Programming note: the Martin news and AD search was clearly more important than slapping up half of the Delaware State UFR, so both halves will land tomorrow.
A couple AD clarifications. The thing about Dave Brandon politicizing the AD position was not meant to suggest a staunch anything couldn't run the department—Bo, good God. The thing is: Brandon almost made a run for senate the last time around and is considering a run for governor. If he's got political aspirations he'd have to resign to pursue them, and Michigan would just be at square one again.
"Medically, everything has been cleared for him to go to practice, so I think it is just a matter of how comfortable he feels with that and getting back in action," Rodriguez said. “He really hasn’t done much football wise. He did a little bit last week, but nothing with full pads so tomorrow will be the truer test as opposed to today."
Moosman would slide over, leaving Huyge and Dorrestein to fight it out for the last spot. Everyone else is on track to go, with Forcier declaring himself "100%" yesterday. To steal some of Tim press-tweet thunder:
Molk healthy, will start at C. Moos to RG, Dorrestein or Huyge at RT // CBrown, Tate healthy. RB starter depends on Minor's health and play selection. Minor's injury day-to-day.
Everyone's full-go, then, except Minor, and that's just life with Brandon Minor.
Down, pull, tomato tomato. So that play that Michigan got burned on a few times against Eastern Michigan and exists as the staple of the Michigan State rushing offense has been called at least two different things around here. Steve Sharik calls it "Down G" because the line blocks down and a guard pulls around. I've tended to call it "power off tackle" because it's a power run that usually goes off tackle. Chris Brown splits the difference, calls it "Power O," and breaks it down in the usual clear language that teaches you something:
The lineman to the side the run is going (playside) essentially “down” block, meaning they take the man to the inside of them. For the guards and center, that includes anyone “heads up” or covering them, but for the playside tackle, he does not want to block the defensive end or other “end man on the line of scrimmage.” These lineman use their leverage to get good angles to crush the defensive lineman, and the fact that they don’t have to block a couple of defenders on the playside frees them to get good double teams and block the backside linebackers. To use Vince Lombardi’s phrase, the idea is to get so much force going that direction that they completely seal off the backside.
There are four or five additional aspects to the play and accompanying cut ups. Every once in a long while Michigan will run this, but not often; usually they just zone to one side of the field or the other. They did bust it out a couple times against Delaware State; they use it as a short-yardage play. (As opposed to DeBord, who loved running the stretch on third and short.) They tried it on the goal line once but Vincent Smith didn't get the memo and ran directly into the space the pulling guard had vacated.
If they do run it in non I-form short yardage sets in the future, I'd expect it would be from a set featuring Robinson and Minor in the backfield.
Michigan gets exposed to this play on defense a ton, though, and the key to it is for the unblocked defensive end to prevent this from happening:
First, the fullback (or, more often nowadays, some kind of H-back or other player) is responsible for blocking the otherwise unblocked end man on the line of scrimmage (”EMLOS”). He uses a “kick out” technique, simply meaning he blocks him from the inside to out, in order to create Lombardi’s famous “seal” going the other way.
EMLOS: football jargon or the cybernetic virtual intelligence gone awry that you must defeat to save the station and turn the zombiefied crew back into humans?
Er. Anyway: the defensive end has to get inside that block. If he does this he almost always turns the pulling guard into a useless hunk of meat stuck in the backfield and then "spills" the play outside, where an unblocked linebacker should have an easy time stringing the play out and tackling for a minimal gain. At least in theory. Michigan's done this a lot this year and sometimes the linebacker has not made the easy play on the outside. Por ejemplo:
That's JB Fitzgerald there but Mouton has also done that more than once. Not recently, though, so that's good.
“I think we feel like we’re the better team and we can go out there and still beat them," Royster told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette for a story published Tuesday.
Not one but two qualifiers there. Graham in response:
“He’s just going to have to show it,” Graham said on a teleconference. “We’re going to come. They better come hard, cause we’re coming. I just don’t think they really know. How much preparation and how much we’ve been waiting for this game since last year. If he feels pretty confident, they better prepare. That’s all I have to say.”
Good show, Mr. Graham. Your delicately phrased bon mot will be the talk of the salons this day! I daresay the viceroy's daughter may even catch wind of it and permit herself a lady-like titter. Write her a letter confessing your affections, but beware her devious half-brother's designs on the throne—and milady's heaving bosom!
Stat abuse. I mentioned the huge swing in Michigan's statistics after the Delaware State game in the game column; Ace has a fuller breakdown over at his site. My favorite line in the table is Zoltan & Co jumping from third in net punting to second on a day with no punts. More drastic than even the huge jump in offense rankings are some of the individual statistics. Denard, welcome to the realm of the statistically viable:
Denard Robinson’s season (and, therefore, career) passer efficiency rating skyrocketed from a paltry 55.39 (for context, the 100th best qualifying passer in the country, Clemson’s Kyle Parker, has a rating of 106.55) to a very acceptable 131.83 (which would qualify for 54th in the country, just above Northwestern’s Mike Kafka). David Cone’s season rating went from 0.00 to 150.72.
Meanwhile, Michigan has been outgained in four games against BCS opponents.
Understated positivity, also ROOOOONEY! You probably have no idea who Martin Tyler is unless you're British or have FIFA 200X, but even if you don't you have to understand this is good news:
SI.com has learned that Martin Tyler, the venerable British announcer who was voted the FA Premier League Commentator of the Decade, has been hired by ESPN to be the lead play-by-play voice for the network's English-language coverage of next summer's tournament in South Africa. The formal announcement is expected this week.
Guess who's not watching the 2010 World Cup in Spanish? This guy. This is going from Pam Ward and a howler monkey that spends 90 minutes screeching your embarrassing personal secrets to the world to Keith Jackson and a somewhat annoying Irish guy. The guy behind this delightful turn of events is the improbably-named Jed Drake, and he's possibly signaling a shift in ESPN policy away from "let's try to make Brian stab the cat":
"After the ['08] Euros we said, 'OK, let's take the presumption that we are going from scratch and start looking at those who can contribute at the highest level to our ongoing efforts in the world arena of football," said Jed Drake, ESPN's senior vice president and executive producer, event production.
Yes. Yes please.
Etc.: Cinci radio stations are getting uppity re: OSU. UMHoops interviews John Gasaway, the artist formerly known as Big Ten Wonk. Chuck Klosterman's new book is excerpted on Page 2; Michigan zone readin' it against Minnesota is a jump-off point for a Klosterman discursion into life, the universe, and everything. It probably says something uncomplimentary about me that I thought Klosterman's description of the play was irritatingly inaccurate in an article where Klosterman apologizes for the excessive football detail four or five times, even inviting readers to skip ahead.
Somewhat annoying Irish guy? I'm not even sure you'll have to deal with that for the big games -- I think just about everyone expects ESPN to hire Andy Gray again as they did for Euro 2008, especially with long-time broadcast partner Tyler on board.
I live in Cinci and work at UC and it's great to see the city getting excited about the Bearcats for once. It all feels pretty bandwagon-y, but for the first time living in this city I don't feel like I'm in a sea of buckeye fans.
with its ludicrous display of umpiring glaringly exposed by high def instant replay, I thought of Klosterman's comments on baseball's resistance to change. Hey, MLB, this is 2009, not 1909; get the calls right.
The play Sharik's calling Down G and the play Chris Brown is describing (Power) are different plays. Power is a double team at the point of attack with a backside guard pulling and kicking. The frontside pull is something different altogether.
I was going to say something, but I see you already have. Power is I formation run scheme, which means (as you said) a double team at the hole, followed by a lead blocker. I formation staples:
-Isolation is a double team behind the OG with a fullback lead on the playside ILB.
-Power is a double team behind the OT with a backside guard pull. There are many variations on this: Power(backside guard kickout, FB or H-back leads on playside ILB), Power O (FB kickout, guard around for playside ILB), Power OG (frontside guard kickout, backside guard around for playside ILB), Power Wham (H-back kickout, backside guard around for playside ILB)
-Counter Trey is a double team behind the OT with the backside guard and tackle pulling. The guard kicks out and the tackle goes around for the playside ILB. The fullback blocks the backside DE, hence the counter action.
Down G is a frontside pull, with the objective being the playside TE, OT, and/or H back (wing) making a wall and the frontside OG (hence "G") kicking out. There is no fullback.
Brandon Graham says that "I don't think they really know...how much preparation and how much we've been waiting for this game since last year." Is this because the team has a sense that this was one that they had last year that just slipped away? The final wasn't close, but we did look great in the first half and (it appeared) just couldn't maintain momentum/adjust in the 2nd half. This quote makes me pretty excited for Saturday.
But won't Rosenberg reveal the amount of our preparation in an upcoming expose, citing Graham's quote as evidence that we violated NCAA regs and the United States securities laws, all under the headline "Does Rodriguez Ignore the Geneva Convention"?
Or irritatingly inaccurate about the Klosterman essay? FWIW, its not an article but an excerpt of an essay from his new book so I can see why he was telling his reader that they could skip ahead if they didnt want to get bogged down by the nuances of a spread offense/zone read. Its not like he wrote it for ESPN. I thought it was a good read.
I used to write letters and send emails to ESPN back when they covered hockey, IMPLORING them to get rid of their hockey crews. Gary Thorne bothered me the most because he wouldn't commentate on the game and would just tell stats. Couldn't stand him.
ESPN soccer needs to just hire BBC crews to learn how to do it right, such as replays during slow parts of the game.
Remember in '94 when ABC would have "red zone scoring" statistics. For soccer?