...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)
UMASS in 2010 opener?
April 27th, 2009 at 11:49 PM | 
Fact Checking
Fact Checking
April 28th, 2009 at 1:47 PM |
If you want to be the
If you want to be the
If you want to be the dick....
What I meant, fucktard, was that having one big non-con game a year, isn't going to make a damn bit of difference, and the negatives outweigh the positives. The Big Ten might not be the greatest OMG conference ever, but every year we play ND and OSU (always on national TV) and often a few more big games, such as PSU, Illinois, Iowa or Wisco, a few of which are on national TV. USC gets little of that since they rarely have a pac ten game anyone gives a shit about, so they schedule bigger ones early, as you can see, always out east.
And I get that SC went 6-6 the year previous to 2002, but they had a big time senior QB and a second year coach coming from the NFL promising big things. Not a surprise they felt they could compete with top talent. IMO, they were the best team in the country that year.
April 28th, 2009 at 4:22 PM |
News Flash
News Flash
I don't know if you're wolvin Los Angeles or Lousiana or jerking off in your moms basement, but just for your information, outside of Big 10 country nobody gives a flying fuck about Michigan vs Iowa or Illinios or Wisconsin. I'm a die hard Michigan fan, but I'm also a huge college football fan and a realist. Nationally the Big 10 gets beaten up in the media and our one big game is Notre Dame, which most people consider a joke!
And have you looked at what Carson Palmer did in his first 3 years at SC? He wasn't a big time QB dick breath!!
April 28th, 2009 at 4:33 PM |
You mentioned national TV, I
You mentioned national TV, I
You mentioned national TV, I gave examples. If no one gives a "flying fuck" about UM-Iowa, then why is it going to be aired nationally? ESPN/ABC is looking to lose money? I guess if we play anyone other than Florida or USC no one cares. Looks like no one in this country has watched a Michigan game in like 15 years then, huh? You must be right. You know, you should put in your application for UM AD, you're clearly more qualified.
Also, I'm changing my handle to "Wolvjerkingoffinmymomsbasement"
April 28th, 2009 at 5:49 PM |
Ahem...
Ahem...
WolvinJerkingoffinmyMomsBasementinLA. Sounds better.
not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user
April 28th, 2009 at 6:37 PM |
Well, I live in LA, but my
Well, I live in LA, but my
Well, I live in LA, but my mom lives in Grand Rapids (with my dad, go figure), so that wouldn't be very accurate. In fact, houses in LA don't even have basements. Which makes me wonder, where do bloggers from LA blog from if their mom's house doesn't have a basement? Are there no bloggers from LA? Gentlemen, this is what I call a paradox.
April 28th, 2009 at 4:58 PM |
"He wasn't a big time QB dick breath!!"
"He wasn't a big time QB dick breath!!"
Looks like another one of Mlive or Freep or ESPN boards finest has found his way over here. Sigh.
Hey, does anyone remember when this place had less trash talking idiots than it does now?
Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05
April 28th, 2009 at 5:13 PM |
Umm...
Umm...
I think wolvinla dropped a "dick" and "fucktard" on me, but yet you call me out. Check yourself Mr. High and Mighty!
April 28th, 2009 at 5:27 PM |
In my defense, I was asking
In my defense, I was asking
In my defense, I was asking you if you wanted to be a dick. I actually laughed at dick breath, I don't know what it means, so maybe that's why.
I think what he meant, sir, was that your posts don't make much of a point, or you're so dogmatic in your view that you refuse to listen to what other people retort with.
If you want to argue your point, do so. But don't be so aggravated about it, and think for just a second that maybe you don't know everything and someone else may be able to provide an interesting point.
April 28th, 2009 at 5:49 PM |
Perfectly said...
Perfectly said...
Your last two paragraphs are exactly how I feel about you. It is what it is. You don't get my side and I don't get yours, or we just don't want to get it. I guess that's where it ends.
April 28th, 2009 at 5:51 PM |
But...
But...
I doesn't have to end, does it?
not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user
April 28th, 2009 at 12:05 PM |
Are you serious!!
Are you serious!!
Yes they did go 11-2, after going 6-6 the previous year. Did you not see that I mentioned that? So when they scheduled all of those games they weren't a powerhouse. I'm born and raised in Southern California, SC hadn't been anything since '88. They had lost to UCLA 8 years in a row. Don't tell me they knew they were going to be 11-2 that year and that's why they scheduled all of those teams!
April 28th, 2009 at 5:52 PM |
That's actually a good point,
That's actually a good point,
That's actually a good point, doesn't apply, but still a good point.
not just "douchey" MGoBlog user, but now TRUSTED MGoBlog user
FWIW, in 2002, Palmer's senior year, USC went 11-2 and beat the shit out of Iowa in the Orange Bowl while playing Auburn, Notre Dame, at Colorado, and at Kansas State in the regular season. I thought I wouldd point that out, since you seem quite concerned with getting fact straight.