"Support The Troops" Is Not An Argument Comment Count

Brian

9/13/2014 – Michigan 34, Miami (Not That Miami) 10 – 2-1

15226541351_678bf958d0_z

Jake Ryan did a good job of not blowing up Hendrix for penalties [Eric Upchurch]

Michigan Stadium was a roomy place on Saturday, somewhat full of cranky people waiting for an opportunity to vent their ire. They held their fire after a Gardner interception; they held their fire when Michigan was tied 10-10 with a team that hadn't won a game since 2012 midway through the second quarter.

This was a bit of a surprise. Hell, the 1997 team(!) got booed at halftime of their game against Iowa when they went into the locker room down 21-7. (This was definitely performance-related, exacerbated by a late Tim Dwight punt return touchdown. The tenor of the boo was WE KNOW YOU ARE BETTER THAN THIS LET'S GOOOO and when they came out of the locker room the corresponding cheer was much louder than it usually is. But damn we used to have some expectations.)

In 2014, after seven years of mostly unrelenting failure, on the heels of a humiliating shutout in the Last Notre Dame Game, I was expecting more audible grumbles. Michigan fans held off, possibly too stunned by last week to do anything but meekly absorb events in front of them.

Then Michigan took a delay of game penalty (after a timeout!) and decided to punt from the Miami 37 with a minute left in the half. This was pure coaching malpractice that reminded a grumbly Michigan Stadium of last year's Penn State game. The boos rained down. It was loud. It was grumbly. It was statistically accurate.

--------------------------------

As the game rolled along and Michigan proved themselves about as superior as you'd think they should be, this game receded from the hateful constellation of lower-level matchups that turned into stomach-churning wins or even losses.

When you end up giving up fewer than 200 yards to an opposing offense you've established that they are very bad and you are not. Eventually Michigan's ground game kicked in and put up similar YOU ARE BAD numbers. Erase some pretty random turnovers (deflected pass at the line, redshirt freshman pop-up kickoff fumble) and this is 45-0 or thereabouts.

I know you don't believe turnovers are random, person on the internet who I am anticipating a "LOL" comment from, but even you have to admit that when a throw goes from probably on target to directly in the chest of an opposing player because it glances off a fingertip that's just life giving you the middle finger, and not—oh you just said MAKE PLAYS in seriousness on the radio nevermind this sentence. Players make plays. Etc.

Anyway: in retrospect I am not stressing about this game.

I was in the second quarter, like everyone else, and while I didn't actually boo—I am in the too-shocked-to-do-anything club—I agreed with it. What's more, I deeply appreciated that the people still mad enough to let someone know about it waited for  the perfect moment.

-------------------------

When Pat Fitzgerald was asked about Northwestern fans being upset in the aftermath of the Wildcats' 0-2 start, he responded thusly.

"No shit."

This is a press conference answer to get behind. It is brief, quotable, and addresses the situation. Fitzgerald is not surprised that fans are upset; he is upset (he called the team "an embarrassment to anyone that ever put on the purple and white"); fans should be too.

When Brady Hoke was asked an open-ended question about his message to the fans, he said this:

As far as the fans that watch from the outside and see some of the similar issues that they saw last season, what would you say to them and how concerning is it as a coaching staff?

"If they’re truly fans they'll believe in these kids and what they've done and the hard work that they've put in. If they’re not, they won't."

To the great misfortune of someone whose words are repeated verbatim on the internet, he would later claim to be misquoted. At least he has been told that knocking the fans who pay his salary and are currently leaning towards "tar and feather" over "put FOR SALE signs on front lawn" is not great, Bob.

But he has succumbed to the post-9/11 Godwin's Law: eventually someone in charge of the troops is going to tell you to support the troops, because he thinks that's the best argument he's got left. You think knocking over tinpot dictators halfway across the world with no real hope of installing anything that won't collapse the minute you leave is a bad idea? Support the troops, buddy. Why don't you support the troops?

So kudos to Michigan Stadium for holding its fire until the guy on the sideline with the timeout blundered his way into a fourth and eleven punt that went into the endzone on the fly. It was 1000% clear who was and was not supported at that moment.

Michigan is at least tolerant of the troops even when they're struggling against Not That Miami. Michigan is pissed off at the guys in charge. No amount of deflection will hide that fact.

Highlights

Awards

brady-hoke-epic-double-point_thumb_31[2]Brady Hoke Epic Double Points Of The Week. #1 is Derrick Green, who was often the recipient of gaping holes but hit them and even made some yards himself.

#2 is Jourdan Lewis, who turned in excellent coverage all day and came up with an excellent interception.

#3 is Brennen Beyer, because it is impossible to really distinguish between the various guys whipping up on Miami's OL but Beyer got a sack.

Honorable mention:

Epic Double Point Standings.

6: Devin Funchess (#1, APP, #1 ND)
3: Derrick Green(#1 MIA)
2: Devin Gardner (#2, APP), Willie Henry (#2 ND), Jourdan Lewis (#2 MIA)
1: Ryan Glasgow (#3, ND), Brennen Beyer(#3 MIA)
0.5: Kyle Kalis (T3, APP), Ben Braden (T3, APP)

Brady Hoke Epic Double Fist-Pump Of The Week.

For the single individual best moment.

This was a one yard run but let us sit and savor the fact that even against a terrible defense Michigan had a touchdown that looked like this.

15228526272_1f2d3f14ba_z

[Upchurch]

Honorable mention: Jake Butt shakes free for a fake screen(!) touchdown, something we haven't seen since Hoke's arrival. Jourdan Lewis runs a guy's fade for him, picks off a ball thrown too far inside. Dennis Norfleet and the KO unit execute a right-sided return on a kick to the left out to the 50. Derrick Green breaks backside and breaks a tackle for a 20-yard gain.

Epic Double Fist-Pumps Past.

AppSt: Derrick Green rumbles for 60 yards.
ND: Nothing.
MIA: Derrick Green scores a goal line touchdown without being so much as touched.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Worst. Event. Ever. This Week.

Devin Funchess standing on the sideline because Michigan threw him a bubble screen halfway through the fourth quarter of a 31-0 game.

Honorable mention: Delay of game ack ack ack, Gardner interception (deflected, FWIW), kickoff mishap, Darboh fumble, various early runs that didn't go anywhere.

PREVIOUS EPBs

AppSt: Devin Gardner dares to throw an incomplete pass.
ND: Countess nowhere to be found on fourth and three.
Miami: You did what to Funchess now when?

[After the JUMP: getting it together, strangling the opposing offense, and goodbye gun.]

Offense

15042117169_124042d6df_z

[Upchurch]

It came together. Things were grumbly and grim early with Michigan pounding its head against the pillowy soft wall that is the Miami defense with little success, but for whatever reason they got it straightened out on a grinding second quarter drive that plowed them back to the lead, and from there they put together a day that is about on par with reasonable expectations: 6.1 yards a carry.

Michigan couldn't get six yards a carry against anyone last year; hell, in the third game of last season Fitz Toussaint could only manage 71 yards on 19 carries, 3.7 a pop. Akron would go on to finish 54th in the country in that department, decent for a MAC team. Michigan was on average worse than those MAC teams at running on the Zips, and that's with Gardner chipping in 103 on ten carries.

So while it was pretty stupid for about 30 minutes there, by the end things looked about right. The highlights above feature a lot of the offensive line mashing guys yards off the ball, and I won't be surprised to find some missed holes or a Miami tweak that had Michigan confused early when I look at the tape.

Green bounceback. After a torches-and-pitchforks kind of outing against Notre Dame, Derrick Green took a lot more of the large holes provided him and even obeyed Mike Valenti's command to MAKE PLAYS on a second-half cutback that saw him run through a defensive back's tackle to pick up a chunk.

That play was not blocked particularly well; Green went and got those yards himself. Those are the first he's earned by himself in a winged helmet aside from the odd  yard or three he's plowed out after contact.

It's a start.

15205843056_b745a60545_z

[Upchurch]

Darboh steps forward. In Funchess's absence it was Amara Darboh emerging into the top target, with almost half of Michigan's 13 catches including the self-troll touchdown above on which a cornerback in press coverage with inside leverage barely even touched Darboh before giving up that leverage. Hooray touchdown! Boo reminding me of last week.

Darboh looked pretty good, sure handed and athletic enough. Miami is obviously not much of a test in that latter department.

Goodbye, Norfleet. Hope to see you again before the bowl. Norfleet disappeared from the gameplan, taking one 21-yard end-around and IIRC not even getting a target otherwise. That's frustrating. When your only touches other than fair-caught or doomed punts are a 21 yard run and a kickoff return out to the 50, you should be getting more looks.

We've yet to see Norfleet act as a real live receiver downfield except on the drive at the end of the first half against ND, where he got open twice. It seems like it would be really hard to stick with him on option routes underneath, and then he is going to be able to get you some YAC.

Someone show Michigan tape of Steve Breaston.

Goodbye, shotgun. After a game in which Michigan had something like eight under-center snaps not dictated by field position or short yardage, Michigan went under center far more against Miami. Probably more than 50%.

This was in no way a departure as radical as the thousands embarked upon by Borges last year—they're still a one-back, inside-zone focused offense. It's still a little odd. Are they repping the under-center stuff only against tomato cans because they don't have confidence in it yet? Or is it because there's an offense for big games you would like to win and one for This Is Michigan purposes? Or did they decide to de-emphasize the gun after getting shut out?

I don't know. Time will tell.

15042932070_7f289591a3_z

Hello Butts. The Butt touchdown was excellent in many ways. It provided breathing room that Michigan needed, it signaled that Butt was just about full-go after his ACL surgery, and it was blitheringly wide open as Michigan successfully faked a wide receiver screen and went over the top.

Did we ever see that under Borges? I don't think so. The number of times Michigan's play design busted a guy wide open was so much lower than it was during the QB oh noes pop pass phase under Rodriguez that it boggled the mind. Funchess got singled on a linebacker in last year's Penn State game, that's one. It's hard to think of others that weren't massive coverage busts that had little to do with the OC. I mean, it's not like Notre Dame was shocked by the Gallon wheel route in 2011. They just blew it.

Anyway: I like that Michigan is making teams defend the whole field and defend the perimeter both short and long. The "long" is still mostly hypothetical but they did try a couple fake-bubble-to-downfield-ish against Notre Dame that didn't go so well.

The next stop for Butt should be replacing Kerridge on a lot of those plays where Michigan splits him out wide. Butt can be a matchup issue on the outside; Kerridge just signals that the defense is in zone.

Also:

Meanwhile, Butt threw up three goggles after his touchdown. Stauskas swag welcome anywhere it shows up.

15229282472_7e5ff4ea3a_z

This was pretty, but not complete [Upchurch]

Can a brother get some help out here? Shane Morris came in and delivered two perfect downfield darts, neither of which got brought in. This strike to Chesson in the endzone was raked out by the defensive back, which will happen. Heitzman flat dropped a 25-yarder. I know the ball spins the other way but cumong man. Men.

Morris showed that he can be a reasonable threat running the ball. He's more Connor Shaw than Denard, but that's a nice option to have that your artillery piece types don't bring.

Minor one-back complaint. Feels like Michigan should still be deploying an honest to god fullback on short yardage. Michigan got snowed under by penetration once in a fashion that having Kerridge in the backfield may have prevented. I know they have to defend more gaps if you spread 'em out across the line but when it's short yardage the equation changes to make the fullback a better option.

Defense

15228515692_ff940d8983_z

[Upchurch]

No problems here. Michigan did what you would expect them to do against a team like Miami, giving up the odd first down here and there and little else. If not for two short fields set up by the Gardner interception and the kickoff mishap Michigan likely shuts Miami out; for the game they gave up under 200 yards of offense.

Even when they did cede first downs it was often a "life happens" kind of event: one particular 20-yard chunk came with 1) Frank Clark breathing down Hendrix's neck, 2) Jabrill Peppers grabbing at the arm of the receiver and 3) Jeremy Clark coming in to bash the guy as soon as he caught it. Okay. If the offense does everything perfectly you can't stop it.

Other than that and the rollout followed by an out first down that everyone always gets Michigan was as good as can be expected.

I should mention that Miami helped things out considerably by being a disheveled mess: false start, delay of game, false start, delay of game, some other penalty for variety. Part of the fan meltdown was that for a good chunk of the second quarter it was unclear if Michigan was any better organized than the goons opposite them.

15205866646_1b0fc3dcc6_z

Hello. [Upchurch]

That didn't take long. Jabrill Peppers spent most of his playing time at boundary corner, rolled up to the line and playing mean ol' press coverage. This went very well; receivers got the odd bit of separation only and Peppers was able to jam guys into the sideline repeatedly. He split time there with Lewis, and as the season goes along it seems likely that he'll lock down that spot.

That shift saw a number of formations with Countess back at the nickel spot he is familiar with, once again leaving Mattison to sigh and scrap his hybrid space player plans. At least putting Peppers to the boundary allows him to remain part of the blitzing plans; one of Miami's life-happens plays was a pretty back-shoulder fade completed on Jeremy Clark after Peppers was sent on a blitz.

Meanwhile, Countess at nickel is something Michigan knows and does well with. When Taylor gets back it'll be interesting to see what happens; I imagine Countess goes back to full-time nickel with Lewis and Taylor mostly to the field as Peppers comes into his authorita.

Ready the order of St. Kovacs. We'll have to wait until midseason but three games in there is no indication that Ryan Glasgow is in any hurry to cede his starting job. On the first play of this game he ripped his way to the tailback on an interior run; Miami spluttered its way to 1.4 yards a carry with Glasgow carrying the bulk of the NT load. I want to see him against Minnesota and MSU power running outfits before declaring him just plain good, but Heininger Certainty Principle and all that.

On the snaps I was watching him he looked just as good as you would expect a guy coming off that ND game to play.

15043042648_aa31a717ee_z

This x10 per game [Upchurch]

Clark is okay you guys. The box score once again does not think Frank Clark did much—three tackles, a QB hurry—but I am telling you that tackles are having a very hard time blocking him and he's going to have a game coming up here where he spends a lot of it sitting on the quarterback's head.

Once Michigan gets their coverage figured out and the defensive tackles get a little more push, a little more lane responsibility, those pressures from Clark will start turning into big plays.

Check complaint reprise. A complaint as traditional as the one about the spread punt: it bugs me when Michigan tips a blitz against hurry-up-and-check offenses, sees the offense check in response to that tip, and then runs the blitz anyway. I don't think I saw Michigan check to something else once when this happened, and the blitzes were for the most part easily picked up. (IIRC there was one on which Michigan got through anyway.) Doesn't matter against Miami. Against other teams…

Michigan shouldn't be checking every time this happens, but they should be doing it at least 30-40% of the time so that there's some uncertainty about what Michigan is throwing at you.

Miscellaneous

Special K Dope Beat Of The Week. "Cherry Pie," third quarter. Bringing the Déjà Vu playlist to Michigan Stadium is a little too on the nose in re: tawdry defilement even for the guy who played that Flo Rida song about beejers, know what I'm sayin'?

WE FORGOT HOW TO DO IT. Did we even do the Go… Blue cheer last year? I don't remember doing so because we have to get Candi up to the main stage during commercial breaks now. I may be forgetting because I look at my phone a lot these days in an attempt to not pay attention to the dope beats of the week. Anyway, we tried it against Miami… and we screwed it up.

The way it works: half of stadium is shown signs that say "GO". Other half shown signs that say "BLUE." They alternate. Often there is pointing back and forth. This is not very hard and we have lost even this, as the cheerleaders just showed everybody GO and then BLUE.

1) Have we really lost so much institutional memory that even the freakin' cheerleaders don't have someone around who can say "do it like this because this is how we have done it since Yost"?

2) One of the side-effects of constant very loud music is to disincentivize anyone else from doing something interesting. The students used to chant Go… Blue at each other at various points and now they mostly stand around, doing nothing, because every available moment of space is filled.

It's an apathy machine. Remember the Saddest Tailgate Ever? They've started a series about life in the student section, and their latest entry reminds you of a fact that's shocking once you hear it:

Cow bell? Depressingly not yet this season. Other students reading this: we must fix this if nothing else

There's no cowbell! They've gone full Penn State: suck all the oxygen out of the stadium and watch your niche stuff—the stuff that matters—die. These people could not be worse for Michigan's long term.

For a guy who constantly says the only thing that will ever get students back is cell reception he doesn't seem to be doing anything about it. I got zero reception until the second half when an already kind of empty Michigan Stadium started downsizing in earnest; in contrast my reception at ND was near-flawless. If you actually believe the words you are saying about kids and their screens, why has coverage gone backwards from last year when there was spotty-but-okay wifi for most of the year?

I know for a fact that Michigan is way behind on this. For one, I've had great reception at ND and Penn State. For two, I know that when the NHL was coming in for the Winter Classic they were appalled by the coverage at Michigan and were trying to badger the athletic department into improvements. This is not an area where Michigan is paving the way for thought leaders of tomorrow.

Here

Best And Worst:

Best:  Depth at Wide Receiver or
Worst:  Is That Depth Only Interchangeable?

It was great to see guys like Darboh, Chesson, and even a brief appearance by Canteen get some focus in a passing attack that still seems to be figuring out what to do with the players available.  Darboh clearly established himself as the starter across from Funchess, and he looked sufficiently athletic enough to punish teams who single-cover him, at least with the ball in his hands (that first fumble was due as much to ball security as a good tackle by Miami).  Chesson couldn't pull in a gorgeous pass from Morris in the endzone when the MU corner swiped his arm, and he was the intended receiver who got crunched on Devin's tipped INT, but he his holding off some decent players for his spot and is also contributing on special teams.  Norfleet didn't catch a pass but had a great kickoff return to start the game and his 21-yard run on 1st down in the 3rd quarter gave Michigan great field position that they ultimately squandered.  Even Jungle Beats got in on the action, and looked like he could be a playmaker as the season progresses.

At the same time, it was a bit disheartening to see the passing offense remain a bit stagnant, at least in terms of downfield threats.  Darboh averaged a shade over 14.5 yards per catch, and that included a 26-yarder that featured quite a bit yac tacked onto a short slant/crossing route.  The longest completion of the day was on Butt's TD, which required absolutely every Miami player to not keep their eyes on a big Butt as it passed them by.

Inside The Box Score:

I think there was a sequence of plays where we may have turned the corner on this running game and left 2013 in the rear-view mirror. With 7:24 to go in the 2nd, Michigan was tied 10-10 with Not that Miami. A pass to Darboh brought the ball to Miami's 40 yard line. After that, Gardner was sacked for a 7 yard loss. I was thinking, "seriously?" My hope is that what happened next is the harbinger of good things to come.
- Green, Derrick rush for 27 yards...
- Green, Derrick rush for 11 yards...
- Green, Derrick rush for 8 yards...
- Green, Derrick rush for 1 yard to the MU0, TOUCHDOWN
Run game established, at least against the Miamis of the world.

More Saddest Tailgate Ever

Game day in Ann Arbor is an experience steeped in tradition. Nevertheless, the stadium experience, and with it the student section experience, has necessarily evolved, even just within my 6+ years in the NW corner. So to kick things off, here are some rapid fire questions/answers:

Kegs? No

Flasks? Yup, though I will add that, at least in the lower sections, most students appear to have gotten less tolerant of drinking and drunkenness from other students. If you’re being positive and happy drunk, great we love you. If you’re incessantly bitching about the team, complaining about the players, generally being negative and happen to stumble into me, I’m getting event staff. And I wouldn’t be the only one.

Marshmallows? Uhh honestly I haven’t seen this in any season I’ve been there…

Beach balls? Have seen them recently, didn’t today.

Cow bell? Depressingly not yet this season. Other students reading this: we must fix this if nothing else

Travelling band? Nope (and I don’t think they have for a year or so but I’m not sure). Definitely remember being entertained by that in years past

We have a mini-UFR on Shane's throws that got dropped, and can I interest you in the state of the Big Ten? No? Right, silly of me to even suggest so.

Elsewhere

Maize and Blue Nation:

At times...like that horrible 5 minute stretch in the second quarter, yes it was ugly...very ugly. But in the second half, when it mattered most Michigan responded. Regardless of what the box score tells us, this Michigan team is still very inconsistent. Maybe it's a product of playing a bad team...maybe a little Notre Dame hangover...poor coaching...poor preparation...maybe its a combination of everything.

Or maybe football is just a weird sport sometimes and things don't always go the way you want. When you have a 2nd quarter like Michigan did, its easy to second guess everything and everyone.

Touch The Banner:

I like Michigan's corners. Jabrill Peppers (3 tackles) played quite a bit on the outside, and while he looked raw in some aspects of coverage, he clearly has the speed, strength, and hips to be a very good corner. It's just a matter of time with him. Jourdan Lewis (1 interception) also looked like a good man coverage guy, which we already knew. They both seemed to get a little more playing time than Blake Countess, although I could be wrong about that. Once Raymon Taylor comes back, I think Michigan will be in good shape. Miami quarterback Andrew Hendrix was completing 48% of his passes but for 338 yards/game coming into this one, and he finished 12/26 for 165 yards, 1 touchdown, and 1 pick.

Also awards.

Sap's Decals:

OFFENSIVE LINE – Kind of stepping out on a limb here but, Derrick Green does not run for 137 yards and 2 TDs without some holes being created by the O-Line.  Derrick Green does not look like High School Derrick Green without the Big Uglies getting it done up front.

I realize the opponent was a MAC school that hadn’t won a game in almost 2 years, but I saw signs of progress by the Hosses in the trenches.  I had a feeling this line would show some addition by subtraction, and now that the 2 senior tackles have left, this unit is starting to gel.  Again, I’m not talking B1G Championship here – just saying that when you gain over 450 yards of offense, the guys up front are something right. Doing it in September is one thing.  Getting it done in November is another.

MVictors:

Not from THERE.  Miami band displayed a “NOT COLUMBUS” banner on the opening number before playing THE VICTORS.  Pandering?  Guilty.  Do I Love it?  Guilty.

Capacity – Two minutes before kickoff, sparse in the student section and the unsold whatever-we-call-it section just north of the students:Sparse

Hoover Street Rag:

On some level, it feels gauche to complain about a 24 point win over a MAC school.  Even one that has now lost nineteen games in a row.  But I think that there is a lesson in Saturday.  It didn't come on the punt debacle at the end of the second quarter.  It didn't come on the special teams meltdown in the middle of the second quarter.  It came at half time.

Watching the Michigan band, and the Michigan choirs, and the flyover, and the Miami band, and well, everything else that was happening simultaneously, my wife turned to me and said "It's like they're trying too hard."  Welcome to the last three years of Michigan football.

Hoke as forthcoming as usual on Funchess injury. 14 ejected, 4 arrested. Braylon Edwards has reputation for being controversial and that's probably why this take is being regarded as hot:

"It's year four, people want to see results in year four. The first couple years they'll give you excuses ... but in year four, you've got your own guys, your own players, your own staff and we want to see the results of your program," Edwards said. "A lot of pressure is on Brady to win three games. He lost one. He lost one of the three and there's a lot of pressure on him to win the other two."

I just think it's accurate.

When Michigan needs him most, they turned to Derrick Green. Or Jake Butt. Or nobody since "needs him most" is definitely not a construction we want to use for Miami (Not That Miami).

I object to this sentence in John Niyo's column:

This is what you get when you’re marketed as an elite team but playing like a generic brand.

Michigan is marketed as a generic brand so hard yo.

Turnovers are bad. Oh look someone's still linking Drew Sharp like it's 2005. More MNBN takes. Offense every snap.

Comments

Reader71

September 15th, 2014 at 11:33 PM ^

I think by now a lot of people understand that, but the coach is potentially putting his job on the line every time he goes for it. It had better work as often as the EV suggests it will, or else he'll lose games and be fired. And because this comes up not too frequently, the sample size is small. If coaches were allowed to go for it in these situations, indiscriminately, hot and cold until they decided to retire, I think we'd see a lot more of it.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 15th, 2014 at 1:32 PM ^

Well, this column was a lot more angry and pessimistic than I expected.  I think patience with Hoke is getting very, very thin.  Not that that is an incorrect sentiment, but a bit unexpected at this point in the season.  But in the end, all that matters is wins.  But even then, I wonder if Hoke's relationship with the fanbase and media is starting to sour too much at this point that it can ever realistically be repaired.  I mean winning cures all, but he's not a Saban type winner where he could punch a small child in the face during the game and the media would shower him with praise.  At this point, anytime a lose or small chink the armor shows, everyone is going to jump on it an twist the knife.  Even if say he wins the B1G this year.  It's starting to feel like the end of RR tenure.  I hope I'm wrong.

stephenrjking

September 15th, 2014 at 1:42 PM ^

Why is this unexpected? It was a blah game against a blah team, the kind of adequate but uninspiring squash match Michigan has produced for decades against MAC teams. The win and the boxscore are at most exactly what people expect. There is nothing Michigan could do to wash out the nasty taste in our mouths from last week, so why pretend otherwise? Things are grim. That doesn't mean they can't get better. There is real potential for growth on this team, and one would expect a decent season to play out this way. And, as sullen as you may read Brian to be here, he was startlingly un-vicious in his UFR postscripts. He, like many of us, is frustrated but wants to see the season play out.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 15th, 2014 at 2:03 PM ^

I guess it was unexpected to me to have such a singular focus on Hoke and not the actual game.  I fully expected Brian to unload on the decision to punt from the 37 yard line, but I thought that was going to be under it's own section or something later on in the column.  Even then, as the man himself has said 'play 1950's ball when the game is being played like the 1950's'.  And that first half was a bit 1950's with both offenses shootin' themselves in the foot.  I didn't expect that decision to be parlyed into a quote from a week ago, and use that as a whole column angry at Hoke.  I just expected more focus on the fact that this team actually looks like, as you said, there is real potential for growth.  Which is the opposite from the last three years. The whole first part didn't mention anything positive, which there was quite a bit in the game outside the bits in the second quarter.   This column tenor seems more like one I would expect when the team is sitting at 5-3 after another MSU beat down and there's no real hope to expect anything better under Hoke.  While we are rapidly getting to that point, there is still a faint glimmer of hope such will be avoided. 

M-Dog

September 15th, 2014 at 1:38 PM ^

Count me in the camp that does not think turovers are random, but rather are most often the the result of players trying too hard to make a play that's not there, or extend a play that is there.

Beyond the three avoidable turnovers that we did have, DG had at least two more out throws that he was lucky were not picked off, and will be picked off against defenses like MSU.

Here's hoping that the running game can give him enough breathing room where he feels he does not have to absolutely "make a play" every time.

Space Coyote

September 15th, 2014 at 1:41 PM ^

What I thought was most interesting, and not touched on above, was a schematic move by the defense to switch to a base 4-3 Over Cover 4 against 11 personnel for the majority of the game.

Michigan went to a Base 4-3 Over Cover 4 defense after Notre Dame saw them really struggle in Cover 1. I, for one, think this helps their CBs a bit more and overall will help Michigan going forward. It also allows Michigan to stay a bit more in their base. Lastly, it is also a rush defense that gets the safeties more involved.

There are a couple downsides to it for Michigan though. For one, it relies a lot more on good communication, both pre- and post- snap for the secondary. You saw MSU get exposed a bit (mostly in their closed-trips adjustment) by having poor post-snap communication, and that's a team that runs Cover 4 90% of the time. So that's an area of concern. It requires you play fast but also play smart, and playing smart may force Michigan to not quite play as fast and aggressive. This means you'll likely see less press from Michigan (though you'll likely still see it to a one-receiver side) and you'll see less blitzes on standard downs (with more blitzes coming from the CBs).

I talked about it a bit more, along with some other things, but that is a fairly significant move from Mattison in the wake of the coverage issues against ND. And, because frankly there isn't really much to take away from either side of the ball againt Miami, I thought that drastic schematic emphasis was something to take note of.

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 15th, 2014 at 2:08 PM ^

So do you think this was a temporary shift while Taylor is out and Peppers still might be injured/still learning, or a permenant shift?  While I want them to do whatever will help them win, I kind of hope they can still pull out what they've been trying to impliment for the past 8 months.  Reminds me of Charlie Weis to ditch such a damatic shift so early into the season after spending all off season implimenting it.  I don't want UM to remind me of Charlie Weis.

Space Coyote

September 15th, 2014 at 2:26 PM ^

Like you said, it's what they mostly repped and work to impliment for the past 8 months. So I think all else being equal, they want to be a Cover 1 base. But I think they also want something to fall back on in case that's not working. A change of pace or a different look for offenses to have to deal with.

I have some mixed feelings about it. It's hard to get the communication down well in Cover 4 to the point of it being consistenly effective and not simply safe if you don't rep it as your base. But I also do think it's a very nice change of pace. It's an underneath zone that is strong against the run and easily can be adjusted to fit any offensive personnel with your base package. Not only that, it can be an emphasis on man or zone based on adjustment, and it's a two high look versus a single-high look, giving the offense one more thing to have to think about regularly.

So from a schematic standpoint, I think it's great. From an execution stand point, I have some worries. We'll see I guess.

dragonchild

September 15th, 2014 at 3:14 PM ^

Yeah but it's not like we're going to use one scheme all the time, right?  I like Mattison's flexibility.  They've repped man for the past 8 months but they ran zone all last year so this is a far cry from a Cheesecake Factory D.  If Cover 4 breaks down I don't see us sticking with it the whole game.  And having multiple coverages gives opposing teams something to think about as well, hopefully well enough that we don't need to run any of them perfectly all the time.

MH20

September 15th, 2014 at 1:46 PM ^

I don't how the people in the north side of the stadium deal with the volume of the piped-in music bullshit.  I sit over in section 4 (SE 15-yard line) and it makes my ears hurt, so I cannot even imagine how uncomfortable it is to be sitting on the north side of the 50.

Turn down the damn volume!

GoBLUinTX

September 15th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^

Michigan 4th &1, Miami calls TO, whistle blows, 30 second TO announced.

38 seconds later whistle blows, ref tells Nuss.  Ref tells Nuss again, and then finally taps his arm, 15 seconds have elapsed since the whistle.  Nuss then holds Gardner back to say something...Gardner then huddles the offense.  Time since whistle 25 seconds.  Gardner brings them to the line and tries a hard count.  

35 seconds after the TO was whistled over, Michigan is flagged and whistled for delay of game.  Any way you cut it, Michigan futzed around for about 20 seconds after they broke their sideline huddle.

And by the way, since Michigan was attempting the hard count, shouldn't somebody have been watching the clock in this specific instance....you know, to call TO if the hard count doesn't work?  Total coaching trainwreck.

Space Coyote

September 15th, 2014 at 2:28 PM ^

A lot of teams, especially after a TO, will actually have a play called as well. You'll run your hard count, then make some sort of call (it can even be a bluff call) and then either run your play or run another hard count. That's pretty normal. So while someone should be watching the play clock, it's not because of your last paragraph, it's because that's what the QB is taught to do when he lines up.

InterM

September 15th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^

Since the MMB sometimes takes a bit of a beating around here, and there seems to be a concern that maybe they're on the decline, it seems worth a mention that the halftime show was really well done, IMHO.

GoBLUinTX

September 15th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^

Gardner stared down Chesson from the moment he received the snap.  Not hard for the DT to read his eyes and get his hand up.

Chesson dropped pass in EZ.  It didn't look like the DB got his hand on the ball, regardless, Chesson had the ball in his hands against his chest and he dropped it.  I think it quite possible that the zip Morris puts on the ball is enough of a change that the receivers aren't used to it.  The exact same thing happened last year to the receivers trying to catch his passes.

Space Coyote

September 15th, 2014 at 2:31 PM ^

They are getting their hands up because of the type of blocking and the QB drop (a 3-step drop). It's what they are taught to do.

Now if you want to talk about the rotation of the defense on the backend because DG looked at Chesson from the snap, alright, that has some merit. But it's also a three step drop, double slant route in which DG has one read and is then supposed to release the football. If Chesson sits (as he should vs zone) and the ball doesn't get tipped, the rotation isn't an issue because Chesson isn't lead into the safety coming down and the ball is out (3-step drop) before the defense can collapse the zone.

Space Coyote

September 15th, 2014 at 6:23 PM ^

You are one of the biggest pessimists on this board, but it's not even objective to the point of some things are alright but most are bad. Everything is terrible to you.

But regardless, you've proven my point that you are clueless with your complains with this post.

DG isn't even running a 3-step drop. It's a one-step drop from shotgun to a double slants look. If he goes to look the safety off with his eyes, or if he looks elsewhere once he receivers the snap, the timing is immediately off for the double slant route. It's one step throw, that's what the play is supposed to be, not looking off elsewhere. The DT is taught to get his hands up based on the OL blocking (not giving ground, indicating quick pass) and the QB drop. It's the OL's job to keep the DL's hands down and the throwing alley clean. It's not because DG telegraphed his pass, he did exactly what he was taught and any other QB attempting to make the same pass is taught. But keep making nonsensical arguments because you don't like this coaching staff. The problem isn't that you quible about things happen with this team or about this staff, it's that you choose to quible much of the time about things that happen to be between the spectrum of completely inane to incorrect.

MGoManBall

September 15th, 2014 at 2:17 PM ^

In response to the complaint regarding checking out of blitzes when a hurry up and check offense catches us in a bltiz and checks to a play to beat it: I completely agree. I hate that our corners show blitz and get caught so they run a hot read off of that look and we blitz anyway. 

HOWEVA, 

I did see one instance where it looks like we may have checked out of a blitz:

 

I'm not sure if this is just Jake Ryan disguising a blitz or if he actually checked out of it. But this made me happy.

Space Coyote

September 15th, 2014 at 2:36 PM ^

But it's also a part of the reason why they aren't switching it up. They disguise that blitz from the start. Miami switches based on that fake pressure. Michigan shows the same look and Miami thinks they have something, but Michigan was never bringing pressure.

I'm not worried about tipping the blitz for this reason, I'm more worried about showing what you're doing on the back end. But in every game so far Michgian has been fairly defined in their coverage anyway (single high in first two games, two-high against Miami).

FWIW, Michigan will check out of blitzes if it's something they can't account for. Every blitz package has this. If they are blitzing in such a way they check out automatically, so the opponent isn't checking into something that Michigan theoretically can't account for without Michigan checking out.

I'd like to see them switch it up a bit just to keep the offense a little more off guard still. But usually you're pretty happy with your play call you make, and unless you see something you don't like (typically associated with the offense switching formations) then there isn't a huge need to switch plays.

Space Coyote

September 16th, 2014 at 8:29 AM ^

But you can roll safeties up or back to disguise the look a little bit. Instead of Cover 1 play a Man Under defense. Instead of Cover 4 run a Cover 1 Robber. Things like that can be done with movement just prior to the snap to give QB's one more thing to deal with. The issue is, as always in these sorts of things (similar to bluffing a blitz) is that the need for that movement puts the players at a disadvantaged position before they move. It puts their attention on something other than lining up and executing their assignment and communicating the things they need to communicate.

So really what it comes down to from a coaching perspective is: do I want to try to confuse the QB, or do I want to make sure our guys are doing their assignment correctly. It's not really a black and white thing, but those are the two sides you have to weigh.

rich watty

September 15th, 2014 at 2:18 PM ^

When a coach resorts to the "support the troops" propaganda, he is back in the Berlin Bunker, in April of 1945.   

Brandon and Hoke, the self appointed keepers of the Bo flame continue to destroy this program.   

REPRIORITZING:

You remember Bo telling people what he believed......"THE TEAM, THE TEAM, THE TEAM".......boy, talk about getting people focused.   Well, when you hire a corporate CEO, who reprioritizes THE TEAM focus and places marketing dollars at the top of the agenda,  you get chicken dance songs, handing out jersey numbers without concern if the player "earned the right" to wear the jersey , combo packages for unsold tickets and we cant leave out the humilating ND loss.     

THE HOKE HIRE:

The second part of the developing Shakespearian tragety is the Hoke hire.   Lets face facts, the guy bleeds maize and blue unfortunately he is a mediocre coach at best (just look at this record).  The only rationale behind such a hire is Brandon wanted to hire a michigan man and someone who would not upstage the self appointed "UM CEO", Brandon himself.    Brandon's ego determined this hire because it was a hire he can control......so you get what you pay for......as long as Brandon refuses to admit he made a mistake, Hoke is the coach for a long time.   The proof for my assertion lies in the following road not taken......imagine four years ago, a Stanford jauggernaut team, lead by Jim Harbaugh who is a proven leader, knowledgable about the game, driven beyond belief, focused, disciplined, involved, principled....and lets not forget a proven WINNER who bleeds maize and blue.  The perfect hire at the right time if it would have been done.   However, he certainly would have upstaged the current UM CEO because at the end of the day, Jim Harbaugh would have told Brandon what to do; and would have let winning on the field be the best marketing program for UM.  Jim believes in THE TEAM, THE TEAM, THE TEAM AS THE ONLY PRIORITY.  But Brandon could not have controlled him; the did not hire.

PERFORMANCE BASED METRICS:

The final part is always the most devilsh because its within the details we find the coffin nails.     UM's CEO can always point to the Profit Loss Statement and say "......  look at how much money we made....."    And it would be true probably......but as any good UM CEO would do he has to also look at the Balance Sheet listing those Assets and pesky Liabilities.........    No Big Ten Championship, continuous losses to rivals MSU/OSU, mediocre W/L records, chicken little songs only to be followed by a 31-0 drubbing, failed no. 98 marketing scheme to revive the faithful, etc..........      And lets not leave out the fan's feedback because they are the customer......and the customer sentiment is that they dont like the product and want different results ...  Simple enough but the UM CEO is not listening to the customer which is a classic CEO mistake.   He is so high in his mind's ivory tower he cannot hear the customer .  Worse yet, his minons are too scared to tell him the truth.......so as a customer let me tell him.......Hey Brandon you as UM KING aren't wearing any clothes...the performance of your product is terrible and your 'yes man VP, Hoke, is doing a terrible job.   You own this car wreck.   Make a plan which leads to a solution.  If you cant make a plan leading to a solution, quit.

POSITION WANTED:

Head Coach: proven winning track record.....must have extensive head-set experience.

AD: smart, insightful, educated......must place THE TEAM before his/her own ego.

KC Wolve

September 15th, 2014 at 5:15 PM ^

And Yes more. I sat next to a guy on the plane after the Nebraska debacle a couple years ago where UM had negative a thousand rushing yards. The guy blamed RR and said he was thankful they hired a guy like Hoke because he was a Michigan Man. I was too tired and hungover to ask him what the fuck that meant, but yeah, there are a lot of these fans out there guys.

JFW

September 16th, 2014 at 8:47 AM ^

Harbaugh won't be coming.

From his comments, I get the impression that Harbaugh's commitment to the UM is tepid at
best, hardly "bleeding Maize and Blue".

The guy wants to coach I the pros. It's not a crime, but let's put out the torch we carry for him.

scanner blue

September 15th, 2014 at 2:24 PM ^

 As one of the hundreds of UM Chous members on the field i will attest that they WERE trying too hard at halftime. If anything they wanted to try harder. The regents nixed real (fake) cannon blasts for the 1812 overture part, they cut one whole medley due to time constraints, they probably would have liked more singers but the logistics of getting us on and off the field was already ridiculous (we had 70 yr. old large women and one very pregnant woman running down the tunnel ). All the feedback I got back from fans in my section , fans at Elbel (yes we practiced for 1 1/2 hours on Sat. morn AND 4 hrs at the stadium on Fri.) people I saw at a concert yesterday all were uniformly gushing over our performance. It was the 200th anniv. of the anthem fergodsakes. Compared to last years shows I thought it was top notch (except for UTLII) ... think tipsy Mary Sue.

markusr2007

September 15th, 2014 at 2:30 PM ^

I don't understand.

Why don't we have a ticket holder vote or a fan poll with a huge sample size, or something and then show the statistical inferences to David Brandon and his Domino's toadies with a simple plea and recommendation, including:

  • This is destroying the Michigan brand.
  • Please put a stop to this now.

champswest

September 15th, 2014 at 2:35 PM ^

but I see improvement weekly and am more encouraged than discouraged about the prospects for this season. I expected an 8-4ish season and they appear on track to equal or better that. This is a young team with a new OC and new defensive style. I didn't expect them to play like a top ten team from day one. The QB play needs to improve. The O line is getting better, we have quality and depth at RB and a young and improving receiving group. The QB play needs to improve and become more consistent and not kill drives.

Chicago'00

September 15th, 2014 at 2:46 PM ^

Can someone ask Hoke at his press conferences what HE would like us, the fans, to do so that it is objectively obvious that our "boos" are directed at him and his staff, and not at the students?

antidaily

September 15th, 2014 at 3:02 PM ^

Seems odd to juxtapose Hoke's true fans comment (Monday after ND) with the booing from the Miami game. Especially since he made a comment more recently that the angry fans just expect the team to perform better. Yes, he backtracked. But at least he realized the true fans thing was a dumb comment and "went out of his way" to praise the fans afterward. 

echoWhiskey

September 15th, 2014 at 3:54 PM ^

You gotta let the Funchess injury go.  Shit happens and whether it’s a lost cause or not, when we’re losing I damn well want our first string in the game.  Had the score been the opposite, I could see this point.

Julius 1977

September 15th, 2014 at 4:13 PM ^

that "support the troops" is not an argument was a poor argument.  I would argue that supporting the troops is a better course of action in a screwed up situation than arguing what does or does not constitute an argument (which does not support the troops anyway).  It is not even an argument to say that not supporting the troops is self-destructive.  Forget the arguments.  Don't be self-destructive.  If you want to argue that the coach should be fired go ahead and argue it.  Maybe you're right.  I wouldn't argue against that.

But support the troops.

And fergodsake don't boo.  Shit.  Booing your own team should only happen in Columbus.

chewieblue

September 15th, 2014 at 6:18 PM ^

Is to force the defense to have the wrong personnel on the field (aka: think UM is in a "power" personnel package). Imagine, enemy defensive GA, armed with binoculars;, "Coach, the fullback is in. They could be in Pro formation here. Send in the mid-90's standard defensive personnel."
You could argue it's merit, but that's where the line of thinking rests.

m1jjb00

September 15th, 2014 at 9:22 PM ^

There was cowbell at Professor Thoms.  How do I know?  It was next to me.  Lol.  What?  I can't hear you.  Actually, impressed that he had the same beat after multiple beers in the 4th quarter.