Unverified Voracity Threatens You About Jenga Comment Count

Brian

Stuff for a good cause. The UM Alumni Club of DC has an annual auction to raise money for the scholarships they endow. It's going on now, and includes things like signed Jake Long and Denard Robinson NFL jerseys, tickets to various games next year, and Michigan jenga. 100% of proceeds help kids go to M. Bid on everything.

Except the jenga. I will cut you if you try to take it from me.

9698357482_87a42f84d2_z

[Bryan Fuller]

Exit the one thing I liked. I liked the "Legends" jerseys for the most part. Having a QB wearing 98 was unique, and Michigan does not have much recognition of the guys who have had jerseys retired. While yanking numbers around annually was a bit much, I thought it was a nice reminder of those who had gone before. No more?

I understand that we are going to discard many Brady Hoke staples with prejudice. Incessant second and eleven: seeya. Touching your armpits after observing another sack: GTFO. Allowing 400 passing yards to Rutgers: toodleoo. But in this one case I feel we may be throwing the staple out with the staplewater.

Also heavily rumored. Michigan may be rejoining the ranks of the bestickered helmets.

boandjim[1]

I'm in the middle here. I like throwback stuff; I like clean, simple stuff. I would prefer helmet stickers made occasional re-appearances for uniformz games, but that's not really how helmet stickers work.

Swat swat swat swat swat. If you follow me on twitter you know the existence of the UC Irvine Anteaters was killing me as they pushed Louisville to the limit in their first-round tourney outing. Irvine has a 6'8" guy… and two 6'10" guys… and a 7'2" guy… and a 7'6" guy. As someone who has pined for a rim protector ever since it became clear Michigan basketball was going to have a really good offense even if their center's game is limited to finishing around the hoop, I was having tiny little conniption fit about a tiny school that had never been to the tournament grabbing enormous people left and right.

Anyway, long story short Jon Teske is tall and alters shots:

Michigan pledge Jon Teske scored 12 points and blocked six shots in the loss, but had a much greater impact than the numbers might indicate.
Though he was credited for only six blocks, the seven-footer (Rivals.com's No. 96 junion nationally) altered at least a dozen shots near the rim with his ridiculous wingspan and was whistled for two fouls on which it appeared he had all ball.

The first two of those were against Esa Ahmad, a WVU-bound forward who Michigan recruited for a minute several months ago. Teske's currently enduring the usual crazy zone defenses that high school teams deploy when facing someone of his size, and he is a young guy who's still growing. Whatever he's going to be is still a long way off—hopefully that includes college-level rim protection duties.

If it isn't broke but could use some improvement, add gradually. Doesn't have the ring of "if it isn't broke, break it" but has the salutary benefit of applying to Michigan football instead of disruptive "sharing economy" Silicon Valley startups. And it's what DJ Durkin is doing to the defense:

"I wouldn't say we're doing 'most' of either (scheme), if there's a defense that fits a scheme and it exposes something with the offense, we'll play it," senior linebacker Joe Bolden said earlier this spring. "Some plays we'll be in 3-4, another we'll be in 4-3. Just depends on personnel, what the other team runs. The scouting reports in the fall will determine what we play. And, if we're playing a 3-4 better, why would we do a 4-3? And just the same the other way.

"I really don't think it's that hard to grasp, personally."

Michigan's defense won't be exactly the same next season, but it won't be drastically different either. More importantly for Durkin, though, the experience level is high.

And again it's what Michigan is going to try to do with that alignment that matters.

Neither option is good here. Funchess revealed that he had a boo-boo last year:

So either that happened when he was inexplicably playing in garbage time or had already happened by the time he was inexplicably playing in garbage time.

I mean, come on. I'd like to see the NCAA burn as much as the next guy but this is laying it on a little thick:

Khari Harding transferred from Auburn to Tulsa to be closer to his ailing father and maximize his dad’s chances to watch him play live next fall.

Under a new NCAA amendment ratified this week, the latter apparently won’t be possible. The NCAA eliminated immediate eligibility hardship waivers for Football Bowl Subdivision transfers.

The rule change is effective immediately, so it doesn’t matter that Harding — whose father Corie is battling cancer for a second time — has been taking classes at Tulsa for two months before the amendment was ratified.

Surely the ability to go to school for free in immediate proximity to your dad so you can see him all the time is the important thing here, not the fact that your football career is going to be delayed by a year. You could argue that the redshirt is actually a benefit.

Andy Staples disagrees with the above paragraph and proposes one weird trick for transfer rules that would handle cases like this by devolving the responsibility to people a bit less bureaucratic. In bullets:

1. Schools may not prevent athletes from transferring to another school and receiving financial aid.
2. The player must sit out the following season. (With only one possible exception.)
3. The athletic director at the previous school signs a form allowing the transferring player to play immediately.
 

I'd be fine with that. The NCAA couldn't do anything to prevent conference rules from kicking in further restrictions (IIRC the SEC does not allow grad transfers between its institutions; the Big Ten has some restrictions that may or may not apply to Jake Rudock), so if you are concerned about the dread specter of Smotrycz proliferation don't be.

Big Puppy, NBA edition. Just a matter of time before he has his own t-shirts and line of dog food and possibly several different breeds of dog all competing to be renamed McGary:

3. Mitch McGary Running

It’s like the Kramer painting: You can’t look away.

Look at all that churning effort, the weirdly stiff arms and hands, the eager glance backward that says, “Please pass me the ball, I’m open, I’m running really fast, so fast, like the wind, am I going to get the ball?” He’s like a dog looking for a Frisbee.

Jokes aside, big men who run the floor suck in defenders and open up shots for teammates. Good on the rookie for playing out the ball.

Yes, he's a purebred McGary. He generates possessions and feels at an elite level.

NO I WILL NEVER GET OVER IT STOP ASKING. Why has Al Borges never recruited a quarterback who could be considered successful*? Well, it may have something to do with his long-time association with Steve Clarkson, who seems to have fobbed off all his lower-level prospects on mister gullible. This Steve Clarkson as portrayed in Bruce Feldman's "The QB" and reviewed by Spencer Hall:

3. Dilfer's just one of the QB whisperers profiled, a group of guys who all come across with drastically different results. George Whitfield, the man on ESPN chasing guys around with a broom, comes off as half-cracked, but still seemingly legit. The guy who pronounced Tim Tebow's throwing motion to be fixed after three months or so of work, Tom House, might be the biggest beneficiary here: a flaky ex-pitcher with piles of data, a messy office to match, and a stellar roster of clients who quietly swear by him. In contrast, Steve Clarkson, the man who brought Jimmy Clausen to the world, comes off as a money-hoovering huckster prone to announcing any client as "the next [STAR QB GOES HERE]" if given enough cash. Feldman doesn't even have to try, really. You just write down Clarkson's quotes and they do their own work.

Clausen was actually pretty good, if not at all deserving of his hype level. The other guys…

*["successful" is here short for "was the clear starter for his team as an upperclassman."

I only kind of hate Wisconsin basketball. I apologize to that one guy whose entire question to me was a statement about said hatred, but Wisconsin is so fascinated by the NCAA stenographer that Nigel Hayes is answering questions like this:

ncb_hayestranscript_ms_400x600[1]

I didn't know you had to capitalize xylophone. But that's why I'm not a stenographer.

Anyway, I still hate that they get away with the Wisconsin Chest Bump all the dang time but I have always coveted their bigs and I find them relatively tolerable when Michigan is not playing them. This has been a difficult confession. Share yours in the comments!

Etc.: Yes, please. Stopping taxpayer money from being spent on stadiums should be a bipartisan thing right? Jim Boeheim is just kind of this dude who doesn't like NCAA rules. Gasaway on the SCORING CRISIS. Relevant to our current situation: the rise of the vagabond QB. Congrats to Carol Hutchins on her 1400th win, a 20-0(!) bombing of OSU.

When I weep on national television I only get scorn.

Comments

Reader71

March 24th, 2015 at 12:22 PM ^

Aesthetically, I hate the stickers. But I'm not against them. I'm glad someone agrees with me on the Legends jerseys. I loved them. They brought old numbers back into circulation, which is great as a practical matter. Put a patch on them to remind people of the legends who wore them. I even like the fact that the jerseys debuted on star players or guys who were on the field a lot, to give the old legends some airtime. I just wish that after the inaugural season of celebration and raising awareness of the old guys, the jerseys became regular old jerseys but with a patch, instead of trophies to be awarded to upperclassmen. Like honor Woodson with a patch and put it on Peppers. But when Peppers leaves, just give it to the next freshman who wants it.

JeepinBen

March 24th, 2015 at 12:23 PM ^

I think they're a nice way to keep those numbers in circulation while honoring them. Howeva, I don't like the numbers changing. If a guy wants to wear one, when it opens, he asks the coaches for the honor, maybe writes a paper/does some history on why it's a Legend Jersey and why he wants to wear it, then it's his for the rest of his career. Incoming freshmen are eligible to get it too.

I'm anti-helmet sticker, I like the clean look. that said, if Harbaugh asked I'd say go for it...

Difficult sports confession? I was sober and stayed for the whole M00N game. That was difficult.

HL2VCTRS

March 24th, 2015 at 12:38 PM ^

It feels like we are kind of forgetting what the purpose of stickers is.  It isn't so that the jersey looks cool or to make the fans happy, it's a motivational/incentive for the players to hit team or individual milestones.  If they make one player try harder or achieve something for that recognition, then I'm all for them.  I feel like Legends jersey's operate a litte under that same theory, but became more of a marketing thing than something that actually drove players to work harder.

Seth

March 24th, 2015 at 2:00 PM ^

I like the Tom Izzo Excuse Factory. I love it when a coach whines about what's going on even if the same thing and worse is probably going on for the other team and 200 other teams besides. I love that he starts each excuse with a paralipsis: "this loss was my fault, it's on me, but their guys were holding and bumping a lot out there and it's hard to coach when the other team isn't following the rules and not getting called for it, but I got to coach around that it's on me I have to do better." Coaches should be screwball fans all the time. That way fans won't be able to shame each other all the time by following A newspaper columnist's sense of "sportsmanship."

ca_prophet

March 24th, 2015 at 2:13 PM ^

And we should use that to its benefit. Legends jerseys are one way of doing that, and I liked the basic idea. What I didn't like is the seemingly constant changing of numbers. Give them out when people first start, and let them keep them until they're done. It would be cool to have Peppers add a patch to an already legendary number.

champswest

March 24th, 2015 at 2:23 PM ^

the best helmet in football?  Couldn't the players put it on the front of their locker?  Serves the same purpose without junking up The Helmet.

I like watching Wisconsin balketball.  They execute very well.  That is much more interesting than watching VCU press full court or MSU play football on hardwood.

bronxblue

March 24th, 2015 at 2:41 PM ^

I'm more bothered by helmet stickers than the Legends patches.  For whatever reason, I just think it is a weird poseur thing to put little sitckers on helmets, like trying to impress people with how hard you work/how good you are by carrying around paystubs or diplomas.  At least with the legends stuff, it was a homage.  But with helmet stickers, it just seems very self-focused in a way that doesn't seem necessary.

ppudge

March 24th, 2015 at 7:23 PM ^

I usually don't disagree with Brian, but when I do, it's over legends jerseys. Let the kids make their own game with their own number. I like the idea of maybe one game a season (homecoming?) using legend jerseys, but that's it.

Helmet stickers? Love 'em. Look back at Tyrone Wheatley running wild against Washington in the Rose Bowl. His winged helmet with those stickers, plus the little bit of red from the roses on the shoulders - classic look!

Rabbit21

March 24th, 2015 at 9:21 PM ^

The Nigel Hayes thing is funny.  Almost funny enough to make me not hate Wisconsin with the burning passion of a thousand suns.  Then I remember the constant not-quite fouling, "death to backboards", Ben Brust's shot, the existence of Bielema, and Bo Ryan's sideline antics and I go right back to my nice, warm bubble of FUCK EVERYTHING ABOUT THAT PROGRAM.  May Wisconsin lose every game.