Tuesday Presser Transcript 11-5-13: Greg Mattison Comment Count

Heiko

file

Opening remarks:

“All right, on to Nebraska. You know, last ball game, it was a tough loss for us obviously. It’s time to move on. I thought for a lot of that ball game our kids competed, played very hard. Obviously there’s things we had to do better. Can’t give a score up before halftime like we did. But watching the tape, I thought our guys fought very hard. It wasn’t good enough.”

Brady expressed concerned on pass defense. What needs to improve?

“We have to be tighter. We have to compete more. There’s a difference between being in the right place as a secondary guy and competing. The bottom line is everybody on that field has a job to do and has an alignment and has a responsibility. And then you’re either successful or not successful based on what happens in your area. It’s like a five-technique defensive end. You can play the C-gap, and if you open that C-gap up too much, then it’s going to make it harder on somebody else. I’m not saying the secondary is the reason. Everybody has something that they have to get better at. One of the things that we have to get better, and it always goes with pass rush and getting to the quarterback, is tightening our coverage up and contesting throws a little better.”

Are you concerned about how you competed? The defense seemed to keep you in the game.

“I was pleased with how we competed until the very very end. I would have liked to see us try to find a way to get the ball, get a turnover, and keep trying to give the offense a chance. You’ll never hear me say, ‘Boy I thought we played pretty good. It’s too bad we lost.’ If you’re a great defense, you find a way to do something. We had the ball on our sideline, we could have gotten that one. Who knows what other turnovers you have to try to – as far as effort, as far as them being prepared, as far as them doing the work they had to do to be in the ball game, I guess they did that. When it came down to it, at the bottom line, it’s a team [effort] all the way. If you’re a great defense, you find a way to win that. We didn’t do that. I’ll never say we’re pleased when you lose the ball game.”

Raymon Taylor had good numbers. Did he play well?

“There were some good things, but there were some things we have to get much better at. Whenever you look at tackles, you want to find out where those tackles were. Was it a tackle right when he hit them, or was it a tackle after he got dragged for five yards? So I don’t ever go by stats that way. I think he, like a lot of our players, have got to be more physical. We have to play harder to the football. We have to compete harder. I think that’s all of us. That’s everbody in the defensive program. The coaches, the players, everybody.”

You mentioned tightness in the secondary. Why hasn’t it been tight?

“I don’t know. It’s got to be. If I knew that, I would probably feel a lot better about that, but we have to. We have to get tighter in coverage. We just have to. We have to contest more balls. And that’s what we’ll work on very hard this week.”

Did you see Willie henry play another step?

“Willie Henry played a very very good football game. I hate saying this, but Willie Henry played the best game since he’s been here and showed the signs that if he keeps working and keeps being hungry – he’s a very talented young man. He’s a redshirt freshman that played very very hard. Jibreel Black played very very hard. Brennen Beyer. I could go through – I thought the linebackers may have played the best game as a linebacking crew that they’ve played. The inside linebackers. They were getting off blocks. They were very very physical at the point of attack. There were a number of bright spots, but we’re not in a position to have some good bright spots. We’re in a position where we better do everything right so we can win the football game.”

MGoQuestion: Coach Borges talks a lot about self-scouting and self-evaluation over the bye weeks. How involved are you have during that process? Do you have any input towards the offense?

“No. We work day and night for two weeks for our game plan defensively to be ready for Michigan State. I don’t have any time to ever go on that side of it or have somebody go on that side. If there’s something glaring – you know, we’ve got some great coaches here, and they’re going to see it without somebody like me saying, ‘Boy, that should be done there.’ I’ve got all I can handle on my side.”

MGoFollowup: When your defense goes against the offense in practice, are you able to identify any of the problems on the offensive line?

“I don’t look at it. I don’t – to be honest with you, throughout an entire practice, I couldn’t tell you who the offensive guard is or who the offensive center is. All I’m trying to do is watch my guys and watch our guys to make sure our guys are improving the best they can. I couldn’t even tell you who was in there. And I really don’t know. It’s really true. If somebody told me that somebody was moved to this position, I’d go, ‘Really? I don’t know.’ Other than our side. And I’m being honest.”

Chris Wormley’s development?

“Chris Wormley continues to improve. He still needs to turn it loose more. There’s times when you see him and you go, wow. That’s just what you’re looking for. And then there’s other times when you say, ‘Turn it loose!’ Again, there were times in that game when you said, ‘Yes, that’s what we’re looking for up front.’ It’s just got to be consistent. I don’t care how many plays it is. It’s just got to be consistent no matter who it is. Every guy has to be accountable each and every play.”

What would you see them improve as a group?

“As a group, what I want to do on film is go through all 11 guys and say, ‘You were accountable to the other ten’ and not say, ‘These nine did a great job. What happened to you two?’ That’s when you have a championship defense, when they’re all accountable to each other. We weren’t that way. It was a lot of really good things. But we’re not there yet, and we have to get there.”

Is Dymonte Thomas close to cracking the lineup?

“The thing with Dymonte is Dymonte is at a position where he’s behind Blake [Countess]. Blake has been pretty consistent. That’s what hurts Dymonte in terms of getting into the rotation.”

How does Taylor Martinez’s absence affect how you prepare for Nebraska?

“They’re all good enough quarterbacks. Number four for them runs the same offense Taylor Martinez runs. It’s the same plays, same offensive line, same running backs, great running back, great receivers. Taylor not being in there, I mean, their quarterback that we play against will be very good.”

How often do you practice hail mary defense?

“We do that every Thursday. When I saw [Nebraska do that against Northwestern], my heart dropped because I was here against Colorado, and I remember it. I think defensive coordinators wake up in the middle of the night seeing that. When you’re part of one, you just hope that no coach has to be a part of that on defense.”

Do you coach your players to knock the ball away rather than try to intercept it?

“Yeah. That’s why we put Funchess back there. You know, the one of the things that you learn in that situation is they’re going to beat the guys running down the field. The guy behind needs to ride that guy all the way out of the end zone. You can’t stop and play the football there. When you’re on that guy, you need to keep riding him and stay on him. Don’t stop and try to jump, because when it’s a jump ball, it’s anybody’s. You don’t want to put yourself in that position. That’s why we put a guy like Funchess back there.”

Who would you compare Ameer Abdullah to?

“I’m not into comparing. All I know is he’s really really good. He’s fast, he breaks tackles, he’s a really good athlete, he steps over people. He could be one of the best running backs we’ve gone up against. In my opinion he can do it all.”

How much do you think the touchdown at the end of the half contributed to Connor Cook’s confidence in the second half?

“That’s the other part of it. If you harass and you play really really tight on guys, pretty soon that gets into the quarterback’s head, too. A quarterback trying to throw the ball into a small window is a lot less accurate than a guy that’s got a guy pretty open. That’s what we have to get better at. That and getting hands up and getting into the quarterback’s face. A lot of quarterbacks don’t throw very good passes when they get hit.”

Comments

aiglick

November 6th, 2013 at 1:16 PM ^

I think this comes back to Hoke. The DC is supposed to coordinate the defense. The OC is supposed to coordinate the offense. The HC is supposed to manage the whole team and not just the D line. We really need to beat Nebraska because if we don't it will mean utter chaos. They are not a bad team but are certainly not world beaters this year and they are missing their starting QB. They lost to Minnesota on the road and nearly lost to Northwestern at home. They also got pounded by UCLA in Lincoln. Anyway another data point comes this weekend.

jackw8542

November 6th, 2013 at 1:59 PM ^

It seems to me as if our DBs are not looking for the ball enough.  If a DB is playing tight bump and run, then it is often necessary for the DB to have his back to the QB, but our DBs are almost always playing well off the ball, so they should be able to be looking for the ball.  Instead, it seems as if they do not retreat, allow the receiver to get up on them without looking for the ball and then turn their backs to the QB to try to catch up with the receiver.  As one of the announcers said Saturday, a QB is told that if a DB has his back to you, that receiver is open.  Yet, it seems as if that is the way our DBs are taught to play.  What does anyone else think about this?

Space Coyote

November 6th, 2013 at 2:10 PM ^

The back to the QB thing was most often in man coverage. In man coverage, once you flip your hips, you have positions: in-phase (in-sync, in-step, in-line, even) and trail. In-phase means that you have your hip on the front side of their hip and your shoulder on the front side of their shoulder, and you're using your body to gradually deflect them in the direction you want to push them. Trail means pretty much anything else.

When you are in-phase, you can feel where the WR is and feel where he's breaking. You are in contact with him with your body and he can't get around you without going through you, so you don't need to watch him. Otherwise, turning and looking for the ball is only slowing you down or putting you out of position as the receiver continues on his route. So when you are in a trail technique, your focus remains on the receiver and you try to go up and through the face, between the arms, and and rip down, only turning looking when you essentially catch back up, or in other terms, get in-phase again.

I'll be discussing DB play more in an article this week (I'm writing it tonight) that will get into some other things. But that generally answers your question.

Princetonwolverine

November 6th, 2013 at 2:02 PM ^

How can the coaches evaluate how the #1 OL is doing if they are not playing the #1 DL in practice? (maybe they do)

How can either unit know what they need to do better?

If our #1 DL is not getting to Devin and stopping the RB's on a regular basis, while every team we play does, then Mattison needs to correct it. If they are then Borges needs to correct it.  In either case Hoke should know what works and what doesn't on both sides of the ball.

Real games is no time to find out we can't block or rush.

Space Coyote

November 6th, 2013 at 2:15 PM ^

For instance, if you look at the start of Borges's offensive playbook, generally there will be about good chunk (talking 30-50+ pages or so) right at the start after "how to huddle" and "nomenclature" that are all about the defense. The different coverages, the different techniques, the different blitz concepts, the different stunts, the different positions, the different fronts, etc. They do this so the offense has a foundation to build their offensive scheme. They also do this so they're on the same page when talking about "here's what the defense is doing".

The defense is no different. If you look at Mattison's defensive playbook, after the huddle and basics for defense, you'll see a big chunk about the offense. It'll discuss formations, personnel, motions, basic run plays, types of blocks, types of protections, types of route concepts, types of roll outs, etc.

Most of this stuff is talked about the first week of Fall training camp, and is probably gone over a good deal outside of actually practice as well. But all teams, all playbooks that I've seen and all practice plans I've seen as far as Fall camp have had this installed as part of their training right away.

Prince Lover

November 6th, 2013 at 3:56 PM ^

I am just curious so if you mind me asking just ignore me. But what are your credentials? (Okay, I know asking like that is snarky) But seriously, how do you know so much of the intricacies of football? Did you play college/professional, did you coach college/professional, did a family mamber coach/play? Again, I apologize if I'm being too nosy on an anonymous internet blog so please ignore this if I've violated a certain code. But I do enjoy your insight as well as your even keel approach vs the doom and gloom commonly found on this site. (And that says nothing of your choice in avatars, that was a great Simpsons episode.) Anyway, if anything, take this as a compliment.

Space Coyote

November 6th, 2013 at 4:22 PM ^

Long Answer (really long answer):

I grew up in a football family (my uncle is in the Michigan HS hall of fame as a football coach, for instance), growing up I didn't necessarily want to be a football player, I wanted to be a football coach, so that was always my focus (though I wanted to play as long as I could, as that was my best chance to get into the profession). When I was in middle school, I didn't doodle or those things, I drew football plays. I had notebooks full of football plays, for various formations, schemes, etc. Some of the stuff was before it's time (pistol was one thing that I thought was pretty smart), some of it I'd still like a chance to implement because I haven't seen it elsewhere, a lot of it, looking back, is really stupid. But that was a way I learned, by trying to scheme and draw up everything. Draw up an offensive play against basic defenses, then draw up defenses to stop it, and go back and forth and back and forth. I also had connections in college to various high schools (and some college head coaches) to start coaching right away, so I decided to take that path and have coached since I was a FR in college. The college coach I had the best connection to got fired, and that hurt that as a way to progress my career in that profession. But I still have some (read: a little) access to some other people inside of some college programs, which is always fun (none directly on the Michigan football coaching staff, for those wondering).

Outside of that, I've read a lot of football books (which get you somewhere, but not the whole way), I've watched a lot of film, both actual football from a coaching standpoint and coaching videos, been to coaching clinics, all those things. I probably haven't watched a non-Michigan football game in a way that I would call "for fun" since high school, I've always tried to learn by watching every football game: technique, scheme, etc. Often times I watch football with a note pad and just scribble things down that I find interesting (which is how I come up with most of my pieces on my blog).

I've been out of football coaching the last 2 years because of a combination of moving around/new job/finishing grad school. In that time I've spent a minorly unhealthy amount of time dedicated to learning more about football, because I don't have the release of actually coaching it.

All that said, it's why I don't like being called a "football genius". I think I know a bit about football, I'm fairly confident with a lot of my knowledge, but I'm not really a whole lot better than other HS football coaches for the most part. I've tried hard to learn as much as I can about the sport from any source I can, but at the end of the day, all I have is what I've had the opportunity to learn, just like most HS coaches.

NoHeartAnthony

November 7th, 2013 at 9:39 AM ^

Do coaches believe that actual practice time, going through the motions typical with the given opposing play give the best prep?  Or is it more of a homework assignment, take these notecards home with you and memorize them?

 

Say for example, the OC is teaching the Smash concept to one side of the field.  How do they expect the QB/receivers to establish a memory for proper execution?  Is it something where each coverage is shown, and memory associated with each situation?  DG immediately after the snap sees what looks to be Cover 4, does he recall those practice situations in August or is he recalling something from film study?

 

 

Indiana Blue

November 6th, 2013 at 2:37 PM ^

#1 think to do on a DEEP hail mary pass (around 50 yards) - is pressure the QB.  Yeah rush 3 but have your fasterst LB hang at the LOS, until the QB rolls (they ALWAYS roll).  Then the LB attacks.  If the QB can't get set - they won't make an accurate pass.  We are talking a max of 4 receivers and 6 DB's ... and it's bunch ball anyway.

Northwestern played "old school" on the Hail Mary ... and also settled for 3 to burn TO from Nebraska (whoa - sound familiar?).  Watch Wisconsin attack the QB on a Hail Mary ... that's how its done.

Go Blue!

Prince Lover

November 6th, 2013 at 3:17 PM ^

Its Nebraska week. Let's get on with our every day lives which has nothing to do with football and everything to do with putting a roof over our heads and food on our tables, and cheer on this team on Saturday. Because that is all that we can and need to do.