whoa boy this is gonna be interesting
there would have to be some to wash away
“Well are we on game 18 or what? It seems like, hoo boy. Every week. This next one is as big as any of them or bigger because one, you’re in the title hunt. You’re still playing for a championship. And two, these seniors deserve to play a great game, deserve to have things be like they should be when you’re a senior at Michigan and you play your last game there.”
What do you take from surviving Northwestern?
“Well the thing that we saw in that game -- people wouldn’t have seen it -- that defense played unbelievably hard. There’s a play in the fourth quarter when there are 11 helmets truly hitting the ball on our sideline, and ironically the next play Craig Roh got a sack and it held them to a field goal rather than a touchdown. And you never know when that’s going to happen. I’m not a stat guy. Never have been. The only stat that matters to me is whether we win or lose. I don’t like it when teams run the football, but the thing that you also saw on that tape, one, that quarterback is a tremendous football player and a tremendous athlete. I think there were four or five legitimate sacks that we had them -- any other quarterback you probably would have had a sack -- that he changed from being a third or a second and long to a first down.
"And that’s where the perception is that you’ve got to get off the field. We’re not talented enough, and there aren’t many [teams] that are good enough, to be able to say, ‘We could have gotten off here, but we’re going to let you play three more plays.’ That happened too many times where you had just what you wanted and he made a play. And I won’t say that our guys didn’t, even though they could have, that young man Colter is -- he’s got my respect, I’ll tell you that. That guy is a football player. And their running back was a very good football player also. The greatest thing is that there are some mistakes again that we have to have corrected on some blitzes and things like that, but they played hard and they stuck together and gave us an opportunity, and our offense did a great job at the very end there and we came out with the win, and that’s all that matters.”
MGoQuestion: It seemed like your outside linebackers were getting edged pretty often. What was the issue you saw on film?
“The outside linebackers were walked out a lot because they were in a spread offense, they were spread out. Their wide receivers did a great job of blocking … I won’t say any more because the last time I said something, [I] got in trouble with it, but let’s just say we didn’t get off the blocks like you would have thought we could have. That caused some problems. And the speed of that running back and the speed of that quarterback. We didn’t play it as well as you’d love to have played it. That happened a few times, you’re right.”
MGoQuestion: Were there any similarities between playing Northwestern and playing Air Force?
“No. No. No. There were no similarities. Air Force is an option wishbone scheme. A dive, veer and all that. With Northwestern it was a get to the perimeter -- some people run what you call a jet sweep. They just do it with [their quarterback]. The thing you felt was that he couldn’t hurt you throwing, and then on that first third down, he puts a beautiful pass on a seven route that you’re like, ‘Oh my goodness, if he can throw it, too, you’re really in trouble.’ Again, I think the thing we took out of it is if you stick together, if you play extremely hard, there’s a chance of good things happening, and that’s what we’ll always build on.”
Are the adjustments or corrections different this week because you’re playing Iowa, which doesn’t have a mobile quarterback?
“No. The corrections can be lumped in a general deal that you’ve got to execute the assignment of the defense. Unless you’re really really much much better than everybody, you have to play it perfect or you’re going to have a chance of things not being like you want. I think our guys understand that. Now you have to do that. The thing you have to always do, and there’s a lot of reasons why you want to get three and out and get off the field, but whenever you start being on the field for quite a while, you have a chance of maybe not concentrating as well as you have to to play up to as well as you have to play. I think that’s something that -- third downs have always been big for us, and there’s a lot of reasons why, and that showed up in that game. You gotta get off the field when you can.”
Is there a way to coach a level of resilience?
“Yeah. I think that’s something that Brady has instilled. I think that’s something that when you come to Michigan, when you sit in that defensive room, there’s no talking about it. That’s what’s done. And that’s one of the points -- there’s a lot of football teams that after they didn’t get the fourth down stop that wouldn’t have kept playing. You’ve seen it happen a hundred times. I’ve been a part of some of them, when all of a sudden a guy breaks a five-yarder and gets a first down, and now it’s over. That defense just kept trying to execute. That defense kept trying to play hard. Brady -- people don’t talk about it -- he did a tremendous job with the time outs. I’ve been on games also where clock management at that time, you’re done. I mean, that showed some faith in our defense also, I think. You call those time outs, saying, ‘Okay, defense, stop them. Give us just some time left.’ And that’s what happened.”
Can you talk about Kenny Demens and the finish he had Saturday?
“Yeah. Kenny’s just -- he is a Michigan senior. He’s what this senior class is all about: a bunch guys that have bought in, a bunch of guys that have worked extremely hard and nothing has come easy for them, and they just keep coming back and believing every game. There were times Kenny, like other guys in that game, didn’t play great. You’d love every player to play a great game the entire game, but you know what? Not just those last two tackles, there were probably three tackles or two more tackles that he made leading up to that that, right at the end, when you needed somebody to do something, he did it. Not that he tried any harder, he just kept doing what he had to do, and he did it like a senior. That’s why it’s really good when a guy like that gets a chance to make a play at the end. That’s what keeps you coming back, I guess.
"And I can go right through them. They’re all that way. Craig Roh getting that sack. I mean, he was close to a couple others that if we would have contained it. He would have gotten him. When Jordan -- you can go right down the list. Will … I don’t want to talk about many because I’ll forget one, but all of them are that way. That’s what the two years of being here, what I’ve seen in these seniors, last year’s group and now this year’s group: it’s never perfect, but they just keep coming back. Like today when we put in the game plan, they’ll all be, ‘Okay, we’re going to do this, we’re going to do that.’ They’ll buy into it. They’ll study it. They’ll do what they have to do. That’s what makes them special.”
Is there any one senior you wish you had a full four years with?
“No. I wish I had the full four years with all of them. I really do. No I’d never say there’s one. They all bring something to this defense in a different way and then collectively you want them to win Saturday so they go into that last game with a real shot, you know. But no, I would never single out one … I’m just happy and fortunate that I’ve had a chance to be with these two groups, because they make you really be proud of Michigan, because that’s what I look at Michigan as being. It wasn’t pretty at times in that game, but you know what? The look in their eyes after that game. It was pretty.”
What does this senior class do to help the mindset of the younger players?
“That’s what I -- in talking to the team, the defense on Sunday -- I told every young guy to listen more intently than you’ve ever listened to what I’m going to say right now. I told them that what that senior class did at the end of that game, that’s Michigan football. You can do anything you want. You can be the most talented freshman, sophomre in the building. You can be anything. But unless you play with that resolve and unless you believe like they believed, then you’re not Michigan. And I told them again, when I was all done, I sad, ‘Trust me. Learn from what that group did there.’ Again, it wasn’t pretty. It’s not our expectations to play like that. We’ve got to play better than that, but that part of it was Michigan. That’s what every freshman should learn from.”
How hard has it been for you to see Denard not being able to play the last few weeks?
“It’s really hard because Denard absolutely loves this program. He absolutely loves football. He loves his teammates, and to see his action when he wasn’t playing is why you think more of him than you could possibly think. He truly is into that game, and he truly is trying to lead when he’s not out on that field. So it just keep reinforcing how fortunate you are to have a Denard Robinson. You want everything possibly good that could ever happen for him to happen. That’s how you feel by being around him.”
Will Campbell said yesterday he wished he could have played for you his first two years. What was your impression of Campbell when you first met him?
“Don’t ask me. Don’t ask me. You just asked about those seniors? When I first got here, I [was like], ‘Whoa, boy.’ I was like, ‘you’ve got to be kidding me.’ But you know what? It’s a whole process. I keep saying it. It starts with Aaron Wellman. It starts with him. That comes through Brady. This group has become more and more Michigan every single day they’re here. These guys, you would never know whatever happened to them before. It doesn’t matter. It’s what they are today. There’s something to be proud of.”
Was that a negative “whoa boy”?
“I’m not going to say it. I’m not saying anything. I’m not -- nothing. Like I said earlier, as a coach, you want to do anything you can to make sure they walk up that tunnel that last time.”
whoa boy this is gonna be interesting
GM just beamed the Section 1 symbol over Gotham
Now, now everyone . . . lets not ruin this thread. (I have to admit, though, that your's was a pretty funny comment.)
First off all the players want to be in a winning situation, so obviously things are better now than in '09 and '10.
It is a two way street. Some of the offensive players may have preferred to play under RR's tutelage for the last two years. Denard would have had incredible numbers under a RR led M team (providing he could have stayed healthy). Gallon, Roundtree, some of the OL aren't ideal for what the current staff wants to do.
Even some of the defensive players recruited by RR seemingly aren't good fits under the current coaching regime. The positions guys like Jones, Hawthorne, Furman, were recruited to play, are non existent now.
For some, like BWC, the coaching change was a god send, for others, not so great, at least on a personal level.
I have no axe to grind here. I was 100% behind Schembechler, Moeller, Carr, Rodriguez, and of course Brady Hoke.
I must say I was surprised by that response. I'm not saying I was angry or happy with the response, just surprised. i have become so accustomed to the non-answer where those questions are concerned it shocked me to hear an actual response. I can see some getting pissy about it though.
He was the one who said when he got here that they didn't know how to watch film properly. And unlike the offense, didn't watch any film of how the players performed before he got here. He's become more diplomatic.
and that was kind of my point. He made that first comment when he got here and then it seemed like he must have been spoken to about that sort of disclosure. Since that remark I don't ever remember any of our coaches taking the bait until now. Again, I don't mind that he said it, I was just shocked that he said it.
In a week where I suggested that The Victors routine at the end of games (initiated by Rodriguez) seems to have been a bad idea, or at least a devolving one, and on a Board where I've pretty much never defended Greg Robinson, and where I hardly ever go much more than a month without reminding everybody that the original GERG-doubter was none other than our gracious host and proprietor Brian Cook...
... I gotta say I don't get this. I mean, in a world where people boil things down to tiny binary bits, I suppose so. Black and white, good and evil, pro and con. But really; when did anybody ever hear me organizing a meeting of the GERG Fan Club?
I don't really want to prod, but Mattison didn't reference GERG. He's talking in general, which includes RichRod/GERG/Barwis on down ... and then he said the resurgence starts with Wellman, which seems to indicate that he didn't approve of the shape that RR/GERG/Barwis had the players in.
...and if you can get Mattison to say any of that stuff and be specific, call me. And I'll buy the drinks.
I think part of the damage control of the rabidly pro-Rodriguez contingent was to seperate and scapegoat GERG and keep the rest of the staff free from criticism, instead of seeing the problem coming from the top down. Ah, old times.
"The rabidly pro-Rodriguez crowd..."
For the eleventy-umpteenth time, I'm not a coaching expert. I am not in the business of deciding that Rich Rodriguez was great or terrible or that Brady Hoke is God or Fred Flintstone. I'll leave the highly specialized and technical world of coaching criticism to the experts who dedicate their lives to the coaching profession. You know; the guys who post on internet message boards.
My thesis -- my one and only thesis -- was that Rodriguez was, in the main and quite critically, treated very unfairly while at Michigan. You could write a book on that subject. Wait; somebody did write a book on that subject.
But here's something interesting for you. Before Greg Robinson was hired at Michigan, when the alleged true believers like Brian Cook were supposed to be all ensared in their rabid Rodriguez love, and most importantly before there was any need to scapegoat GERG for anything, this is what Brian wrote. I'd like to take credit for this; I can't:
Section 1, I honestly admire your restraint in not pointing out the success that RR is having with a crappy team out west. You are a bigger man than I am, because if RR crapped the bed out there, I would not be able to resist pointing it out to justify my staunch anti-RR views these past years.
After the USC game.
I was just joking, in reference generally about some of the epic thread wars you've had on the subject of the last regime as a whole. :)
GERG was awful. But let's not forget that we had Bruce Tall (who was a safeties coach trying to coach the DL) and Tony 'Best Man' Gibson because of Rodriguez, too. (Also, those hires had exactly fuck all to do with the amount of funds the AD was willing to extend Rodriguez).
HERE is the bus...
and THERE is the last administration, GERG and all, right under it.
(How does ONE university get Brian Ellerbe and Greg Robinson, within the same couple of decades?)
Greg Mattison just got on Section 1's bad side.
Wow. In this presser it finally became clear to me why Mattison is such a great coach and why his players really respond. Its not just the fact that he coached at a high level in the NFL, etc., etc. You can see the love he has for his players oozing out of every pore. He wants to mention everyone, he loves how much Denard loves the team and the game, he respects the fight in each kid. If I were a parent of a recruit, I think it would be extremely comforting to know that Mattison was watching over my kid. No doubt about it.
Perfect insight to Mattison's recruiting prowess. His genuine, unvarnished pride in these kids should also win over Alex Bars and Bryan Mone and other kids who have influencers inside the program because he oozes sincerity all the time. He always trumpets how great kids with great effort become a great team.
Play for a career-obsessed DC or a player-obsessed Mattison? UM is in good hands.
Leading up to his final home game, I'm sure we'll see hundreds of words written about Denard, his impact on the Michigan program these past four years and the type of person we all perceive him to be. But Greg Mattison summed it up perfectly:
"You want everything possibly good that could ever happen for him to happen."
Common coach Mattison you can say it here, no reason to be coy, you're amoung friends remember? The reason your LB's couldnt get off their blocks as quickly as you would've liked is because they were constantly, relentlessly and effectively held by the Northwestern wideouts.
There now....doesnt that feel better? We promise to not tell a soul.
The linebackers jerseys should be able to fit onto 350 lb. linemen after the streaching they were taking... it not too difficult to see the point of attack defenders shoulder pad pointing straight up on his outside shoulder as he's being turned in by the receiver for the runner to get to the edge!
Awesome to hear a coach summarize his unit's play with "there are 11 helmets truly hitting the ball". No smugness about penalties or injuries - just flat out requirement to play hard.
It would only be better if a gif existed of all 11 UM defenders running past the infamous VT wide receiver as he jumped out of their way.
The dude is probably one of the most honest coaches out there. I mean when you say stuff like this --
"I won’t say any more because the last time I said something, [I] got in trouble with it, but let’s just say we didn’t get off the blocks like you would have thought we could have."
That's gold for reporters and fans alike. Kudos, Coach.
GMAT pressers are so much different than Hoke's. The honesty is refreshing in a time when 99% of answers are fully coachspeak. Hoke likely feels similarly but keeps it behind closed doors, which is fine with me. I love reading these because you can tell how genuine GMAT is. No wonder he is such an effective recruiter.
And only on MGoBlog can GMAT, and the second comment posted, call for Section 1's take. Too funny.
I have a man-crush on Mattison.
that now I pretty much have a regular crush on him. Mattison: universal appeal!
But I find it interesting both coordinators bring up how Brady Hoke coached teams don't quit. Because the difference between Michigan teams making plays in these situations, in comparison to Northwestern finding a way to lose, came up in the game wrap column yesterday.