Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (48)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 6 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 1 week ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  • OT - Kentucky Derby 2012
    k.o.k.Law - 2 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,537 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 785 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 665 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 645 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 633 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 18 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 12 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: I love High School football
    14 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    33 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    16 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    25 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    37 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    64 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    22 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    119 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    27 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    38 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    62 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    26 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    52 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    56 replies
  • ESPN: Michigan BBall article featuring GRIII.
    6 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: I love High School football
    14 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    33 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    62 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    16 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    119 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    25 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    46 replies
  • ESPN: Trey Burke Articles/Video/Fluff/Etc.
    13 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    64 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    115 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    22 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    37 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    38 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    82 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    52 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    119 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    115 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    82 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Unverified Voracity Has Smart, Is Determination

By Brian — February 12th, 2013 at 1:07 PM — 37 comments
Filed under:
  • basketball wonkery
  • big ten divisions
  • foul up three
  • michigan state
  • ncaa: the bureaucracy
  • nine game conference schedule
  • unverified voracity
  • zack novak

Totem animal qualities. I thought this was an interesting shot from the extensive ESPN galleries put up in and around the OSU/Indiana games. It's a switch board; each player has an abstract quality they would like to embody they are supposed to dwell on:

image

Yes, it bothers me that some of these things are qualities one can possess—toughness, perspective, pose—and others are not. You cannot have "smart"; You can be smart. One can have determination; you cannot be determination.

Given the WE ON shirts, we can put grammar next to drawing free throw attempts as Michigan's main weaknesses.

Trice nyet. Travis Trice will miss The Big Game tonight. That leaves MSU with little on their perimeter bench other than Denzel Valentine, a slick-passing wing type with a whopping 31 in the TOrate department. So maybe not as slick passing as you'd hope if you're Tom Izzo. MSU also has Russell Byrd, who's like Stauskas if Stauskas was hitting 18% of his threes.

Expect both backcourts to get scant rest, then. Projected MSU minutes without at least one of Appling/Harris: 0. Impact won't be large except in the unlikely event that Harris or Appling gets in foul trouble.

In the negative column, it doesn't seem like Jordan Morgan will be available, either, after Michigan "shut him down."

Foul: nyet? The foul-or-defend up three late discussion has been raging for years, to the point where Ken Pomeroy's effort starts its title with "Yet another. " Most studies show there's little difference; further most give the slight edge to playing D. Kenpom's results:

         W    L   OT   Win%   Cases
Foul    122   5   10   92.7    137
Defend  598   2   77   94.0    677

That gap is narrow enough that the gap could be chance, but you can say that there's no evidence fouling is better in practice. Note that Michigan's recent misfortune does not make these statistics since this data only covers possessions that start with between 5 and 12 seconds on the clock, which will no doubt give our local Bo Ryans the wiggle room to say this does not apply. While I'm still on Team Foul, the margins here are so narrow that it doesn't seem that important. Certainly less important than the pending invasion of the planet.

I mean, NBA types are two of 64 on similar shots since 1996. Debating whether or not that late game strategy is correct is like debating whether the windows are ready for a hurricane when you live in Michigan.

More games: da. We've heard it before only to have it go poof, but yet another round of stories endorsing a nine or ten game conference schedule has burst onto the internet, leaving a legendary trail of leadership viscera behind:

After spending Monday in meetings with coaches and athletic directors at conference headquarters in Park Ridge, Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany told the Tribune the status quo of eight conference games “is not even on the table right now.”

It will be nine or 10, with the decision to be made this spring.

Insert the usual AD assertions that without seven home games they will have to dress all of their teams in sackcloth and ashes, but it looks like at least nine games are on the way.

Also on the table: November night games, early conference games, and the usual chatter about having an East-West split. The bizarre bit in there:

Central time zone schools Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois and Northwestern could be joined by Indiana, Purdue, Michigan or Michigan State. Delany said the conference would try to “figure out a way” to maintain rivalries between in-state schools.

Michigan State keeps getting lumped in with the schools that could be put in the other division… and Michigan is actually in here as well. No further words need to be spent on how dumb it is to have Michigan and Ohio State in opposite divisions; assuming that's not the case, hopefully MSU isn't allowed to nonsensically flee the division Michigan is in and expect to maintain an annual rivalry with them.

A little more detail on the divisions model that seems to have the most favor this instant:

Although the Big Ten presented the athletic directors -- and several university presidents who came to the league office Sunday -- with several models for divisions, don't be surprised if the league decides to keep things simple with an East-West alignment following the additions of both Maryland and Rutgers in 2014. The simplest solution -- one the athletic directors are discussing -- is to assign teams based on their time zone (Eastern or Central).

The lone caveat: there will be eight Big Ten teams in the Eastern time zone -- Maryland, Rutgers, Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana and Purdue -- and only six in the Central time zone (Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Northwestern and Illinois). So one team from the Eastern time zone would need to move.

That article from Rittenberg also plays up the possibility that Michigan State will end up in the other division. This would either stick Michigan with a protected crossover—thus trading games against interesting teams in the other division for constant Purdue/Indiana games—or bust up the in-state rivalry. Neither is appealing. Let us condemn Michigan State's Rose Bowl hopes to death and keep them in the East.

The worst part about this is I can no longer dump on Indiana State as much. Indiana State, of course, submitted an override to the barely-passed multi-year scholarship legislation reading as such:

The current system works.  We don't need to get into bidding wars where one school offers a $75% for 2 years and the other school then offers 85% for 3, etc., etc.  This puts the kid into a situation where they almost need an agent/advisor just to determine the best "deal."   Again, if it isn't broke, don't fix it. [Indiana State]

Since I've used the tree people as the primary example of why the NCAA's governance structure is permanently broken: programs with nothing in common with each other are under one large dumb tent. So I am dissapoint, Big Ten, that you are trying to fight the recent recruiting deregulation:

PRESS RELEASE

We are specifically concerned with the following three proposals and ask that they be tabled along with Proposal 13-2:

Proposal 11-2: Athletics Personnel - Limitations on the Number and Duties of Coaches - Elimination of Recruiting Coordination Functions

Proposal 13-3: Recruiting - Deregulation of Modes and Numerical Limitations on Communication

Proposal 13-5-A: Recruiting - Elimination of Printed Recruiting Materials and Video/Audio Legislation

We have serious concerns whether these proposals, as currently written, are in the best interest of high school student-athletes, their families and their coaches. We are also concerned about the adverse effect they would have on college coaches, administrators and university resources.

There's nothing in the first and last proposals that has material impact on prospects or their associated hangers-on, and the horrors of communications deregulation seem eminently preventable. "Hello, Coach X. Please limit your contacts with me to X in timeframe Y, or I will not consider your school." Or, like, turn your phone off when you don't want to use it.

The assertions about "adverse effects" on people in the athletic department who now have to hire "u r gud art fertbar"-texting interns and print glossy media guides are more credible, but shortsighted. If you want to play on level ground on the big stuff you have to let the NCAA dump big sections of meaningless secondary violations.

In the building. Zack Novak returns to the scene of the Aneurysm of Leadership tonight:

"It's going to be so weird, I've only been to one Michigan basketball game in my life watching it, it's going to be odd," Novak said by phone Monday. "But I know this would be a big win for them, and I know they'll be ready to go.

"I know it's disheartening to lose a game the way they did at Wisconsin, but it's a great opportunity for them to go in and get a win on the road at Michigan State. That would totally bring the team's psyche right back to where it needs to be. It'd get their swagger back, and that's big."

His team in Holland has a week break.

Ondre is smaller. Down to 315 from 347.

Etc.: Four down at Alabama, leaving just six left to cut. Tifos at Georgetown. The Daily bombs hockey after suffering yet another sweep. Twice. Michigan's commits are lighting up high school basketball—Derrick Walton has had triple-doubles in two of his last three games, and Irvin puts up 30 a game it seems.  Paterno business is "200 pages of nothing." Hate quantified. Players only.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
February 12th, 2013 at 1:18 PM | 2 of 64 (Score:5 Normal)
MaizeNBlueJ
MaizeNBlueJ's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 550

Okay, so NBA players are 2 of 64 in the same situation that Brust was. How is it possible that we've been snakebit by that shot twice in the past 3 years? (Brust on Saturday & Evan Turner in March of 2010)

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:52 PM | Because we refuse to guard (Score:-1 Flamebait)
TheGhostofYost
TheGhostofYost's picture
Joined: 04/20/2011
MGoPoints: 2560

Because we refuse to guard the inbounder and allow people to square up to the basket.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:02 PM | He was like falling sideways from halfcourt (Score:5 Normal)
AAB
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 7196

Let's not start pretending that's some high-percentage shot (or anything other than one of the lowest percentage shots imaginable) just because we got hit by the nasty end of variance.  

There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 5:59 PM | The Turner shot was a higher (Score:3 Normal)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

The Turner shot was a higher percentage look.  He was moving towards the basket and we didn't make a real effort to defend.  He'd probably hit that shot 15% of the time.  Brust's shot was much more difficult moving towards the sideline with real defense being applied by LeVert.  That's bad luck, and it happens.  In either case, I do think not having someone on the ball is a valid criticism.  A lot has to go right with under 3 seconds left from the opposite baseline.  I don't see why we should ever voluntarily make it easier and let the offense pretty much execute their desperation play the way they want to.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:21 PM | Where is (Score:2)
nmumike
nmumike's picture
Joined: 10/28/2010
MGoPoints: 459

Stauskas on the above list?

 

"It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing."

"The world is given to me only once..."

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:41 PM | You don't see it? (Score:2 Normal)
Duncan
Duncan's picture
Joined: 11/24/2008
MGoPoints: 30

It says 'swag'

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:21 PM | Grammar is a socially (Score:-1 Normal)
DKohn81
DKohn81's picture
Joined: 02/11/2012
MGoPoints: 710

Grammar is a socially constructed idea. There is nothing inheriently correct about English.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:40 PM | Why do people more and more (Score:5 Normal)
Owl
Owl's picture
Joined: 04/14/2012
MGoPoints: 376

Why do people more and more try to equate "socially constructed" with valueless in some important  way? Perhaps that demonstrates that it lacks a certain objective quality, but it certainly doesn't mean it lacks real qualities of the sort that would make it important. Just because something isn't "inherently correct" doesn't mean it isn't significantly correct.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 3:21 PM | Spoken like someone who has (Score:4 Normal)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5834

Spoken like someone who has never had to grade papers written by students with a poor grasp of grammar. You will quickly appreciate the need for proper grammar when you're stuck having to parse meaning from of a jumble of poorly constructed sentences and incorrect conjugation.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 7:23 PM | Can we assume you drive on (Score:2)
Profwoot
Profwoot's picture
Joined: 10/12/2010
MGoPoints: 197

Can we assume you drive on whichever side of the road you want? Social norms can be extremely important despite being constructed.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:35 PM | Most of those words are nouns (Score:5 Normal)
dnak438
dnak438's picture
Joined: 08/12/2009
MGoPoints: 2007

so if we just change smart to 'smarts' or 'intelligence' and physical to 'physicality' and 'dependable' to 'dependability' then it's all good.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:41 PM | OCD Tendancies for everyone (Score:2)
JeepinBen
JeepinBen's picture
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 9532

...

it bothers me too...

"Over? Did you say, over? Nothing is over until we decide it is!"

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:43 PM | They misspelled Bielfeldt. (Score:3 Normal)
HermosaBlue
HermosaBlue's picture
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 1431

I presume they spelled it right on his scholarship paperwork.  But still, that's gotta feel less than good.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:44 PM | I have a feeling that the (Score:5 Normal)
Feat of Clay
Feat of Clay's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 2870

I have a feeling that the fuse box was Coach Alexander's thing, and I think in general ol' Coach BA cares a lot less about grammar and word forms than he does MESSAGING.

He also talks about himself in the third person, which makes him seem like a magical person for whom the usual rules of language usage do no apply.

 

 

Candace: No... That why they make smart word box for tell monkey hard brain-hurty things.
Phineas: Removing prepositions makes it more condescending.
  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:44 PM | Attn math people. Is it (Score:3 Normal)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4160

Attn math people. Is it possible to maintain a Big 10 schedule in which only 2 Big 10 teams have protected crossovers? 

Because if it is, then splitting Purdue and IU is the perfect solution. The IU-PU game can be their game on the final weekend, freeing the rest of the conference up for intra division matchups in which most rivalries will get played. This would be a great final weekend, covering many of the league's trophy games: 

-The Game

-UW-Minny for the Axe

-Iowa-UNL  for whatever that trophy is. Heros Game?

-NU-UI for the Land of Lincoln

-IU-PU

-MSU-PSU for the land grant (haha)

-Maryland - Rutgers for the Amtrak Train

That's a weekend that trumps any other conference for finishing with significant, traditional matchups (compare to the SEC where half the teams are playing FBS teams in late November).

I don't think anyone would object to Purdue and Indiana being locked into a recurring crossover, and there's no other game that really requires a crossover, freeing up a more even rotation of games. But I'm not sure if the scheduling works over time with only one crossover.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:06 PM | Yes. (Score:5 Normal)
Alton
Joined: 07/05/2008
MGoPoints: 988

It's possible to protect only one cross-over rivalry.

So let's say the divisions are as you propose, and the Purdue-Indiana game is the only protected cross-division game.  Let's also say there is a 9-game schedule.

Michigan would play everybody in the East Division 9 times in 9 years (Rutgers, Maryland, Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan State, Indiana).

Michigan would play everybody in the West Division other than Purdue 4 times in 9 years (Illinois, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska).

Michigan would play Purdue 3 times in 9 years.

That's a total of 81 games in 9 years, for 9 games a year.

You can make the rotation work, but the rotation would not be very regular.  You don't have a cycle shorter than 9 years that you can use (18 years if you include home and away during every cycle, the way they do now).  The schedule would repeat after 18 years, and certainly the 14-team alignment won't last from 2014 to 2031.  Teams will be added or subtracted before the first cycle ends.

I also tried it with a 10-game conference schedule, and it works just as well.  The home-and-away cycle is 24 years instead of 18 years, and Michigan would play the Western teams other than Purdue 14 times in 24 years, and they would play Purdue 12 times in 24 years.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:19 PM | Hopefully, that's the (Score:2)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4160

Thanks.

Hopefully, that's the solution. It works to set up an appealing final day slate of games. It also works because, to be frank, I don't think there are any teams that are going to lament playing Purdue or Indiana 3 times over 9 years rather than 4.

It does give PU and IU a slight competitive advantage, in that a historically weak team remains fixed to their schedule, but it's far more competitively equitable than anchoring every team to a protected crossover. And it allows those teams to maintain their most important annual game.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:46 PM | I wish Kenpom would also look (Score:3 Normal)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13168

I wish Kenpom would also look at the numbers as it relates to guarding the inbounder or not.  Just as "convential wisdom" in the NFL that dictates punting on 4th & 1 is almost always wrong I would expect that there is similar data that can be compiled on guarding vs not guarding the inbounder.

It would seem to me (anidotal evidence notwithstanding) that placing a single player in a zone defense while everyone else plays man is of little real value.  But if you're able to disrupt the inbound pass thereby making the pass-catch-shoot less fluid you reduce the longshot odds even further.  Go back and look at the shot on Saturday.  The ball was caught in stride and he was able to rise and fire (albiet drifting right to left) with an absolutely clean look.  While not a good shot by any means it's not like this was an one armed heave.  

As pointed out by MaizenBlueJ we've been beaten now twice on the same play in the past three years.  And the one constant was we didnt guard the inbounder in either case.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:54 PM | Well even if we're not going (Score:-1 Redundant)
TheGhostofYost
TheGhostofYost's picture
Joined: 04/20/2011
MGoPoints: 2560

Well even if we're not going to guard the inbounder, which is a mistake, why we have McGary just sitting under the basket is mind-boggling.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:12 PM | Crazy (Score:3 Normal)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5142

Do you guys think Beilein is just some lunatic and despite 30 years as a head coach he has refused all logic and talks amongst his peers to come up with this defense that everyone else thinks is stupid?  So all the internet geniuses are smarter than Beilein, Pitino, Knight and the rest of college basketball that has tried this at one point and been burnt.  

The reason Mcgary is back there(he's not underneath the basket  to start, he drifts there once the pass is completed) is to prevent players from breaking open and getting a wide open look down in our end.   That's why in football you keep a safety back. 

Please check out this clip.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0haGKGiX9qA 

Player on the ball didn't work there so that must be a stupid strategy as well.   Why have a guy guard the guy throwing the ball in he doesn't have enough time to get the ball back?    Stop with the blame game.

Your whole logic is based on them getting a good look.   Beielien instructed them to foul.   So your strategy discussion isn't even relevant.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:28 PM | Did you even bother to read (Score:4 Normal)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13168

Did you even bother to read my first paragraph?

" I wish Kenpom would also look at the numbers as it relates to guarding the inbounder or not.  Just as "convential wisdom" in the NFL that dictates punting on 4th & 1 is almost always wrong I would expect that there is similar data that can be compiled on guarding vs not guarding the inbounder."

I'm asking for empirical evidence to see which side is correct.  Obviously given that some coaches prefer to guard him and some (like ours) do not there isnt consensus even amoung coaches so why get your panties in a bunch cause I happen to fall in the camp that thinks gaurding him is the best option?

Also - by your logic every coach always makes the right decision (hey...they're coaches what do WE know) so punting on 4th & 1 is always the "smart" choice......right?

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 3:51 PM | Ghost (Score:2 Normal)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5142

I was replying to Yost who has been all over these boards like Beilien is a moron.  

As to your point,  your 1st paragraph does not relate at all to the rest of your post.   You should have stopped after the 1st paragraph. 

I am not saying the coaches are always right.  What I am saying is that fans on the internet and call in shows have said not guarding the inbounds pass is 100% the wrong play.   "I've coached high school ball for 20 years and Beilien choked on Sat.  Everyone knows you guard the inbounder."   That's what I have been hearing.  Since I see coaches using all sorts of strategies I don't think it's everyone.

The other point was that the strategy Beilien was usin gwas so we could foul.  There were going to be no passes so the extra guy was on the floor to get the foul quick.   Wisconsin has a lot of very tall gys so havina guy back was a pretty good call in my book.

    

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 6:09 PM | You don't get guys breaking (Score:2 Normal)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

You don't get guys breaking open toward the bask if you don't do a hard deny on the inbounds pass (which we didn't do in either of our two loses anyway).  The best strategy in the less than 3 seconds, full court scenario is to put a guy on the ball and force who ever catches it to catch the ball going away from the basket.  It forces the inbounds man to execute  a tough pass in the face of pressure and the offense either to perfectly execute a play (i.e. Valpo) or make a true desperation heave.  We haven't done that in either loss.  Against OSU, Turner was able to catch the ball in stride going up the court and take a reasonable long shot at the buzzer against lax defense.  Against Wisconsin, we did better, but Brust was still able to catch a relatively easy pass going toward the sideline and get up something less than a complete desperation heave.  I think we could have done better defending both shots, starting with making life more difficult on the pass.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 8:28 PM | The reason McGary is back there... (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38797

That's not the reason at all. There's zero reason to prevent a 2 up 3 with that little time left. Score 2 and be down 1 fouling us with a second left. Better odds. He shouldn't be playing safety...he should playing kick returner, stopping any "kick" at the 3 point line, and if anyone goes past it, let him go. Defend a guy shooting 3, and if someone goes past him, who cares?

Problem is he doesn't actually move back after caught. He's already deep in the paint when the pass is made, then is worried about rebounding a miss for some reason.

http://youtu.be/M9W7AVuN9dI

I think you should front the guy, but if not the extra man has to be doing SOMETHING to help defend. At that point you don't need a big guy rebounding, you need a quicker guy who CAN be a safety and get over and double team faster.

I don't get saying a guy made a mistake means that he's a crappy coach, or people are acting like OMG he should be fired!!!! No one has said that. It's not like the weekly fall FIRE BORGES! thread. (Who also knows more about coaching than anyone on this site but there aren't any posts like yours when people are saying far more than "hey, maybe we should do that better."

And I bet Pitino still wakes up with cold sweats thinking if he had fronted Hill he might not have ended up with two defenders between Laettner and the basket instead of one preventing the pass. I know I do because the Fab Five would have handled that team...if they had even beat Indiana.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:47 PM | Parts of Indiana are in the (Score:4 Normal)
samsoccer7
samsoccer7's picture
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 906

Parts of Indiana are in the central time zone so maybe just move them to that division??

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:25 PM | But only NW Indiana.  I guess (Score:3 Normal)
IndyBlue
IndyBlue's picture
Joined: 09/13/2008
MGoPoints: 287

But only NW Indiana.  I guess that's close to Purdue, but doesn't have any effect on IU.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:49 PM | My suggestion on the (Score:1)
ChalmersE
Joined: 11/19/2008
MGoPoints: 1068

My suggestion on the conference lineup is to move BOTH Indiana and Purdue West, preserving that "rivalry".  Then I'd move Northwestern East.  Why?  Northwestern is in Chicago whcih effectively makes them closer to the Eastern teams than both Indiana and Purdue (and arguably MSU) because it's so easy to fly to Chicago.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 1:56 PM | That would put essentially (Score:2)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4160

That would put essentially all the major media and population centers Chicago, NYC  DC, Columbus/Cleveland, and Pittsburgh/Philly in the East, though. Hard to believe they'd do that from a media attention standpoint.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:12 PM | recruiting limits (Score:1)
Shop Smart Shop...
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 463

Brian,

Your assertation that we have to go along with the changes to get rid of the extraneous rules doesn't compute.  There is no good reason to to allow schools to contact a player at an increased rate.  Your idea that kids are going to turn their phone off if they don't want to be contacted seems terribly naive as well.  Kids don't turn their phones off, ever.  I have to make kids run at practice because they have their phones on them, and I'm a tennis coach.  These kids live on those damn things.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:24 PM | I was just going to say, I (Score:2)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11814

I was just going to say, I don't even think teenagers know that phones can turn off, and would be horrified to learn that they could do that just by accidentally pushing a button.  "Off" is the state in which the phone exists when the battery runs down, and is to be avoided at all possible costs lest they feel unconnected from the grid.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:25 PM | I'd rather play in the West than play f&#@ing Rutgers (Score:1 Normal)
93Grad
Joined: 07/26/2011
MGoPoints: 823

and f*&^%ing Maryland every year.  What a joke.  Death to Delaney

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:25 PM | Question about drawing fouls . . . sort of (Score:1)
jballen4eva
jballen4eva's picture
Joined: 11/20/2012
MGoPoints: 27

Forgive me if this has been answered on this site before, but is there any analysis of what percentage of shots teams take in transition?  It seems Michigan has enough high percentage shots to have a higher number of free throw attempts, but maybe too much of that is in transition? 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:27 PM | Russell Byrd (Score:2)
so bored at work
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 93

But is Byrd more than just a (18%) shooter???

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:32 PM | My issue with the recruiting (Score:2)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13964

My issue with the recruiting changes is that the coaches will be forced to "keep up with the Joneses" and increase the volume of communication to absurd levels just to show requisite interest. Sure, kids can control their recruitment to a point, but then coaches have to deal with the fact that 17 year-old kids are stupid and don't mean what they say. Plus, there's no enforcement mechanism to force coaches to stop calling. The top kids are going to get literally hundreds of phone calls / texts each week.

I think unlimited contact is great if the NCAA creates a "do not call" list for prospects to sign onto when they enter the NCAA Clearinghouse. Every week, the kid logs on and adds/deletes the names of any schools he doesn't want contact from. That list is then sent to the schools with a 2-3 day grace period. A certain number of phone calls to recruits on your schools do not call list equals one scholarship off for that recruiting cycle.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:42 PM | I think our Michigan (Score:5 Normal)
NYWolverine
Joined: 08/16/2008
MGoPoints: 353

I think our Michigan basketball players can absolutely strive to embody each of the qualities on that board, from "toughness" to "smart". The utility of the board clearly relies on the subjective weight each word carries with a particular player, which seems to be quite useful for personal motivation.

No, the words are not all grammatically similar possessable qualities, but who said they have to be? On Michigan's board, each word is unique to a particular player, and each player is only supposed to draw on their word to play with motivated discipline to best help the team.

When Jon Horford is on the floor, the coaches want the word "BELIEF" to flash through his head. Why? So he thinks about: Belief in the system. Belief in his own abilities. Belief that if he does his job, the team will make a play. Belief in his teammates. Perhaps one or more of these has been a weakness of Jon's, but if he's coming to play with that word on his mind, he'll help the team by playing with belief.

On the other hand, when Spike Albrecht is on the floor, the coaches want "SMART" going through his head. Why? So when he's playing point, he thinks about playing smart. Make the smart play. Read the defense, and make the smart pass. Don't try to rely so much on your physical tools, but on the smart coaching you've received.

Spike obviously spells one of the leading candidates for POY on a team seemingly destined to make a tournament run. The team can only get there if the guy running the system plays "SMART."

And so on and so forth. Personally, I love that the coaches had the creativity to put up this board. I love how the players seem to buy in to it. Think about each player and their word, then watch them play. It's effective.

E to the S Go Blue, Class of '04

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 2:47 PM | I might be alone here, and (Score:2)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

I might be alone here, and maybe it is because I don't gamble, but I don't much care to study stats before a game, after the game I'm very interested in who did what statistically.  I  will pour over the stat sheet after the game in rapt curiosity, taking on the task before the game is a cure for insomnia for me.

  • Login or register to post comments
February 12th, 2013 at 6:05 PM | Zack Novak... (Score:1)
Lordfoul
Lordfoul's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1456

was Determination.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.