Home
TAKE IT LIKE A MAN

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • BlogPoll
    • Join
    • Blogpoll Editorial Guy @ CBS
    • Votes By Blog
    • Votes By Team
    • Voting Philosophy
    • Links For Voters
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2011 Recruiting Board
    • 2010 Recruiting Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
Home

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • Brian @ TSB
  • Brian @ Bucknuts
  • Hail To The Victors 2009
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • @MGoBlog (Twitter)
  • mgo.licio.us
  • RSS Feed
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]

sportsbook

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Bo Schemblogger
  • Brice's Recruiting
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • In Rod We Trust
  • MGoBlue Football
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Football Recruiting
  • Michigan Football Saturdays
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • Michigan Sports Center
  • Ron Bellamy's Underachieving All Stars
  • Spawn of M Zone
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Game
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Varsity Blue
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinitalk
    • Illini Basketball Fans
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Hoosier Report
    • Behind The Plate
    • Cannot Falter
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • Buck Bravo
    • TNABACG
  • Northwestern
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • ND Choo Choo
    • The House Rock Built
    • The Blue-Gray Sky
  • Ohio State
    • We Will Always Have Tempe
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Jim Tressel's Head
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • March 2010 (34)
  • February 2010 (70)
  • January 2010 (76)
  • December 2009 (63)
  • November 2009 (96)
  • October 2009 (107)
  • September 2009 (132)
  • August 2009 (94)
  • July 2009 (56)
  • June 2009 (42)
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Visit Sports-Gambling.com, your online Gambling Sports site for live Super Bowl Odds , NFL Odds, College Football Bowls games odds and much more!

Expert Sports Handicappers

Click here to check out some of the best online casino sites & US casinos online!

CFB Betting Odds

Get free Michigan Wolverine college football predictions and NCAA basketball picks.

For the best football picks and online football betting information visit BangTheBook.com

Get great Michigan college football tickets for an amazing price from OnlineSeats. We have every team and every sport, including Tigers tickets.



Sports Betting Lines: Betting on All Sports: Real sports betting action. Try LinesMaker.com for free sports betting lines updated in real time. Massive free sports bets and cash bonuses for new members. Sign up for free!

Sports Betting Lines: Preview all sports betting lines and odds at LinesMaker! We have live betting odds and lines for all sports events. It doesn't get any better than this: Sportsbetting3.com offers the best college football betting and pro football NFL betting. Like casino games? Discover the best online casinos at the top casino site, Plazacasinos.com

Check out the Penn State preview. Get free College Football Picks from the National Sports Advisors.

Get free College basketball Picks and basketball odds at Doc's Sports.

Have a fantasy league? You can find quality Trophies for every sport at Lamb Awards.

Fooball Betting from Bet Vega.

TheSeats.com has tickets for all your NCAA football favorites like the Michigan Wolverines, Nebraska Cornhuskers, Wisconsin Badgers, Rose Bowl tickets and many more!

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Big Ten Recruiting Class Rankings 3-15
    Tim - 6 min ago
  • Lax: Weekend Wrapup... AND MORE!
    Tim - 8 hours ago
  • Chris Rock - Post Visit Update
    TomVH - 23 hours ago
  • Can The Heat Be Beat?
    Elno Lewis - 1 day ago
  • Bubble News: Big 10 Makes A Move For More Bids
    jamiemac - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 325
  • ››
more
  • Night of Champions Attendees
    TomVH - 7,225 views
  • Chris Rock - Post Visit Update
    TomVH - 3,849 views
  • UConn, last year and this year
    chunkums - 2,525 views
  • Defensive Front Basics and the Evolution of Under
    steve sharik - 2,211 views
  • Big Ten Expansion and What it Means for Notre Dame and the Big East
    Seth9 - 1,952 views
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more
  • Poll:Favorite Michigan Football Road Uniform
    steve sharik - 70 comments
  • Big Ten Expansion and What it Means for Notre Dame and the Big East
    Seth9 - 52 comments
  • UConn, last year and this year
    chunkums - 50 comments
  • Night of Champions Attendees
    TomVH - 43 comments
  • Defensive Front Basics and the Evolution of Under
    steve sharik - 30 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Tom
  • Insider Info
    0 replies
  • Lickliter done. Resemblance to UM Football coaching situation?
    1 replies
  • Help! Need a NCAA BB Team
    9 replies
  • '92 Michigan versus '10 Kentucky
    16 replies
  • Should Michigan be in the NIT?
    18 replies
  • Lane Kiffin is a Pretty Girl
    7 replies
  • OT And Geeky
    20 replies
  • OT - Improving Ambidextry
    25 replies
  • Is a foreign language requried for engineering at Michigan?
    46 replies
  • OT- How do you do your bracket?
    28 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 27
  • ››
  • Is a foreign language requried for engineering at Michigan?
    46 replies
  • Lickliter done. Resemblance to UM Football coaching situation?
    1 replies
  • Insider Info
    0 replies
  • OT And Geeky
    20 replies
  • '92 Michigan versus '10 Kentucky
    16 replies
  • Night of Champions results
    43 replies
  • Lane Kiffin is a Pretty Girl
    7 replies
  • OT - Improving Ambidextry
    25 replies
  • "And thanks Demar, I'll see you here shortly. No need to bring your crowbar."
    60 replies
  • Help! Need a NCAA BB Team
    9 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 27
  • ››
  • Michigan Hating God
    185 replies
  • stop freaking out about the buzzer beater loss, please
    143 replies
  • OT: Were you a ladies man in high school?
    143 replies
  • OT: Bulldoze 1/4 of Detroit?
    112 replies
  • GAME TIME BABY
    111 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 53
  • ››
  • "And thanks Demar, I'll see you here shortly. No need to bring your crowbar."
    60 replies
  • TomVH: Trai Turner Update
    38 replies
  • Nike Indoor Nationals (Track) - Delonte Hollowell
    9 replies
  • Night of Champions: Who made the trip?
    3 replies
  • OT - Hangover Cures
    107 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

Football betting

If you're looking for online football betting, look no further! Party Bets is safe, fast and secure.

NCAA basketball odds

Get live NCAA basketball odds from multiple sportsbooks at OddsShark.com

Unverified Voracity Wants To Kiss You, Sam

By Brian — February 26th, 2009 at 2:47 PM — 26 comments
Filed under:
  • hobbits
  • rumormongering is what the internets are for
  • stat wonk
  • steven threet
  • unverified voracity

Do or die. So, good news about the game tonight: MGoBlog will not be hosting a liveblog. Therefore, Michigan has a chance. Bad news: gimpy Purdue star Robbie Hummel is a go.

I've laid it out before and I believe the equation still holds: Michigan needs two of its final three games and then one win in the Big Ten Tournament to feel pretty good about getting in. Gacking it up against Iowa has cut their margin of error down greatly, and I'm expecting the NIT. But if homoerotic hobbits on a trek into Mordor teach us anything, it's that short pasty white guys with curly hair can do anything. So rock on.

Fuller previews can be found at UMHoops and Hammer and Rails; Purdue is favored by 2.5. Hopefully no one gets ejected for an inadvertent elbow this time.

What with the Threet. While on John Bacon's show on WTKA I mentioned what I had heard about Threet's decision to transfer. MVictors recaps:

One of Cook’s insiders revealed that Rodriguez met with Steve Threet and basically told him he’s decided frosh Tate Forcier is getting all the snaps this spring. Thus Threet bolted. If this was posted on mgoblog I missed it (and maybe the info wasn’t solid enough to post).

Some clarification: I've heard this from a few different people, all of them on the Threet side of things. I didn't post anything on it because it didn't seem quite strong enough, but when I was LIVE it just sort of came out and there it is. The details are still fuzzy but Threet clearly felt he was not going to have a full opportunity to win the job and, not wanting to be David Cone, decided to go elsewhere.

It's a risk on Rodriguez's part to be sure; the upside is that Forcier gets all the snaps and will be as ready as he possibly can be when Western Michigan rolls into town. Which may not be particularly ready, but he's all we've got.

Risk and expectation and so forth and so on. Braves and Birds notes a Smart Football post on the appropriate amount of risk to take in a football game. This has long been a topic of interest here, too, as it was my longstanding opinion that Lloyd Carr's answer to that ("almost none unless we're playing Ohio State") was way too conservative. However, conservative strategy has its place. Smart Football:

Is it always "optimal" to set your strategy to maximize points scored?

In the NFL -- which is what Brian [not me, this Brian –ed] focuses on -- this is likely true and the assumption holds. NFL teams are almost all competitive with each other, and even the worst teams can beat the best in a given game. So any reduction in expected points is likely to hurt a team's chances of winning because they need to maximize that out to get wins.

But is that true in college? Or in high school? Think about when Florida plays the Citadel. The Gators have a massive talent advantage compared with the Bulldogs. As a result, what is the only way they can lose? You guessed it: by blowing it. They can really only lose if they go out and throw lots of interceptions, gamble on defense and give up unnecessary big plays, or just stink it up.

My theory as to why Michigan got so stagnant under Carr was an extension of the Florida-vs-Citadel mindset. Bo Schembechler pretty much believed everyone was the Citadel—or, more likely, never gave a whole lot of thought about the appropriate level of risk in a football game past the Woody Hayes maxim that "only three things can happen when you throw the football and two of them are bad." This worked out fine for him because everyone in the Big Ten other than Ohio State pretty much was the Citadel: it would take some seriously freak occurrences for Michigan to lose to them.

Carr's mindset was formed in this era, but he coached in an era of greatly increased parity. This was bad. When you give away expectation against the Citadel, you just win by less. When you give it away against a competitive but slightly inferior team you are going to find yourself in a lot of late-game dogfights and some of those are going to slip away. Carr started moving away from this philosophy, but it was a halting process, and I could write about this sort of thing forever. It's a digression.

Not a digression: no, it's not always optimal to maximize your points scored. It's pretty easy to set up a situation where it's not (you have the ball on the opponent's five yard line with thirty seconds left and you're down two, etc etc). While a lot of these things are specific situations they illuminate a larger issue: most of the measures, even the advanced measures we have at Football Outsiders and places like that, don't take variance into account.

Smart Football's got a theory that teams should strive for run-pass equilibrium in a different fashion than you hear about it on TV. Instead of running half the time or getting half of your yards on the ground, you should seek to have your passing plays and running plays gain the same number of yards. Just about no one does this except real weirdo offenses like Texas Tech. One possibility is coaches are just doing it wrong. The other possibility is that there's an institutional wisdom there.

What would that wisdom be? Well, gaining big hunks of yards a portion of the time and getting zero a lot is a different way of doing things than gaining small hunks of yards a lot and not getting zero very often. Is second and seven better than second and two half the time and second and ten the other half? That's an unanswered question.

[/dorkmode]

[okay, /extremedorkmode, returning to standarddorkmode]

  • Login or register to post comments
  • ShareThis

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 10:46 PM #1
Carcajou
Joined: 2009-02-26
Points: 13
Offline
Bo & Llloyd

I realizing whacking Lloyd is a standard theme here. But I think you've got much of it wrong.

I will agree that both Bo and Lloyd attempted to impose Michigan's will upon the opponent. But there was quite a difference and evolution that took place.

The most common thread was the insistence on soundness in scheme and design and execution, eliminating chances of mistakes, and making the opponent play a near perfect game to beat you- which, while it is admittedly predictable, is a philosophy hardly unique to Michigan. Virtually all big (better talent) programs follow this general blueprint, depending on their own talent and situation. Did they err on the side of conservative sometimes? Sure, but not all that often. We tend to remember the cases where that MAY have been true, without knowing of course if the alternative really would have been better or worse.

Bo's schemes on offense and defense from the the 70's (and even through much of the 80's) and Lloyd Carr's offenses and defenses in the 00's were entirely different.

Bo's philosophy for much of his career: put your best athletes on defense, be tougher on both sides of the ball, and pound them; sooner or later the TB or QB will get loose on the option (and later maybe a WR on something deep) for a big play.

Mo and Lloyd's offenses were adopted from the NFL to the college game, and generally built around (NFL prospect) big play receivers and QBs who could get the ball to them if the defense dared to single cover them. The routes were usually intermediate and longer routes, although increasingly used WR screens in later years.

It was hardly "three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust" stuff. If the safeties were back, that allowed the run game to control the game. The Alex Gibbs zone run offense was based in large parts on reducing or eliminating negative yardage plays, in part with the realization that there is a big difference between 3&5 and 3&9 in what routes you can run, pass protections you need, etc. Perhaps I have digressed...

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 10:28 PM #2
Carcajou
Joined: 2009-02-26
Points: 13
Offline
maximizing points

Maximizing points is often not the best strategy.

I recall a game at Michigan Stadium several years ago when Illinois give Michigan several chances to steal the game back, when all they really needed was a first down and possession of the ball.

Apart from sportsmanship issues of running up the score, scoring can remove the element of control. Generally a team of superior talent game plans around wanting to reduce the variables, increase its own time of possession and reduce the number of chances the other team has to score.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 9:34 PM #3
Carcajou
Joined: 2009-02-26
Points: 13
Offline
YPA

"you should seek to have your passing plays and running plays gain the same number of yards" sounds pretty silly to me.

Certain plays will (and should) have higher reward (and hence higher risk). To design all pass plays and runs gain 3-4 yards would be ridiculous- defenses would merely align all 11 players within 5 yards of the LOS.

Rather than maximizing points scored in a game, you should seek to have each offensive play gain the maximum number of yards (and minimizing losses) for that play. Expectations (and risk/rewards) for each respective play are different, and perform a different function within the game plan and weekly practice plan.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 8:05 PM #4
Ziff72
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2231
Online
Brian we need an answer

We've had a hundred different posts here on the Threet topic. You seem to be forwarding a rumor and not exactly giving it a ringing endorsement. I think relaying all the info you get is good, but I think we are all curious on what you believe.

I still contend RR's program is all competition based and would never discourage a player from competition so I find this rumor at the least overstated and at the worst complete hogwash. Why tell your most experienced guy in an extremely thin depth chart you are not getting much a chance?? I guess I'm so stuck on this issue because if I believe it true, I have to believe RR is a lying knucklehead which I just can't handle.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 5:54 PM #5
Damaniac
Joined: 2008-07-25
Points: 0
Offline
YPP

That makes sense, but doesn't passing generally carry an increased risk of a turnover (between interceptions and also fumbling), such that to achieve true balance you might still want more YPP passing than running?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 9:40 PM #6
Carcajou
Joined: 2009-02-26
Points: 13
Offline
speaking of passing risk

we should not neglect the additional risk of injury to the QB when attempting to pass. While RBs (and running QBs) face a greater risk of injury when running the ball, they are not exposed in the way that a QB are.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 7:41 PM #7
Alton
Joined: 2008-07-05
Points: 191
Online
YPP

I have heard that since passing yards has a much higher standard deviation than rushing yards, the ideal balance between the two is for yards per pass to be about 1 yard higher than its yards per run.

I don't know if I buy that--the most successful teams over the past few seasons seem to have a YPP about 1.5 to 2.0 yards higher than their YPR, even when you count sacks as passing attempts (NFL-style), rather than rushes (NCAA-style).

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 5:31 PM #8
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 2008-09-05
Points: 2611
Offline
[extremedorkmode alt="If you

[extremedorkmode alt="If you really enjoy this joke you spent too much time at a computer in the last 10 yrs"]

Guilty as charged.

[/extremedorkmode]

"I will fight, 'til I'm dead, with a Winged Helmet on my Head"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:50 PM #9
Amazin-Blue
Amazin-Blue's picture
Joined: 2009-02-05
Points: 41
Offline
Glass Mostly Full

I know a lot of folks are freaking out about Threet's leaving. But, the only way that Threet leaving is a bad thing is if you assume that Forcier and/or Robinson are going to fail or get injured.

Otherwise, it is unlikely Threet would ever see the field and any snaps he would have taken in practice merely mean Forcier/Robinson are less prepared.

Argument fallacy ad hominem: Attacking a characteristic of the source rather than addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:25 PM #10
jamiemac
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 5385
Offline
Yes,

We never do know what short, pasty white, curly haired dudes can do....but, if you want to know what a light skinned, curly haired, Creole looking dude did at one time against Purdue, check out my latest Diary.

Shameless Plug.

Oh, and solid work as usual Brian.....thanks for the no live blog thing as well.

The Winter Olympics at www.justcoverblog.com

God Bless Your Cotton Pickin' Maize & Blue Hearts

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:45 PM #11
ColoradoBlue
ColoradoBlue's picture
Joined: 2008-09-13
Points: 485
Offline
Basic strategy

Carr's mentality has always reminded me of basic strategy in Blackjack; that is, my actions will be dictated by this little card - I don't believe "gut," I don't believe a table is ever "hot" or "cold," I'm not going to try to count cards. Regardless of what the situation is, I'm putting my faith in age-old fundamentals and statistics (nevermind the fact that Carr's basic strategy sometimes conflicted with statistics).

As a basic strategy player, myself, I can empathize. Sticking to "the rules" of my game can prevent me from losing a lot of money very quickly... but it can also prevent me from making a lot of money quickly. I'm okay with that trade-off because I hate losing anything more than I like winning big. It takes emotion out of the decision-making.

Dantonio is obviously a basic strategy player. I'd put Tressel's game on the side of basic strategy, but he's also a good card-counter, and that swings the odds his way.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:41 PM #12
stubob
Joined: 2008-08-20
Points: 323
Offline
Wait, what?

"Instead of running half the time or getting half of your yards on the ground, you should seek to have your passing plays and running plays gain the same number of yards."

Instead of getting half of your yards on the ground, you should seek to get half your yards on the ground? Am I missing something?

"Nobody’s a perfect person in the world. Everyone kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me"

http://stewartj76.blogspot.com

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:56 PM #13
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 2008-10-12
Points: 3402
Offline
Instead of running 30 times

Instead of running 30 times at 5 YPC and Passing 15 times for 10 YPA, we should try for 20 rushing attempts at 7 YPC and 25 passing attempts at 7 YPA.

I lost the bet. Something (Adrian) witty will end up here as soon as I think of it.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:56 PM #14
BleedingBlue
BleedingBlue's picture
Joined: 2008-07-25
Points: 1609
Offline
What is

What is 'Yards per play' for $200 Trebek

I NEED QUESO! QUESOOOOO!!

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:56 PM #15
GCS
GCS's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 880
Offline
Per play basis

To clarify, you want yards per pass attempt to equal yards per rushing attempt. If you're passing twice as much and getting the same amount of yards per attempt for each, you will have twice as many passing yards as rushing yards while still meeting their definition of balance.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:19 PM #16
stubob
Joined: 2008-08-20
Points: 323
Offline
That's what I thought he meant

So, more, shorter passes. Hence the spread/west coast offense mentality.

Yards per attempt, not necessarily yards per play. Gotcha. Not sure I agree with the idea, but that's why I'm a programmer and they're NCAA coaches.

"Nobody’s a perfect person in the world. Everyone kills people, murders people, steals from you, steals from me"

http://stewartj76.blogspot.com

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:26 PM #17
Sommy
Sommy's picture
Joined: 2008-07-29
Points: 1597
Offline
Nice touch with using BBoard

Nice touch with using BBoard tags instead of actual HTML tags for your dorkmodeness.

...and by that, I mean helter-skelter, willy-nilly and putt-putt!

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:21 PM #18
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 2008-12-03
Points: 1966
Offline
My own attempt at football logic

The problem with the Woody-Bo-Carr philosophy (and don't get me wrong, those guys know/knew 1000x more about football than I do) is that, you can at least argue, their grind-out-the-clock philosophy is riskier than a more wide-open one is in the game now...It made sense not to throw the ball all over the place when your QB just wasn't a good passer. Now, though, top-level teams almost always have QBs who can pass well. The risk of passing, then, is less...The real risk now is not taking advantage of the huge talent advantage you have when you have Chad Henne, Mario Manningham, and Adrian Arrington lined up against App. St., Iowa, Minnesota, etc. The better your team the more snaps you should want in the game - the more roles of the dice in which your talent is matched up against the lesser team's talent, the better.

I was really happy when Rodriguez was hired in part b/c I watched WVU's 2008 game against UConn (66-21 in favor of WVU, I believe). I think UConn came into that game with a chance to take the lead in the Big East and they were fired up. WVU and Coach Rodriguez found weaknesses in UConn's defense and stepped on their throat w/out blinking. UConn would have needed a truly bizarre amount of lucky breaks to win that day. I don't think Michigan under Carr would have had the same mindset of "let's score as many points as we possibly can."

I'm glad that Michigan will be looking for points now instead of time off the clock (an over-simplification, to be sure). A two-play touchdown drive can only be matched with another touchdown. A six-minute drive that ends with a punt can be trumped by a single defensive breakdown that allows the opposing team's wide-outs to break one into the end zone.

"That's horrible"

"Terrible is what it is."

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:37 PM #19
His Dudeness
His Dudeness's picture
Joined: 2008-11-24
Points: 3900
Offline
My biggest fear

is knowing that UConn at its best could very rarely beat O$U at its worst... this is my paranoid fear. It keeps me awake at night.

or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:52 PM #20
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 2008-10-12
Points: 3402
Offline
What does it matter about

What does it matter about UConn? You should care about how you think that WVU would have done against OSU two years ago, had they not lost to Pitt.

I lost the bet. Something (Adrian) witty will end up here as soon as I think of it.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:10 PM #21
His Dudeness
His Dudeness's picture
Joined: 2008-11-24
Points: 3900
Offline
UConn

matters because they were the Big East runners-up in the scenario above. I don't really care at all about how WVU would do against anybody. My fear is that the competition in the Big East was not even close to the level of competition in the Big Ten.

And please tell me more about what I should care about.

or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:42 PM #22
ColoradoBlue
ColoradoBlue's picture
Joined: 2008-09-13
Points: 485
Offline
Florida fans probably had the

Florida fans probably had the same concerns a couple years back, maybe moreso.

That's not to say I'm expecting the same results in the same amount of time, but at least it's a data point in our favor.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:37 PM #23
LJ
LJ's picture
Joined: 2008-07-05
Points: 272
Offline
This is probably true, but

You also have to consider that the talent level RR had at his disposal at WVU was nowhere near what he'll have at M. At WVU, he beat up on teams with equal talent level (Louisville, Pitt, etc). At M, the only teams he'll regularly play with approximately equal talent are OSU and ND. Thus, if he creates a WVU-like machine here (that's a big if), we have an advantage over every team on our schedule.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 4:24 PM #24
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 2008-12-03
Points: 1966
Offline
I understand your point

What makes me feel better about that is that Rodriguez will have much better talent at Michigan than he did at WVU. That said, I'll certainly heave a sigh of relief the first time Michigan runs all over a quality opponent.

"That's horrible"

"Terrible is what it is."

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 3:12 PM #25
so bored at work
Joined: 2008-07-08
Points: 33
Offline
2 out of 3?

Jay Bilas said last night that a win against Purdue pretty much locks up a bid. I actually wondered if that was his attempt to placate the UM fanbase (and MGoBlog in particular).

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: February 26th, 2009 at 2:57 PM #26
99bobcats
99bobcats's picture
Joined: 2008-08-20
Points: 232
Offline
dorkmode

You should have opened those dorkmode tags. I read too much before I realized where I was.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.