Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Notes on 2013 B1G and Other QBs
    MCalibur - 8 hours ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 1 day ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 day ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 2 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 6 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,507 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,095 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,088 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,048 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 911 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 10 comments
  • Some Interesting Facts About Big Ten Scoring Offenses: 2000-Present
    LSAClassOf2000 - 9 comments
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 comments
  • Notes on 2013 B1G and Other QBs
    MCalibur - 5 comments
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 4 comments
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Michigan could be taking 4 receivers
    38 replies
  • OT- RIP James Gandolfini
    51 replies
  • Women's Hoops Hello: Akienreh Johnson (#34, 2016 class)
    5 replies
  • OT: Kentucky Football Pulling It Together
    57 replies
  • Hello: Garrett Moores (2013 Catholic Central walkon QB)
    50 replies
  • MLIVE per ESPN: Derrick Green "Future Star"
    53 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    114 replies
  • OT - US soccer players who play for foreign countries
    39 replies
  • OT: GIF Tourney IV
    32 replies
  • CIC to Consider Starting Own Coursera-like System, BTN-style
    13 replies
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    56 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo: Early Returns & Gripes
    56 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    15 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    43 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    41 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • MLIVE per ESPN: Derrick Green "Future Star"
    53 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo: Early Returns & Gripes
    56 replies
  • OT: Kentucky Football Pulling It Together
    57 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    133 replies
  • OT- RIP James Gandolfini
    51 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    114 replies
  • Hello: Garrett Moores (2013 Catholic Central walkon QB)
    50 replies
  • Michigan could be taking 4 receivers
    38 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    15 replies
  • OT: GIF Tourney IV
    32 replies
  • Women's Hoops Hello: Akienreh Johnson (#34, 2016 class)
    5 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    41 replies
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    56 replies
  • OT - US soccer players who play for foreign countries
    39 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    38 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    133 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    114 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    112 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    77 replies
  • Cornwell to Bama
    76 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Why some corners can't play zone coverage

    i find this extremely interesting

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-Urban Meyer not on the Bo Schembechler-Woody Hayes level, Hoke says, pointlessly because who would believe it was

    i may have altered the title

    0 comments
  • Police: Man arrested for masturbating while riding bike through The Diag

    i thought this was america

    0 comments
  • Miami fans leave Game 6 early, miss incredible ending

    like I said on twitter: that was almost as intense as Iowa NIT games

    1 comments
  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Tuesday Recruitin' Burns The Mail

  • View
  • Revisions
By Ace — May 29th, 2012 at 12:40 PM — 33 comments
Filed under:
  • 2013 recruiting
  • 2014 recruiting
  • cole luke
  • derrick green
  • elijah qualls
  • jaylan grandison
  • jourdan lewis
  • kirk garner
  • laquon treadwell
  • logan tuley-tillman
  • recruiting roundup
  • scott pagano
  • shane morris
  • su'a cravens

Today's recruiting roundup examines new rankings from Rivals and 247, recaps the IMG 7-on-7 tournament, checks in on Laquon Treadwell and Su'a Cravens, and there's something about a letter that almost certainly won't draw any attention.

So Much For "Return To Sender"

2013 OL commit Logan Tuley-Tillman caused, shall we say, a bit of a stir on Saturday with a simple tweet reading "#goblue #beatohio". Oh, and there was a picture attached:

Well, that's one way to say you'd appreciate no further correspondence from your future school's rival. While I'm sure this has ruffled feathers on both sides of the rivalry, I must say I thought this was hilarious, a harmless statement from a high school kid having some fun and fueling the fire stoking the flames turning up the heat non-fire-related cliche about The Game. Looking closer, there's a couple of details in the photo worth pointing out:

  1. The letter is unopened. It doesn't look like there was any middle step between "receive letter" and "light letter on fire".
  2. The luminaries at the Ohio State athletic department believe Tuley-Tillman lives in "Peroia," Illinois. So close, guys.

The photo has made its way to the USA Today, local ABC news, Fox Sports Radio, and corners of the internet far and wide. Football season cannot start soon enough.

In other news, both Rivals and 247 updated their 2013 rankings. The Rivals100 was released this morning; here's the movement of current commits:

  • Shane Morris drops from #16 to #22 (still a four-star)
  • Mike McCray drops from #44 to #55
  • Chris Fox drops from #46 to #57
  • Patrick Kugler drops from #54 to #73
  • Kyle Bosch drops from #60 to #77
  • Dymonte Thomas drops from #77 to #95
  • Jake Butt (previously #96) drops out of top 100

Notable targets include VA RB Derrick Green, who shot up to #12 overall and earned a fifth star, FL DB Leon McQuay III (#33), IL WR Laquon Treadwell (#39), MD DT Henry Poggi (#52), and CA DE Joe Mathis (#71).

While the drops across the board don't look great, it's important to remember that several prospects have been evaluated (or re-evaluated with more film or new info from camps) since the initial rankings dropped in February—early standouts aren't so much losing stock as they are being passed by those who have gained exposure in recent months.

Here's the movement in the updated Top247:

  • Shane Morris drops from #18 to #22 (first four-star)
  • Dymonte Thomas drops from #41 to #45
  • Kyle Bosch drops from #42 to #46
  • Chris Fox drops from  #53 to #60
  • Logan Tuley-Tillman drops from #82 to #85
  • Taco Charlton drops from #86 to #90
  • Ben Gedeon jumps from #255 to #171
  • Mike McCray drops from #173 to #176
  • David Dawson jumps from #199 to #196
  • Patrick Kugler drops from #192 to #206
  • DeVeon Smith debuts on the list at #231
  • Gareon Conley debuts on the list at #234

Again, mostly minor drops here, with the notable exception of Ben Gedeon. Any disappointment should be severely mitigated by the fact that Michigan has 12 recruits on the list.

You Down With IMG? Yeah, You Know Me

Auburn Hills hosted last weekend's Michigan Elite/IMG 7-on-7 Regional qualifier, which featured Laquon Treadwell's Core 6 squad facing off against Shane Morris & Co.'s Maximum Exposure. Neither team took the title, though thanks to their IMG national title last year MaxEx gets an automatic invite to this year's national tournament, but several commits and targets were standouts. Treadwell earned top performer honors from 247's Steve Wiltfong:

A smooth route runner, Treadwell is a physical player that does a superb job of catching the ball away from his body and making catches with the cornerback draped on his back. Whether he was going over the middle, leaping over a defender, or catching the ball back shoulder, Treadwell was good for a few wow moments a game. He also has some yards after the catch ability. Defensively, he played safety and came through with several plays on the football.

Morris was #4 on the list due to a performance described as "methodical, accurate, and easy like a Sunday morning," an assessment that is Lionel Richie-approved. Jourdan Lewis, playing for MaxEx, was the #9 performer. Maize & Blue News, a new recruiting/news site started by Matt Pargoff (formerly of The Wolverine) has highlights of Morris (above) and Lewis (here).

The event provided the opportunity for everyone to talk to Treadwell about his recruitment, and he provided similar, if slightly differing, statements for the recruiting sites. He presented a chopped-down list to Pargoff:

“I’ll probably decide during my high school season,” he stated. “I’m still looking at Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Notre Dame and Illinois. That’s actually narrowed down a lot. There were a lot of schools on me. I just didn’t know what to do, so I just had to think about which ones I really wanted to go to … But I want to take some official visits.”

That list got a little bit smaller when Treadwell talked to Tim Sullivan ($):

Michigan isn't the only school still in play, but the list of serious contenders for Treadwell's services appears to be dwindling.

"Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Michigan State, Ohio State, and Illinois," he said. "That's about it that I can think about off the top."

When he talked to 247's Steve Wiltfong, the list dwindled to four ($):

Treadwell says he remains in touch with about 10 college programs, and has four schools he’d currently have a tough time saying no to in Michigan, Michigan State, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.

“I’m looking at those four schools pretty hard,” Treadwell said.

Finally, Treadwell found a very roundabout way to name a leader, giving TomVH a top three of Michigan and... TBD ($):

He recently went on the record to say just where the Wolverines rank for him.

"In the top three," said Treadwell, who was in Michigan with his travel team for an IMG 7-on-7 qualifier. "That's the first offer. I love that school."

While he says some favorites have started to emerge, he isn't sure who else is on that list, so it's the Wolverines by themselves for now

Treadwell added that he plans to visit Oklahoma State on June 8th, and there's a chance he sees Oklahoma on that trip as well. He has no other visits planned. He also told GBW($) that he plans to take "probably, two officials" and said of Michigan, simply, "I love that school." Draw whatever conclusions you will from that.

The other big news of the week comes from CA S Su'a Cravens, a longshot for Michigan who is now an even longer shot, according to the Omaha World-Herald:

Five-star safety Su'a Cravens had been scheduled to unofficially visit Michigan and Nebraska next week in preparation for his June 6 decision date. NU, UM and USC were the three presumed favorites.

But the Vista Murrieta (Calif.) two-way star reportedly canceled both trips. Su'a Cravens father, Kevin confirmed the cancellation Sunday night.
“It's accurate,” he said.

According to Kevin Cravens, Su'a has final exams to take, and while the family initially thought he'd be able to make up these exams at a different date, the school, Kevin said, won't allow it. So no visit.

Despite the cancellation, Cravens will still announce his decision on June 6th. If he leaves the state of California, I'll eat two lemons.

Quickly: Michigan makes the top seven($) for AZ CB Cole Luke and the top six($) for Good Counsel S Kirk Garner. CA ATH Elijah Qualls tells GBW's Andre Barthwell that he plans to take an official visit to Ann Arbor ($). LSU leads($) for HI DT Scott Pagano. Magnus scouts VA RB Derrick Green at a 7-on-7 tournament. Tremendous gets a visit reaction from 2014 WR Jaylan Grandison.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
May 29th, 2012 at 1:05 PM | A bit of 24/7 movement (Score:1)
neyvit
Joined: 11/04/2010
MGoPoints: 61

There was some more very slight movement in 24/7 very recently:

  • Ben Gedeon dropped form 171 to 174
  • Deveon Smith went up from 231 to 229

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:07 PM | I definitely don't see (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12618

I definitely don't see anything in this post being blown out of proportion by anyone.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:07 PM | Am I just being paranoid in (Score:0 Overrated)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13229

Am I just being paranoid in thinking it appears the recruiting services simply assaigned a percentage drop to ALL our recruits across the board?   It seems more than a bit odd that all our commits dropped and not a single one improved.  I would also love to see the relative change in recruits who've already committed to a school versus those remaining uncommitted.  After all - recruiting services exist for a reason and once a player has committed they aren't really needed anymore now are they?  They have a vested financial stake in following (and perhaps inflating) the players still on the market versus those already locked up by somebody.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:20 PM | Hate to say it... (Score:1 Normal)
Sinsemillaplease
Joined: 01/01/2011
MGoPoints: 505

but you started off sounding like a little brother.

2014 Offer List BOYCOTT ADIDAS

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:30 PM | I find the whole argument (Score:2)
Ace
Ace's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 23752

I find the whole argument that recruiting services have a "vested financial stake" in playing up uncommitted guys to be pretty ridiculous. There's a reasonable explanation for early commits being ranked high early, then falling; when guys commit early, the recruiting services have very good reason to do a thorough evaluation, before they've taken a hard look at many other prospects. As a result, early commits tend to comprise a large chunk of the early lists. When the services start evaluating the uncommitted players, it's natural for the players on the early lists—committed or uncommitted—to drop as these new players get their rightful place in the rankings.

PA WR Robert Foster dropped in the Rivals update, from #26 to #34. Since he's uncommitted, nobody is complaining, but he was one of those guys who got evaluated very early in the process. I could pick dozens of other examples, or you can just believe me when I say these guys are professionals and there's no conspiracy behind the rankings.

"Recruiting Ninja" | Email | Twitter

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:44 PM | I'm usually not one to wear a (Score:4 Normal)
neyvit
Joined: 11/04/2010
MGoPoints: 61

I'm usually not one to wear a tin-foil hat when it comes to sports conspiracies, but it is imprudent to dismiss rankings tampering for the purposes of driving up subscribers since it has been proven to happen before.

I forget the scout's name, but a couple years ago, a former Rivals employees admitted that Alabama recruits were all bumped up in the rankings to appease the Albama subscriber base - the largest fan base out of all the Rival premium sites.  He was fired shortly after that.

I'm sure the vast majority of the scouts for these sites do their work honestly, but it doesn't mean there aren't external factors other than pure football ability that ultimately decide the rankings - either on a conscience or subconscience level.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 2:32 PM | "When the services start (Score:2)
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 13229

"When the services start evaluating the uncommitted players, it's natural for the players on the early lists—committed or uncommitted—to drop"

In all due respect Ace - why?  Why is there any inherent movement upward or downward if the early evaluations were done correctly?  Wouldnt the closer look theroy also lead to players being moved UP as frequently as down?  Why wouldn't the services be just as likely to re-evaluate a Shane Morris, for example, and move him up after looking more thorougly at other players they may have ommitted initially instead of down?

You may sumarily dismiss the financial angle I believe exists but trust me, I've spent over 30 years in business and the adage "follow the money" is used for a reason.  As altruistic as you may believe the services to be they are still filthy capitalists like me and are driven at their core at generating income so their company can grow and prosper.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 2:57 PM | I agree with both of you in (Score:2)
turd ferguson
turd ferguson's picture
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 2956

I agree with both of you in that I think that both of these things happen, but I think the effect that Ace is talking about is probably stronger.

I'd think about it this way:

Prospects rankings came out incredibly early this year - well before these services could have fully evaluated each of these kids.  Therefore, they focused their attention on the most visible kids, who often were the kids who had committed to top programs or at least been offered by them.  Many Michigan commits got this early treatment.  As time goes on and other prospects are discovered, they find their way into their appropriate rankings.  All of the Michigan commits had been noticed and accounted for; some of the other prospects hadn't even been evaluated.  Sure, the Michigan kids will pass some of the initially ranked recruits, but they can't pass kids who hadn't been ranked yet.  They can only be passed by them.

On top of that, there's a general regression to the mean phenomenon, where there's more room to move down than up (and the error that's baked into the rankings of the highest-ranked prospects is disproportionately likely to be error in their favor).

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 8:17 PM | Agree (Score:1)
D-Rob4Prez
Joined: 02/21/2012
MGoPoints: 67

Agree - #10 ranking is more likely to move down than up. Any time you re-rank, you're bound to have many changes which creates "news." The sites don't have plan a big conspiracy to get rankings to change. They just need to ask their scouts to re-evaluate the universe.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 3:48 PM | Why? Because, as more players (Score:2)
Ace
Ace's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 23752

Why? Because, as more players are evaluated, the pool is larger. Also, recruiting services are reluctant to rate players who haven't been extensively evaluated very highly; since the early commits are extensively evaluated, they tend to start at the top and slip behind players who start getting more attention later in the cycle. There's also some regression to the mean. Guys who start up top don't have much room to move ahead, but have a lot of space to fall.

"Recruiting Ninja" | Email | Twitter

 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 30th, 2012 at 12:24 PM | Ace - a question(s) (Score:1)
bubblelevel
Joined: 06/01/2011
MGoPoints: 228

Do you believe that recruiting services have any business pressures built in to bias them towards chasing eyeballs rather than having "accurate" ratings?  Does not the business side of all this drive activity?  Do editors (or whatever you call them at Rivals, Scout et al) get measured on metrics that involve traffic, links, etc?

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:18 PM | Peroia? (Score:4 Normal)
74polSKA
74polSKA's picture
Joined: 05/25/2011
MGoPoints: 1271

That's somewhere near Cichago right?  I cannot express how much man-love I have for the kids in these last few classes.  They know how to be characters with character. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:29 PM | The burning letter... (Score:1)
jmdblue
Joined: 12/01/2010
MGoPoints: 670

The burning red and gray letter is almost as delicious as predicitons of someone else's "blood on the field".  Heartening stuff all.

We're gonna play with toughness, we're gonna be responsible and we're gonna play with toughness.  This is Michigan.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:42 PM | I have no problem with them ranking guys by stars. (Score:3 Normal)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 39229

You can say a guy is in a talent category by watching him play. And maybe even name a couple of guys who are best at their position, or someone who looks like a rare talent. But this continual moving up and down of players in rankings, like anyone can have ANY idea the difference between the 54th and 55th best player, has gotten so ridiculous it's practically becoming insulting.  It's just creating news to get more people reading them, and we all eat it up.  It's not unique...the NFL guys do this too...but I don't really see anyone taking seriously any changes Mel Kiper makes out of his top ten or so.  After the top of the draft it's more a "this guy is still available", not "boy, is this team stupid for trusting their scouts rather than Kiper's rankings." 

Give the players a star ranking, rank the classes at the end, do some evaluation.  But these endless conflicting lists...meh.

(Directed at the services...not Ace. He's just reporting what people are interested in.)

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 2:49 PM | I'll respectfully disagree.  (Score:2)
turd ferguson
turd ferguson's picture
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 2956

I'll respectfully disagree.  I strongly prefer rankings to star ratings.  Here are the two main reasons why:

1.  Rankings don't have the hard cut points that star ratings have (and therefore, rankings provide much richer information).  Let's say that a service has 20 prospects rated as "five-stars" and 400 rated as "four-stars."  If you throw away the rankings, it looks like there's an enormous difference between the #20 and #21 prospects.  All you'd know about the former is that he's a five-star and all you'd know about the latter is that he's a four-star.  At the same time, it would look like there's no difference between the #21 and #420 prospects (both four-stars).  Rankings get you out of this problem.

2.  Rankings are inflation-proof.  Over the years, prospect star ratings seem to be going the same way of college grades, and there's been a general move upward.  This makes it hard to compare classes over time.  You can't inflate rankings, though.

I agree that there's no meaningful difference between the #54 and #55 prospects, but that's on the reader to interpret the information properly.  For those who interpret this stuff the right way, I think there's much more information in rankings than star ratings.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 4:00 PM | Maybe the problem is the inflation. (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 39229

Where you have 400 4* players. I'm just not so sure they can see that much more difference between the 20 and 21 guy than they can the 21 and 74.  Star should just be categories. The really elite, the very good, the good, and so on.  Why is one guy a 5 and another a 4 if there's no discernable difference in their ability at 20 and 21?  Just because we said we'd have x number of players ranked that?  There should be a way to tell when there's definitely a step down in ability, but just a little bit better than another guy, with all the factors? Folly, because a guy isn't changing how good a player he is that much.  If it's a lack of info before, then they've made assessments inaccurately because they couldn't wait for enough evidence to be out there. 

And comparing classes over time is just something to get more people interested in the rankings. The only thing that matters is how they did on the field. How they ranked in 2008 doesn't really matter anymore.  

But even if you wanted to have this dynamic, you could certainly just rank them at the end of the season, when all the evidence is in.  At least with school classes you can see additions to a class. That a guy is getting that much better or worse from camps, camps often with only coaches there, and not real football, is the part that is just to garner subscriptions.  It's all smoke and mirrors to make one think it's important where it's just a lot of make it up as you go along. 

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 4:33 PM | True. (Score:2 Normal)
StateStreetApostle
StateStreetApostle's picture
Joined: 01/18/2012
MGoPoints: 266

I agree with this, and your original post, M-Wolv!  It's always bothered me too.

While TF has two decent points, I simply don't believe that in this post-spring, pre-summer camp "season" enough has changed to merit these "updates".

Furthermore, is there really that great a difference, not just between 54 and 55, but 54 and 155?  Or 255? (Ask the NFL draft!...)  

Perhaps the rankings themselves should be analyzed (ahem MATHLETE), because to some degree it's apples and oranges.  I.e., who is to say that a 5-star safety at #3, say, is more valuable than a 5-star quarterback at #25, anyway?  Is he THAT much better of a safety than that other guy is at a more important position?

The only rankings worth paying attention to are the stars, and the position ranks (i.e. #3 safety vs. #25 safety).  Anything else is too subjective, in a subjective game (witness the MATHLETE on the overimportance of the running back, for instance).  These "top 250s" are the Ace Williams of recruit ranks...

John Navarre, John Navarre, he is John Navarre

(to the tune of Jingle, Bells)

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 4:05 PM | You can inflate rankings, (Score:1)
RationalBuckeye
Joined: 04/06/2012
MGoPoints: 388

You can inflate rankings, ESPN just did it this month. 

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 4:19 PM | Either you're confusing star (Score:2)
turd ferguson
turd ferguson's picture
Joined: 12/09/2009
MGoPoints: 2956

Either you're confusing star ratings with player rankings or I'm not following you.

You can - and ESPN did - inflate star ratings by, for example, making too many kids four-star recruits. However, as long as you have one guy ranked #1, one guy ranked #2, one guy ranked #3, etc., you can't inflate player rankings.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 4:27 PM | Well you can't just use 1-150 (Score:1)
RationalBuckeye
Joined: 04/06/2012
MGoPoints: 388

Well you can't just use 1-150 (or any arbitrary number) to judge talent, because talent differs year to year, creating a certain deviation, so I assume you mean that we're looking at numerical rankings. In this case, ESPN just changed their entire numerical ranking system, inflating every ranking in order to make their system more "logical" (or so I hear). Thus, top prospects from last year have paltry rankings compared to the inflated numbers of this year.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 4:53 PM | Ranking. (Score:1)
wild_blue_yonder
Joined: 04/05/2011
MGoPoints: 98

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think is means...

The "score" ESPN gives each player is a rating, not a ranking.

A ranking system is not subject to score inflation, but doesn't take into account fluctuations in talent level (i.e. a "weak" year).

A rating system can suffer from inflation, but can also account for talent differences from year to year.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 5:29 PM | I assumed it was you who was (Score:1)
RationalBuckeye
Joined: 04/06/2012
MGoPoints: 388

I assumed it was you who was using the loose meaning of the word, since as you agreed, the "ranking" system is flawed as well. 

On the other hand, I don't think differences year to year effect ratings that much. There's a level of player that garners a certain star rating, and they don't meet quotas on that data.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:45 PM | By my math (Score:5 Normal)
jerseyblue
jerseyblue's picture
Joined: 12/20/2008
MGoPoints: 1154

Treadwell eliminates a team each time he's interviewed. If we can just get him interviewed two more times we'll have a commit.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:59 PM | Just don't interview him (Score:5 Normal)
unWavering
unWavering's picture
Joined: 01/13/2011
MGoPoints: 1768

Just don't interview him another time, because then he will give up playing college football altogether.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:55 PM | I'm kind of surprised that (Score:2)
denardogasm
Joined: 09/11/2011
MGoPoints: 1948

I'm kind of surprised that there is a national tournament devoted to 7 on 7. It seems like a backyard game like 500 or pepper. It doesn't seem to really show anything or improve any skills other than receivers hands, but there are so many guys in that small space that someone is always bound to get loose in the chaos.

"Michigan Defense" is dominating everything, in every aspect of life. That's a rough definition.

-Craig Roh 10/29/2011

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 7:55 PM | Really? (Score:1)
Mr. Yost
Mr. Yost's picture
Joined: 07/25/2011
MGoPoints: 5706

In a world where we measure half naked men like livestock and make 350 lb lineman run in a straight line for 40 yards...while wearing tights....THIS is pretty low on the list of activities that don't truly translate to football.

“True loyalty is that quality of service that grows under adversity and expands in defeat. Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise — the other, loyalty.”

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 1:55 PM | Queme las correspondencia! (Score:5 Normal)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4186

Queme las correspondencia!

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 9:07 PM | Queme la correspondencia. (Score:3 Normal)
JuggernautRIDES
JuggernautRIDES's picture
Joined: 12/07/2008
MGoPoints: 10

Queme la correspondencia.

/spanish grammar nazi

What if the breath that kindl'd those grim fires Awak'd should blow them into sevenfold rage And plunge us in the Flames? or from above Should intermitted vengeance Arme again His red right hand to plague us?

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 2:41 PM | I am fired up for some (Score:1)
aiglick
Joined: 11/27/2010
MGoPoints: 1512

I am fired up for some reason.

Here's hoping for a bright future. This team does try hard and I will continue to support them.

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 5:14 PM | Since you don't have one, the (Score:2)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6534

Since you don't have one, the burning OSU letter would make a good avatar for you.  It must live on.

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 2:47 PM | I truly love that burning (Score:2)
DIABEETUS
DIABEETUS's picture
Joined: 09/29/2009
MGoPoints: 2322

I truly love that burning letter picture. Honestly and truly. I would like to frame it.

Michigan: 903–315–36 (Best in NCAA)
vs Ohio State: 58-44-6
vs Notre Dame: 23-16-1
vs MSU:  68-32-5
vs B1G: 522-197-24
vs SEC:  20-8-1
vs PAC 12: 48-24-1
vs Big 12: 10-5-1<

  • Login or register to post comments
May 29th, 2012 at 3:09 PM | Wow (Score:1)
LightTheLamp
LightTheLamp's picture
Joined: 04/20/2012
MGoPoints: 282

Tillman is the man, can't wait to see him in the Maize and Blue!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
May 31st, 2012 at 12:24 AM | I  want to  look at some sec (Score:1)
The Truth Hurts
Joined: 03/30/2011
MGoPoints: 240

I  want to  look at some sec early committs list to see how many of their stock have risen.  I'm just saying. Also, Tillman is okay with me

 

 

 Michigan Football-  


 What you gonna do when hokemania RUNS wild over you?

 

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.