Michigan 20-7? I remember playing more games than that.
this may be of some local interest
Michigan (25-8, 15-3 B1G) vs.
Wofford (20-12, 11-5 SoCon)
|WHERE||Bradley Center, Milwaukee, WI|
|WHEN||7:10 pm Eastern, Thursday|
|LINE||Michigan -12 (KenPom)|
Win or go home.
Projected starters are in bold:
|G||2||Karl Cochran||Jr.||6'1, 175||79%||29%||No|
|SoCon Trey Burke: huge usage, excellent A:TO, post-like DREB. Make him shoot twos.|
|G||5||Eric Garcia||Fr.||5'11, 170||63%||15%||Not at all|
|46% from deep but took only 82. Not just a shooter: assists. Make him shoot twos.|
|G||32||Spencer Collins||So.||6'4, 195||77%||22||Yes|
|Driver hits 49/30% on 2s/3s. Low TO rate, gets to line.|
|F||34||Lee Skinner||Jr.||6'6, 220||82%||23||Very|
|DREB machine at 6'6 probably SoCon artifact. Gets to line a lot. Not a shooter.|
|F||31||CJ Neumann||So.||6'7, 230||50%||12||Very|
|Doesn't shoot much but is 64% from two. FT% terrible, foul if in dangerous spot.|
|F||24||Justin Gordon||So.||6'6, 205||45||21||Very|
|Other post-type substance pounds offensive boards. Another horrible FT%.|
|G||20||Jaylen Allen||Fr.||6'3, 180||33||21||No|
|Like Garcia, but slightly worse everywhere.|
|G||3||John Swinton||Jr.||6'2, 185||25||10||Very|
|Drink if he takes a shot, let alone makes one.|
Cochran is the Wofford offense.
Wofford's offense revolves around 6'1" guard Karl Cochran exactly as much as Michigan's previous team revolved around Trey Burke. Cochran's SoCon Burke impression is fair, but he struggles inside the three-point arc (43%) and doesn't have Burke's astronomical assist rates. He is still a multifaceted guard who will be tough to check for Michigan's wonky perimeter defense. He's just a 29% shooter on two point jumpers, so run him off the line and live with the consequences if you have to.
Eric Garcia is not quite a Designated Corner Gunner mostly on volume. Normally a guy hitting 46% gets off 200 or so if he wants to be a DCG; Garcia is well under that. His height is a limiting factor. He's by far the most efficient Terrier, so limiting his attempts will be key. Stauskas likely to check him because he's the least threatening Terrier guard on a drive, but Michigan will be switching so much it won't matter.
Wofford has three "posts" that range from 6'6" to 6'7". None of these guys has three point range. All rebound well in the SoCon context; CJ Neumann and Justin Gordon are extremely bad FT shooters should they grab a putback opportuniy. Lee Skinner is a more frequent and more notable presence; he is a frequent recipient of Cochran assists under the basket and makes a respectable 63% at the rim.
6'4" guard Spencer Collins is a slasher more likely to create his own shot than anyone other than Cochran, and he's pretty good on two point jumpers. Unless he starts going Shannon Scott on Michigan, sagging off him and responding is the likely recipe. Likely to draw Caris LeVert defensively with Walton on Cochran.
Aside from Gordon, the third post-type guy, Wofford's bench is short. Very short. Like one guy short. That guy is Jaylen Allen, a freshman who shoots decently (45/38%) on normal usage. He doesn't get to the line or assist much and turns the ball over quite a bit. The only other Terrier to see time is John Swinton, who has a total of 33 FGAs on the year.
As mentioned in a previous post, Wofford has struggled against teams approaching Michigan's stature even when we take the most liberal possible view of stature:
Wofford's ventures into the Kenpom 100 have not gone well. At all:
- #75 Georgia: L 72-52
- #76 Iona: L 76-55
- #57 Minnesota: L 79-57
- #34 Saint Louis: L 66-52
- #12 VCU: L 72-57
All of these games were double-digit losses, as were Wofford's two conference matchups against #118 Davidson. In their only other game against a team in the top 200 on Kenpom they lost to William and Mary by three, at home.
All of those games against the top 100 were on the road, for what it's worth. Not much when the closest game is a 14-point loss.
A closer look at the Minnesota game is in order since you're familiar with the Gophers. Minnesota put up 79 by shooting 61% from two, with just about everyone contributing an above-50% performance. Wofford stayed somewhat in contact by getting 18(!) offensive rebounds but shot 38%/19% from the floor. Cochran came off the bench (discplinary?) and hit just 3 of 13 shots. Minnesota blocked a whopping 12 Wofford attempts.
When not playing teams in the top 100, the Terriers finished 11-5 in the SoCon, tied for third.
UPDATE: Ace provides his graphs.
Wofford is a grim offensive team that is respectable defensively. They finished second in the league on both offense and defense, so it's safe to say that it's their offense that bogs down against higher level competition. When they've got the ball:
The Minnesota game suggests that driving to the basket is going to be there. Wofford has even less shot-blocking than Michigan does, possibly less shot blocking than any other team in the tournament.
Wofford is a really slow team—only 14 percent of their shots are in transition. That plays into Michigan's hands.
All eyes on Cochran. He's their alpha and omega, and that usually means you can clamp down a guy
Defeat their rebounding. For such a short team, Wofford rebounds well. They're nationally average on offense and quite good on D; they were third and second, respectively, in conference. Michigan is as good on defense as the Terriers against a slightly different schedule and is not good at offensive rebounding.
With turnovers projected to be low, rebounding will be the main source of shot advantage.
Be patient and drive the ball. Against a fierce defensive team that forces a lot of turnovers, quick long-ish shots are defensible with Michigan's lineup of shooters. Against a team with no inside presence that apparently emphasizes preventing threes, Michigan should probe for at least 20 seconds before defaulting to shooting mode.
Michigan by 12.
Michigan 20-7? I remember playing more games than that.
I believe it should be.
Not to be THAT guy, but I don't want to tempt KenPom fates.
If you are predicting the same thing as KenPom, shouldn't it be Michigan by 9 (based on the essentials block).
Please don't tempt KenPom!!!
I'm somewhat surprised that he says we are favored by single digits. I'm thinking we win by double that.
There big man is only 6'7 so we're good
Jordan Morgan will tower over him with that extra inch.
ACE YOU FOOL! Kenpom is -9 per summary yet you said Michigan by 12 at the end!! Remember can't temp Kenpom!
...it's always worth checking the byline. Also, notified Brian, think he already fixed it.
Gah. My bad. And it was a sarcastic "fool". While Kenpom should never be tempted, I'm sure a typo doesn't count.
Brian wrote the preview, and I'm sure we are safe in this game even if he predicted Michigan by 25.
I'm happy to see the SIBMIHHAT column has returned.
i forgot what SIBMIHHAT means.
"SIBMIHHAT" column stands for "Should I Be Mad If He Hits A Three?"
I don't really agree with it. I mean, I understand the notion that a good 3-point shooter is expected to make some threes, but isn't anger somewhat justifiable if we let a hot shooter keep on shooting? Especially if he's not a point guard (in cases like Yogi Ferrell, it's a little tougher to prevent him from shooting).
I thought it got dropped for the more useful ORtg.
I feel like at Michigan -12 I should bet all the moneys.
I'd like to think that we'll beat Wofford by WAY more than 12 points. I'd be a little worried about the next game if it was that close.
from an overdue optometrist appointment and recording the game, so I'll be able to start watching while you all start the second half. I'd appreciate it if you all wouldn't post anything on the blog about the game until at least 8pm. Okaythanksappreciateit.
and I'll make sure not to text you the score of the game.
Coach McGary sez: Win the Game!
UM drives the lane for points against the Terriors the mentality carries over through the tourney. If LeVert and GRIII start hitting the paint for points now, it will only help the outside shooters later. GO BLUE!!!