon Wood leaving for MSU either.)



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

AnnaCPrice

September 10th, 2016 at 5:58 PM ^

I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website. ►►► www.NetNote70.com