Unverified Voracity Exclaims About Thick Air Comment Count

Brian

Extremely important fainting goat update. The conversation did not quite go as asserted yesterday, but it's pretty great anyway:

“He told me the play of the week, the special teams funky deal, was a fake punt – the Fainting Goat,” Mays said. “In my mind, I was like, ‘What’s that?’”

Said Paschall: “Book, you’re going to be the goat.”

“I was like, ‘Oh, my God.’ What is he saying?” Mays said.

Also:

“I was talking to the guy across from me, saying, ‘Wow, there is some thick air down here in Miami,” Mays said.

God bless Arkansas State.

BEAT THE DRUM EVERYBODY. Ineligible man downfield complainin' is welcome wherever I find it. Pete Roussel notes an egregious event in the Alabama-USM game:

6_3098761

yes the penalty is called when the ball is thrown but not caught; still geez

Remember last year when Taylor Lewan engaged a guy about three yards behind the line and drove him so far downfield he got a penalty and everyone clucked at him about how he had to know better? Why would he have to know better? I think he would not have to.

Offenses are brutally effective already without adding blocking linebackers ten yards downfield on pass plays to their docket.

BEAT THE DRUM PART 2. Yes, we are going to beat this dead horse until it sends seven guys downfield on the snap. "Shield" punting, which we've called "spread" around here because I'm sure you can figure it out*, has taken over college football. Michigan is an exception, and apparently so is Texas. They ate a 45-yard punt return before UCLA's winning drive after lining up like so:

1_Nr-lTFzY1Zc2bvZnWDKs5A[1]

This is actually a little more spread-ish than Michigan, but eight Longhorns are behind the LOS when the ball is kicked.

Like Michigan, the bad way stats are kept somewhat conceals the issue here. Not only does Texas give up a lot of yards per return, they give up a lot of returns, period:

UT’s 10.3-yard-per-punt-return average allowed isn’t miserable — although it ranks 88th out of 128 FBS teams — but the Longhorns are allowing a greater number of punt return chances under Vaughn, and as the UCLA punt shows, a reason could be because his players are late getting downfield. The nine punt returns against UT this year is tied for fourth-most nationally while the Longhorns’ 93 total punt return yards allowed puts them tied for 115th.

Strong used a spread punt at Louisville to good effect; no idea why he's not doing the same thing at Texas.

*[Bizarrely, coaches keep telling me that it is Michigan's NFL-style punt game that they know as "spread." I reject that lingo and all its works. You don't get to call it that. That makes no sense. Unlike coaches who don't want to use seven  gunners, I insist on making sense.]

Also in Texas but better? Four minutes left is a weird amount of time to have in a game. If you're leading and on offense, you need a first down at all costs. If you're leading and on defense you want to prevent the other team from scoring, but if they're going to score you want them to do it quickly, not after 3:58 has left the clock. The paramount thing is to get (or keep) the ball.

So a lot of offenses will grunt their way to a third and seven and then take their shot. Strong elected for a different path:

When Texas got the ball at 4:17 with a four point lead and chose to go "tempo", the ensuing three and out and minimal clock burn was widely panned on the web and in the traditional media.  Of course, it didn't matter.  UCLA scored in about nine seconds on a punt return followed by a good play call against tendency.

Texas had just scored to go ahead with the aid of a hurry-up no huddle; a UCLA player misaligned on a 30-yard run. They continued that with the lead and 4:17 left, and that's… odd. But if you think that's the best way to get a first down, that's at least defensible. Of course, when you lose five yards on a run up the gut you're not going to be bleeding much of anything.

Upshot: coaches don't place enough emphasis on having the ball last when they're in a one-possession game. They're willing to bleed down the field for an opposition four-minute drill instead of being aggressive, and they place minimally useful timeout-sapping over a greater chance of getting a first down.

A stupid reason but okay. We're now talking about revoking the NFL's non-profit status because of "Redskins"?

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) announced Tuesday that she will introduce legislation to eliminate the NFL’s tax-exempt status because of its refusal to address the name of the Washington Redskins.

While I also find the name distasteful, why don't we revoke the NFL's non-profit status because it in no way fits the definition of a nonprofit enterprise? The idea that the NFL can skate on millions of dollars in taxes because [no reason given] is equally offensive. Possibly more so, because one situation is a private enterprise being offensive and the other is the government being idiotic.

I mean, if there's one class of industries you can tax the living hell out of without seeing them move their labor force, it's pro sports.

(No polo.)

It's profile o-clock. Jeremy Clark:

"Of course everyone wants to play, but (last year) I was still learning the process and there were guys in front of me who knew the calls and everything, so you can't get mad if you don't know what you're supposed to be doing out there," Clark said. "This year, I feel like I'm learning it well."

Dueling Bryan Mone Piece #1:

“The thing you realize quickly about Bryan is the genuine concern he shows for everyone he comes in contact with,” said Benson, Mone's prep coach at Highland High School in Salt Lake City. "And it's genuine. He truly cares about everyone around him. I don't know if I've met a kid with a bigger heart.

"He's one of a kind. Truly one of a kind."

Dueling Bryan Mone Piece #2:

"My brother has always been my motivation, because growing up he couldn’t really feed himself or do all types of stuff, so I had to grow up soon enough to help out my mom and my sister,” said Mone, who had another older brother who died from leukemia.

Mone began caring for his brother in earnest in sixth grade, but didn’t feel comfortable with all his responsibilities until a few years later.

“I started getting used to it in junior high,” he said. “I knew what I had to do to take care of him.”

Designated official site softball-tosser on Jack Miller:

Jack Miller is many things.

He's best known as the starting center and anchor of the offensive line for the University of Michigan football team. But he's also a political science major, and thinks he might someday become a lawyer or run for public office.

He's a music lover -- especially Dave Matthews and jam bands -- and takes aim during deer and duck hunting seasons.

Miller also is the great-nephew of former Detroit Tigers manager Jim Leyland, who texts him after every game and remains a huge inspiration.

Spence suspended further. Noah Spence's ecstasy suspension was three games, and now it's at least four after he failed a test before Kent State. If Ohio State follows the usual policy here he would be out for the year, as most teams go 1) nothing, 2) one game, 3) quarter of a season, 4) whole season for failed drug tests. Spence has apparently entered rehab.

But you have a legitimate reason! I don't understand why Brady Hoke keeps saying things like "I don't feel like it" and this latest…

…when asked about injuries. He has a legit reason. He can just say "I don't want to help Utah prepare for our game by telling them which personnel we'll have available." This is 1) the truth and 2) not insulting to the intelligence of anyone coming across his answer.

It is not good when your contempt for the media gets in the way of obviously better and more honest answers. See: Gibbons, Brendan.

Etc.: Tip times set times set for a number of basketball games. Article on how Michigan sticking by Devin Gardner despite "fans' pleas" for Shane Morris cites no fans pleading for Shane Morris. In fact cites reporter's question about Shane Morris indirectly by including Nussmeier answer to it.

Comments

tylawyer

September 17th, 2014 at 1:02 PM ^

I'm both left-leaning and not a fan of the NFL as an organization. The league is dysfunctional, hypocrtical, and opposed to accountability on just about every conceivable issue. But I think this tax exempt argument is baloney. League-level revenue (for stuff like licensing etc.) gets passed through to the teams, which are not tax exempt, and the players, who pay (or should pay) income taxes. Goodell gets his (exorbitant, preposterous) salary and he pays taxes on that. There's taxation happening here. It's just not happening at the level where there isn't actual taxable income.  

Cranky Dave

September 17th, 2014 at 1:25 PM ^

This is very similar to the taxation of REITs where all income is paid out to the shareholders and  no taxes are paid at the "corporate" level, only at the shareholder level. 

For those interested in more details, the NFL is tax exempt under IRS section 501c (6) not the more well known 501c(3) for charitable organizations (United Way).  501c (6) states:

"Business leagues, chambers of commerce, real-estate boards, boards of trade, or professional football leagues (whether or not administering a pension fund for football players), not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual."

FWIW, the NFL itself lost money at least the past two years so wouldn't pay taxes anyway.

InterM

September 17th, 2014 at 1:55 PM ^

but leaves some questions unanswered.  Is NFL league revenue used to pay Goodell and other league officials, and to cover other league-wide expenses?  If so, the NFL can easily manage to "lose" money through such means as paying Goodell way too much (check), building palatial league offices, etc.  In that case, I'd rather see the league paying taxes than finding ways to spend its profits on needless extravagances.  Also, it appears from the statutory language you quote that the NFL is singled out over, say, MLB -- is professional football operated differently from other pro sports, such that this distinction is justified?

tylawyer

September 17th, 2014 at 2:15 PM ^

Goodell is getting taxed on his stupidly high salary, a lot of it at the highest marginal tax rates. So there are taxes being paid. And expenses related to palatial offices are deductible even in the for-profit context. There are so, so many reasons to criticize the league. This isn't one of them.

gbdub

September 17th, 2014 at 2:02 PM ^

Lots of people get really fired up by the thought of "corporation X paid zero taxes!" without really understanding that corporate income gets taxed in a lot of ways other than the corporate tax. Now, the tax code is way too complicated and there's lots of games being played to minimize reported profit, but it's still more complicated than the typical discussion, which rarely rises above rabble rousing. Municipal stadium funding is often pretty ridiculous though so feel free to direct ire there.

BloomingtonBlue

September 17th, 2014 at 1:02 PM ^

The Arkansas State play is a bit bush league. But, that's a good program. 5 head coaches in 4 years, and they just keep winning. Must be nice.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

TruBluMich

September 17th, 2014 at 1:19 PM ^

Last I heard the NFL was not the company or business that made money, they just distribute it. NFL Ventures is owned by the 32 owners and that is what brings in the majority of the money people claim is the NFL's. NFL Ventures does pay taxes. I could be mistaken, but I had to sit through a debate at my daughters school about this subject. It was something I wasn't aware of.

steve sharik

September 17th, 2014 at 2:02 PM ^

Is like all football terminology, in that it's evolutionary. Back in the day (and still exists at some HS programs for sure), there was "tight punt:" Image and video hosting by TinyPic"Spread punt" was just tight punt but with two ends split to get to the returner more easily, analagous to the reasoning to go from "spread punt" to "shield punt." The difference is that going from "tight" to "spread" punt does, in fact, make you more susceptible to punt blocks. "Spread" to "shield" does not, and has been statistically shown as such. Heck, back in the day, this offensive formation was "wing:"Image and video hosting by TinyPicAnd then this was "spread:"Image and video hosting by TinyPicIn fact, Michigan was in "spread" I formation (now known as I Pro) when Wangler hit AC in the '79 Indiana miracle. Michigan was at the IU 45 with 6 seconds left and Bo had 1 TE and 2 RBs on the field. "Ahhhh, fuckit!"

Njia

September 17th, 2014 at 2:55 PM ^

But if there's one thing I could not possibly care any less about, it's white people going all holier-than-thou about the name of a sports team. The only people I know who seem to be up in arms about this are not Native American.

I am part Cherokee. I find it far more offensive that I was taught in school to practice at the altar of one President Andrew Jackson, that murderous S.O.B. at whose sole discretion (and in explicit contempt of the U.S. Supreme Court) the entire Cherokee nation was made to walk, on foot, from Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee to barren reservations in Oklahoma. One-quarter of the entire Cherokee Nation perished.

So, net-net, count me among those who aren't particularly impressed by the PC crowd and the "issue" of what to call the NFL's pro football franchise.

micheal honcho

September 17th, 2014 at 3:03 PM ^

Sadly for "spread" or at least "zone read" based teams. If they ever were to return to calling the ineligible by the book(3yds max) it would be the death of their bread and butter.

The zone read itself is a morph of the old wishbone/option offenses of the 70's. Defenses figured out how to play lanes against it using inside to outside angles & 4 linebackers and it was pretty much neutralized. Without the threat of that slot reciever standing open in the spot the linebackers vacated, the spread would also be neutralized to a degree, or at least the oregon/R-Rod version.

I watch it closely during oregon games and count more plays than not where they have at least 1 and many times 2 ineligible and it goes uncalled every time. Keep in mind. The rule is 3 yards not 5 not 6. If you watch it closely they routinely violate the 3yds.

Its the overriding threat of the quick passes that cause defenses to not be able to over commit to the run, meaning they have to hold rather than attack. It used to be once linebackers read the lineman going forward hard it was automatically run and they were set free to "hunt" as they pleased. Thats why linebackers(HS) were taught to read guards first. One or the other guards is always on a "combo" block  with the center and is supposed to release to the LB's as soon as he's got his man "turned". By watching him we waste no time looking at the TE since the guards action(chip & release) makes covering a releasing TE irrelevant.