Tuesday Presser Transcript 10-29-13: Al Borges Comment Count

Heiko

What’s the secret to moving the ball against this Michigan State defense?

“Uh. Well, the first thing you have to make sure is you don’t give it to them. Same deal, because they’ve done a great job of feeding off turnovers, either creating opportunities for offense or literally scoring themselves, which is amazing how many times they’ve done that. So that’s the starting point. Take care of the football and minimizing the damage, if in fact there is damage. Making what could be a bad play not into a disaster. That’s number one. Number two is getting your bodies on their bodies, making sure your plays get started, so you give your skill guys a chance to do what they do best, whether it be in the open field or around the line of scrimmage. Those are really key points. If you’re getting hit in the backfield as soon as you hand the ball off, you’re not going anywhere, and they’ve done a lot of that.”

What transfers forward from the Indiana game?

“Just efficient play, you know? Having open receivers, throwing and catching in the passing game, getting all your plays started offensively with your run game. Those types of things. You’re going to have a certain amount of plays during the course of the game that are going to be a little ugly, as much as you like to think that everything’s going to turn out exactly as you planned. Make sure those plays, A, don’t put you in such bad down and distance situations that you’re always fighting the chains, and that you’re not creating an opportunity for their offense by turning it over. That’s what we did on that game as much as anything. We had opportunities and we took them. As our offense becomes more and more efficient and understands more and more what to do, I think you’ll see more and more of that.”

Have you picked up any tendencies from their defense after playing them the past couple years?

“Oh, you study all you can, but he’s going to mix it up to where there’s not going to be a true, ‘Oh here it comes.’ You have to, as an offensive coach, make sure you take care of all the things they could do to you. If you don’t call the perfect play, can we still handle what they’re doing. I learned years ago, ‘What’s the contingency plan?’ If we can still handle what we’re not expecting at times – and again, if it’s not perfect, minimize the damage – then we’ll be okay. You just can’t put yourself in bad situations where they disasters, you know what I mean? They’ve fed off that all year. If we do that, they’ll feed off it against us. We had to be smart with the ball.”

You talked about getting run plays started. How have Erik Magnuson and Kyle Bosch stepped up this week?

“They’re developing. But the test is going to be much greater. There’s really to me not a great deal of carry-over from what we just played to who we’re going to play. This team plays a similar style of front and a similar style of coverage, but it’s much more a sic’em mentality where they’re trying to take everything away – short passes, long passes, as well as the run. It will be a completely different test in a completely different environment.”

Michigan State likes to pressure up the middle. What can you do to help your guards and center?

“Oh it’s a huge test.”

What do you do?

“I’d never tell you, but we always have a plan for it. That’s all I can tell you. We’ll have a plan for it. That said, it is going to test the core of our offensive line?”

Is that an area where Devin needs to be conscientious and not panic?

“Oh yeah. Like I said, minimize damage. If someone does make a mistake, just minimize the damage.”

You’ve talked about the battle at the line of scrimmage. What about the perimeter? Their corners are aggressive. How important is it for your receivers to get free?

“Oh that’s huge. You have to, because there’s going to be some instances where you’re singled up, and you’re going to have to get free. If we’re not able to do that, then we’re going to have to hold the ball longer than we want to, and generally something bad happens after that. It’s a joint effort, you know? Yeah it’s offensive line handling the A-gap blitzes or whatever, it’s the quarterback – it’s everybody involved. To beat a team that’s that good defensively, you need a stellar effort from your entire offense. Not just certain positions, because when a team’s good defensively, it’s because they can exploit a lot of different things. It’s not because they’re good at one thing. We have to play well at every position, play aggressively at every position, and handle the adversity of being on the road and all the things that come with it.”

What does Michigan State do to discourage teams from spreading it out and having to force it back up the middle?

“They don’t change a heck of a lot. If you spread or play tight. They’re going to pressure receivers, try and implement their blitz package and do all that, they’re a little further from the ball, but they’re still thinking the same. They’re going to stop the run and take your wideouts out of the game with their corners.”

Taylor Lewan talked about the physicality of this game. How do you ramp up the physicality without taking penalties?

“Yeah. That’s a delicate balance. You have to be smart, but then you don’t want to go in with the idea that you’re going to get pushed around. This is a figurative street fight. You want to go out there and match and exceed the intensity of your opponent. That’s the only way you’re going to play games like this. These aren’t finesses games, to me. There may be a little finesse here and there, but when push comes to shove, the winner is going to be the guy that’s most physical and won’t back down and still be smart and not throw punches when you might be tempted to throw punches. Whatever. It’s easy to get caught up in that stuff, but that generally doesn’t win football games. That loses football games, to be honest with you. There’s a composure that comes with your emotion that helps you win the game. But you do want to play with some emotion. Not going to erase that. Especially in rivalry games.”

When a game is as physical as this, is that all on the players to take it to them, or is there something you can do as a playcaller that puts them in position to do that?

“Oh yeah. At the end of the day it’s the players. I haven’t hit anybody in 40 years. So it’ll come down to giving them that opportunity, and when they get that opportunity, take advantage of that opportunity. But physicality, particularly offensively, being physical has to be matched with technique. Just coming off trying to kill somebody doesn’t usually work. There has to be technique, there has be fundamental issues that go with your physicality. I think when you do that, you really give yourself a chance.”

How much leeway does Devin have to make changes at the line of scrimmage?

“It’s just like any other game. There will be scenarios when we will. There will be scenarios where we’ll be locked into certain plays. It’s like that every game. It’s not anything different.”

You lead the country in yards per completion. Is that a function of Devin, your recievers, or something else?

“Yes.”

Is it by design?

“It’s everything you said. It’s by design, who we have [catching], and who we have throwing the ball. To a degree that’s the nature of our offense. But we’re not a completely push the ball down the field kind of the team. We still throw the ball underneath the defense a little bit.”

Big plays may determine the game …

“Any game, just like Indiana, it wasn’t any different – some of your bombs have to land. But to depend on that the entire game is a little scary. If you’re just trying to heave the ball over the guy’s head all the time, sometimes it doesn’t work out. You’ll be in second down and longs. But there’s got to be some of that just like there is in every other game.”

Will adjusting to the level of physicality be an issue for Devin Funchess when he switches between tight end and receiver?

“Well it’s good for him. He’s been in tight and he’s been out wide. The physicality shouldn’t bother him any. He’s used to it. He doesn’t really – he’s played more tight end in the box than he has out wide.”

Do you need to worry about Jeremy Gallon?

“No. Jeremy Gallon will show up. I’ll promise you that. He’s exactly the demeanor you want for a game like this.”

Are you pleased with the way practice has gone the last two weeks in terms of intensity and execution?

“Yeah. It’s Michigan State. You can feel that. Kids looking forward to playing the game. And they’re going to compete. I don’t have any doubt about that. They’re going to come out there and compete. With all respect for what they do, we’re going to come out and compete.”

Do you simulate a street fight atmosphere?

“We do our best. Heh heh. Sometimes we literally have them.”

How’s Kyle Bosch doing with that?

“Bosch has no trouble simulating the street fight atmosphere. Heh. Taylor Lewan. That’s easy for them. It comes natural. But you know, you play a team that you know you’re going to have to play that way against, and the message is being sent loud and clear by everybody involved. Usually it’s kind of reflected on how you practice, whether it be hitting after the whistle a little bit. As long as it’s during practice. We can monitor that. We have to be smart when it counts.”

Do you and Mattison throw punches at each other?

“No. No. Are you kidding? We’re a little too old for that. I always tell the guys I have one fight left in me, and I’m not going to use it on Mattison.”

Do you like this?

“Oh yeah. I love it.”

You’re known to be more of a finesse guy.

“I don’t think so. I think it just depends. If you look at my background, there’s years we’ve thrown the ball more, there’s years we’ve run the ball more. It’s all been based on personnel. But at the end of the day, I love mixing it up and I like all the other stuff, too. I said this before. I think good offenses are the perfect mix of finesse and physicality. Not too much of one or the other. But as a competitor, as a human being, I love these games. I love it. This is why I coach. Just personally. And I think all our guys feel that way. I don’t think it’s just me. I don’t think everyone feels that way. These are fun games to play.”

What are you looking for from the tight ends who have to make up for AJ Williams’s absence?

“We have the next guy up. You kind of treat it like he got injured, and you just move on. We had that happen early in the year and he missed a game. This isn’t a completely novel concept. Can’t make too much of that. I feel bad for the kid. He made a mistake. He knows he made a mistake – he made a bad decision, not a mistake. And now he’s paying for it, and we’ll move on from there.”

Will you move Funchess inside more?

“I wouldn’t tell you if I was. Would you tell me [if you were me [then I’d be you, and I’d use your body to get to the top]]?”

No.

“It’s fair to ask. But I’m not going to answer that.”

Comments

PAproudtoGoBlue

October 29th, 2013 at 5:50 PM ^

It's not that state's D can't be scary but it's been picking on all the little kids on the block. M is actually the 2nd best passing team YPG wise and the 2nd best rushing team YPG they've faced.(thanks DG) We aren't wearing any D lines out for sure but with the new found Funchess and Cloaking Device combo match up nightmare we can spread them out. If Al doesn't feel like he has to prove a point...cuz this ain't the week for that.  

Sten Carlson

October 29th, 2013 at 5:51 PM ^

As someone else mentioned, did you guys watch the Seahawks last night?  They ran into a stacked box, with a great line, great RB, and a great QB.  Didn't get much, but they had to do it to keep the Ram's defense honest.

You guys all act like Michigan's offense is pathetic.  We're 8th in points scored, and in the presser they said we're leading the nation in Yards per pass.  C'mon, quit whining.

Reader71

October 29th, 2013 at 10:33 PM ^

Yeah, Seattle...lost? The object of the game is not to outgain your opponent. The object of the game isn't even to score as much as you can. Those are good things that certainly help, but, the object of football is to outscore your opponent. We won against State last year without scoring a touchdown. That wasn't all that bad. We gave a guy a nickname for catching a few third down passes, for God's sake. What is wrong with winning?

MVictors97

October 29th, 2013 at 10:35 PM ^

He was referencing my comment way up in the thread. My point was that Borges is taking heat for being some incompetent moron that is stubborn to allow Gardner to check out of a run against an 8 man box. While Seattle did the same thing all night with an OC that is considered to be more than competent.

allintime23

October 29th, 2013 at 6:08 PM ^

I think everyone that watches these two teams play knows how important the first five minutes of this game will be. If we can get a quick stop on D or pick up a first down or two early it will be huge. As powerful as the east Lansing crowd will be in high points it can detract too when taken out of the game by good play. A quick start is almost a must if we are going to win this game. I am very hopeful that we can win the toss and defer.

DonAZ

October 29th, 2013 at 9:52 PM ^

If we can get a quick stop on D or pick up a first down or two early it will be huge.

I think that's correct.  That won't guarantee a win, of course, but I think it'll go a long way in settling Michigan into the game.  And if they can settle into the game, then I think Michigan has the advantage.  Slight, but an advantage.

No turnovers, of course ... turnovers that lead to opposition points are hard to overcome.

tzwolverine

October 29th, 2013 at 7:54 PM ^

that all of you expert OC's and DC's that are so good at determining what should have been done or what you would have done after the fact would shit all over yourselves if you were actually put in a position to have to make the calls during the game.

I come on this blog multiple times a day to read the next "expert" and what he would have done. I have news for you an idiot can sound like and expert after the fact every time.

Again, it does not reflect well upon our fan base to always be bashing the coaches, there are recruits, HS coaches and parents of recruits that actually read this stuff on several of the blogs.

It would be great if Hoke actually took you of you guys up on your "if I was the OC or DC or HC, I'd do this" bullshit. I'd like him to sit you down in the chair in the pressbox during a game when the shit is flying and the other team is running no huddle offenses and defenses are throwing multiple blitz packages at you and see how you would react in the "heat of the battle". My guess is you would most likely faint, be speechless or as I said earlier "shit all over yourself". One thing you wouldn't do is be successful.

I will continue to support our program that includes, coaches and players and not lower myself to acting like so many of you on this blog.

 

Go Blue!!! Beat the Sparties and move on

Mgodiscgolfer

October 29th, 2013 at 8:02 PM ^

about Al Borges is really reaching a point where when I see it I move to the next thread before even reading it. Hell I would not be a bit suprised if half of the fire Borges crowd were actually Spartans and Buckeyes in disgiuse. I have read so many over the past three or four weeks that they all sound the same. So I don't need to read them I already have, in one form or another. They all say the same things. "He always wastes first down running in the middle of a loaded box for a two yard loss". I wish I had a nickle for everytime I read that one. One I never hear though is the one about UM leading the league in passing.

93Grad

October 30th, 2013 at 10:37 AM ^

RR is not the bar for this program and never should be. The fact that Hoke and Co have done better than RR is meaningless. 

I'm not saying anyone should be fired, but can we please hold them to a higher standard than that?

Bluebastard

October 29th, 2013 at 8:31 PM ^

Hello, has anyone forgotten that Drew Dileo single handedly, WON the game last year!! If he does not play STATE Wins!!!!

markusr2007

October 29th, 2013 at 8:33 PM ^

Michigan squandered an 11 point 4th quarter lead at Penn State, and then found a way to lose the game by 3 pts in multiple OT.

Last Saturday Urban Meyer, Tom Herman just plain rogered Penn State 63-14 with almost 700 yards of total offense, 8 yards per carry on the ground -  worst lost in 100+ years for PSU football. 

Michigan couldn't run damn yard against Penn State. WTF?

So when you're obviously out-manned and out-gunned, all that's left is to get mean. I mean plumb mad dog mean.  Borges is Mr. Nice guy on Saturday.  It's Halloween  week goddammit, I want to see a sociopath in the booth calling plays with malice aforethought!

 

 

 

I dumped the Dope

October 29th, 2013 at 8:59 PM ^

Patience...these coaches work 7 days a week on this stuff. 95% of the people in society don't have the fortitude to work that many hours on anything. I'm not here to talk smack but I've put some silly hours into my job over the years and I bet it pales to what the coaches do during the season. The key going forward in my mind, to the Team, is the OL development. Give it two years...and let's see what we have in '15. I have this vision of the two-deep is that the best 5 will play 3 quarters, and then you bring in a set of 5 fresh legged peeps in the 4th and become unstoppable running the ball down the field while the clock melts like butter in the noonday sun...the fresh legs concept works with rb, in basketball. The other concept I think somehow gets missed is that currently we are pretty darn good at moving the ball, and field a respectable defense. Is it elite, no. Can I live with it, hell yes. Are we blowing people off the ball? No. But we've found a way to run with every team presented (to some dismay at times...) but I believe we can scrap with anyone on our schedule if we don't blow ourselves up prematurely. And last. I am thrilled with hoke, al and gmatt. When my tickets aren't worth their face value on the open market over the entire season, then it's time for a change. (This scenario has happened, btw). Until that point, it's game on.

Mr. Yost

October 29th, 2013 at 9:10 PM ^

I think it's a misleading stat.

I also think Borges relies on it WAY too much...

We don't use the short passing came to set up the run and it hurts us, it's a big reason why Devin struggles.

GET THE BALL OUT OF HIS HANDS.

Big pass plays usually mean that he needs time to stand in the pocket, we don't have a dominant oline and we don't play IU again this year. Get the ball out of DG's hands and move the chains.

It's so frustrating that we can't control the ball and give our defense a rest. Long drives are HUGE. Instead we seem to rely on 1 drive, 4-5 big plays and punts and turnovers the rest of the time. If we play a good defense, those big plays don't come and we struggle.

If we could add a consistent short passing game to our offense it'll open up the run and we'll have the offense that we've been hoping for all year.

snarling wolverine

October 29th, 2013 at 9:45 PM ^

Gardner is sixth in the country in yards per attempt - not just yards per completion.  That shows that even if we're attempting some low-percentage passes, he's still pretty efficient on them.

In any event, against MSU I think you need big plays.  Moving the ball on them methodically is very difficult.  You've got to beat them over the top to get your points.  If Devin only completes 50% but hits a few long gainers, that's probably fine.  

 

Franz Schubert

October 29th, 2013 at 10:35 PM ^

This O-line cannot hold up on 5-7 step drops against this defense. We need a short efficient passing game, using the flats to open up the other elements of the offense. MSU is so aggressive that a few short throws to the flat will have their secondary crashing down which should allow Funchess to get deep.

getsome

October 30th, 2013 at 3:07 PM ^

yeah slow developing play action passes and deep drops have no shot unless maybe its 3rd and 20 with 3 man rush.  touissant needs to step up and attack blitzers or first man free and play like a grown man in pass pro - and gardner needs to utilize his legs more than ever this game in order to offset OL issues as much as possible.  its gonna be very interesting.  if they cant run block and cant pass block, might as well spread em out and win or lose with gardner playing street ball....really only option....he needs 20-30 carries and needs to limit tipped balls and late throws.  hoping the front 5 and gardner really ball out bc msu is very aggressive and very sound in their scheme 

WineAndSpirits

October 29th, 2013 at 9:53 PM ^

I recognize that folks take Borges' comments literaly in that he intends to establish the run game. However, this could all be a smokescreen to confuse State.

What are the odds that he adjusts the gameplan so we don't play the PSU game over again?

turtleboy

October 29th, 2013 at 10:01 PM ^

He gives great answers to the questions he's asked, but at the same time I'm thinking: " wtf?! Everything you're saying we have to do is the exact thing that's been embarrassingly lacking in our offense for half the season!1!"

bronxblue

October 30th, 2013 at 9:59 AM ^

I love that Borges has become the new RR/Hoke, The Process, Student Ticket Pricing, and basically every other hot-button issue that promises at least 100 comments and multiple attacks on both the team and individual posters.  It's like the Civil War/War of Northern Aggression for 2013!

uncleFred

October 30th, 2013 at 8:18 PM ^

There are a handful of posters here who support the echo chamber that Brian and others have allowed to be created. Scream, bitch, whine, vent all you like, it matters very very little. 

A few points:

1: As long as this coaching staff is at Michigan they will move away from the spread. They tried for a major break this season but the players didn't quite have the experience to pull it off. So they'll run spread like pieces out of the power I and the shotgun, but next year they wil try again.

2: The athletic department is 100% behind these coaches and is willing to back them through a number of tough seasons. 

3: The vast majority of the alumni are willing to back these coaches through a number of tough seasons.

4: The RichRod years established such a crater of expectations that these coaches could go 6-6 this year with NO repercussions.

5: Michigan has a huge alumni base, and most of it has been around decades longer than the average age of this blog's contributors. That means that most of the aumni understand about rebuilding. Even those who only heard about the 60's when they were at the U, understand that major rebuilding takes time.

My point is that the vast majority of the alumni base, and the fan base in general, have decided to give the program time. None of us like losing, but the majority of us are willing to suffer three or four disappointing seasons while the coaches rebuild the program.

I've been following this blog for something over four years. I've learned a great deal here. The things I have learned allow me to make my own judgements about the things said here.

MGoBlog is an enormous resource. It was a reasoned space where thoughtful opinion could be presented and tested by various observations. For the last few weeks that thoughtful discussion has been lost, and along with that loss the value of this site has been proportionately diminished. Hopefully this trend will be arrested by those who depend on this blog for their livelihood. 

Very very sad. I truly miss the MGoBlog of a few weeks ago. 

 

getsome

October 30th, 2013 at 3:01 PM ^

worst question ever but unbelievable retort by borges, just hilarious...."i always tell the guys i have 1 fight left in me, but im not going to waste it on mattison"