So last year everyone was wondering how bad Wright and Lopata must be for that fuck Gingell to be starting. Lloyd eventually made the switch for Lopata, and lo and behold, he was way better than that fuck Gingell.
I think a few days ago, someone was wondering the same thing about Michael Williams - if Brown is this bad, how bad must Williams be to not see any playing time. I seriously doubt that they could be that much worse than Steve Brown. I know this is some idiotic logic, but I really would love to see either Brandon Smith or Michael Williams get significant playing time in place of Brown with the hope that they'll prove the speculators wrong just like Lopata.
Anyone with inside knowledge care to shed some light on this situation?
i heard brandon smith was doing real well early on and was an outside candidate to play this year. possibly they just want to save him and redshirt him. but williams on the other hand should really be given more of an opportunitity to showcase his talents. in HS he was in the army all-american game so the guy must have some talent (he was one of the top prospects in his recruiting class as well). he had some illness (mono?) last year so he couldn't play but i agree, he should be out there. with that said, i understand that stevie brown is playing up to his ability and needs to be better, but all this anomosity towards him is starting to get ridiculous. we can make him out to be the scapegoat but there were still 1 million other reasons we lost that game. Or just 6; as in 6 horrendous turnovers.
i only respect other superfans