Home
Ok. Inaccurate, but ok.

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • BlogPoll
    • Join
    • Blogpoll Editorial Guy @ CBS
    • Votes By Blog
    • Votes By Team
    • Voting Philosophy
    • Links For Voters
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2011 Recruiting Board
    • 2010 Recruiting Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
Home

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • Brian @ TSB
  • Brian @ Bucknuts
  • Hail To The Victors 2009
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • @MGoBlog (Twitter)
  • mgo.licio.us
  • RSS Feed
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Blah Blah Blah
  • Bo Schemblogger
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • In Rod We Trust
  • MGoBlue Football
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Football Recruiting
  • Michigan Football Saturdays
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • Michigan Sports Center
  • Ron Bellamy's Underachieving All Stars
  • Spawn of M Zone
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Diag
  • The Game
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Three And Out
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Varsity Blue
  • When Carcajous Attack!
  • Wolverine Liberation Army
  • Wolverines Daily
  • iBlog For Cookies

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinitalk
    • Illini Basketball Fans
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Hoosier Report
    • Behind The Plate
    • Cannot Falter
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • Buck Bravo
    • TNABACG
  • Northwestern
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • ND Choo Choo
    • The House Rock Built
    • The Blue-Gray Sky
  • Ohio State
    • We Will Always Have Tempe
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Jim Tressel's Head
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • February 2010 (23)
  • January 2010 (407)
  • December 2009 (63)
  • November 2009 (96)
  • October 2009 (107)
  • September 2009 (132)
  • August 2009 (94)
  • July 2009 (56)
  • June 2009 (42)
  • May 2009 (41)
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Visit Sports-Gambling.com, your online Gambling Sports site for live Super Bowl Odds , NFL Odds, College Football Bowls games odds and much more!

Expert Sports Handicappers

Click here to check out some of the best online casino sites & US casinos online!

CFB Betting Odds

Get free Michigan Wolverine college football predictions and NCAA basketball picks.

For the best football picks and online football betting information visit BangTheBook.com

Get great Michigan college football tickets for an amazing price from OnlineSeats. We have every team and every sport, including Tigers tickets.



Sports Betting Lines: Betting on All Sports: Real sports betting action. Try LinesMaker.com for free sports betting lines updated in real time. Massive free sports bets and cash bonuses for new members. Sign up for free!

Sports Betting Lines: Preview all sports betting lines and odds at LinesMaker! We have live betting odds and lines for all sports events. It doesn't get any better than this: Sportsbetting3.com offers the best college football betting and pro football NFL betting. Like casino games? Discover the best online casinos at the top casino site, Plazacasinos.com

Check out the Penn State preview. Get free College Football Picks from the National Sports Advisors.

Get free College basketball Picks and basketball odds at Doc's Sports.

Have a fantasy league? You can find quality Trophies for every sport at Lamb Awards.

Fooball Betting from Bet Vega.

TheSeats.com has tickets for all your NCAA football favorites like the Michigan Wolverines, Nebraska Cornhuskers, Wisconsin Badgers, Rose Bowl tickets and many more!

Beveled Guilt

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Michigan Baseball Greats: Jim Burton
    formerlyanonymous - 1 day ago
  • Michigan's Geographical Disadvantage
    Champswest - 1 day ago
  • 2010 Recruiting Class: Filling the Gaps
    Lordfoul - 3 days ago
  • Investigating media bias
    michelin - 3 days ago
  • Lacrosse Preview: Exhibitions
    Tim - 3 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 316
  • ››
more
  • 2010 Recruiting Class: Filling the Gaps
    Lordfoul - 4,939 views
  • An Open Letter to Drew Sharp
    Seth9 - 4,831 views
  • Demar Dorsey in Centerfield Please
    blueloosh - 3,941 views
  • My Letter to D. Sharp (Ex D-1A Recruit)
    TMayBG20 - 3,265 views
  • The Generation Gap and Reactions to Rodriguez
    Undefeated drea... - 2,653 views
  •  
  • 1 of 3
  • ››
more
  • An Open Letter to Drew Sharp
    Seth9 - 75 comments
  • 2010 Recruiting Class: Filling the Gaps
    Lordfoul - 57 comments
  • Demar Dorsey in Centerfield Please
    blueloosh - 55 comments
  • The Generation Gap and Reactions to Rodriguez
    Undefeated drea... - 42 comments
  • One Thread to Rule Them All: Analysis of the Freep article on Dorsey's past
    Rasmus - 37 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Tom
  • Why Devin Gardner Will Not Redshirt
    5 replies
  • Pac Ten Expanding?
    3 replies
  • OT - Best Place to Open a Bar in AA
    19 replies
  • OT-RIP Mitch's Place
    41 replies
  • OT - Amar'e Stoudemire to Pistons?
    34 replies
  • UM hockey game tonight?
    10 replies
  • OT-Second Chances-Dorsey and Hopwood. A Michigan Connection
    11 replies
  • Interesting quote from Rod Smith on Gardner
    56 replies
  • OT- Andre the Giant and alcohol..
    44 replies
  • High School Workouts
    37 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 29
  • ››
  • Why Devin Gardner Will Not Redshirt
    5 replies
  • Interesting quote from Rod Smith on Gardner
    56 replies
  • Pac Ten Expanding?
    3 replies
  • High School Workouts
    37 replies
  • OT - Best Place to Open a Bar in AA
    19 replies
  • OT-RIP Mitch's Place
    41 replies
  • Worst Professor
    96 replies
  • OT- Andre the Giant and alcohol..
    44 replies
  • OT - Smokestacks on Campus
    25 replies
  • OT-Ed O'Bannon vs the NCAA
    14 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 29
  • ››
  • Hardest Class at U-M?
    252 replies
  • OT: Super Bowl Open Thread
    249 replies
  • Latwan Anderson considering Michigan?
    188 replies
  • Best UM teacher
    179 replies
  • Demar Dorsey confessed to 2 Florida burglaries in 2007
    131 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 58
  • ››
  • Latwan Anderson considering Michigan?
    188 replies
  • SuperBowl Food
    50 replies
  • Anthony Zettel has Mich offer
    27 replies

mgo.licio.us

Football betting

If you're looking for online football betting, look no further! Party Bets is safe, fast and secure.

NCAA basketball odds

Get live NCAA basketball odds from multiple sportsbooks at OddsShark.com

Unverified Voracity Says Hello, Old Friend

By Brian — June 1st, 2009 at 12:18 PM — 35 comments
Filed under:
  • golf
  • kelvin grady
  • ncaa: the scandals
  • ohio state
  • rose bowl
  • Softball
  • unverified voracity

I'm still catching up after spending large chunks of the weekend away from precious internet access, so forgive if some of this is old.

Back like it never happened. So, yeah, Michigan might not be through with Gradys yet:

As Grady continues to evaluate his options, one of them is playing for the Michigan football team. He has spoken with the U-M staff regarding the opportunity. Grady, a 5-foot-10 standout running back/receiver in high school at East Grand Rapids, is considering a number of basketball and football options.

While the Free Press article above indicates Grady is still evaluating his options, a previously reliable source indicates this is a done deal and Grady will not be transferring.

As we've all learned from the Greg Paulus fiasco, players don't use up eligibility in any sport they're not actually playing and have a five-year period before they're ineligible, so Grady would be the functional equivalent of a redshirt sophomore if he was to join the team: three years to play three.

Grady's quick as hell and was a legitimate football prospect coming out of high school, so he could be of some use. No one has put a stranglehold on the slot position and the starting tailback job will be wide open next fall. Also maybe he can catch punts.

Nothing to see here. I really wish this wasn't cause to play officer Barbrady, but even if this is Terrelle Pryor (and it very probably is)…

The football player received a special, discounted hotel rate and free food while visiting Ohio State.

On Aug. 21, OSU declared the athlete ineligible and filed a violation report with the NCAA. He never missed a game, though. He paid back $158 for his extra benefits, and the NCAA restored his eligibility. He was a freshman at Ohio State last year. He was recruited by quarterbacks coach Joe Daniels.

…it's a minor NCAA violation that's been handled already. This, though fun, is also pointless to get excited about:

Since 2000, Ohio State has reported to the NCAA more than 375 violations -- the most of any of the 69 Football Bowl Subdivision schools that provided documents to The Dispatch through public-records requests. Most infractions were minor -- a coach called a recruit too many times, for example. Others, however, left athletes benched, fined or at least embarrassed.

If the NCAA hasn't deigned to slap Lane Kiffin's wrist, this won't bring any additional scrutiny. Especially since the list of violations is full of stuff like "player mentions ice cream shop where she worked" and—seriously—"hockey players sneak into Nickelback concert."

But the larger point in the Dispatch report is a good one: many schools now use any means possible to avoid or make useless FOIA requests by citing a federal law designed to prevent the public disclosure of student grades. An example:

We asked the eight Ohio schools eligible for the Bowl Championship Series for the list of people who flew on university airplanes to away football games. These records are used by the NCAA to determine whether boosters (people who give money to the university and whose actions are scrutinized) fly with the team.

Kent State University sent the entire list, with no names removed. Three schools blackened out the names of students. Four removed the names of students and some nonstudents.

Others just make it ridiculously costly. This includes Michigan, which asked for $850 to fulfill the Dispatch's FOIA request. Only Maryland's hilarious demand for over $35,000 beat that.

Urgh? Odd that Tony Barnhart is the guy to report on this change in the BCS selection process:

In past contracts if the Rose Bowl lost one of its traditional partners, the Big Ten or Pac-10 champ, to the BCS championship game, it could simply fill with another Big Ten or Pac-10 team that qualified. That’s how a 9-3 Illinois team got to Pasadena two years ago.

But in the new contract, I’m told, there is an interesting clause: The first time in the deal that the Rose loses one of its champions to the BCS title game, that opening will be automatically filled by a Coalition (non-BCS conference) team if one has qualified.

Barnhart interprets this as an attempt to not get sued, and okay maybe it is but why does the Rose Bowl get stuck with an automatic mid-major slot instead of losing its special ability to pick a totally undeserving Big Ten team? That seems like swinging the pendulum too far in the other direction.

After getting over the initial revulsion at the thought of Boise State in the Rose Bowl, though, I'm not too put out: better that than a barely-qualified* Big Ten team like Illinois leaping into the BCS, embarrassing itself, and giving the rest of the conference harder matchups in their bowl games. At least some part of the Big Ten's recent bowl struggles is due to the conference almost always getting a second team into the BCS whether it deserves it or not.

*(Literally: IIRC, there was great worry that year because Illinois needed an extremely friendly set of final-week results to even get itself into the top 14 of the BCS rankings.)

Ends to excellent season. The men's golf team made a late surge to squeeze into the top eight at the national championships, then won their first round of match play before losing a "heartbreaker" to Texas A&M in the semifinal. Michigan's top player, the spectacularly-named Lion Kim, is but a sophomore, so future success is a possibility.

Softball, meanwhile, won against Alabama but lost 1-0 against Florida and 7-5 against Georgia to exit the WCWS around 5th or 6th place. At least they're not Ohio State's baseball team, which managed to lose 24-8 and 37-6 this weekend. Even stranger: in between those two games they won twice.

Etc.: Hockey recruits do well at the NHL draft combine.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • ShareThis

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:52 PM #1
bronxblue
Joined: 2008-11-22
Points: 3044
Offline
"hockey players sneak into

"hockey players sneak into Nickelback concert." - Good God, they might as well strip him of his eligibility right now! Such insanity should not go unpunished!

As for the Rose Bowl clause - I think it is fine. Sure, would it be nice to keep only conference champions? Sure. But over the past few years (outside of crappy Hawaii), most of the non-BCS teams to make the BCS were top-notch programs that were at least as good as the champions from the Big East and ACC. I would much rather see Utah battle USC than another Illinois/USC debacle. Let some other team get crushed by USC at home for once.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:35 PM #2
mgovictors23
mgovictors23's picture
Joined: 2009-05-03
Points: 1094
Offline
Grady

I think if he were to join the team it would definitely be as a slot guy.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:40 PM #3
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2682
Offline
Good.

Cause we need more of them.

Self proclaimed MGoBlog "quiz-bowl stud"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:15 PM #4
ronmexico
ronmexico's picture
Joined: 2008-11-19
Points: 256
Online
I watched him play on many

I watched him play on many occasions in highschool. very speedy and shifty. more of an offensive threat than defensive. has the ability to make plays in open field. then again that was all highschool. and it looks like he hasnt added much size. lets see if the Barwis method can fix that.

Well i hope you leave enough room for my fist, so i can ram it into your stomach, and break your goddamn spine!!-Lloyd Carr

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:17 PM #5
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1616
Online
The Rose Bowl clause has to

The Rose Bowl clause was probably added because the other bowls trying to stick the RB with the non-BCS team for once so they won't be stuck with them all the time. The Rose Bowl is the only BCS bowl that gets auto-assigned two league champs, and in the years the RB loses a team to the championship game they get one of the first two at-large picks and can leave the non-BCS team for some other poor sucker. I still don't know how the Rose Bowl agreed to this though, I would think that its representatives from the Big Ten and Pac 10 would throw a fit until it was removed.

Our helmets got wings

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:46 PM #6
Wide Open
Wide Open's picture
Joined: 2008-07-02
Points: 1737
Online
Orange Bowl

While I don't think it's in the contract (the official BCS site is down), the Orange Bowl has put both the ACC and Big East champs against each other recently.

(Although is that really much different from being stuck with two mid-majors?)

I think this comes down to having Nick Satan and Andre Smith to thank for the BCS's new-found benevolence to the little guy.

Laissez les bons temps rouler!

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 3:05 PM #7
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1616
Online
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_Series#Selection_of_Teams

Having the ACC and Big East champs meet in the Orange Bowl was just due to the Orange Bowl selecting/being left with the Big East champ for its open spot to go with the tie-in to the ACC champ.

Our helmets got wings

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 1:55 PM #8
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2682
Offline
What a horrible development for the Rose Bowl.

Hey Rose Bowl haters! Want to guarantee second tier status for the RB in a certain year? Here's your new rule!

In reality, while I don't think there are any actual RB haters, there may as well be based on this idiotic decision. ANY B10 team in the RB is more attractive to both the RB, TV and most fans than any future Boise or Utah. Remember that this hypothetical team would be the SECOND non-BCS conference team in a BCS game that year. So if your already not excited by the presence of lower tier schools (go ahead and flame "BCS doesn't matter because Utah/Bama and Boise/OK" people), hey we've got a second unattractive BCS game for you to watch!

Self proclaimed MGoBlog "quiz-bowl stud"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 11:15 PM #9
funkywolve
Joined: 2008-10-08
Points: 295
Offline
Second non-BCS conference team?

Maybe I've missed it, but I don't see that. I see the ruling as being if a big ten/pac 10 team goes on to the title game, if a non-bcs school has qualified for the BCS they automaticly get shipped to the rose bowl. It seems that this would take place before the other bowls choose their match-ups and thus no other non-bcs conference school would already have been picked for a BCS bowl.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:20 PM #10
ShockFX
ShockFX's picture
Joined: 2008-07-16
Points: 6058
Online
Did you watch Illinois vs

Did you watch Illinois vs USC?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:43 PM #11
MGoAero
Joined: 2009-03-16
Points: 384
Offline
Keep in mind...

that was just one game. Michigan got into the Rose Bowl after the 2006 season using that same (old) rule, and our fanbase was peeved enough with that (not getting to face OSU again in the NC game)! Imagine if a non-BCS team had gone to the Rose Bowl that year instead of UM - we would've been incensed! (Obviously, we also would have been saved another beatdown at the hands of USC, but...)

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:39 PM #12
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2682
Offline
Still.

I would rather take a chance on that, than a game I know I won't watch. Imagine a year where SC is in the title game, so the RB matchup is let's say a 9-3 Stanford team vs. Fresno State or Utah. Ugh.

I know I know, any college game has the potential to be good, but its so much better if you actually want to watch the game in the 1st place.

Self proclaimed MGoBlog "quiz-bowl stud"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:51 PM #13
ShockFX
ShockFX's picture
Joined: 2008-07-16
Points: 6058
Online
Oklahoma - Boise

Oklahoma - Boise State
Georgia - Hawaii
Alabama - Utah

2 of those 3 games were worth watching (all 3 if you enjoyed watching Colt Brennan die). It's all relative anyway, since the BCS championship game has become the only thing that seems to matter to people.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 3:31 PM #14
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 2009-02-07
Points: 3873
Offline
I am an OU fan and indeed,

I am an OU fan and indeed, while Boise was still good, they had no business winning that game. Trick plays won it and I'd bet that OU would win 9 of 10.

As for Georgia - Hawai'i was way overrated and it was nice seeing them slaughtered.

Kittens help make the pain go away.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 8:38 PM #15
DoubleB
Joined: 2008-11-19
Points: 296
Online
Talk about selective memory

Boise DOMINATED the first 40 minutes of that game and led 28-10 with 5 minutes left in the 3rd. Total yardage was close (within 30 yards). Both teams had multiple turnovers (Boise 3 and OU 4). Boise was able to do what non-BCS teams HAVE to do to have a chance: not get destroyed on the lines. I think Boise wins 4 out of 10 times that game is played and maybe 5.

I don't know how anyone could have watched that game and state Boise would win 1 out of 10 times.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 4:12 PM #16
tubauberalles
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 89
Offline
Only non-BCS teams get to be over-rated?

Interesting that Hawaii is determined to be "over-rated" but Boise St is deemed to have no business winning their game because of "trick plays"? I don't get it - was there an abuse of the rules that Boise St snuck past the under-achieving (as opposed to over-rated) Sooners? Nine times out of ten, one would expect UM to beat Toledo, too.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 4:28 PM #17
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2682
Offline
"Nine times out of ten, one would expect UM to beat Toledo,

too." Sure, but the difference is that no one would ever purposefully schedule a 13-0 Toledo team in a BCS game if they had a choice. And they would be right, because Toledo is not as good as M. Just as Boise is not as good as OK.

I'm not saying they didn't deserve to win, they did. But they and their conferences are not as good as the BCS conferences, and the forced affirmative action of promoting them into the BCS games is what I resent.

Self proclaimed MGoBlog "quiz-bowl stud"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 5:17 PM #18
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 2009-02-07
Points: 3873
Offline
I did not say that they did

I did not say that they did not deserve to win. I said that they had no business being in that game. They clearly played a fantastic game and deserved to win as much as Oklahoma did. I'd say that that game and Vince Young vs. USC tie for the best games in the new centurey. Not Appy St.. Oh please, not them.

Kittens help make the pain go away.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 4:30 PM #19
therealtruth
Joined: 2009-04-04
Points: 33
Offline
There is no objective way to

There is no objective way to claim that Boise State wasn't as good.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 5:10 PM #20
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2682
Offline
I'll try a couple.

NFL draft picks from each roster, recruiting rankings of those on each roster, record of respective conferences, strength of schedule...

Self proclaimed MGoBlog "quiz-bowl stud"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 8:41 PM #21
DoubleB
Joined: 2008-11-19
Points: 296
Online
Individual football talent is

Individual football talent is not a measure of TEAM strength. If that were the case, then why on earth has FSU sucked ass for the past 5 or so years?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 8:29 PM #22
Ernis
Ernis's picture
Joined: 2008-09-23
Points: 3112
Online
Not to interject but...

...I just gotta interject here.

1) BSU was clearly good enough to beat OU as well as their patsy opponents (including conference), so what of the SOS?

2) Football is a team sport so it is a fallacy to list individual accomplishments or rankings as a means of evaluating the team as a whole. For that, performance on the field is all there is.

That's right, Dude. 100% certain.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 3:19 PM #23
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 2682
Offline
That's another thing I hate about the BCS.

It has made most of the other major bowls irrelevant. Bama and Ok were disappointed to be in those bowls and thus it is extremely hard to get up for a game against a team you know you should beat. Then play against a team with something to prove and voila: upset city. But this recent decision will accentuate that trend, and give people even more of rationale to say that the non-BCS schools are as good. Which is not true.

Self proclaimed MGoBlog "quiz-bowl stud"

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 8:45 PM #24
DoubleB
Joined: 2008-11-19
Points: 296
Online
How was Oklahoma

How was Oklahoma "disappointed?" It wasn't like they were about to play for the national title if they had won the Big XII title game. Oh, that's right. THEY WON the Big XII title game. They went to the bowl game they were slotted for as conference champion. They then proceeded to lose.

After losing to Texas Tech, you're telling me Oklahoma was able to get up for the Big XII title game against Nebraska, but then weren't ready for the Fiesta Bowl? I didn't realize Boise State magically made teams play flat.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 9:11 PM #25
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 2009-02-07
Points: 3873
Offline
Theere were national

Theere were national championship hopes deservedly that year. they should have been 11-1 going into that game, Oregon stole the game from them.

It's not like they were jumping for joy at the thought of playing... Boise State. "ooh cool, we get to play... who now?"

Kittens help make the pain go away.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 10:26 PM #26
DoubleB
Joined: 2008-11-19
Points: 296
Online
So it's WHO they played, not

So it's WHO they played, not the situation they found themselves in? Because they would have been "up" for a traditional power like LSU, USC, West Virginia, or Florida, right?

Talk of a double standard for the non-BCS schools. You lose, you don't belong. You win and the other team wasn't "motivated" or "up" to play. It's complete and utter horsesh!t.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 2nd, 2009 at 3:41 PM #27
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1919
Offline
Life's not fair,

Life's not fair, friend.

College football is not like pro football. In the NFL, each team is essentially equal. Some teams like Pittsburgh or Dallas have a lot of tradition, but the teams have an even playing field.

College football is not this way, like it or not. People outside of Idaho (do people live there?) don't give a shit about Boise St so this won't change soon. I don't want to see them in a major bowl game. I watched Utah-Bama because we played Utah and I hate Alabama. Had it been different, I wouldn't have watched the game.

I get the playoff argument saying that a mid-major should get a chance to win the title. But Utah wasn't in the Championship game. The title game is to crown a champion, the other bowls are for fun. I advocate leaving that to the big dogs.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 2nd, 2009 at 6:38 PM #28
DoubleB
Joined: 2008-11-19
Points: 296
Online
So because YOU personally

So because YOU personally don't like watching Boise or other non-BCS teams play in BCS bowls, they should be left to the minor, pre-New Years bowl games?

The "I'm just better than you because I am" argument. Really impressive.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 5:22 PM #29
Tha Stunna
Joined: 2008-10-13
Points: 644
Offline
Well, pre-BCS, why should a

Well, pre-BCS, why should a 5th ranked or lower team bother playing when they aren't going to win the title anyways? (I don't know the lowest ranking for a team, before bowls, that won a title after playing their bowl game, but I doubt it's below 4.) There are issues with the BCS, but this isn't really one of them.

And if Bama couldn't be excited to play in a BCS bowl a year after going 6-6, they suck. The end.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 1:27 PM #30
rdlwolverine
Joined: 2008-09-28
Points: 581
Offline
Lion Kim

Do Lion Kim and Marques Slocum know each other at all?

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 1:24 PM #31
Anonymosity
Anonymosity's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1063
Online
I don't think that spot in

I don't think that spot in the Rose Bowl would be "automatic" for a mid-major- Barnhart specified "if one has qualified." Not quite sure what counts as "qualified," but I imagine he's referring to the top-14 ranking requirement.

So, I what I take from that is if the top mid-major team is ranked, say, 23rd, they won't be getting that spot in the Rose Bowl.

Ann Arbor: now the permanent home of the Little Brown Jug

66-22-3 all-time

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 12:47 PM #32
Ziff72
Joined: 2008-07-07
Points: 1476
Offline
Grady

Is anyone else confused by the whole Grady thing?? If he wants to play football great, but why not stick with basketball as well?? The starting PG spot is available. If he wanted to play football why didn't he say that from the beginning?? Are his offers to play hoop slim so he's backpedalling?? Very bizarre situation.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 12:54 PM #33
WolvinLA
WolvinLA's picture
Joined: 2008-06-30
Points: 1919
Offline
I'm cool with Grady playing

I'm cool with Grady playing football. He was a stud in high school and could very well improve our team. Maybe he can take Turner's spot at CB...

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 2:11 PM #34
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 2009-02-07
Points: 3873
Offline
I agree, he almost got as

I agree, he almost got as much media coverage as Kevin during the football season.

Kittens help make the pain go away.

  • Login or register to post comments
Posted on: June 1st, 2009 at 12:54 PM #35
therealtruth
Joined: 2009-04-04
Points: 33
Offline
Are his offers to play hoop

Are his offers to play hoop slim so he's backpedalling??

This would appear to be true.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.